YW and thanks. So here's a question you may have already answered, but perhaps you may want to expound more for the readers understanding. The below link has been described as a "miracle". But what is the non-spiritual explanation? I will admit, I do believe it was a miracle and can't honestly see it any other way at this point. Thx.
You are not alone in believing the accounts of what was said to have happened in 1917. There are many travel agencies that book pilgrimages to Fatima. The info below is from the 206 Tours' website.
Did You Know These Interesting Facts About Fatima?
Over 4 million people make a Pilgrimage here each year.
Over 1 million people attended the 100th Anniversary of the Apparitions on May 13, 2017
Some pilgrims crawl 600 feet (182 meters) from the Basilica of the Most Holy Trinity to the Chapel of Apparitions on their knees as an act of penance. Then they circle around the Chapel on their knees too, while praying the rosary.
My question is if there has ever been a miraculous event like this one that could not be explained in some other way by experts in different fields such as those cited in the Miracle of the Sun website? The weeping statues were disproved, and the shroud of Turin was proven not to be the authentic burial shroud of Jesus.
Is it even possible for supernatural beings to prove themselves in the natural realm of science, physics, etc.?
Not only so, but recognition thereof was an important development in my (still extremely limited) understanding of spirituality in general.
IOW, recognizing experiences we, while in twi, exclusively labeled as miracles due to God honoring our faithfulness, were NOT in fact limited to a certain parochial group of fundamentalist Wierwillites was a BFD for me.
God makes the rain to fall on the believers and unbelievers... or some such similar expression.
If the experiences are being exclusively labeled as miracles (either inside or outside of twi), do you mean they are, are not, or possibly can be actual miracles? I'm not sure of the point you are making by your last sentence.
If the experiences are being exclusively labeled as miracles (either inside or outside of twi), do you mean they are, are not, or possibly can be actual miracles? I'm not sure of the point you are making by your last sentence.
No. I mean that unexplained, unexplainable phenomena that we considered miracles and thought was exclusive to twi (the "household") takes place whether the person is a believer or not.
22 hours ago, Rocky said:
God makes the rain to fall on the believers and unbelievers... or some such similar expression.
It's thought of and described in secular circles as synchronicity.
Here's another thing that we, in TWI, thought was US as individuals tapping into the power of a specific God.
Meditation alone in nature. 42 or 43 years ago, I spent a year as a Wow in Fremont, Ohio. In the Spring of 1982, I started spending some time in a small woods environment along Muskellunge Creek Road, immediately south of State Street. It was my happy place. I felt like I was communing with God.
What was really happening is better described as achieving a FLOW state.
The irony, looking back on it, is in that it was and is something that is not at all unique to TWI or any other flavor or sect of Christianity.
It took me a VERY LONNNNNGGG time to recognize and realize this aspect of FLOW. When I did, it was freeing in a very real way. I could accomplish things without reference to anything Wierwille.
As far as a biblical key, I found it in Proverbs 2: 1-5.
It took many long hours (over the course of years) it took me to overcome the chains Victor Wierwille planted in my brain in his PFLAP classes (read ONLY this and not that),
Why? Could it have been because I had been indoctrinated ("trained") to be afraid of world wisdom?
Here's another thing that we, in TWI, thought was US as individuals tapping into the power of a specific God.
Meditation alone in nature. 42 or 43 years ago, I spent a year as a Wow in Fremont, Ohio. In the Spring of 1982, I started spending some time in a small woods environment along Muskellunge Creek Road, immediately south of State Street. It was my happy place. I felt like I was communing with God.
What was really happening is better described as achieving a FLOW state.
The irony, looking back on it, is in that it was and is something that is not at all unique to TWI or any other flavor or sect of Christianity.
It took me a VERY LONNNNNGGG time to recognize and realize this aspect of FLOW. When I did, it was freeing in a very real way. I could accomplish things without reference to anything Wierwille.
As far as a biblical key, I found it in Proverbs 2: 1-5.
It took many long hours (over the course of years) it took me to overcome the chains Victor Wierwille planted in my brain in his PFLAP classes (read ONLY this and not that),
Why? Could it have been because I had been indoctrinated ("trained") to be afraid of world wisdom?
I like the video - I keep saying I want to begin doing laps again and the video is a good incentive.
I can understand someone communing with God while being in the woods. I used to do that myself.
When it comes to Prov 2:1-5 though, I don't see world wisdom here.
1 My son, if thou wilt receive my words, and hide my commandments with thee;
1 My son, if thou wilt receive my words, and hide my commandments with thee;
Well... proverbs was written by a specific person or people to specific persons or people.
