Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Not to Alarm anyone..................


Cowgirl
 Share

Recommended Posts

Terror in the Skies, Again?

By Annie Jacobsen

A WWS Exclusive Article

Note from the E-ditors: You are about to read an account of what happened during a domestic flight that one of our writers, Annie Jacobsen, took from Detroit to Los Angeles. The WWS Editorial Team debated long and hard about how to handle this information and ultimately we decided it was something that should be shared. What does it have to do with finances? Nothing, and everything. Here is Annie's story.

On June 29, 2004, at 12:28 p.m., I flew on Northwest Airlines flight #327 from Detroit to Los Angeles with my husband and our young son. Also on our flight were 14 Middle Eastern men between the ages of approximately 20 and 50 years old. What I experienced during that flight has caused me to question whether the United States of America can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual, even non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.

On that Tuesday, our journey began uneventfully. Starting out that morning in Providence, Rhode Island, we went through security screening, flew to Detroit, and passed the time waiting for our connecting flight to Los Angeles by shopping at the airport stores and eating lunch at an airport diner. With no second security check required in Detroit we headed to our gate and waited for the pre-boarding announcement. Standing near us, also waiting to pre-board, was a group of six Middle Eastern men. They were carrying blue passports with Arabic writing. Two men wore tracksuits with Arabic writing across the back. Two carried musical instrument cases - thin, flat, 18 long. One wore a yellow T-shirt and held a McDonald's bag. And the sixth man had a bad leg -- he wore an orthopedic shoe and limped. When the pre-boarding announcement was made, we handed our tickets to the Northwest Airlines agent, and walked down the jetway with the group of men directly behind us.

My four-year-old son was determined to wheel his carry-on bag himself, so I turned to the men behind me and said, You go ahead, this could be awhile. No, you go ahead, one of the men replied. He smiled pleasantly and extended his arm for me to pass. He was young, maybe late 20's and had a goatee. I thanked him and we boarded the plan.

Once on the plane, we took our seats in coach (seats 17A, 17B and 17C). The man with the yellow shirt and the McDonald's bag sat across the aisle from us (in seat 17E). The pleasant man with the goatee sat a few rows back and across the aisle from us (in seat 21E). The rest of the men were seated throughout the plane, and several made their way to the back.

As we sat waiting for the plane to finish boarding, we noticed another large group of Middle Eastern men boarding. The first man wore a dark suit and sunglasses. He sat in first class in seat 1A, the seat second-closet to the cockpit door. The other seven men walked into the coach cabin. As aware Americans, my husband and I exchanged glances, and then continued to get comfortable. I noticed some of the other passengers paying attention to the situation as well. As boarding continued, we watched as, one by one, most of the Middle Eastern men made eye contact with each other. They continued to look at each other and nod, as if they were all in agreement about something. I could tell that my husband was beginning to feel anxious.

The take-off was uneventful. But once we were in the air and the seatbelt sign was turned off, the unusual activity began. The man in the yellow T-shirt got out of his seat and went to the lavatory at the front of coach -- taking his full McDonald's bag with him. When he came out of the lavatory he still had the McDonald's bag, but it was now almost empty. He walked down the aisle to the back of the plane, still holding the bag. When he passed two of the men sitting mid-cabin, he gave a thumbs-up sign. When he returned to his seat, he no longer had the McDonald's bag.

Then another man from the group stood up and took something from his carry-on in the overhead bin. It was about a foot long and was rolled in cloth. He headed toward the back of the cabin with the object. Five minutes later, several more of the Middle Eastern men began using the forward lavatory consecutively. In the back, several of the men stood up and used the back lavatory consecutively as well.

For the next hour, the men congregated in groups of two and three at the back of the plane for varying periods of time. Meanwhile, in the first class cabin, just a foot or so from the cockpit door, the man with the dark suit - still wearing sunglasses - was also standing. Not one of the flight crew members suggested that any of these men take their seats.

