One person in this conversation is actually a naturalist by definition. The one bloviating about what naturalists would know, while saying something no naturalist would say, is not that person.
Well in the context of this conversation that is not the meaning.
A naturalist in philosophy is someone who believes the natural world is all that is. It is incompatible with spirit or the supernatural.
All these words have histories and overlapping definitions. Best bet is to allow people to label themselves and articulate what they mean by these labels.
A naturalist in philosophy is someone who believes the natural world is all that is. It is incompatible with spirit or the supernatural.
All these words have histories and overlapping definitions. Best bet is to allow people to label themselves and articulate what they mean by these labels.
yeah, the definition of a cult for sure, nothing to do with nature naturism or humanism
you can label it anything you want, but I will use the terms as they were correctly intended
Plus, to/for. ThIs was written TO the angel of the ekklesia in Laodicea. It was not written TO you.
The fact that Jesus would say to any believer, at any time or any place, that he would spit them out of his mouth for being lukewarm is sick stuff.
Besides, there are plenty of other verses in the gospels where Jesus lays out what it takes to be a follower of his and being lukewarm is nowhere in the mix.
The fact that Jesus would say to any believer, at any time or any place, that he would spit them out of his mouth for being lukewarm is sick stuff.
Besides, there are plenty of other verses in the gospels where Jesus lays out what it takes to be a follower of his and being lukewarm is nowhere in the mix.
This carries with it a couple of interesting thoughts at least:
(1) The Douay Rheims version says "vomit". This to me conveys the idea that Jesus' reaction to an unconcerned or disinterested churchgoer is one of nausea and disgust.
(2) Preterists believe all this already happened, sometime around 70 A.D. and/or shortly thereafter, and the whole bible already has been fulfilled (full preterism); Jesus REALLY meant "I come quickly" he didn't mean 2000+ years later; and talk of "end times" today is BS. "Gathering together" is BS. Preterists also believe the 'millenial kingdom' already happened, but don't ask me how. (Catholics, who have been described as "partial preterists" also think the "rapture" is BS.)
This carries with it a couple of interesting thoughts at least:
(1) The Douay Rheims version says "vomit". This to me conveys the idea that Jesus' reaction to an unconcerned or disinterested churchgoer is one of nausea and disgust.
(2) Preterists believe all this already happened, sometime around 70 A.D. and/or shortly thereafter, and the whole bible already has been fulfilled (full preterism); Jesus REALLY meant "I come quickly" he didn't mean 2000+ years later; and talk of "end times" today is BS. "Gathering together" is BS. Preterists also believe the 'millenial kingdom' already happened, but don't ask me how. (Catholics, who have been described as "partial preterists" also think the "rapture" is BS.)
The fact that Jesus would say to any believer, at any time or any place, that he would spit them out of his mouth for being lukewarm is sick stuff.
Besides, there are plenty of other verses in the gospels where Jesus lays out what it takes to be a follower of his and being lukewarm is nowhere in the mix.
Oh, those words are attributed to Jesus? (I admit to not reading The Apocalypse of John of Patmos carefully enough.) Who says the Nazarene said? John of Patmos? Let me guess, he had a vision. Riiiiight…
Build-A-Bear Workshop is a fun-filled store where you will make a new best friend. Choose from more than 25 different animals priced from $12 to $27. Stuff your furry friend, make a wish and give it a heart. Dress it in over 250 outfits and accessories. Name it and make a personalized birth certificate or storybook.
What is the difference between an atheist (who believes neither in a god or in the bible) and a non-fundamentalist (who "builds" a god through a subjective selection of which scriptures they interpret favorably)?
IOW, what is the difference between a non-existent god and a made-up god?
This has always been my favorite deconversion story.
This is Julia Sweeney, who played the Androgynous "Pat" on Saturday Night Live.
The video is a great example of the deconstruction that leads to deconversion. And although the emotions she displays are part of her comedic monologue, they are nonetheless a real part of the process of letting go of God.
Build-A-Bear Workshop is a fun-filled store where you will make a new best friend. Choose from more than 25 different animals priced from $12 to $27. Stuff your furry friend, make a wish and give it a heart. Dress it in over 250 outfits and accessories. Name it and make a personalized birth certificate or storybook.
