Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Moneyhands


Belle
 Share

Recommended Posts

quote:
Was this thread about the Limb Coordinator from Florida that is a penis?

Shellon, yes it is and I suppose he knows who I am now. icon_biggrin.gif:D--> The WAYGB aren't the only ones who can keep records, e-mails and whatnot for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

To make this easier for the person who requested it I am re-posting the e-mails in order:

My Daddy has been in banking since he was in college. He’s been District President over banks in several states for many, many years. When the debt policy was being enforced with full strength and people were being told to sell their homes, put on probation and labeled Mark & Avoid for not doing so, I asked my dad how we could pay cash for a house since The Way International (TWI) leadership was requiring it but not providing the practical “how to” instruction.

Daddy responded back saying:

Not much way to do home purchases without debt... it seems... so sorry!

BUT: a couple of angles...

1. It is possible to find someone who would "self finance" the

purchase...meaning they would let you pay them and at the end of some

term it would belong to you. Of course, it is financing, but between

individuals, which means the terms could be more favorable. In the

Orlando area I would assume there are numbers of folks who would be

agreeable to such arrangements. It happens here-that I am aware- at

least half-dozen or dozen times a year. It could be wealthy people who

own property and prefer the monthly payment plus interest instead of

putting money into CDs or the stock market. Oftentimes they can get a

better return, too. Or, someone who inherited property and just don't

want to sell in the regular real estate market and pay commissions, etc.

They don't need the property

but don't want to "cash out" right now.

2. The "main most" reason for purchasing homes in the USA is that the

interest paid is tax deductible...where it is not for other personal

debt. That makes home purchasing more important in tax planning. The

question becomes, do you want to pay taxes to the government, or legally

avoid that and build your own net worth - because you are paying for

something you can own. Plus, when you have that mortgage tax deduction,

then it makes other deductions get to IRS's hurdles for counting on the

tax return...further legally aiding the individual household... i.e.

monetary gifts to The Way would be tax deductible gifts (or, to

Mississippi State University,

United Way, Red Cross, Boy Scouts, etc....)

The Main Issue is: do you want to pay money unnecessarily to the

government, or do something that benefits you personally and creates

wealth for you?

Here's a "for instance": Let's assume your rent is $850/month. What

that gets you is a place to live in someone else's property. Nothing

more. Now, what if you were paying a mortgage payment of $850/month?

...

What would $850/month "buy"? .... A reasonable interest rate right

now would be 7. 25% for a regular 30 year mortgage. So, $850/mo, for

30 years, at 7.25% ... would finance a purchase of $124,600. In other

words, a payment of $850/mo for 30 years would pay a loan of $124,600 to

zero.

Interest the first year would be slightly less than $9000. If you are

paying taxes in the 30% tax bracket that means you've just reduced

your "tax bill" by about $2700 (30% X $9000)... more bluntly... if you

are currently getting a tax refund, then take that amount and add $2700

to it. You can stand that, can't you? Can't do that if you rent.

Two raps on home mortgages.... both of which I think are bogus in this

day-and-time.

a.) over a 30 year period you will pay total interest on the $124,600

borrowed of $181,400. But, the interest has been tax

deductible over that time. If this bothers you a lot, invest the tax

savings over that time and see what IT is worth in the 30 years! But,

mainly, that argument is so much baloney... AT LEAST at the end of the

30 years you own something. .... by renting, you keep putting money in

the pocket of the person owning the house. ...and you own nothing.

b.) what if the property declines in value and I have to take a loss

when I sell?

That could happen, and has in the recent past in different parts of the

USA. But, I wouldn't count on that happening in the Orlando area

anytime soon...period! Look at little ole Starkville: We paid

$189,000 for our house in 1991. Today we owe about $109,000, and our

house would sell tomorrow for at least $310,000... and we've had the

tax deduction all along!

So, to me the case for home ownership is a no-brainer. There are

bunches of good mortgage programs out there - especially for "first

time" home owners... little or no downpayment, low closing costs, etc.

....

the average length of time a particular home mortgage is outstanding, by

the way, is 7 or 8 years. So, people don't get a loan and live in the

same house forever... they move. Surprise!! So, if the values are

going up, it gives you an opportunity to "tap into" that gain at some

interval...you know, your Mom and I have owned 3 houses in little ole

Starkville!!