Watching all of this, my husband was now beyond anxious. I decided to try to reassure my husband (and maybe myself) by walking to the back bathroom. I knew the goateed-man I had exchanged friendly words with as we boarded the plane was seated only a few rows back, so I thought I would say hello to the man to get some reassurance that everything was fine. As I stood up and turned around, I glanced in his direction and we made eye contact. I threw out my friendliest remember-me-we-had-a-nice-exchange-just-a-short-time-ago smile. The man did not smile back. His face did not move. In fact, the cold, defiant look he gave me sent shivers down my spine.

When I returned to my seat I was unable to assure my husband that all was well. My husband immediately walked to the first class section to talk with the flight attendant. I might be overreacting, but I've been watching some really suspicious things... Before he could finish his statement, the flight attendant pulled him into the galley. In a quiet voice she explained that they were all concerned about what was going on. The captain was aware. The flight attendants were passing notes to each other. She said that there were people on board higher up than you and me watching the men. My husband returned to his seat and relayed this information to me. He was feeling slightly better. I was feeling much worse. We were now two hours into a four-in-a-half hour flight.

Approximately 10 minutes later, that same flight attendant came by with the drinks cart. She leaned over and quietly told my husband there were federal air marshals sitting all around us. She asked him not to tell anyone and explained that she could be in trouble for giving out that information. She then continued serving drinks.

About 20 minutes later the same flight attendant returned. Leaning over and whispering, she asked my husband to write a description of the yellow-shirted man sitting across from us. She explained it would look too suspicious if she wrote the information. She asked my husband to slip the note to her when he was done.

After seeing 14 Middle Eastern men board separately (six together, eight individually) and then act as a group, watching their unusual glances, observing their bizarre bathroom activities, watching them congregate in small groups, knowing that the flight attendants and the pilots were seriously concerned, and now knowing that federal air marshals were on board, I was officially terrified.. Before I'm labeled a racial profiler or -- worse yet -- a racist, let me add this. A month ago I traveled to India to research a magazine article I was writing. My husband and I flew on a jumbo jet carrying more than 300 Hindu and Muslim men and women on board. We traveled throughout the country and stayed in a Muslim village 10 miles outside Pakistan. I never once felt fearful. I never once felt unsafe. I never once had the feeling that anyone wanted to hurt me. This time was different.

Finally, the captain announced that the plane was cleared for landing. It had been four hours since we left Detroit. The fasten seat belt light came on and I could see downtown Los Angeles. The flight attendants made one final sweep of the cabin and strapped themselves in for landing. I began to relax. Home was in sight.

Suddenly, seven of the men stood up -- in unison -- and walked to the front and back lavatories. One by one, they went into the two lavatories, each spending about four minutes inside. Right in front of us, two men stood up against the emergency exit door, waiting for the lavatory to become available. The men spoke in Arabic among themselves and to the man in the yellow shirt sitting nearby. One of the men took his camera into the lavatory. Another took his cell phone. Again, no one approached the men. Not one of the flight attendants asked them to sit down. I watched as the man in the yellow shirt, still in his seat, reached inside his shirt and pulled out a small red book. He read a few pages, then put the book back inside his shirt. He pulled the book out again, read a page or two more, and put it back. He continued to do this several more times.

I looked around to see if any other passengers were watching. I immediately spotted a distraught couple seated two rows back. The woman was crying into the man's shoulder. He was holding her hand. I heard him say to her, You've got to calm down. Behind them sat the once pleasant-smiling, goatee-wearing man.

I grabbed my son, I held my husband's hand and, despite the fact that I am not a particularly religious person, I prayed. The last man came out of the bathroom, and as he passed the man in the yellow shirt he ran his forefinger across his neck and mouthed the word No.

