Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Bad Witness for VP Wierwille


Eagle
 Share

Recommended Posts

It has been my recent experience that those who are very solid Wierwille believers (not necessarily "Word" believers) tend in most part to "mark and avoid" those who do not take to his foundational doctrine and openly discuss or disagree with it.

While it is not called "mark and avoid", it is still the same behavior. I have to keep my mind off of it because it is hard. Even old friends that are still into Wierwille cut me off, refusing to email me or fellowship.

Total silence.

This does not "shame" me into coming back. It gets me angrier. I can't say the rest agree or disagree here, but it makes me want to look at Wierwille and say to him, "THIS is the EXAMPLE you set? THIS is what you taught? Did you set out on purpose to elevate yourself as a god to most people or what? Because it seems to have worked. You are not my God."

Then I just want to throw Wierwille and all his teachings out with the bathwater. I could care less now what Wierwille's followers think or believe after being treated like this.

Some ambassadors these people turned out to be.

I will continue to agree or disagree with Wierwille where and when I feel it is appropriate. If I am "heathen", fine. If I am a heretic, fine. But at least I kept my mind independent of being ruled by an image. They are REALLY going to not like what I write about next. Funny thing, though, I have more respect for TWI in this regard. They may have been callous toward the Wierwille family and I did not like that, but at least they seemed to have dropped the image.

Well, maybe in favor of a newer image, burt they dropped the Wierwille god concept.

Eagle.

:asdf:

Edited by Eagle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It has been my recent experience that those who are very solid Wierwille believers (not necessarily "Word" believers) tend in most part to "mark and avoid" those who do not take to his foundational doctrine and openly discuss or disagree with it.

While it is not called "mark and avoid", it is still the same behavior. I have to keep my mind off of it because it is hard. Even old friends that are still into Wierwille cut me off, refusing to email me or fellowship.

Total silence.

This does not "shame" me into coming back. It gets me angrier. I can't say the rest agree or disagree here, but it makes me want to look at Wierwille and say to him, "THIS is the EXAMPLE you set? THIS is what you taught? Did you set out on purpose to elevate yourself as a god to most people or what? Because it seems to have worked. You are not my God."

Then I just want to throw Wierwille and all his teachings out with the bathwater. I could care less now what Wierwille's followers think or believe after being treated like this.

Some ambassadors these people turned out to be.

I will continue to agree or disagree with Wierwille where and when I feel it is appropriate. If I am "heathen", fine. If I am a heretic, fine. But at least I kept my mind independent of being ruled by an image. They are REALLY going to not like what I write about next. Funny thing, though, I have more respect for TWI in this regard. They may have been callous toward the Wierwille family and I did not like that, but at least they seemed to have dropped the image.

Well, maybe in favor of a newer image, burt they dropped the Wierwille god concept.

Eagle.

:asdf:

Interesting observation Eagle. The Wierwillites, at least most of the one's I've known are very much as you describe, real loving aren't they? Not!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee, almost like they have a dogmatic adherance to dubious blather.

Funny, I noticed the same thing - in a markedly reduced degree, but there all the same - from my former "Christian" friends when they found out that I was an agnostic. Hell, that was even the excuse my wife used for taking her leave.

"Don't share my superstition?" "Well, I can't be seen with YOU!"

It seems like a pretty human trait...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been my recent experience that those who are very solid Wierwille believers (not necessarily "Word" believers) tend in most part to "mark and avoid" those who do not take to his foundational doctrine and openly discuss or disagree with it.

True. Here in Minney-soda, there is just such a group. They have a *farm*, it's called the *grounds*, the man in charge has his phone lines open from 6 am to midnight, to *take care of his people*.

Castigate docvic, and he will hang up. But you're welcome to come for Sunday morning fellowship (10:30 am), when you can (supposedly) talk about anything. RIGHT!!!

Ironically -- (you all may get a kick out of this) -- I passed this man's phone number on to Mike, and Mike got hold of him, and now this group up here is really considering *doc's last lost teaching*, from what I have heard.

I got profuse thanks from Mike for letting him know about this group. My puter crashed (totally), and I lost ALL info I had on it a coupla months ago (including this group's name, and phone number), but I also heard that they *sponsored* D*an *ll*nwood to come up here from Austin Tx, to do concerts here in the Mpls. area.

While all might be welcome at their fellowships, concerts, etc. --- don't ya dare say anything bad about docvic.

They are Wierwille based, not Word based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and now this group up here is really considering *doc's last lost teaching*, from what I have heard.

...My puter crashed (totally), and I lost ALL info I had on it a coupla months ago (including this group's name, and phone number).....

Sounds like you have no communications with this group at present.

From whom, then, have you heard they are "really considering" this?

Would it be a less-than-objective source known for...alternative

interpretations of events, text and people?

Do you really KNOW they're considering this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bear in mind that people in clubs, fellowships, associations etc.. like to 'hang' with like-minded people as well.Thats the main reason behind their associations.

For example you don't join a Harley Davidson club with a Honda and expect other members to go ga-ga over your Honda CB 250 !!

You either buy a Harley or aspire to buy one or join a Honda enthusiasts club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bear in mind that people in clubs, fellowships, associations etc.. like to 'hang' with like-minded people as well.Thats the main reason behind their associations.

For example you don't join a Harley Davidson club with a Honda and expect other members to go ga-ga over your Honda CB 250 !!

You either buy a Harley or aspire to buy one or join a Honda enthusiasts club.

Granted,

but, that having been said,

there is a fundamental difference in your example and what we're

discussing about shunning.

I've got hobbies. I occasionally "talk shop" with people who

have the same hobbies. In fact, I can get so hobby-specific that

our discussions can leave normal non-fan(atics) people bewildered

by the strange language we speak.

However,

I don't shun people without the same hobbies.

Some of my friends have ZERO hobbies in common with me.

Some Christians I respect and associate with are in different

denominations-from me AND each other.

We never shut the door on learning from each other,

even when we disagree.

Of course, there are some people who DO.

I'm not speaking for them. This is fair, since they're not only

not speaking for me, they're not speaking TO me, either.

====

Oh, and, AFAIK,

bikers who SWEAR by Harleys are still able to appreciate

Hondas and others. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious if the 'farm' dmiller is referring to in Minnesota is the one run by M**k Fr***z*k.

I know they are staunch Weirwilleites. They have also sold the property within the last year or so, and are back to running household fellowships.

And since I brought his name up, I must add that in my experience, M**k is a fine fellow, honorable, and steadfast in his life ,family, and work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for the record I talk to Dean periodically as we carry his music in the bookstore. I'd have to say Dean is his "own man so to speak". He see his music as a ministry and I think he does it well. Before he would come anywhere he would spend time in consideration and discussion if it was the right thing to do. This I know from personal experience. I also know that if he felt it was the thing he should do he would do it regardless if anyone would or could pay him to do so. He has no desire to be a performer doing a show, he sees his music as a chance to minister to God's people. I suppose If you think that happens or not is a matter of opinion, but I have to say I appreciate his efforts to do what he does best. I think it shows through in the quality of his music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious if the 'farm' dmiller is referring to in Minnesota is the one run by M**k Fr***z*k.

I know they are staunch Weirwilleites. They have also sold the property within the last year or so, and are back to running household fellowships.

And since I brought his name up, I must add that in my experience, M**k is a fine fellow, honorable, and steadfast in his life ,family, and work.

are you speaking of the same mark f who was in maine for a long time?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is good to know their are Wierwille believers out there that keep an independent mind and agree to disagree, and still remain friends and sometimes fellowship.

Unfortunately, this is not my experience. I wish I could say I had that experience.

Eagle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people may say I'm a Wierwille-ite in that I still enjoy his teachings and find that they are full of truth. I am so thankful for his life and ministry because it was PFAL that finally taught me how to research and understand the Bible. He was never a god to me, but my Father in the Word, and I will always love him for that. I think he would hate people making a god out of him because he taught against that so often. It's just a pity that so many people magnify the negatives in his life above the Word that he taught. He died, but the truth he taught never will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's so easy to say "the negatives in his life."

It's far more difficult to say "his lecherous abuse of those who trusted him, the way he twisted God's Word to serve his lusts, the dishonest way he handled God's Word from the beginning of his ministry until the end."

Welcome to the Cafe. Does your handle mean what it sounds like it means?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted a reply, but it did not show up. I guess I'm still too new at this.

The gist of it was, despite all his imperfections, I am still thankful for what I learned from him and always will be. It was through PFAL that I finally learned how to develop an intimate relationship with God. I can't imagaine life without it.

My handle means sudo is mine, and I am his.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Mrs. Sudo I am. Thanks for the welcome. My husband spends so much time here, I thought I'd drop in for a while and get to know his on-line freinds. I've met several when we've traveled to places they live. Like everyone I've met so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...