Well, hope this is of some value... let me know if you have other

questions... Love, Dad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*****************************************

Bob Moneyhands was, at the time, the Branch, Limb and Region Coordinator of Florida and Alabama (he may have still had oversight of Georgia too at the time but I can’t remember)

I sent my father’s e-mail to Bob and this is his reply:

Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:53 AM

Subject: Re: Home Stuff - too

I am thankful for your dad's wisdom and insight. What he expresses is

what our biblical men are working on.... We want to firmly establish a

biblical foundation for our position that mortgages are debt, or we want

to be able to definitively say, as your dad can from an economic theory,

that a mortgage is not debt.

By the way, we have knowledge of a couple in AL that has been saving as

much as they possibly can over the last several years with the intent of

buying a house. They have been keeping track of foreclosures and finally

found a home that they like and could afford for CASH! It was a home

worth in the neighborhood of $75-100,000 and they purchased it for

$30,000. They have a minimum of immediate "fix up" to do. They are

thrilled that they fought to buy a home they could "afford" with cash.

Now they are in a position of strength and they, of course, don't

understand why anyone would pay the "going cost" for a home over a

30-year period (the pretty standard length of current mortgages).

I respect the knowledge your dad evidences in his communication. I

understand it (I was a business major for two years). I understand

assets and liabilities, and income and expenses. But the reason I

switched to math rather than continuing in business was that I could not

understand economics. It is based on the theory of supply and demand,

which fluctuate with trends, etc. Mathematics is based on an unchanging

standard.

When the Word of God became evident to me, it too, was unchanging.

(There are some biblical things that I am still working to understand,

but I am patient, because I know that God knows the answers and if I stay

faithful, He will fill me.)

I am passing on your dad's communication to The Way of the U.S.A. so

those working the Word on the subject have this input to consider. I

believe it is consistent with what we have received in the past, but it

is put in simple, clear, and definite terms. It is the best I have seen

so far. I appreciate his honesty to qualify his limited biblical

knowledge, yet to proclaim his authority from his background and career.

I appreciate his clarifying that beyond the tithe, it is up to the

disciplined ones to determine what to do with their income. (I would add

that we do with our income what is STILL consistent with the Word and

will of God, rather than just any old thing! Wisdom versus frivolity is

best whether coming from a biblical or secular position, and your dad

makes that very clear.)

That's all I have for now. What are you all thinking regarding your

dad's input? Thank you for sharing it with me. I thank God for your

dad. He has been a friend of ours and a friend to our ministry. His

willingness to work with you rather than to be critical is so

refreshingly positive.

Love, Bob

P. S. It is my impression you are endeavoring to be the best possible

stewards over that which you have responsibility and that you want to act

with God's blessing on your life. (So do I!) I think it is great you

are getting the best education you can. Take advantage of all of the

resources you have! Then your decisions are based on solid, clear

standards with which you believe you can live...and serve others, too.

***************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My notes and comments posted on the board based on some research I’ve been doing on manipulation:

Rationalization – “we’re doing the same thing your dad is doing, but we’re going to stick to the Bible, not plain common sense”

Playing the Servant Role –this tactic cloaks their self-serving agendas in the guise of service to a more noble cause. By pretending to be working hard on someone else's behalf, they conceal their own ambition, desire for power, and quest for a position of dominance over others. The only master he serves is his own ambition..

Diversion – “change from the definition of debt to someone who has done what TWI wants people to do”

Shaming - an effective way to foster a continued sense of personal inadequacy in the weaker party, thereby allowing an aggressor to maintain a position of dominance. “They are in a position of strength” and subtly implying that someone who doesn’t pay cash is not in a position of strength. Rhetorical comments and subtle sarcasm. Imagine how much more effective this tactic would be in person.

Seduction- charming, praising, flattering or overtly supporting others in order to get them to lower their defenses and surrender their trust and loyalty.

There’s something else here, I just can’t put my finger on it. And I mean besides the fact that he just admitted that he doesn’t understand economics, so how the he11 can he say something is wrong or not if he doesn’t understand it?

Seduction- Again.

And, not being all that familiar with my dad, he possibly didn’t realize my dad was being semi-sarcastic when he stated that he may not be an “authority” on the Bible, but that he could definitely see where he didn’t think God would consider a mortgage evil and then why from his “authoritative” position of “worldly” knowledge.