The plane landed. My husband and I gathered our bags and quickly, very quickly, walked up the jetway. As we exited the jetway and entered the airport, we saw many, many men in dark suits. A few yards further out into the terminal, LAPD agents ran past us, heading for the gate. I have since learned that the representatives of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), the Federal Air Marshals (FAM), and the Transportation Security Association (TSA) met our plane as it landed. Several men -- who I presume were the federal air marshals on board -- hurried off the plane and directed the 14 men over to the side.

Knowing what we knew, and seeing what we'd seen, my husband and I decided to talk to the authorities. For several hours my husband and I were interrogated by the FBI. We gave sworn statement after sworn statement. We wrote down every detail of our account. The interrogators seemed especially interested in the McDonald's bag, so we repeated in detail what we knew about the McDonald's bag. A law enforcement official stood near us, holding 14 Syrian passports in his hand. We answered more questions. And finally we went home.

Home Sweet Home

The next day, I began searching online for news about the incident. There was nothing. I asked a friend who is a local news correspondent if there were any arrests at LAX that day. There weren't. I called Northwest Airlines' customer service. They said write a letter. I wrote a letter, then followed up with a call to their public relations department. They said they were aware of the situation (sorry that happened!) but legally they have 30 days to reply.

I shared my story with a few colleagues. One mentioned she'd been on a flight with a group of foreign men who were acting strangely -- they turned out to be diamond traders. Another had heard a story on National Public Radio (NPR) shortly after 9/11 about a group of Arab musicians who were having a hard time traveling on airplanes throughout the U.S. and couldn't get seats together. I took note of these two stories and continued my research. Here are excerpts from an article written by Jason Burke, Chief Reporter, and published in The Observer (a British newspaper based in London) on February 8, 2004:

Terrorist bid to build bombs in mid-flight: Intelligence reveals dry runs of new threat to blow up airliners

Islamic militants have conducted dry runs of a devastating new style of bombing on aircraft flying to Europe, intelligence sources believe.

The tactics, which aim to evade aviation security systems by placing only components of explosive devices on passenger jets, allowing militants to assemble them in the air, have been tried out on planes flying between the Middle East, North Africa and Western Europe, security sources say.

...The... Transportation Security Administration issued an urgent memo detailing new threats to aviation and warning that terrorists in teams of five might be planning suicide missions to hijack commercial airliners, possibly using common items...such as cameras, modified as weapons.

...Components of IEDs [improvised explosive devices]can be smuggled on to an aircraft, concealed in either clothing or personal carry-on items... and assembled on board. In many cases of suspicious passenger activity, incidents have taken place in the aircraft's forward lavatory.

So here's my question: Since the FBI issued a warning to the airline industry to be wary of groups of five men on a plane who might be trying to build bombs in the bathroom, shouldn't a group of 14 Middle Eastern men be screened before boarding a flight?

Apparently not. Due to our rules against discrimination, it can't be done. During the 9/11 hearings last April, 9/11 Commissioner John Lehman stated that ...it was the policy (before 9/11) and I believe remains the policy today to fine airlines if they have more than two young Arab males in secondary questioning because that's discriminatory.

So even if Northwest Airlines searched two of the men on board my Northwest flight, they couldn't search the other 12 because they would have already filled a government-imposed quota.

I continued my research by reading an article entitled Arab Hijackers Now Eligible For Pre-Boarding from Ann Coulter (www.anncoulter.com):

On September 21, as the remains of thousands of Americans lay smoldering at Ground Zero, [secretary of Transportation Norman] Mineta fired off a letter to all U.S. airlines forbidding them from implementing the one security measure that could have prevented 9/11: subjecting Middle Eastern passengers to an added degree of pre-flight scrutiny. He sternly reminded the airlines that it was illegal to discriminate against passengers based on their race, color, national or ethnic origin or religion.

