Was [name deleted] one of the club? It's hard to imagine that mean little wench giving up the booty to anyone. I know she later married and had a baby, so, at least she did it that one time...
Car*l*n Mo*ica was also ordained.. don't remember which corps she was from though.
quote:
Regarding Tick. Remember the german shepard. Should we really think that Tick was innocent?
Well, Tick was a german shorthair, not a german shepherd. Might be tough to make the accusation stick. But considering what was going on in that joint, I guess that almost anything could go..
I think that's a very nasty thing to say about [name deleted] and I don't believe it for a minute!
She was once of the neatest, kindest people I ever met.
Not everyone who was WC, ordained and a woman got there by providing sexual favors. Maybe nobody did. Maybe some of them actually deserved it, even though they were women! Ya think?
This is beginning to sound very sexist and prejudiced. Not a good thing.
wg...you have a perfect right to feel the way you do, according to your experiences with [name deleted]
I ALSO have a perfect right to feel the way I do according to my experiences with [name deleted]
If you think it's nasty, so be it...but since you do not know anything about why I would say that,have not considered that there is a very good reason I would say that, and have not asked...we leave it there.
(and since my experience had NOTHING to do with sexual favors, I take it that your comment about that was not directed at me, wg)
well.....just because folks were decieved into believing that it was their rsponsibility or somehow acceptable....doesn`t mean that they couldn`t ever be known as decent and nice in other settings as well wg...
It is just one step further in the deception that most of us all fell victim to.
We all had leaders that treated us well in twi ....whom we find out treated others brutally
Mr. Hamm is right...some really nice nice people turned into monsters later on.
What I find the most incredible about the trashing of [name deleted] is the offhand remark, "Oh and she was VPW's mistress for years."
That's crap. I don't believe it for a minute. But hey, anyone who was WC is fair game, right? Especially if the poster had an argument or disagreement with them or just didn't like them!
Watered Garden...I made the remark...sorry you were offended by it, but it's the truth.
I liked [name deleted]...she was my corps coordinator. I think she helped a lot of folks and basically had a really good heart...I don't have a thing against her...I hope she's doing well...
...And let me add, that I didn't start this thread just to trash [name deleted] or anyone else...
...but I think it's important for people to realize that twi lied about a LOT of things...when people are led to believe that a person is ordained because God gave them one of the 5 gift ministries...when actually, their ordination was a reward for sexual favors...well, they are being lied to in God's name and it's very destructive for that individual to follow a counterfeit. This forum is designed, in part, to "enlighten" people to the truth of twi and it's destructive practices...why? So that others can avoid the same mistakes that many of us made...and to expose the truth, regardless of how ugly it may be.
Like I said, I liked [name deleted]...never had a "bad encounter" with her...I knew her fairly well...in fact, I believe that [name deleted] was a victim of Wierwille's lies...she trusted him and fell for his line of crap.
Not everyone who was WC, ordained and a woman got there by providing sexual favors. Maybe nobody did. Maybe some of them actually deserved it, even though they were women! Ya think?
This is beginning to sound very sexist and prejudiced. Not a good thing.
WG
Well, I believe, that the leaders of this organization, otherwise known as a cult, were both sexist and prejudiced. Could be why some were ordained and others weren't, men and women. From what I have heard, some men didn't get 'moved up' in the cult if their WIVES would not 'perform' for the presidents.
Groucho, common knowledge is just that: common, in the sense of "5 a : falling below ordinary standards : SECOND-RATE b : lacking refinement : COARSE (my emphasis added).
How did a discussion about which women were ordained become a mud-slinging party?
ow did a discussion about which women were ordained become a mud-slinging party?
Ya know, I have seen the names of ordained men here whose names were not entirely "written out". You know, with blank spaces or asterisks in place of certain letters, but their "coded names" were not deleted. The allegations remained with their names mostly intact in order to "help us all". Why not the same with women clergy and leaders?
One of the ordained women mentioned here tried to seduce me in the "sewing dept trailer" at hq while I was there to get my pants hemmed. She took a very long time measuring my inseam", much to my half confusion as well as male delight, and she flat out asked me to take them off right there in front of her so she could fix them, with a sly grin on her face, knowing full what had occurred to me physically as I was standing there. But, I decided that, as a graduating Corps guy, I should not have sex with this ordained woman who was clearly very horny and wanting some sex.
And so, I just told her that I had to go, and then I left. I was pretty confused, really, because I just didn't think it was right, with her being a Reverend and all. Part of me thought it was WAY OK (which part? ;)-->), but with what I thought I knew about God and His Word, I didn't think it was right. But if I mentioned her name with asterisks and all, it would be deleted. If I said just her first name in light of this incident, it would probably be deleted.