My Daddy also commented that he was surprised that TWI was even trying to tell people what to do with their money.

See anything I missed? This was very perturbing at the time, but I couldn’t put my finger on why I was so p1ssed nor how to respond.

**************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My father’s Response after I forwarded the above e-mail from Bob Moneyhands to him with a bit of venting:

Hi!! Well, I've seen debt get folks in big trouble... so, generally

being very careful with it is a good idea! Home ownership is a little

different, in that you have the double whammy of tax deduction and

building wealth. I vote for that!!

... not for me to be "Biblical" in the mortgage debt issue! But, the

entire banking industry from the beginnings of commerce in the world is

predicated on those having wealth (deposits) keeping that wealth in one

spot (a bank) for safe keeping and earnings (interest earned), and the

bank knowing those with deposits do not want all their wealth at one

time can then "loan" the other's wealth to those needing "wealth" ...

hence, loans.

We "buy" funds from folks, and "sell" to others... a form of commerce,

just like going to the grocery store. Sorry, I don't buy into the

notion that debt, in and of itself, is bad. Mismanagement of debt is

bad. If all felt that debt is bad, there would be no banking industry!

We "loan" money lots of different ways... besides "people to people"

...anytime someone, or something, needs funds TODAY for something, but

can only pay for it with TOMORROW's money - it's a debt. For instance,

the US Government sells US Treasury Securities to do it's important

day-to-day work... like building highways, buying military equipment,

building government office buildings, etc. That sort of borrowing is in

the papers often - it's called the National Debt !! (ever hear Gore or

Bush talk about that?) .... The State of Florida, or the City of Winter Springs

create debt to do things government should do for its constituencies -

again, to build highways, to build schools ...hey, to buy police cars.

The source of repayment is taxes... what we all pay. Sometime those

kinds of debt are called Bonds... or, Indenture Agreements... not

always called flat-out loans... but, that is really what they are.

Here's a better question... ask someone if The Way has ever borrowed

any money for that Ohio facility... by the pictures that is a very nice

place! My guess... if not now, at some time in the past the organization

has borrowed money for that facility.

The very question to me, again, is Managing Debt... not that debt

itself is bad. Beyond your tithe your funds are yours to manage... some

do that better than others. (after all, if it were not for "money", how

would we manage our lives? ... by bartering... not very efficient...).

Remember,if you purchase something that will last for, and have value

after 30 years, then it is appropriate to pay for it over that same 30

years. The premise of home mortgages...

Trying to get an owner to do the "self financing" is not a bad

deal...sort of a "rent to own" theory. Seems that should pass muster.

If the amount of monthly payment is roughly the same as true rent, and

the "rent to own" idea positively affects the parishioner - then that

seems to be a good thing.

Anyway, throw more questions my way.... Love, Dad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*****************************************

Bob Moneyhands’s response to reading the above e-mail:

-----Original Message-----

Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:53 AM

Subject: Re: Home Stuff - too

To answer your dad's question, The Way DID mortgage its Headquarters in

1974/5 for about 18 months in order to purchase The Way College of

Emporia. It was most distasteful to Dr. Wierwille and the original

Trustees, but they felt they needed the additional campus, saw that they

would be able to pay off debt for the campus within a limited number of

months, and then they aggressively worked to eliminate that debt. When

the debt was paid off, Dr. Wierwille announced it to those of us on Staff

at the time. Then he cut up the mortgage paper into small pieces and

distributed one piece to each in-residence Way Corps person. He said

that he wanted that to remind them to never mortgage our Headquarters

again.

Our ministry acknowledges that borrowing takes place and it is talked

about in the old testament. We further acknowledge that the commerce

practices and trade practices of antiquity up until today are time-tested

and universally accepted.

What we have taught is that the follower of the Lord Jesus Christ needs

to be in a position of strength. Debt, (and your dad's point about

MISMANAGEMENT OF DEBT being the main concern is well taken), is something

that is universally accepted by most U.S. citizens. These people do not

have the background and understanding that the district president of a

bank has. That's why you have to ask questions.

(You grew up in the home of a man with extensive knowledge and experience

in the field, but what were you taught then about debt and mortgages?

The quality of your life indicates that you were instructed on many

things. Your dad is a great man and a wonderful father and father-in-law

and friend. However, you are asking questions because (a) he did not

teach you that information or (b) he taught you and you ignored him!)

