Def, not quite so sure about that. Bullinger Publishing Trust sold rights for publication to Kregel and others I think.. even der vey bought rights (shared with others though..) to publish the Companion Bible. A few hundred copies were marred with the label "American Christian Press" during their brief ownership of said rights..
I know this won't be a popular post in this thread, but I believe that God made it snow for Victor Paul Wierwille ... just as I believe God could make it snow for any of us, if the need was there.
Someone in Tulsa gave me the name of B.G. Leonard, or sent my
name to him, I can't remember which. Anyway, after Tulsa I began to get his monthly
newsletter from Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
I never read that thing. It was so badly printed, you could hardly make out a word. I never
read it for two years. And then a couple of years after Tulsa, I had been working the Word
about laying on of hands. I'd worked every scripture and seen how they worked together
perfectly.
That particular day, just after I'd worked it through, I'd gotten B.G. Leonard's newssheet.
Well, I just crumpled it up and threw it in the wastebasket as usual. I did some other
things, and later that day I took the wastebasket out to burn the rubbish. As I shook it
out, this thing, which was on the bottom, fell out on top of the heap in the incinerator--
opened.
There staring me in the face was an article about laying on of hands. I read the first two
lines fast, and they are perfectly accurate. So I pulled the whole thing out of the fire
before it burned and read it through. The whole article was exactly what I had come up with
in my months of research.
vpw's slanted viewpoint doesn't fit.
Yeah, right......a monthly newsletter that was "so badly printed, you could hardly make out a word." In one breathe, vpw loathes leonard's work.....in another, it is PERFECTLY ACCURATE.
And the highlighted point that veepee wants to make........"the whole article was exactly what I had come up with in my months of research."
"Do you know that three times in those early years people
tried to kill me?" he remarks suddenly, facing me squarely. I wait,
hoping for details, but Doctor relaxes his shoulders in a barely
noticeable gesture, and then launches into a new theme.
Anybody ever get the details on this? Who was it? Angry husband? Cast iron skillet bearing wife?
Or is it some kind of ellipsis:
"three times in those years, people tried to kill me..(and we all know we wouldn't have the verd like it has not been known since the first century if they had succeeded..)"
vpw was expounding on his trip to India. He said Bishop K.C. Pillai invited them to
India in 1955.
pg-215.
quote:
"Bishop Pillai was a converted Hindu who opened up for us the Eastern customs behind many scriptures. He had taken the class and had been teaching Orientalisms to us here. He said that Hindus would believe and would want to hear the Word of God.
We went as a family, Dotsie and I and the three oldest children. John Paul was two
months old, so he stayed with his aunt, Dotsie's sister. It had never happened before that a man of God and his whole family went on a missionary tour. And I went unaffiliated, not under the flag of any denomination."
First one in history???? How about that.
pg-216.
quote:
"The non-Christians, they were fabulously responsive. I met with
governors-of-states and other top men in the Central Government of India, as well
as leading professionals and businessmen. I was the first minister invited to
speak before the Jain convention.
They responded because we brought with us only a teaching and research ministry
of blessing to the people, irrespective of religious allegiance, with no
acquisition of property and with no threat to the freedom of the nationals.
The response of the denominations-my own included-was supremely non-loving, even
vociferously opposed. The National Council of Churches in India informed me that
I was not representing the Evangelical and Reformed Church, which I never
claimed anyway. From then on I stopped all mission support except one dollar
per year.
quote:
"I could see that America was at a very low ebb spiritually. We had a lot
of religion, but we sure lacked knowledge of the accuracy and integrity of
God's Word, so that Christianity was just a name, a flag, a title.
pg-217.
quote:
"I wrote a long study of my research and observations called
the Dilemma of Foreign Missions. That caused some furor from the top
echelons. But all that has passed. I just needed the freedom to work and teach
to whoever was hungry. I didn't need the pressure, the man-made rules.
That's when I resigned in 1957 and we moved to that house on South Washington
Street. I asked twelve people to stand with me for one year. But many of them
were not in the curch. I was still hung up on the denomination. I told others
to stay with the church. I didn't want to disrupt anything, cause division or
hardship. I didn't want to hurt anyone, so I told them to stay with the
denomination."
My, THAT attitude certainly changed...if this account was true, of course.
He made it a hobby to attack denominations whenever he could.
