In addition to my colorful refutation (not twisting) of your argument here on this thread, more details of my argument are on the official PFAL thread.
I explain there why these printed words you've quoted here do NOT refer to the texts we OLGs were told to master.
There are two separate and disctinct sets of texts, but you've merged them into one set. That's where YOU did the twisting, not me.
Recommended Posts
dmiller
Oh --- ps. I was going to put this in the Ultimate, Amazing, Yada, Yada thread,
but figured you could address this (singular) issue about the disclaimer, without dealing with the *other topics* going on there.
Oh no! I just realized I split your time, and it only rains so long there in San Diego, right?? :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
dmiller
Please read what is written.
WE DO NOT CLAIM THAT EVERYTHING WE PUBLISH OR TEACH
IS THE FINAL TRUTH OF THE ORIGINAL "GOD-BREATHED" WORD.
And add to it this:
PFAL page 83
"Not all that Wierwille writes will necessarily be God-breathed..."
And this:
TNDC page 34
"...every word I have written to you is true."
***************************************
Maybe you thought it said?
Maybe you WANTED it to say?
I, VPW, DO NOT CLAIM THAT ANYTHING I PUBLISH OR TEACH
IS THE FINAL TRUTH OF THE ORIGINAL "GOD-BREATHED" WORD.
Edited by MikeLink to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
This may be the shortest thread I posted on.
I eblaborated on the Yada, Yada thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CM
so this is what you think makes everything he wrote "god-breathed"
you got a real problem
no wonder you get so defensive-it's not truth
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dmiller
Shucks -- that there seems QUITE *cut and clear * to me.
(You go and twist it any way you want.)
If you want us to read docvic's words *as written*,
please don't forget to include these as well.:)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
dmiller,
In addition to my colorful refutation (not twisting) of your argument here on this thread, more details of my argument are on the official PFAL thread.
I explain there why these printed words you've quoted here do NOT refer to the texts we OLGs were told to master.
There are two separate and disctinct sets of texts, but you've merged them into one set. That's where YOU did the twisting, not me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dmiller
Twist and shout ~~~ so be it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
Mike is correct. At least, he's correct about one thing: namely, that this discussion belongs on the other thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites