The censorship's been going on for over a year nellie. The Chinese government imposed the demand for the filtering, after shutting Google down at one point. It came back up, with some things being left out, Google cooperating with the Chinese gov't. The alternative would have probably been a complete ban of the service where Google would have pulled the plug itself. It appears they went with what the gov't. would allow for now with a view to the future.
One of the biggest complaints seems to be that Google projects a pretty progressive image but has decided to work around these issues. Here's a good write up HERE on wired.com that covers some viewpoints.
Searching the internet with Google isn't foolproof though and never has been, there's limits, although I think Google works well. Internet information has always been a question of quality, so I think you're right that people need to access that information thoughtfully and with the some care. If we think we can do a search, get some hits and read a few pages and be assured we have reliable information that's wrong. Where's it coming from, who wrote it, what's the background, integrity of what we're reading, etc. - that all factors in when we're looking for stuff.
"Googling" makes it easier to get to some information but of course someone has to have "put it out there" to have it available at all. And one thing it doesn't, and can't really do, is tell us the scope of information of a field we're inquiring about in an easy paragraph. It still requires a logical and persistent approach, "learning". Overall though I like Google, and use it and other search engines.
And there's always the good ol' local library, one of the greatest values in our economy. Universities have killer libraries, too.
Recommended Posts
socks
The censorship's been going on for over a year nellie. The Chinese government imposed the demand for the filtering, after shutting Google down at one point. It came back up, with some things being left out, Google cooperating with the Chinese gov't. The alternative would have probably been a complete ban of the service where Google would have pulled the plug itself. It appears they went with what the gov't. would allow for now with a view to the future.
One of the biggest complaints seems to be that Google projects a pretty progressive image but has decided to work around these issues. Here's a good write up HERE on wired.com that covers some viewpoints.
Searching the internet with Google isn't foolproof though and never has been, there's limits, although I think Google works well. Internet information has always been a question of quality, so I think you're right that people need to access that information thoughtfully and with the some care. If we think we can do a search, get some hits and read a few pages and be assured we have reliable information that's wrong. Where's it coming from, who wrote it, what's the background, integrity of what we're reading, etc. - that all factors in when we're looking for stuff.
"Googling" makes it easier to get to some information but of course someone has to have "put it out there" to have it available at all. And one thing it doesn't, and can't really do, is tell us the scope of information of a field we're inquiring about in an easy paragraph. It still requires a logical and persistent approach, "learning". Overall though I like Google, and use it and other search engines.
And there's always the good ol' local library, one of the greatest values in our economy. Universities have killer libraries, too.
Edited by socksLink to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.