Some excellent observations. But it is late and I only have time for a quick joke this topic reminded me of:
Three gay men died, and were going to be cremated. Their lovers happened to be at the funeral home at the same time, and were discussing what they planned to do with the ashes.
The first man said, "My Benny loved to fly, so I'm going up in a plane and scatter his ashes in the sky."
The second man said, "My Carl was a good fisherman, so I'm going to scatter his ashes in our favorite lake."
The third man said, "My Jim was such a good lover, I think I'm going to dump his ashes in a pot of chili, so he can tear my axx up just one more time."
Butt, then again, I guess I am slow, but what are you wanting to figure out Satori? I was taught as so many of us were, that verse that says; "In marriage, the bed is undefiled". And VP basically said that this means that when you are married, "anything goes" as long as both partners are comfortable with it. And that seemed to work for me.
But you bring into the conversation the term "intelligent design", which, sodomy does not seem to keep with the intelligent design of that particular body part that is the subject of this thread. As I understand it, many male homsexuals who practice this act end up having to wear diapers when they are older because they have ruined themselves. And so, I would say that the mechanics of it is not natural, and, is detrimental to the "receiver's" (lambano) health. "Bottom" line? Not healthy...
I would ask why it is acceptable in male/female scenarios and not male/male? How is it less of a health problem? How is it less conflicting with "intelligent design"?
Regardless, what two consenting adults do and what an adult does with a child who is too young to understand the consequences and therefore cannot truly give consent are two very very different things, be it hetero or homo sexual in nature.
Well speaking of intelligent design. I've always felt that had god been opposed to the idea of human masturbation he would have made our arms much shorter.
would ask why it is acceptable in male/female scenarios and not male/male? How is it less of a health problem? How is it less conflicting with "intelligent design"?
Oh, sorry if I was mis-leading. I think that it would seem detrimental in any scenario, hetero most definitely included. And, I am not judging anyone. I was only saying that it seems that by the design of our bodies, certain things would seem more detrimental than others. Sorry for not being clearer.
And obviously, any form of child molestation is a hanging offense in my book. I have no problem being jundgemental on that subject.
Well speaking of intelligent design. I've always felt that had god been opposed to the idea of human masturbation he would have made our arms much shorter.
Exactly!
Thank you for the demonstration.
Jeez, how many times to I have to mention Martindale to have this thread stay in the About The Way forum?
Ugly truths. The Way. Sexual impropriety. The Way. Sexual exploitation. The Way. Unseemliness. The Way.
Well speaking of intelligent design. I've always felt that had god been opposed to the idea of human masturbation he would have made our arms much shorter.
Sodomy is most commonly legally defined as any contact between the genitals of one person, and the mouth or anus of another.
The word has its origins in Christianity. It is sometimes used to mean sexual deviation, though in legal contexts it is defined as above.
Throughout history, "sodomites," mostly male homosexuals and bestialists, have been punished by a largely theocratically controlled government, in hopes of stamping out "ungodly practices" that might bring divine retribution against Christian society.
In medieval Europe, intercourse between a male field worker and a noble woman was legally considered "sodomy," as it was thought to cause a poor harvest.
The history of the concept of sodomy is tied to the Church in most every case.
Currently, there is no federal sodomy law, though some federal land falls under maritime jurisdiction, which may have sanctions in some cases. 25 states do not have sodomy laws. 5 states have laws pertaining to homosexual sodomy only, and the remaining 20 states, plus the District of Columbia, have laws covering all sodomy, even between heterosexuals.
--
for what it's worth, father butler was a beast, an animal, a disgusting, horrible..... ah forget it
he went after little boys and ruined their lives
maybe if his higher ups cared one crappola about these young boys, they would have done something beside protect the beast
and with wierwille ha ha ha ha ha ha he had no higher ups, smart beast
Well said Igotout and Excie,,,,thats why I have said we need to round up all tha hogs in this country and put parachutes on em and throw em out of C130's over Irag and bring our boys home. Pork em!
Well said Igotout and Excie,,,,thats why I have said we need to round up all tha hogs in this country and put parachutes on em and throw em out of C130's over Irag and bring our boys home. Pork em!
Damn Galen. You must mean Rosy Palms and her Five Sisters? Yeah, wow, I've been out with her too...
And man, that is a very sad commentary: "I am married, so, I have sex with rosy". But geez, what else to do? Do that, I guess, or, get a girlfriend, which is WRONG, or, go and buy a prostitute from time to time which again is WRONG, and so, what to do? Go out with Rosy I guess, and wait for that oh so wonder time when God Almighty collects us together and we get new bodies, and everything we thought about sex will probably be nothing compared to the Life we will have...
But geez, just a little exciting sex from time to time, is that so wrong?
Recommended Posts
igotout
Some excellent observations. But it is late and I only have time for a quick joke this topic reminded me of:
Three gay men died, and were going to be cremated. Their lovers happened to be at the funeral home at the same time, and were discussing what they planned to do with the ashes.
The first man said, "My Benny loved to fly, so I'm going up in a plane and scatter his ashes in the sky."
The second man said, "My Carl was a good fisherman, so I'm going to scatter his ashes in our favorite lake."
The third man said, "My Jim was such a good lover, I think I'm going to dump his ashes in a pot of chili, so he can tear my axx up just one more time."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tomtuttle1
It is a DISGRACE.... for ME ... to have been in this fellowship this morning!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
satori001
I was afraid this topic might become the butt of some bad jokes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevlar2000
Yes, let's end it now. :P
What consenting adults do with consenting adults in privacy generally is no one's business (unless it's Paris Hilton; she makes it our business).