Coulter also writes that a few months later, at Mr. Mineta's behest, the Department of Transportation (DOT) filed complaints against United Airlines and American Airlines (who, combined, had lost 8 pilots, 25 flight attendants and 213 passengers on 9/11 - not counting the 19 Arab hijackers). In November 2003, United Airlines settled their case with the DOT for $1.5 million. In March 2004, American Airlines settled their case with the DOT for $1.5 million. The DOT also charged Continental Airlines with discriminating against passengers who appeared to be Arab, Middle Eastern or Muslim. Continental Airlines settled their complaint with the DOT in April of 2004 for $.5 million.

From what I witnessed, Northwest Airlines doesn't have to worry about Norman Mineta filing a complaint against them for discriminatory, secondary screening of Arab men. No one checked the passports of the Syrian men. No one inspected the contents of the two instrument cases or the McDonald's bag. And no one checked the limping man's orthopedic shoe. In fact, according to the TSA regulations, passengers wearing an orthopedic shoe won't be asked to take it off. As their site states, Advise the screener if you're wearing orthopedic shoes...screeners should not be asking you to remove your orthopedic shoes at any time during the screening process. (Click here to read the TSA website policy on orthopedic shoes and other medical devices.)

I placed a call to the TSA and talked to Joe Dove, a Customer Service Supervisor. I told him how we'd eaten with metal utensils moments in an airport diner before boarding the flight and how no one checked our luggage or the instrument cases being carried by the Middle Eastern men. Dove's response was, Restaurants in secured areas -- that's an ongoing problem. We get that complaint often. TSA gets that complaint all the time and they haven't worked that out with the FAA. They're aware of it. You've got a good question. There may not be a reasonable answer at this time, I'm not going to BS you.

At the Detroit airport no one checked our IDs. No one checked the folds in my newspaper or the contents of my son's backpack. No one asked us what we'd done during our layover, if we bought anything, or if anyone gave us anything while we were in the airport. We were asked all of these questions (and many others ) three weeks earlier when we'd traveled in Europe -- where passengers with airport layovers are rigorously questioned and screened before boarding any and every flight. In Detroit no one checked who we were or what we carried on board a 757 jet liner bound for American's largest metropolis.

Two days after my experience on Northwest Airlines flight #327 came this notice from SBS TV, The World News, July 1, 2004:

The U.S. Transportation and Security Administration has issued a new directive which demands pilots make a pre-flight announcement banning passengers from congregating in aisles and outside the plane's toilets. The directive also orders flight attendants to check the toilets every two hours for suspicious packages.

Through a series of events, The Washington Post heard about my story. I talked briefly about my experience with a representative from the newspaper. Within a few hours I received a call from Dave Adams, the Federal Air Marshal Services (FAM) Head of Public Affairs. Adams told me what he knew:

There were 14 Syrians on NWA flight #327. They were questioned at length by FAM, the FBI and the TSA upon landing in Los Angeles. The 14 Syrians had been hired as musicians to play at a casino in the desert. Adams said they were scrubbed. None had arrest records (in America, I presume), none showed up on the FBI's no fly list or the FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists List. The men checked out and they were let go. According to Adams, the 14 men traveled on Northwest Airlines flight #327 using one-way tickets. Two days later they were scheduled to fly back on jetBlue from Long Beach, California to New York -- also using one-way tickets.

I asked Adams why, based on the FBI's credible information that terrorists may try to assemble bombs on planes, the air marshals or the flight attendants didn't do anything about the bizarre behavior and frequent trips to the lavatory. Our FAM agents have to have an event to arrest somebody. Our agents aren't going to deploy until there is an actual event, Adams explained. He said he could not speak for the policies of Northwest Airlines.

So the question is... Do I think these men were musicians? I'll let you decide. But I wonder, if 19 terrorists can learn to fly airplanes into buildings, couldn't 14 terrorists learn to play instruments?