You are asking questions now and your loving dad is teaching you what he

knows now! And that is good. You realize his abilities and he realizes

your desire to make educated, informed decisions.

The Bible clearly says that the borrower is slave to the lender and that

is something that every believer must deal with when/if he enters into a

debt. Regardless of what decision you make regarding a mortgage, it is

clear that you are going to be an informed, confident consumer and that

you will be able to count the entire cost, both spiritually and

financially.

Honestly, I have been thinking about this topic for over a year. I have

heard equally convincing arguments from both sides--the financial advice

being "enter into mortgage, it's smart," to the biblical advice being

"debt in all forms is wrong."

Though having a home with a mortgage seems to be preferable to some of

our disciples, many desire MORE to be in the center of the will of God

and are willing to await the conclusive results of the study before

entering into a mortgage. There are others who did not enter into a

mortgage because Craig "said" mortgages were wrong. They feel they

cannot wait any longer, and they must buy now. Freedom of will is not

the issue; that's a given. The best choice is the issue for me. I want

to know what the Word says.

I am thankful Rev. Rivenbark has assigned this project to biblically and

financially knowledgeable men and women to examine and settle so that we

can make the best decisions possible. I am thankful for those who

patiently work the information on their own and anticipate the decision

from Headquarters.

Isn't it great to have the best in both "worlds"? Your dad's insight and

your Father's! Love, Bob

*********************************

quote:

(You grew up in the home of a man with extensive knowledge and experience

in the field, but what were you taught then about debt and mortgages?

The quality of your life indicates that you were instructed on many

things. Your dad is a great man and a wonderful father and father-in-law

and friend. However, you are asking questions because (a) he did not

teach you that information or (b) he taught you and you ignored him!)

Actually, Bob, I was asking questions because everything coming out of the mouth of TWIts contradicted what my Daddy taught me. Smile (insert an imitation of one of your sarcastic smirks here) I also, did NOT ignore my Daddy and he’ll tell you so. That’s the reason I didn’t have money problems before getting involved with your little cult. I had financed a car and WISH I had financed a house prior to becoming involved. My Daddy taught that those are considered good management of my money providing I can easily make my payments each month and I am not living beyond my means. TWI doesn’t teach that, they keep people in bondage, but you do a very good job of using the tactics mentioned in the “Manipulative People” thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, a lot of great things said here, so I thought as a licensed financial advisor and one licensed to supervise financial advisors, I might throw in my two cents.

Math doesn't lie. Look at your situation and see where you come out ahead in the end. Mortgage or rent? Both of them are a mortgage. One is yours and one is someone elses. For twi to say a mortgage is wrong is ludricrous. The ABS of "in debt" believers has been and is still paying tons of landlords' mortgages as we speak and especially during the years we were all encouraged to sell our houses and rent.

My mortgage that I was granted in 1994 was touted in the corps teachings by lcm as a manifestation of believing if not a miracle. S*m and Chery** Wa**on used it for the entire year as a teaching example of how my beleiving had brought the impossible to pass. It was not considered debt at that time because I could sell it and pay it off. How quickly things changed!

By the way the very first thing I found fascinating in my debt research was that the word borrower and the word lender in the much quoted "the borrower is servant to the lender" verse are the exact same word! How could that be was a question I pondered at length until I realized that it was not a judgement verse but a statement of fact. With money comes power. Not that rich are good and poor are bad. To borrow there must be one that lends. You can't have the transaction without both. In our terminology the borrower is servant to the lender but in reality the lender is also serving the borrower by lending him money. No judgement - just statment of fact.

Money brings power. And lending it to someone is a service. Paying it back is also a service.

Isn't life fun when you get to think??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Life IS so much fun when you can think and especially when you can do it without TWIt blinders on. I'm sure my dad was shaking his head and thinking, "I can't believe we're having this conversation" the whole time he was helping me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the good info. I always had this argument with our BC's. Show me the logic of having a $400 mortgage vs getting stuck with a $700 rent for something even close to comparable. I guess they figured all that money not going to interest would go to their pockets fot these BoD advances in the Bahamas. icon_frown.gif:(-->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a point I have said before. When you sell your house for twice as much as what you bought it for and twi wants what you make off of the GROSS selling of your home. They make a ton more in ABS.

