Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Chernobyl


Tom Strange
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's been 20 years since the worst nuclear disaster...

From http://www.chernobyl.co.uk/ :

On April 25th -26th, 1986 the World's worst nuclear power accident occurred at Chernobyl in the former USSR (now Ukraine). The Chernobyl nuclear power plant located 80 miles north of Kiev had 4 reactors and whilst testing reactor number 4 numerous safety procedures were disregarded. At 1:23am the chain reaction in the reactor became out of control creating explosions and a fireball which blew off the reactor's heavy steel and concrete lid.

The Chernobyl accident killed more than 30 people immediately, and as a result of the high radiation levels in the surrounding 20-mile radius, 135,00 people had to be evacuated.

Click on Ghost Town at this site.

I just revisited this website after a couple of years, it is the 'project' of a young woman who grew up in the area who wants the world to know what the area looks like and how lives were changed in an instant... it has a lot of interesting photos of the aftermath of Chernobyl. It really makes you think...

Edited by Tom Strange
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom, I spent my lunch hour looking at that woman's photos and reading part of her journal and looking at the photos on Belle's link. One of the morning talk radio guys yesterday said that he drove past Chernobyl when he was in Russia and that it was still a ghost town. I had no idea how devastated it still is (and maybe will always be).

"Chilling" and heart-rending are understatements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember driving to work that morning and hearing about it. I was really angry that it turned out that the Sweeds reported the accident (in a way it was a report) because Russia should have done that itself.

A documentary was made after if was cleaned up and I made it a regular point to show it to my older classes. They didn't know much about nuclear power stations but they did understand about nuclear accidents. They were impressed as far as 16 and 17 y/o's can.

I used to know, but I've forgotten how long it will be before any of that land will be useable again especially for growing consumable food. I also wonder about the ground water. It is a fairly safe bet that the melt down didn't reach the ground water, but weathering will drive most things all the way down there one way or another. I would love to map that aquifer and hope it's not attached to any other one that's necessary for human consumption.

This is what happens when you over extend yourself so that you cannot successfully maintain your stuff. Man made stuff falls down sooner or later it it's not maintained. Major bridges in and around NYC are in a constant state of painting, inspection, repair etc. It's not enough just to build it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a personal note, I can only hope and pray that the nuclear power plants in the U.S. are maintained better than they were 20 years ago in Russia (of course I think so, but who knows?)! There's one about 40 miles east of me and another 50 miles west of me.

Krys, did you check out the link Tom posted? I think it has some of the info about the duration of the effects on the land and water and such. I just scanned through it quickly, but I think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but I just scanned quickly through it bookmarking it for later.

If I recall correctly, the biggest single problem with that plant was that the reactor was made of graphite. The ones we have don't have the graphite so a total melt through is much less likely, although by no means impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but I just scanned quickly through it bookmarking it for later.

If I recall correctly, the biggest single problem with that plant was that the reactor was made of graphite. The ones we have don't have the graphite so a total melt through is much less likely, although by no means impossible.

Each different design has it's own good and bad. But designing a plant to be cooled by a metal that is normally a solid, just seems dumb to me.

Most of our plants 'melting down' really is not a issue. RO's get plenty of practice, and should they ever melt the liquid would just drop out into cubes underneath and cool down again. No big deal, regardless of what movie pictures would imply. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was Hyman Rickover who insisted that everytime he addressed congress that he be provided with a pitcher of drinking water that had recently been taken from a nuclear reactor's coolant loop.

He lived to 86 yr old, under his close supervision the Navy produced 199 nuclear-powered subs and 19 nuclear-powered surface-skimming target vessels. He insisted on personally interviewing every officer to serve onboard a nuclear-powered vessel, and to gain his approval each candidate had to meet his exacting and eccentric standards of personal integrity.

He served under 13 presidents.

What a screw-ball.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom, that young woman's site is absolutely incredible! What a brave woman! I want to order her DVDs just to support her! Incredible....absolutely amazing and scary how absolutely destructive mankind can be.

Sounds like we need more folks like Rickover in power. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...