Cowgirl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cowgirl, print out a copy of this article and take it with you to the airport. If you see something going on, show them the article... if they don't do anything... you know what? take about 25 copies with you, if you see something suspicious, ask about it, and then pass out copies of the article! they'll have to do something!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
Coulter also writes that a few months later, at Mr. Mineta's behest, the Department of Transportation (DOT) filed complaints against United Airlines and American Airlines (who, combined, had lost 8 pilots, 25 flight attendants and 213 passengers on 9/11 - not counting the 19 Arab hijackers). In November 2003, United Airlines settled their case with the DOT for $1.5 million. In March 2004, American Airlines settled their case with the DOT for $1.5 million. The DOT also charged Continental Airlines with discriminating against passengers who appeared to be Arab, Middle Eastern or Muslim. Continental Airlines settled their complaint with the DOT in April of 2004 for $.5 million.

Mr Mineta seems to think that it is better to risk having a plane blown up than to risk hurting the feelings of a few people.

Goes to show what sort of world this has become, hm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
posted by Searcher:

Mr Mineta seems to think that it is better to risk having a plane blown up than to risk hurting the feelings of a few people.

Goes to show what sort of world this has become, hm?


Same thing happened in our country (I think it was) in the last year or so, but the "risk" happened to concern a few fish, versus humans.

Wildfire was happening, out West, and out of control. Planes were in place to scoop water out of lakes in the area, and dump the water on the fire. Enter -- local envirionmentalists.

There was a fish (endangered) living in the lake that the water was to be "scooped" from, and because of that, the planes were grounded.

Because of this action, the fish lived, while (I think) 8 humans died.

I, for one, would never think twice about the "public good" over that of a few individuals, or even fish -- for that matter.

You pegged it right -- this world is going to hell-in-a-hand-basket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fly 100,000+ miles a year, in & out of the Middle East...The food isn't bad either!

I SHALL not allow these people to dictate what I do and don't do...Fear will not rule my life.

side note:I have many muslim friends over here(there) and many of them feel the same way.

Live your life, trust God, heck...we're His!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Securtiy gets to be a tricky business, eh? And it isn't just about hurting someone's feelings, it is also about who you hire and how well paid they are. Frequent "changing of the guard" would probably help as well.

Here's another true story.

The attorney I work for was in trial last week. This meant I too was in and out of the courthouse quite a few times.

The courthouse is supposed to be a secured building. You have to go through a metal detector and your purse and briefcase are scanned.

I don't even recall how many times I passed myself and my things through those scanners last week.

Well, it turns out, for most of those passes, I had a rather large pair of scissors in my brief case and no one caught it, though one guard almost did.

This past spring I had been making fliers for the boys' school and had put the scissors in my briefcase so I could cut the paper in half. I had forgotten about them.

The only reason I even found them this past Thursday was because after one of my trips through the scanner, while I was waiting for the elevator, I noticed the security guard was looking over the picture of the contents of my briefcase. He stopped and zoomed in on an image that looked like a knife. I knew it was my briefcase and I kind of wondered what it was I had in there that looked like that.

The security guard never did stop me or ask me to empty my briefcase. I got on the elevator and proceeded to the courtroom.

Later, when I went home, I emptied my briefcase to figure out what it was that had made that image on the scanner, and there the scissors were.

Kind of spooky to think I spent four days making numerous trips in and out of the courthouse with those scissors in my bag and no one stopped me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never been to NY, never seen the Twin Towers, and don't know anyone who died in the attack. I did make a trip to DC in Nov. 2001 and saw the Pentagon. That was enough to leave a lasting impression in my mind and heart for the rest of my life.

Part of the problem, I think, in dealing with terrorists, is that we want to deal with them on "American, civilized, everybody's got rights, politically correct" terms. They know that and they count on that. Terrorists (and I don't even like that term, it seems to give people of that mindset a sort of power and control and yes, even respect. Maybe we could call them annoying gnats) have absolutely no regard for human life, not their own, not anyone else's.