But if there was a reversal here, and men's names were mentioned (coded w/ asterisks) And I've seen it before, would there be such censorship? I have seen in the past where this is not the case, such as the name "Howie". Geez, could that be H*wie Y*r*mian? Senior or Junior?
Hey things happened the way they happened, and if there were women guilty of the same things that many of the men did, then so be it. If this is supposed to be a "forum of honesty" then it should remain that way, with no favoritism concering gender...
Actually.....if you follow the context....the HOWIE being discussed.....was HOWARD ALLEN. That particular poster would is NOT the type of poster that would slander someone....however, I do completely follow your reasoning.
Hey Radar, how are you? After I looked at it, (before your post) I finally figured it to be H.A. But it did throw me for a loop for a sec. And, one could be led to believe it was "Howie Some One Else" had they not known better...
But I am glad you got my overall point. Things happened the way they happened, and if there were women who were part of it, then their names should not be censored.
OR...
Nobody's names should be allowed to be mentioned, male or female, in "code form" or no...
And;
Why thank you Excathedra, I really appreciate that. And I hope you have a fine evening wherever you are, and once again, I am sorry for offending you in the past... :)-->
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
4
12
8
3
Popular Days
Jul 19
28
Jul 17
14
Jul 18
10
Jul 21
7
Top Posters In This Topic
excathedra 4 posts
GrouchoMarxJr 12 posts
J0nny Ling0 8 posts
Ham 3 posts
Popular Days
Jul 19 2005
28 posts
Jul 17 2005
14 posts
Jul 18 2005
10 posts
Jul 21 2005
7 posts
J0nny Ling0
Was [name deleted] one of the club? It's hard to imagine that mean little wench giving up the booty to anyone. I know she later married and had a baby, so, at least she did it that one time...
Edited by moddishwasherLink to comment
Share on other sites
Cindy!
[deleted by the moderator]
Note to Cindy: I accidentally deleted the whole post, instead of just the name.
Edited by moddishwasherLink to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Car*l*n Mo*ica was also ordained.. don't remember which corps she was from though.
Well, Tick was a german shorthair, not a german shepherd. Might be tough to make the accusation stick. But considering what was going on in that joint, I guess that almost anything could go..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Watered Garden
I think that's a very nasty thing to say about [name deleted] and I don't believe it for a minute!
She was once of the neatest, kindest people I ever met.
Not everyone who was WC, ordained and a woman got there by providing sexual favors. Maybe nobody did. Maybe some of them actually deserved it, even though they were women! Ya think?
This is beginning to sound very sexist and prejudiced. Not a good thing.
WG
Edited by moddishwasherLink to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
I feel the same way about what was said about other folks that were really, really nice- at least when I knew them.
But some of the nicest people were mutated into monsters.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cindy!
wg...you have a perfect right to feel the way you do, according to your experiences with [name deleted]
I ALSO have a perfect right to feel the way I do according to my experiences with [name deleted]
If you think it's nasty, so be it...but since you do not know anything about why I would say that,have not considered that there is a very good reason I would say that, and have not asked...we leave it there.
(and since my experience had NOTHING to do with sexual favors, I take it that your comment about that was not directed at me, wg)
Edited by moddishwasherLink to comment
Share on other sites
rascal
well.....just because folks were decieved into believing that it was their rsponsibility or somehow acceptable....doesn`t mean that they couldn`t ever be known as decent and nice in other settings as well wg...
It is just one step further in the deception that most of us all fell victim to.
We all had leaders that treated us well in twi ....whom we find out treated others brutally
Mr. Hamm is right...some really nice nice people turned into monsters later on.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Watered Garden
What I find the most incredible about the trashing of [name deleted] is the offhand remark, "Oh and she was VPW's mistress for years."
That's crap. I don't believe it for a minute. But hey, anyone who was WC is fair game, right? Especially if the poster had an argument or disagreement with them or just didn't like them!
So snipe away. I'm outta here.
WG
Edited by moddishwasherLink to comment
Share on other sites
GrouchoMarxJr
Watered Garden...I made the remark...sorry you were offended by it, but it's the truth.
I liked [name deleted]...she was my corps coordinator. I think she helped a lot of folks and basically had a really good heart...I don't have a thing against her...I hope she's doing well...
...But nevertheless, it was common knowledge.
Edited by moddishwasherLink to comment
Share on other sites
GrouchoMarxJr
...And let me add, that I didn't start this thread just to trash [name deleted] or anyone else...
