DotDotDot... glad you came back... I think we have all agreed here that we are not going to "cross site post quoting" (at least I think that's what I read on another thread).
I checked the website you posted, it looks like it might be "fair use" if you quote to criticise... but I'm no lawyer...
I'm not defending either side... now, do you own the copyrights to the little doggie and the little flag? :D-->
DotDotDot... glad you came back... I think we have all agreed here that we are not going to "cross site post quoting" (at least I think that's what I read on another thread).
Well, pawtucket doesn't want it, although I personally think it's ok because people posting something publicly should have no expectation that it's kept private.
quote:Originally posted by Tom Strange:
I checked the website you posted, it looks like it might be "fair use" if you quote to criticise... but I'm no lawyer...
Quoting does fall under fair use provisions of the copyright law, plus the fact that if her interpretation was correct, we would all be breaking the law (herself included) because computer browsers download a copy of the html as cache. The most she might be able to limit is quoting of the full text, but even then she has given up the rights to her words to pawtucket by posting here. On top of that, I seriously doubt that any competent judge would allow a trial over someone cross posting what she says, unless they somehow make a profit off of it. If someone were to sell a book about this site and post entire threads by people as their own, then they could be sued and possibly win. I think that Dot's post here is just something to make her feel good, but has no real legal basis.
Recommended Posts
Tom Strange
DotDotDot... glad you came back... I think we have all agreed here that we are not going to "cross site post quoting" (at least I think that's what I read on another thread).
I checked the website you posted, it looks like it might be "fair use" if you quote to criticise... but I'm no lawyer...
I'm not defending either side... now, do you own the copyrights to the little doggie and the little flag? :D-->
Edited by tomstrangeLink to comment
Share on other sites
Mister P-Mosh
Well, pawtucket doesn't want it, although I personally think it's ok because people posting something publicly should have no expectation that it's kept private.
Quoting does fall under fair use provisions of the copyright law, plus the fact that if her interpretation was correct, we would all be breaking the law (herself included) because computer browsers download a copy of the html as cache. The most she might be able to limit is quoting of the full text, but even then she has given up the rights to her words to pawtucket by posting here. On top of that, I seriously doubt that any competent judge would allow a trial over someone cross posting what she says, unless they somehow make a profit off of it. If someone were to sell a book about this site and post entire threads by people as their own, then they could be sued and possibly win. I think that Dot's post here is just something to make her feel good, but has no real legal basis.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kit Sober
Hereby notice is given that I do consider author who goes by a pen name of Dot Matrix a most wonderful addition to Greasespot Cafe.
So glad you post here.
As of July 24, 2004 this has been written public notification.
This is no joke, only public declaration of what I believe to be true.
Kit Sober
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.