The people in that article were not paranoid, they were observant, and it seems rightfully so. Richard Reid, "the shoe-bomber" was stopped by observant passengers, who had to hold him down and physically stop him from trying to kill them. The annoying gnats are hell-bent on killing themselves and whoever else to further their cause. We have to continue to be observant, be sharp, speak up, and not be afraid. I won't give these people any place in my life but I also won't give them my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This story was just on the 5:00 o'clock news.

It turns out that all the men who were detained and questioned had expired visa from Syria.

They had expired visas......and they let them go!

Gimme a break!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by wwjesuslaughat:

Part of the problem, I think, in dealing with terrorists, is that we want to deal with them on "American, civilized, everybody's got rights, politically correct" terms. They know that and they count on that.


How else are we supposed to act? You have to understand that if you take away their (meaning the people you are afraid of, not actual terrorists) rights, you lose your own as well. Freedom is not political correctness, it is about human rights and what so many people have died to protect for our nation.

quote:
Originally posted by wwjesuslaughat:

The people in that article were not paranoid, they were observant, and it seems rightfully so.


Actually, the woman that wrote the article made the story up. The truth is that some Syrian musicians were travelling together to play at a hotel. They took turns getting up to pee, they talked to each other since they knew each other, and flew on an airplane. Nothing more, nothing less.

quote:
Originally posted by wwjesuslaughat:

Richard Reid, "the shoe-bomber" was stopped by observant passengers, who had to hold him down and physically stop him from trying to kill them.


Richard Reid is a British guy, not an Arab, and if he had shaved his face and cut his hair, he would have blended in perfectly and many people would have died as a result. I don't know if you've seen the videos of the 9/11 hijackers who were forced to go through extra security, but in those photos they look like respectable average guys, which was their camoflauge. It's not easy to spot a terrorist because they come from all sorts of nationalities, religions, etc. I wouldn't feel any better knowing that my loved ones were killed by a white Christian American veteran like Timothy McVeigh than I would by an arab Muslim Saudi terrorist like Mohammad Atta. What bothers me is that while we're all fearful of sikhs or whatever, al Qaeda will have convinced some blond haired blue eyed guy with khakis and a polo shirt to hijack a plane and crash it into something.

quote:
Originally posted by wwjesuslaughat:

The annoying gnats are hell-bent on killing themselves and whoever else to further their cause. We have to continue to be observant, be sharp, speak up, and not be afraid. I won't give these people any place in my life but I also won't give them my life.


We have to take away their motivation to attack us, and we have to take the personal responsibility to fight back if they come after us. There's nothing else we can do, and there's no reason to dwell on it. However, we can't let our desire to do something and our fear drive us to make stupid choices that go against what our country stands for. Without freedom, what is there left to protect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
the woman that wrote it is a manipulator who is simply trying to make herself famous. Roll Eyes

How did you find this out? I'd like to know some of your sources - this way - I'm not only reading words, I'm understanding the intent behind them. That would save me a whole lotta trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, here is another one on the same subject (sorry that it is from the Washington Times rather than the Post, but I don't think it is overly political):

quote:
Scouting jetliners for new attacks

By Audrey Hudson

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Published July 22, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Flight crews and air marshals say Middle Eastern men are staking out airports, probing security measures and conducting test runs aboard airplanes for a terrorist attack.

At least two midflight incidents have involved numerous men of Middle Eastern descent behaving in what one pilot called "stereotypical" behavior of an organized attempt to attack a plane.

"No doubt these are dry runs for a terrorist attack," an air marshal said.

Pilots and air marshals who asked to remain anonymous told The Washington Times that surveillance by terrorists is rampant, using different probing methods.

"It's happening, and it's a sad state of affairs," a pilot said.

A June 29 incident aboard Northwest Airlines Flight 327 from Detroit to Los Angeles is similar to a Feb. 15 incident on American Airlines Flight 1732 from San Juan, Puerto Rico, to New York's John F. Kennedy Airport.

The Northwest flight involved 14 Syrian men and the American Airlines flight involved six men of Middle Eastern descent.