But adults doing that kind of stuff to kids?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
J0nny Ling0
Butt, then again, I guess I am slow, but what are you wanting to figure out Satori? I was taught as so many of us were, that verse that says; "In marriage, the bed is undefiled". And VP basically said that this means that when you are married, "anything goes" as long as both partners are comfortable with it. And that seemed to work for me.
But you bring into the conversation the term "intelligent design", which, sodomy does not seem to keep with the intelligent design of that particular body part that is the subject of this thread. As I understand it, many male homsexuals who practice this act end up having to wear diapers when they are older because they have ruined themselves. And so, I would say that the mechanics of it is not natural, and, is detrimental to the "receiver's" (lambano) health. "Bottom" line? Not healthy...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Morgan
I would ask why it is acceptable in male/female scenarios and not male/male? How is it less of a health problem? How is it less conflicting with "intelligent design"?
Regardless, what two consenting adults do and what an adult does with a child who is too young to understand the consequences and therefore cannot truly give consent are two very very different things, be it hetero or homo sexual in nature.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
diazbro
Well speaking of intelligent design. I've always felt that had god been opposed to the idea of human masturbation he would have made our arms much shorter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Allan
Does this mean the animal kingdom is more intelligent than us humans after all ??!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
J0nny Ling0
Oh, sorry if I was mis-leading. I think that it would seem detrimental in any scenario, hetero most definitely included. And, I am not judging anyone. I was only saying that it seems that by the design of our bodies, certain things would seem more detrimental than others. Sorry for not being clearer.
And obviously, any form of child molestation is a hanging offense in my book. I have no problem being jundgemental on that subject.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
satori001
Exactly!
Thank you for the demonstration.
Jeez, how many times to I have to mention Martindale to have this thread stay in the About The Way forum?
Ugly truths. The Way. Sexual impropriety. The Way. Sexual exploitation. The Way. Unseemliness. The Way.
The Way, The Way, The Way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
coolchef1248 @adelphia.net
i have always pitied penguins!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
karmicdebt
Satori,
Has anyone ever told you - you present with serious control issues? :)
I'm kidding. The Way! No really. The Way International! Just trying to help. VP & Me!
Be careful... this may get moved to the Doctrinal thread...That's where they keep Mike...
Edited by karmicdebtLink to comment
Share on other sites
igotout
Maybe more meta tags will get it moved back.
TWI, Way, The Way, The Way International, no Way out, Way out there, LCM, Craig, Rozilla, Headquarters, Farm in Ohio, Beautiful Ohio, ROCKA Ages, BRC,
Link to comment
Share on other sites
excathedra
from one web site -
Sodomy is most commonly legally defined as any contact between the genitals of one person, and the mouth or anus of another.
The word has its origins in Christianity. It is sometimes used to mean sexual deviation, though in legal contexts it is defined as above.
Throughout history, "sodomites," mostly male homosexuals and bestialists, have been punished by a largely theocratically controlled government, in hopes of stamping out "ungodly practices" that might bring divine retribution against Christian society.
In medieval Europe, intercourse between a male field worker and a noble woman was legally considered "sodomy," as it was thought to cause a poor harvest.
The history of the concept of sodomy is tied to the Church in most every case.
Currently, there is no federal sodomy law, though some federal land falls under maritime jurisdiction, which may have sanctions in some cases. 25 states do not have sodomy laws. 5 states have laws pertaining to homosexual sodomy only, and the remaining 20 states, plus the District of Columbia, have laws covering all sodomy, even between heterosexuals.
--
for what it's worth, father butler was a beast, an animal, a disgusting, horrible..... ah forget it
he went after little boys and ruined their lives
maybe if his higher ups cared one crappola about these young boys, they would have done something beside protect the beast
and with wierwille ha ha ha ha ha ha he had no higher ups, smart beast
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Littlehawk
Well said Igotout and Excie,,,,thats why I have said we need to round up all tha hogs in this country and put parachutes on em and throw em out of C130's over Irag and bring our boys home. Pork em!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Belle
:o :unsure: :blink: :o
Does that REALLY say what I think it says??
Link to comment
Share on other sites
justloafing
Yes it does. We are all probably in a bunch of trouble. :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites
coolchef1248 @adelphia.net
yes little hawk what a great idea!!!
pork em
i love it
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brother Speed
Humans are the only ones in the animal kingdom that have sex face to face.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Allan
I guess if you're a male warthog thats not a nice option ! But then again, some girls I knew in my early adolescent years as a desperate young man...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galen
speak for your self, I am married which means that I have sex with rosy.
rosy palm
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jim
The first time I had sex I was scared. I was all alone...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
J0nny Ling0
Jim, that is really funny. I was all alone too...
Damn Galen. You must mean Rosy Palms and her Five Sisters? Yeah, wow, I've been out with her too...
And man, that is a very sad commentary: "I am married, so, I have sex with rosy". But geez, what else to do? Do that, I guess, or, get a girlfriend, which is WRONG, or, go and buy a prostitute from time to time which again is WRONG, and so, what to do? Go out with Rosy I guess, and wait for that oh so wonder time when God Almighty collects us together and we get new bodies, and everything we thought about sex will probably be nothing compared to the Life we will have...
But geez, just a little exciting sex from time to time, is that so wrong?
Edited by Jonny LingoLink to comment
Share on other sites
coolchef1248 @adelphia.net
ya gotta love rosey don't ya
she never says was it good for you or nor does she want to do it again! she just let's you roll over and go to sleep
you don't even have to "snuggle"
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.