Stupid Is As Stupid Does. Just the opposite of Forest Gump.

Hell twi has not even tapped into the richness of their innies if they thought about it.

Here we go helping twi again. This is not even closing down a web site that has the word "Way" in it.

Put together $100 to make a class (Economy 101). Get your facts straight. Teach it to the 3 or 4 you have left. Charge $300.00 for the class and then micro manage the hell out of them and you will see great profit. Fuc-'n dumb butts.

Edited by justloafing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belle,

I thank you from the bottom of my heart for posting those emails.

Right now I am trying to help my husband undo twi 'logic' so that we can move ahead with financial stability...and now that I've seen these emails from your father, we can also move ahead with financial gain.

These emails are priceless for a juxtapositional presentation of twi 'logic' vs sound, professional financial advice.

THANK YOU!!!!!

PS--Last evening was our church's First Friday Fellowship evening. It was all about how God provides when there is no other option. During one of the prayer times financial hardships and decisions were the subject. This kind of knowledge and wisdom was exactly my prayer request. icon_smile.gif:)-->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Obviously the debt issue is still a big issue with those who are still involved with TWI. They haven't changed their stance one iota and they continue to dodge questions or provide vague generalities with no concrete "how to" teachings on this issue. So much for the "We're a 'how to' ministry" - it's a "do as we say without asking any questions ministry".

This is still the number one question I get asked about in private messages - and, WAYGB, I get asked about it quite frequently. Lately, though, there have been a lot of PMs to me on it, and that's why I'm bringing these to the top instead of merely providing the links in the PM like I have been doing. :wink2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple whom I have known all my life, and whom I love very much were once involved in TWI. When they were nearing retirement age, they decided to buy a house in Florida. They worked very hard for five years, picking up overtime when they could, and in five years time, were able to pay off a morgage for a small house in Florida.

They moved to Florida, debt free before the policy was even thought of.

When they came, they found a fellowship, and became active in it. They spoke the word to everyone they met, went to meetings, abundantly shared of their money and time, and did all with thanksgiving. Basically, they did everything and more than they were asked to do.

Well, when the debt free policy came about, the twig coordinators of this couple called them, and asked them how much they owed on the house, and on their cars, and other things. And the couple replied, "None of your business."

Shortly afterwards, Rev. Moneyhands sent them a letter, telling them they were no longer welcome at TWI, and they would be happier at church. Now, tell me where in the Word does it say that twig coordinators need to know your financial business, and where does it say that ordained clergy should insult people who have given everything with gladness? I guess in TWI's twisted world.

This debt free policy isn't all about how much money you owe, but about how much control TWI can have over you. Belle, I hope the people who PM you get out quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds like the way Moneyhands treated many people around here. It was cruel, cold and callous. He should be ashamed at the people he hurt and should apologize to them for it as other leaders have done. It is my belief that he is too prideful to do that ever. Not man enough as I see it and also afraid. I'm glad I'm not like that.

John Richeson

Tampa, FL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and I don't know about you guys, but 30,000 around here will buy just about nothing, short of an old meth lab...garage or hmm, a good lawnshed maybe. Even 70,000 will put you in gang territory, if that. Maybe that couple did find soemthing in Alabama, but I also think they have know idea what the vocabulary word "appreciation" means besides donating bodies to derVig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30,000 is not even much of a down payment around here.

I left before BM (lol) took over down there and I believe the G****s' took my parent's place. From what I have heard from folks down there and read on here it seems they undid a lot of the good my folks had done. It seems like that was the way of the 90's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and to get back on topic.

"The borrower is slave to the lender"

Seems odd that no one I have heard of in twi has ever said anything about the word "landLORD"

Rent is debt.

Homeownership is the only way out of that one.

Or homelessness. :spy:

We have some great ones around here. I saw a guy holding a sign up the other day that said, "Won't work for sh!+." His buddy next to him had one that said, "Broke, tired, and ugly. Anything will help." :spy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belle, Glad to see this topic high on the list.

Still think there should be a document (Belle has something useful) set in the Editorial section so it's RIGHT IN THE FACE of newbies and innies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only have one thing to say about the Way's "no-debt" policy

(well, I actually have several things to say about it [and I have]. but the one word that seems to predominate in my mind is - )

stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid

:asdf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...