Many are also terribly radio-active, enough so that submarine crews are not allowed to carry certain brands on-board as their radio-activity would set-off alarms on the atomospheric monitors trying to monitor the reactor.
"For beer commercials, they add liquid detergent to the beer to make it foam more."
Not just on the commercials. Check any Beer-making supply store, they all stock 'foaming agents' to make beers to hold their head longer. Soaps change to surface-tension of the liquid so bubbles rising to the top will not pop quickly, rather they make foam and hold it. Beer is commonly judged, and among the qualitys that it is judged for is uniformity of it's head and how long it holds it's head.
Do you mean like using a black-powder scatter-gun mounted on the bow of a row-boat, load it up with single-ought-shot and rowing out onto a pond trying to aim the whole boat directly at ducks [because the if you shot it off at an angle it would flip the boat over, so it has to be aimed directly ahead].
Is that what you mean?
Nope, I never did that. :-)
Built a couple scatter-guns though; I own one; I helped mount one to a boat once; I may have even helped some body by loading it for them.
But nope I never did hunt birds with one. And I would know very little about how to do such a thing.
What your link shows is that he didn't coin the noun assassin. According to what I've read, he did coin the verb assassinate, or at least was the first person known to have used it.
"Ah. It's cumbersome, takes a lot of work, and while it accomplishes the task of killing the bird, it's far more force than necessary, right?"
Work? Oh, I thought it was for fun.
"accomplishes the task of killing"?
Yeah, but it kills 20 birds at once.
"... more than necessary"?
Do you never do anything bigger than you absolutely need? Drive a V-8 when a L-4 wold work? Ride a 1000cc bike when a 150cc would do the trick? Work for a high-wage job, when you would do fine at minimum wage?
In a group of 23 people, the odds are better than 50% that at least two will share a birthday. Start with one person. The odds that the next person will have the same birthday is 1/365. The odds that a third person would have the same birthday as one of the first two is 1/364, so the odds that any two of the three share a birthday is 1/365 +1/364. By the time you get to 23 people, the sum is greater than 1/2.
Oh, and my sister and I have birthdays on the same day of the month and three of four times on the same day of the week. Her birthday is Feb. 20; mine is Mar. 20. On leap year, our birthdays are not on the same day of the week.
In a group of 23 people, the odds are better than 50% that at least two will share a birthday. Start with one person. The odds that the next person will have the same birthday is 1/365. The odds that a third person would have the same birthday as one of the first two is 1/364, so the odds that any two of the three share a birthday is 1/365 +1/364. By the time you get to 23 people, the sum is greater than 1/2.
George
Not quite. Start with person 1. The odds that person 2 will have the same birthday is 1/365, but person 3 does NOT have a 1/364 chance of matching either. He has a 2/365 chance, because he can match either one of the first two. Continuing onward, the sum of the probabilities becomes greater than 1/2 (182.5/365) at the 20th person(190/365), not the 23rd. Remember to count the first person, but not to add a probability to him. (0/365+1/365+2/365+3/365+4/365+ ... +19/365=190/365. 190/365 > 1/2.)
EDIT: I thought something looked funny about that. Turns out you don't ADD the probabilities that two people share the same birthday, you MULTIPLY the probability that they DON'T until it drops below 1/2. So, it's 365x364x363...x343/365^23 which finally drops the probability that no two people share the same birthday to less than .500.
In other words, 23 is the correct answer, but for a different reason. If you added the probabilities together, you'd go over 365/365 when you hit the 28th person--which is nonsense. 28 people can easily have 28 different birthdays in February alone. Doing it the other way assures the probability converges to 1.000 at person 365.
Many are also terribly radio-active, enough so that submarine crews are not allowed to carry certain brands on-board as their radio-activity would set-off alarms on the atomospheric monitors trying to monitor the reactor.
I'm guessing Crest. Anything with tin compounds in it (stannous fluoride--Crest's "fluoristat") would probably have some level of radioactivity from trace elements.
I was once told that due to 'truth in advertising', anyone who says: "Whitening" must then have some component that either bleaches or dyes white. To say: "Brightening" it must have some method of increasing the lumins the object gives off [either little light bulbs, or radium, etc].
A lot of guys [including the RadCon guys] commonly smuggled any kind of toothpaste they wanted, saying that "so longs as it did not get airborne it only effected the 'background' levels slightly". Not nearly as much as glow-in-the-dark wrist-watches [which are a huge no no].
I always used dry baking-soda [from 1978 to 2002].
Untill resently I read that book from the former ADA [American Dental Assoc] President, he claims that any strong anti-bacterial would make more sense if your looking at a bacterial infection. So now I use H2O2 with peppermint oil [20% Hydrogen-peroxide with maybe 6 drops of peppermint oil per 10 fl oz].
Yeah. I realized my mistake on my way to work this morning. I was going to edit it before anyone found out :o--> but forgot all about it when I got here.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
7
8
5
8
Popular Days
Apr 21
31
Apr 19
13
Apr 22
13
Apr 18
8
Top Posters In This Topic
Galen 7 posts
Raf 8 posts
sharon 5 posts
outofdafog 8 posts
Popular Days
Apr 21 2005
31 posts
Apr 19 2005
13 posts
Apr 22 2005
13 posts
Apr 18 2005
8 posts
Galen
outofdafog:
That some toothpastes contain antifreeze...."