Who was on this Board of Directors, and what was there to "direct"? Sounds like his story runs aground here. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Mrs. Wierwille mentioned a Board of Directors in Born Again to Serve. It was apparently made up of PFAL grads, but would not be the rubber stamp body that Wierwille envisoned, so he disbanded it and formed the Board of Trustees, with his brother and his old croney Ermal Owens as his yes-men
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
208
38
36
60
Popular Days
Sep 5
38
Sep 19
22
Sep 4
20
Sep 7
19
Top Posters In This Topic
WordWolf 208 posts
templelady 38 posts
A la prochaine 36 posts
Ham 60 posts
Popular Days
Sep 5 2005
38 posts
Sep 19 2005
22 posts
Sep 4 2005
20 posts
Sep 7 2005
19 posts
Popular Posts
penworks
I agree that it is "garbage" insofar that it is propaganda. But I think it does have a certain value: it's a good case study on VPW's sick thinking (and lack thereof) and a red flag about the dangers
A la prochaine
If 'Calling him everynight' wasn't enough..then she visited him every weekend ... wowza That's quite the committed individual to Wierwille. What kind of life did she have? Man oh man...I can hard
Ham
Def, not quite so sure about that. Bullinger Publishing Trust sold rights for publication to Kregel and others I think.. even der vey bought rights (shared with others though..) to publish the Companion Bible. A few hundred copies were marred with the label "American Christian Press" during their brief ownership of said rights..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
def59
since ewb was dead, they could use his writings and no heir was going to speak up, they could lionize and criticize him when it suited their purpose.
With Leonard being alive, they had to watch their step.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
True.. that makes a little more sense to me now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
But still, with the raw copying.. surely did not spare him the plaigiarism they abundantly showed to others..
Hmmm.
Makes me wonder a little more.
vic knew the guy, personally.
Perhaps vic was counting on BG being "a nice guy" about it all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
Let's see, where were we...
pg-209, vpw on the genesis of the White Book.
1954.pg-210
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
pg-210, 211, he speaks about Dr E.E. Higgins.
She's the one who would call him up every night, asking
what God taught him that day.
How many people see that little comment as a dire warning,
given 20/20 hindsight?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ToadFriend
I know this won't be a popular post in this thread, but I believe that God made it snow for Victor Paul Wierwille ... just as I believe God could make it snow for any of us, if the need was there.
TF
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rascal
Wordwolf, that IS ominous in light of what we now know...shiver
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
Well,
it wasn't exactly on topic for this thread (at least until we discuss the exact
quote), but you brought it up.....
=====
Could God make it snow for any of us?
I believe all the Christians here will say "yes".
(I'm supposing that you mean the "snow on the pumps".
The Tulsa snow job was confirmed to be a untruth in great detail.)
There's several sub-issues here. Was this supposedly REAL snow, or a VISION of snow?
All indications SEEM to be that it's supposed to be REAL snow.
If it WAS, then it arrived in exactly ONE spot, with some of it instantly on the
ground, and some of it heavy in the air. It then VANISHED.
Could God do that? Well, yes. Whether you think God would go thru all that trouble
when a VISION would work as well is a matter of opinion.
If it was a VISION, then this goes back to the original question-
which it would anyway. The supposed snow was to confirm that God would teach
vpw God's Word like it had not been known since the 1st century, if vpw would teach
it to others.
The teachings and practices vpw taught and instituted bear NO resemblance to the
1st century church.
They decentralized authority-he concentrated it in one person-himself.
They spread out the money where there was need-vpw concentrated it at hq, where it
STAYED.
Their leaders led austere lives, Paul working a secular job at one point.
vpw piled up luxuries for himself of nearly every kind.
Their emphasis was on spiritual basics. vpw emphasized intellectual study.
They had signs, miracles and wonders as day-to-day events. vpw-well, I suppose he
saw a FEW here and there.
Furthermore,
"The Word like it hadn't been known since the 1st century" is a FICTION. In the 1st
century, they had the Old Testament (the Torah), and a few of the letters where they
could be found. It sounds like such a neat slogan, though.....