...but I think it's important for people to realize that twi lied about a LOT of things...when people are led to believe that a person is ordained because God gave them one of the 5 gift ministries...when actually, their ordination was a reward for sexual favors...well, they are being lied to in God's name and it's very destructive for that individual to follow a counterfeit. This forum is designed, in part, to "enlighten" people to the truth of twi and it's destructive practices...why? So that others can avoid the same mistakes that many of us made...and to expose the truth, regardless of how ugly it may be.
Like I said, I liked [name deleted]...never had a "bad encounter" with her...I knew her fairly well...in fact, I believe that [name deleted] was a victim of Wierwille's lies...she trusted him and fell for his line of crap.
Edited by moddishwasherLink to comment
Share on other sites
act2
Originally posted by Watered Garden:
Not everyone who was WC, ordained and a woman got there by providing sexual favors. Maybe nobody did. Maybe some of them actually deserved it, even though they were women! Ya think?
This is beginning to sound very sexist and prejudiced. Not a good thing.
WG
Well, I believe, that the leaders of this organization, otherwise known as a cult, were both sexist and prejudiced. Could be why some were ordained and others weren't, men and women. From what I have heard, some men didn't get 'moved up' in the cult if their WIVES would not 'perform' for the presidents.
Just my humble opinion.
:(-->
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Belle
[deleted by the moderator]
Edited by moddishwasherLink to comment
Share on other sites
Mod Kirk
Please do not identify victims by name unless they have identified themselves.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GrouchoMarxJr
gotcha...I apologize to one and all for singling out that one fine lady.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Linda Z
Groucho, common knowledge is just that: common, in the sense of "5 a : falling below ordinary standards : SECOND-RATE b : lacking refinement : COARSE (my emphasis added).
How did a discussion about which women were ordained become a mud-slinging party?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
moony3424
She was 3rd corps.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WeWereScammed
Link to comment
Share on other sites
excathedra
ps. i'd love to know what sunesis posted that got deleted. i'd bet my bottom dollar it was all too true
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jim
That's the real b*tch with moderation, isn't it
:)-->
Link to comment
Share on other sites
J0nny Ling0
Ya know, I have seen the names of ordained men here whose names were not entirely "written out". You know, with blank spaces or asterisks in place of certain letters, but their "coded names" were not deleted. The allegations remained with their names mostly intact in order to "help us all". Why not the same with women clergy and leaders?
One of the ordained women mentioned here tried to seduce me in the "sewing dept trailer" at hq while I was there to get my pants hemmed. She took a very long time measuring my inseam", much to my half confusion as well as male delight, and she flat out asked me to take them off right there in front of her so she could fix them, with a sly grin on her face, knowing full what had occurred to me physically as I was standing there. But, I decided that, as a graduating Corps guy, I should not have sex with this ordained woman who was clearly very horny and wanting some sex.
And so, I just told her that I had to go, and then I left. I was pretty confused, really, because I just didn't think it was right, with her being a Reverend and all. Part of me thought it was WAY OK (which part?
;)-->), but with what I thought I knew about God and His Word, I didn't think it was right. But if I mentioned her name with asterisks and all, it would be deleted. If I said just her first name in light of this incident, it would probably be deleted.
But if there was a reversal here, and men's names were mentioned (coded w/ asterisks) And I've seen it before, would there be such censorship? I have seen in the past where this is not the case, such as the name "Howie". Geez, could that be H*wie Y*r*mian? Senior or Junior?
Hey things happened the way they happened, and if there were women guilty of the same things that many of the men did, then so be it. If this is supposed to be a "forum of honesty" then it should remain that way, with no favoritism concering gender...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Radar OReilly
Buck,
Actually.....if you follow the context....the HOWIE being discussed.....was HOWARD ALLEN. That particular poster would is NOT the type of poster that would slander someone....however, I do completely follow your reasoning.
ror
Link to comment
Share on other sites
excathedra
oh **** was that me ? i'm sorry
and dear lingo, we have had disagreements, but i really do understand and appreciate where you're coming from
and thanks dear radar
Link to comment
Share on other sites
J0nny Ling0
Hey Radar, how are you? After I looked at it, (before your post) I finally figured it to be H.A. But it did throw me for a loop for a sec. And, one could be led to believe it was "Howie Some One Else" had they not known better...
But I am glad you got my overall point. Things happened the way they happened, and if there were women who were part of it, then their names should not be censored.
OR...
Nobody's names should be allowed to be mentioned, male or female, in "code form" or no...
And;
Why thank you Excathedra, I really appreciate that. And I hope you have a fine evening wherever you are, and once again, I am sorry for offending you in the past...
:)-->
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Oakspear
Jonny:
There is a thread discussing possible changes in what names are allowed to be typed in full, which should be in "code form", etc. in the OPen Forum.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.