"I've never been in a situation where I have felt that afraid," said Annie Jacobsen, a business and finance feature writer for the online magazine Women's Wall Street who was aboard the Northwest flight.

The men were seated throughout the plane pretending to be strangers. Once airborne, they began congregating in groups of two or three, stood nearly the entire flight, and consecutively filed in and out of bathrooms at different intervals, raising concern among passengers and flight attendants, Mrs. Jacobsen said.

One man took a McDonald's bag into the bathroom, then passed it off to another passenger upon returning to his seat. When the pilot announced the plane was cleared for landing and to fasten seat belts, seven men jumped up in unison and went to different bathrooms.

Her account was confirmed by David Adams, spokesman for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS), who said officers were on board and checked the bathrooms several times during the flight, but nothing was found.

"The FAMS never broke their cover, but monitored" the activity, Mr. Adams said. "Given the facts, they had no legal basis to take an enforcement action. But there was enough of a suspicious nature for the FAMS, passengers and crew to take notice."

A January FBI memo says suicide terrorists are plotting to hijack trans-Atlantic planes by smuggling "ready-to-build" bomb kits past airport security, and later assembling the explosives in aircraft bathrooms.

On many overseas flights, airlines have issued rules prohibiting loitering near the lavatory.

"After seeing 14 Middle Eastern men board separately (six together and eight individually) and then act as a group, watching their unusual glances, observing their bizarre bathroom activities, watching them congregate in small groups, knowing that the flight attendants and the pilots were seriously concerned and now knowing that federal air marshals were on board, I was officially terrified," Mrs. Jacobsen said.

"One by one, they went into the two lavatories, each spending about four minutes inside. Right in front of us, two men stood up against the emergency exit door, waiting for the lavatory to become available. The men spoke in Arabic among themselves ... one of the men took his camera into the lavatory. Another took his cell phone. Again, no one approached the men. Not one of the flight attendants asked them to sit down."

In an interview yesterday with The Washington Times, Mrs. Jacobsen said she was surprised to learn afterward that flight attendants are not trained to handle terrorist attacks or the situation that happened on her flight.

"I absolutely empathize with the flight attendants. They are acting with no clear protocol," she said.

Other passengers were distraught and one woman was even crying as the events unfolded.

The plane was met by officials from the FBI, Los Angeles Police Department, Federal Air Marshal Service and Transportation Security Administration. The Syrians, who were traveling on one-way tickets, were taken into custody.

The men, who were not on terrorist watch lists, were released, although their information and fingerprints were added to a database. The group had been hired as musicians to play at a casino, and the booking, hotel accommodations and return flight to New York from Long Beach, Calif., also checked out, Mr. Adams said.

"We don't know if it was a dry run, that's why we are working together with intelligence and investigative agencies to help protect the homeland," he said.

Mrs. Jacobsen, however, is skeptical the 14 passengers were innocent musicians.

"If 19 terrorists can learn to fly airplanes into buildings, couldn't 14 terrorists learn to play instruments?" she asked in the article.

The pilot confirmed Mrs. Jacobsen's experience was "terribly alike" what flight attendants reported on the San Juan flight.

He said there is "widespread knowledge" among crew members these probes are taking place.

A Middle Eastern passenger attempted to videotape out the window as the plane taxied on takeoff and, when told by a flight attendant it was not permitted, "gave her a mean look and stopped taping," said a written report of the San Juan incident by a flight attendant.

The group of six men sat near one another, pretended to be strangers, but after careful observation from flight attendants, it was apparent "all six knew each other," the report said.

"They were very careful when we were in their area to seem separate and pretended to be sleeping, but when we were out of the twilight area, they were watching and communicating," the report said.

The men made several trips to the bathroom and congregated in that area, and were told at least twice by a flight attendant to return to their seats. The suspicious behavior was relayed to airline officials in midflight and additional background checks were conducted.