Many are also terribly radio-active, enough so that submarine crews are not allowed to carry certain brands on-board as their radio-activity would set-off alarms on the atomospheric monitors trying to monitor the reactor.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galen
sharon:
"For beer commercials, they add liquid detergent to the beer to make it foam more."
Not just on the commercials. Check any Beer-making supply store, they all stock 'foaming agents' to make beers to hold their head longer. Soaps change to surface-tension of the liquid so bubbles rising to the top will not pop quickly, rather they make foam and hold it. Beer is commonly judged, and among the qualitys that it is judged for is uniformity of it's head and how long it holds it's head.
A common ingredient.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sudo
Victor Paul Wierwille's secret twin brother becomes Pope!!!
sudo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Excuse me, Sudo, but you knew darned well that originally read:
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger becomes Pope Joe Pesci I
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Galen,
Ever go bird hunting with a cannon?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galen
Do you mean like using a black-powder scatter-gun mounted on the bow of a row-boat, load it up with single-ought-shot and rowing out onto a pond trying to aim the whole boat directly at ducks [because the if you shot it off at an angle it would flip the boat over, so it has to be aimed directly ahead].
Is that what you mean?
Nope, I never did that. :-)
Built a couple scatter-guns though; I own one; I helped mount one to a boat once; I may have even helped some body by loading it for them.
But nope I never did hunt birds with one. And I would know very little about how to do such a thing.
Have you?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Ah. It's cumbersome, takes a lot of work, and while it accomplishes the task of killing the bird, it's far more force than necessary, right?
Shakespeare didn't coin the word assassinate.
Check it out.
I try to save cannons for larger targets. :)-->
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LG
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galen
Raf:
"Ah. It's cumbersome, takes a lot of work, and while it accomplishes the task of killing the bird, it's far more force than necessary, right?"
Work? Oh, I thought it was for fun.
"accomplishes the task of killing"?
Yeah, but it kills 20 birds at once.
"... more than necessary"?
Do you never do anything bigger than you absolutely need? Drive a V-8 when a L-4 wold work? Ride a 1000cc bike when a 150cc would do the trick? Work for a high-wage job, when you would do fine at minimum wage?
:-)
Shakespeare didn't coin the word assassinate.
Check it out.
I try to save cannons for larger targets. :)-->
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sharon
By the time a child finishes elementary school she will have witnessed 8,000 murders and 100,000 acts of violence on television.
sad huh?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
outofdafog
That sex is the safest tranquilizer and is 10 times more effective than valium
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
In a group of 23 people, the odds are better than 50% that at least two will share a birthday. Start with one person. The odds that the next person will have the same birthday is 1/365. The odds that a third person would have the same birthday as one of the first two is 1/364, so the odds that any two of the three share a birthday is 1/365 +1/364. By the time you get to 23 people, the sum is greater than 1/2.
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Oh, and my sister and I have birthdays on the same day of the month and three of four times on the same day of the week. Her birthday is Feb. 20; mine is Mar. 20. On leap year, our birthdays are not on the same day of the week.
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
outofdafog
That if one places a tiny amount of liquor on a scorpion, it will go mad and sting itself to death.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zixar
EDIT: I thought something looked funny about that. Turns out you don't ADD the probabilities that two people share the same birthday, you MULTIPLY the probability that they DON'T until it drops below 1/2. So, it's 365x364x363...x343/365^23 which finally drops the probability that no two people share the same birthday to less than .500.
In other words, 23 is the correct answer, but for a different reason. If you added the probabilities together, you'd go over 365/365 when you hit the 28th person--which is nonsense. 28 people can easily have 28 different birthdays in February alone. Doing it the other way assures the probability converges to 1.000 at person 365.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jardinero
Wow, Galen! Really? What brands?
J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zixar
I'm guessing Crest. Anything with tin compounds in it (stannous fluoride--Crest's "fluoristat") would probably have some level of radioactivity from trace elements.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galen
jardinero:
"Wow, Galen! Really? What brands?"
Long list of them.
I was once told that due to 'truth in advertising', anyone who says: "Whitening" must then have some component that either bleaches or dyes white. To say: "Brightening" it must have some method of increasing the lumins the object gives off [either little light bulbs, or radium, etc].
A lot of guys [including the RadCon guys] commonly smuggled any kind of toothpaste they wanted, saying that "so longs as it did not get airborne it only effected the 'background' levels slightly". Not nearly as much as glow-in-the-dark wrist-watches [which are a huge no no].
I always used dry baking-soda [from 1978 to 2002].
Untill resently I read that book from the former ADA [American Dental Assoc] President, he claims that any strong anti-bacterial would make more sense if your looking at a bacterial infection. So now I use H2O2 with peppermint oil [20% Hydrogen-peroxide with maybe 6 drops of peppermint oil per 10 fl oz].
:-)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Tattooed, biker cats fall with the same acceleration from penthouses as their normal, regular couterparts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
I knew something was wrong with the first equation. Thanks for clearing it up, Zix.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Yeah. I realized my mistake on my way to work this morning. I was going to edit it before anyone found out :o--> but forgot all about it when I got here.
I think I'm not getting enough sleep.
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
outofdafog
That money isn't made out of paper, it's made of cotton......
There are 2,598,960 possible hands in a five-card poker game.........
Link to comment
Share on other sites
johniam
He'd get pulled over in a school zone.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
excathedra
snort snort johnnyam
i gotta read this thread, it looks funny
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.