Finally, although vpw taught others, EVERYTHING he taught (95% at the bare minimum)
can be traced DIRECTLY to the work of ANOTHER Christian which was ALREADY in effect
at the time. pfal was an cut-and-paste of the work (primarily) BG Leonard-
whose class vpw copied over word-for-word originally, and thus it was known to all
students of BG Leonard before vpw came around-
(secondarily) EW Bullinger-whose books had been around for perhaps half-a-century
before vpw heard of him, thus it was known to all his readers-
(tertially) JE Stiles-whose work and book on the holy spirit were ALSO in effect
long before, and whose book "Gifts of the Holy Spirit" was copied over almost
word-for-word into the 1st edition of the White Book.
Thus, the only things that had not "been known" before vpw ripped off the works of
others was a handful of names-"manifestation","administration"-if those weren't a
direct ripoff of someone else as well. Thus, the entire 1942 promise completely
failed to come to pass. vpw taught others, but at no point did he teach them
"God's Word as it has not been known since the 1st century" (for all the reasons I
just gave.) Since God does not fail His promises, the logical conclusion is that this
was NOT a promise of God. According to Scripture, if a man claims to speak in the
name of the LORD and what he says does NOT come to pass, then he is a FALSE PROPHET.
The only question then remaining is:
Did vpw invent this 1942 promise?
or did vpw receive a vision from a source other than the True God?
The possibility of him actually receiving this as revelation from God, as you see,
is excluded based on its phrasing and its results.
Given that BG Leonard wrote something similar, vpw read his book, and, some years
later began making this promise, it is most likely that vpw intentionally made it up
based on BG Leonard's writings.
=======
Knowing all this, you of course may STILL believe God made it snow for him.
However, all the evidence argues AGAINST it.
Just as Sarah did not exercise "blind faith", but rather
"judged Him faithful who had promised" (aka GOD), most of us will choose to
"exercise our senses to discern good and evil"
and say this is so unlikely based on a MOUNTAIN of evidence, that it's not even
worth considering once it's been exposed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
skyrider
vpw's slanted viewpoint doesn't fit.
Yeah, right......a monthly newsletter that was "so badly printed, you could hardly make out a word." In one breathe, vpw loathes leonard's work.....in another, it is PERFECTLY ACCURATE.
And the highlighted point that veepee wants to make........"the whole article was exactly what I had come up with in my months of research."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brother Speed
Awww,
I wanted to say, "all women are liars...and SHE teaches vpw about the human body."
Things that make you go hmmm.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brother Speed
Yep, Skyrider.
almost sounds like 'but I wrote it first, he plagiarized me'
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brother Speed
but more like 'since I came up with in on my own, its not like plagiarism or anything.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Anybody ever get the details on this? Who was it? Angry husband? Cast iron skillet bearing wife?
Or is it some kind of ellipsis:
"three times in those years, people tried to kill me..(and we all know we wouldn't have the verd like it has not been known since the first century if they had succeeded..)"
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
vpw was expounding on his trip to India. He said Bishop K.C. Pillai invited them to
India in 1955.
pg-215.
First one in history???? How about that.
pg-216.
pg-217.
My, THAT attitude certainly changed...if this account was true, of course.
He made it a hobby to attack denominations whenever he could.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
pg-217 into 218, vpw now catches up to UH's account, in 1957.
Um, he had already left his organization with 10 people. Who was on this
Board of Directors, and what was there to "direct"? Sounds like his story runs
aground here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
pg-220, some more history.
April to July of 1961, they had a class in April, running to July.
Then Pillai ran a class on Orientalisms, then they ran an Advanced class.
(pg-221)
Summer camps run in Wisconsin in 1959, Indiana in 1960, and Miamisburg, Ohio in
1961.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Makes me wonder about this too. Any of these people still alive? I'd like to hear the other side of the story..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Funny how the first time around, when I read that thing, I swallowed it all up like it was gospel truth..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
skyrider
So.......after FOUR years of "pfal" still very interest or involvement.
So.......in 1957, veepee finally cut the church umbilical cord.
So.......twi really DID NOT start in 1942 if the HONEST TRUTH WERE TOLD.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
And keep saying that loud and long enough, perhaps people will believe it..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Explains everything.. why else would he leave him unnamed in the foundational class?
Love em and leave em I guess..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
A la prochaine
OH MY GOD!!!!
I'm only in the middle of page 3 and I can't get over all the "I did..." "I said..." "I saw.."
VP speaks he learnt so much from everyone..but it sounds more like...
"They agreed with what I believed...and therefore, they were right on because of it!"
PUKE PUKE PUKE
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Oakspear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.