A second pilot said that, on one of his recent flights, an air marshal forced his way into the lavatory at the front of his plane after a man of Middle Eastern descent locked himself in for a long period.

The marshal found the mirror had been removed and the man was attempting to break through the wall. The cockpit was on the other side.

The second pilot said terrorists are "absolutely" testing security.

"There is a great degree of concern in the airline industry that not only are these dry runs for a terrorist attack, but that there is absolutely no defense capabilities on a vast majority of airlines," the second pilot said.

Dawn Deeks, spokeswoman for the Association of Flight Attendants, said there is no "central clearinghouse" for them to learn of suspicious incidents, and flight crews are not told how issues are resolved.

She said a flight attendant reported that a passenger was using a telephoto lens to take sequential photos of the cockpit door.

The passenger was stopped, and the incident, which happened two months ago, was reported to officials. But when the attendant checked back last week on the outcome, she was told her report had been lost.

Recent incidents at the Minneapolis-St. Paul international airport have also alarmed flight crews. Earlier this month, a passenger from Syria was taken into custody while carrying anti-American materials and a note suggesting he intended to commit a public suicide.

A third pilot reported watching a man of Middle Eastern descent at the same airport using binoculars to get airplane tail numbers and writing the numbers in a notebook to correspond with flight numbers.

"It's a probe. They are probing us," said a second air marshal, who confirmed that Middle Eastern men try to flush out marshals by rushing the cockpit and stopping suddenly


http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040721-101403-1508r.htm

This is a major topic right now on our local (Washington DC) talk radio station. Had a pilot for a "major airline" on as a guest and he provided confirmation that these things are happening more and more in recent months. (FWIW)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by krysilis:

How did you find this out? I'd like to know some of your sources - this way - I'm not only reading words, I'm understanding the intent behind them. That would save me a whole lotta trouble.


A good place talking about it was an article on Salon.com (sorry, I haven't bookmarked the URL but I may be able to find it later.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snopes is your friend:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/skyterror.asp

Here's the Salon article P-Mosh mentioned, and it's good indeed:

http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2004/0.../askthepilot95/

Here's one from the National Review, not exactly a bastion of liberalism and/or terrorist coddling:

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/taylor200407211921.asp

I'm with P-Mosh on this one all the way. That woman is an idiot looking to gain an audience and these days more than ever fearmongering is the way to do it.

I learned to recognize fearmongering over twelve years of observation in a pathetic cult and my BS meter goes beyond the red zone when I see something like this. I hit Google and/or the "what's new" page on Snopes and suspicions are generally confirmed.

If you're one of the thousands who's been sending this by e-mail, please read the articles first (and there are more; Google is your other friend) and be sure that what you're sending is accurate. I have seen ONE (1) fear-spreading e-mail that has proven to be true in my years of receiving them and that one had inaccuracies and exaggerations.

Amusing observation: Whenever I point out that the latest rumor or the most recent recycled rumor is untrue, whoever's spreading the fearladen crud inevitably asks me for proof. However, the offended party rarely has anything to show to back up the original story. Unfortunately, this story was printed in a "credible" place and was repeated enough that it does almost carry a whiff of reliability. It's the hysterical, exaggerated tone of the thing in the first place that sets off the alarm bells. I truly hope the woman who wrote that and her editor are hunting for new jobs because that was... irresponsible is the nicest word I can think of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont' fly.

I KNOW that the Muslim Terroista are doing dry runs.

They have one ultimate goal. To kill all who do not worship the pagan allah god.

If I were a "flyer" and I saw more than 2,

yes TWO, middle eastern men, I would get off the plane and catch the next one.

But I don't fly.

I have way too much to accomplish now to allow some muslim bastard to kill me.

And yes they had expired visas and they were allowed to board the plane because we have to be NIIIIIICe to the muslim terrorists and their RELIIIIIGION of PEEEEEEEEEACE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...