This reminds me of one of my favorite exchanges between Hitch and a zealot…
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
77
47
92
214
Popular Days
May 18
36
May 13
28
Nov 13
24
May 16
24
Top Posters In This Topic
Raf 77 posts
Rocky 47 posts
Nathan_Jr 92 posts
Charity 214 posts
Popular Days
May 18 2024
36 posts
May 13 2024
28 posts
Nov 13 2024
24 posts
May 16 2024
24 posts
Popular Posts
waysider
Yeah, see. That kinda leaves us between a rock and a hard place. We were either following the teachings of a man with devil spirits or he was wrong about what he taught. That means he could have been
Raf
I consider myself humanist as well. Since there is no hierarchy in humanism, no one really gets to define it. This website gathers various definitions that permit us to ascertain some kind of co
Nathan_Jr
I don't know if they accept the science or not, but I suspect it doesn't matter to them either way because of the new earth. If anything, I could see them pointing to climate change as evidence of the
Posted Images
cman
a naturalist would know that which dies will be born again
does the humanist see the same? doubt it
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Says who? Pleasing unto which lord?
Plus, to/for. ThIs was written TO the angel of the ekklesia in Laodicea. It was not written TO you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Um.
No.
Not without a clear definition of what you mean by born again.
No naturalist would say this meaningless drivel
Edited by RafLink to comment
Share on other sites
cman
or a clear definition of what it is to die?
not meaningless at all, but it is the subject....or object
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
One person in this conversation is actually a naturalist by definition. The one bloviating about what naturalists would know, while saying something no naturalist would say, is not that person.
Edited by RafLink to comment
Share on other sites
cman
the terms of naturalist and naturism has its beginnings in art and paintings of nature
of course, today the terms have been perverted
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Well in the context of this conversation that is not the meaning.
A naturalist in philosophy is someone who believes the natural world is all that is. It is incompatible with spirit or the supernatural.
All these words have histories and overlapping definitions. Best bet is to allow people to label themselves and articulate what they mean by these labels.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
yeah, the definition of a cult for sure, nothing to do with nature naturism or humanism
you can label it anything you want, but I will use the terms as they were correctly intended
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
The fact that Jesus would say to any believer, at any time or any place, that he would spit them out of his mouth for being lukewarm is sick stuff.
Besides, there are plenty of other verses in the gospels where Jesus lays out what it takes to be a follower of his and being lukewarm is nowhere in the mix.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldiesman
This carries with it a couple of interesting thoughts at least:
(1) The Douay Rheims version says "vomit". This to me conveys the idea that Jesus' reaction to an unconcerned or disinterested churchgoer is one of nausea and disgust.
(2) Preterists believe all this already happened, sometime around 70 A.D. and/or shortly thereafter, and the whole bible already has been fulfilled (full preterism); Jesus REALLY meant "I come quickly" he didn't mean 2000+ years later; and talk of "end times" today is BS. "Gathering together" is BS. Preterists also believe the 'millenial kingdom' already happened, but don't ask me how. (Catholics, who have been described as "partial preterists" also think the "rapture" is BS.)
Preterism - Wikipedia
added for reference purposes
Edited by oldiesmanLink to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Then you will be intentionally derailing the conversation and it will be handled accordingly.
Edited by RafLink to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Thank you for the education.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Oh, those words are attributed to Jesus? (I admit to not reading The Apocalypse of John of Patmos carefully enough.) Who says the Nazarene said? John of Patmos? Let me guess, he had a vision. Riiiiight…
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
Build-A-Bear Workshop is a fun-filled store where you will make a new best friend. Choose from more than 25 different animals priced from $12 to $27. Stuff your furry friend, make a wish and give it a heart. Dress it in over 250 outfits and accessories. Name it and make a personalized birth certificate or storybook.
What is the difference between an atheist (who believes neither in a god or in the bible) and a non-fundamentalist (who "builds" a god through a subjective selection of which scriptures they interpret favorably)?
IOW, what is the difference between a non-existent god and a made-up god?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Is that like asking: What’s the difference between a duck?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
The video is a great example of the deconstruction that leads to deconversion. And although the emotions she displays are part of her comedic monologue, they are nonetheless a real part of the process of letting go of God.
Ex: @ 51:30 - 53:40
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Five. Do you walk to school or carry your lunch?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
This reminds me of one of my favorite exchanges between Hitch and a zealot…
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
Thank you for the clip
. I found the whole debate and will watch it later.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
Not sure what the five means but the answer seems to be you do both at the same time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Don’t overthink this.
Edited by Nathan_JrJust let it sit there like a duck.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
The question is: What is the difference between a duck?
Most people say, between a duck and what? Those people don’t understand the question.
Waysider understands perfectly. He answered with a mathematical accuracy and a scientific precision not know since…
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.