Steriods were much easier to get in the 80's - they are much more controlled now than they were before and if you've ever lifted at a gym where there are a lot of power lifters then you can usually pick out the juiced ones - they are just unnaturally bulked up and usually have 'chicken legs' in contrast to their massive chests and glutes. Amongst real lifters they are looked down on - it's probably different in the body building community but I don't know much about that... I wasn't into body buliding - just strength training.
I can tell you that there are supplements on the market - legal supplements - that can give many of the same advantages that juicing can. They have to be taken more often - not cycled - and have overall less side-effects. Most lifters I know would increase usage with upcoming competitions and then lessen usages at non-competitive times. There are still side-effects - no doubt about it - with the supplements.
Somethings this article doesn't address - juicers usually tear muscles more than regular lifters because their tendons and frame are equipped to handle the bulk of the muscles they develop. There's more damage to major organs - especially the liver - than the article discusses. Also, there are sexual side-effects that weren't addressed. In reading this article I seriously doubt there's a real "Bill" or that there's a "Bill's wife" - she'd be due sainthood for living with a man injecting the crap he was supposedly into...
Atheletes who are serious about their sport and their bodies - pureists - know better than to play with this kind of fire. They also have more respect and better quality of life because they aren't compromising their health with these types of chems!
Well first of all its always been easy to get steroids in the more serious gyms. In fact, back in the early 70s in California it was commonplace for dedicated bodybuilders to exchange information on where to get them and how to use them. Law enorcement was not concerned with this element since it represented such a small slice of overall controlled substance traffic. Also some of those steroids weren't even classified as controlled substances since it never occurred to law enforcement that people would seek out these drugs.
Okay whatever. Steroids were part of that scene for sure and it crept into popular sports in the 70s and stretched out in the 80s and became de riguer in the 90s for professional athletes. If your opponent is using supplements then you feel you have to also just to be able to match his/her performance. Nothing new.
Steroid use has trickled down into the consumer level where you have average joes "juicing". Lots of these people are looking for shortcuts to being shape. The sad reality is that they are't in shape. They just pump some iron (usually their chest and arms), and "juice up" so they can get "HOOGE" (a word the college students use) but they lack cardiovscular endurance and have no overall fitness. In fact they damage their body and the benefits associated with the drug rapidly disappear after they stop taking the drugs.
Also the average joe 'roid user isn't even really a bodybuilder. Its just a time saver (he thinks) to getting "in shape". The popualrity of these drugs are just another example of our "quick fix" mentality wherein people want it NOW ! They just can't workout over time and wait for the results. They feel that it should be here NOW !
Its a sure bet that things like human growth hormone will probably improve in quality since it does have legitimate uses (for those with thyroid problems, degenerative diseases, alzheimers prevention). This is good news since it could save lives but its also going to happen that average people want to use this stuff because they aren't happy with who they are. They want to get "ripped" or they want to avoid a mid life crisis or whatever.
There is a balance though. Its reasonable for people to choose regular exercise as a means to a truly healthy lifestyle. Anytime you artificially stimulate or suppress metabolic processes for long periods of time there are consequences. There are NO exceptions to this. So those that think that drugs or so called "peformance enhancing substances" are okay , well they are just ignorant (or are consciously ignoring the truth). As you know, the US now has an obesity epidemic. People , especally the younger generations, are , quite simpy, fat because they make poor nutritional decisions. The problem is that their quality of life will diminish if they don't do something about it. Hopefully they don't trade once vice (junk food) for another (steroids/growth hormone).
I do reject the concept that those who actively engage in regular physical fitness activities (and aren't on "the juice" - again NOT steroid users) are "fitness addicts" which is how sometimes the are portrayed (usually by those who are very out of shape). There are plenty of people who do enjoy being in shape and exercising and I hardly see it as a problem that they choose going to the gym over going to happy hour at a bar where they drink 4 or 5 beers and eat a plate of nachos.
Now. Lots of people who are out of shape sometimes want to criticize those who are doing something about it. Why ? Jealousy perhaps ? I think there is something really wrong with a society that emphasizes personal comfort over personal health. You don't need to join a gym to be in shape. Walking or running 3 times a week for at least 20 minutes is an excellent start. You can still have your "reward" though as time goes by and you get in shape you won't want that. You won't want to eat half a gallon of chocolate ice cream or eat a large piece of carrot cake at lunch or cram down a bagel loaded with cream cheese for breakfast. Hopefully people can learn that there is a middle ground between the steroid users and the couch potatoes which represent two extremes.
Recommended Posts
ChasUFarley
Steriods were much easier to get in the 80's - they are much more controlled now than they were before and if you've ever lifted at a gym where there are a lot of power lifters then you can usually pick out the juiced ones - they are just unnaturally bulked up and usually have 'chicken legs' in contrast to their massive chests and glutes. Amongst real lifters they are looked down on - it's probably different in the body building community but I don't know much about that... I wasn't into body buliding - just strength training.
I can tell you that there are supplements on the market - legal supplements - that can give many of the same advantages that juicing can. They have to be taken more often - not cycled - and have overall less side-effects. Most lifters I know would increase usage with upcoming competitions and then lessen usages at non-competitive times. There are still side-effects - no doubt about it - with the supplements.
Somethings this article doesn't address - juicers usually tear muscles more than regular lifters because their tendons and frame are equipped to handle the bulk of the muscles they develop. There's more damage to major organs - especially the liver - than the article discusses. Also, there are sexual side-effects that weren't addressed. In reading this article I seriously doubt there's a real "Bill" or that there's a "Bill's wife" - she'd be due sainthood for living with a man injecting the crap he was supposedly into...
Atheletes who are serious about their sport and their bodies - pureists - know better than to play with this kind of fire. They also have more respect and better quality of life because they aren't compromising their health with these types of chems!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
diazbro
Well first of all its always been easy to get steroids in the more serious gyms. In fact, back in the early 70s in California it was commonplace for dedicated bodybuilders to exchange information on where to get them and how to use them. Law enorcement was not concerned with this element since it represented such a small slice of overall controlled substance traffic. Also some of those steroids weren't even classified as controlled substances since it never occurred to law enforcement that people would seek out these drugs.
Okay whatever. Steroids were part of that scene for sure and it crept into popular sports in the 70s and stretched out in the 80s and became de riguer in the 90s for professional athletes. If your opponent is using supplements then you feel you have to also just to be able to match his/her performance. Nothing new.
Steroid use has trickled down into the consumer level where you have average joes "juicing". Lots of these people are looking for shortcuts to being shape. The sad reality is that they are't in shape. They just pump some iron (usually their chest and arms), and "juice up" so they can get "HOOGE" (a word the college students use) but they lack cardiovscular endurance and have no overall fitness. In fact they damage their body and the benefits associated with the drug rapidly disappear after they stop taking the drugs.
Also the average joe 'roid user isn't even really a bodybuilder. Its just a time saver (he thinks) to getting "in shape". The popualrity of these drugs are just another example of our "quick fix" mentality wherein people want it NOW ! They just can't workout over time and wait for the results. They feel that it should be here NOW !
Its a sure bet that things like human growth hormone will probably improve in quality since it does have legitimate uses (for those with thyroid problems, degenerative diseases, alzheimers prevention). This is good news since it could save lives but its also going to happen that average people want to use this stuff because they aren't happy with who they are. They want to get "ripped" or they want to avoid a mid life crisis or whatever.
There is a balance though. Its reasonable for people to choose regular exercise as a means to a truly healthy lifestyle. Anytime you artificially stimulate or suppress metabolic processes for long periods of time there are consequences. There are NO exceptions to this. So those that think that drugs or so called "peformance enhancing substances" are okay , well they are just ignorant (or are consciously ignoring the truth). As you know, the US now has an obesity epidemic. People , especally the younger generations, are , quite simpy, fat because they make poor nutritional decisions. The problem is that their quality of life will diminish if they don't do something about it. Hopefully they don't trade once vice (junk food) for another (steroids/growth hormone).
I do reject the concept that those who actively engage in regular physical fitness activities (and aren't on "the juice" - again NOT steroid users) are "fitness addicts" which is how sometimes the are portrayed (usually by those who are very out of shape). There are plenty of people who do enjoy being in shape and exercising and I hardly see it as a problem that they choose going to the gym over going to happy hour at a bar where they drink 4 or 5 beers and eat a plate of nachos.
Now. Lots of people who are out of shape sometimes want to criticize those who are doing something about it. Why ? Jealousy perhaps ? I think there is something really wrong with a society that emphasizes personal comfort over personal health. You don't need to join a gym to be in shape. Walking or running 3 times a week for at least 20 minutes is an excellent start. You can still have your "reward" though as time goes by and you get in shape you won't want that. You won't want to eat half a gallon of chocolate ice cream or eat a large piece of carrot cake at lunch or cram down a bagel loaded with cream cheese for breakfast. Hopefully people can learn that there is a middle ground between the steroid users and the couch potatoes which represent two extremes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.