That doesn't mean any OTHER people would be unable to cultivate long term curiosity. I get it. it took me years to get beyond the chains Wierwille installed in my brain.
Think about what scientists, mathematicians, or philosophers having curiosity to figure out things they are interested in. Wierwille and Martindale were adamant that any new insight about ANYTHING was ONLY revelation from God. I (NOW) say that's malarkey.
You are not alone in believing the accounts of what was said to have happened in 1917. There are many travel agencies that book pilgrimages to Fatima. The info below is from the 206 Tours' website.
Did You Know These Interesting Facts About Fatima?
Over 4 million people make a Pilgrimage here each year.
Over 1 million people attended the 100th Anniversary of the Apparitions on May 13, 2017
Some pilgrims crawl 600 feet (182 meters) from the Basilica of the Most Holy Trinity to the Chapel of Apparitions on their knees as an act of penance. Then they circle around the Chapel on their knees too, while praying the rosary.
My question is if there has ever been a miraculous event like this one that could not be explained in some other way by experts in different fields such as those cited in the Miracle of the Sun website? The weeping statues were disproved, and the shroud of Turin was proven not to be the authentic burial shroud of Jesus.
Is it even possible for supernatural beings to prove themselves in the natural realm of science, physics, etc.?
Honestly don't know... but I believe faith is still a requirement to accept it as an actual miracle. Similar is the story of Bernadette Soubirous. I believe the hell she went through trying to prove to everyone what she saw, was eventually confirmed by the spring, the healings that occurred, and later her incorruptible physical body. Even with all that, faith still is a requirement.
Honestly don't know... but I believe faith is still a requirement to accept it as an actual miracle. Similar is the story of Bernadette Soubirous. I believe the hell she went through trying to prove to everyone what she saw, was eventually confirmed by the spring, the healings that occurred, and later her incorruptible physical body. Even with all that, faith still is a requirement.
Bernadette Soubirous had a childhood bout of cholera which left her with severe, chronic asthma along with other ailments throughout her life. Eventually she contracted tuberculosis of the lungs and bones, and this long-term illness caused her to die in 1879 at the age of 35.
But here's the thing - according to Wikipedia, the apparition of "the lady" in Bernadette's third vision "told her that she does not promise to make her happy in this world, but in the other." However, the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes was built in honor of the apparitions of "the lady" she saw. It is one of the most-visited Catholic shrines in the world, with around four million tourists coming every year. (Wikipedia: Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes)
And although God did not heal her during her life, she was canonized by the church in 1933.
But because of her religious faith, she will get her rewards in the afterlife – an unprovable concept which requires faith in order to be real in the minds of those living.
Where would religions be without the faith requirement?
It took me a VERY LONNNNNGGG time to recognize and realize this aspect of FLOW. When I did, it was freeing in a very real way. I could accomplish things without reference to anything Wierwille.
It took many long hours (over the course of years) it took me to overcome the chains Victor Wierwille planted in my brain in his PFLAP classes (read ONLY this and not that),
23 hours ago, Rocky said:
It took me years to get beyond the chains Wierwille installed in my brain.
Think about what scientists, mathematicians, or philosophers having curiosity to figure out things they are interested in. Wierwille and Martindale were adamant that any new insight about ANYTHING was ONLY revelation from God. I (NOW) say that's malarkey.
Did you have any strong beliefs about God before you became involved with twi? You went through a lot more than I ever did and you've come through a lot since leaving. Do you think any of it still has some impact on your life?
Did you have any strong beliefs about God before you became involved with twi? You went through a lot more than I ever did and you've come through a lot since leaving. Do you think any of it still has some impact on your life?
I was born into an Italian family in upstate NY. I was baptized into the Catholic Church and attended five years of Catholic (elementary) school. It was, on the whole, a major influence in my childhood. It sowed the seeds of longing for communion with God. IOW, it was instrumental in plowing the fields of my mind to prepare me for Wierwille's cult.
When my children (one of mine and a stepson) were elementary school age, I became very involved in advocacy for public schools, both political and involvement with school district leadership.
That was when I began reading regularly and extensively to satisfy curiosities and answer questions that frequently came up as I faced and endured life's challenges.
Of course my childhood still has impact in and on my life. We each, individually and together, are the sum and substance of our life experience. I'm in my 70th year in this life (I have completed half of my 70th trip around the sun). I've been around the block a time or two. I've face my share of travails.
I realize that's vague. But it's the best answer I can give you this evening.
Faith is a requirement when it comes to believing in God for without it, one would see God and the bible quite differently. But what should someone do when a biblical concept they have put their faith in proves to be untrue?
God’s protection is a good example of this. It is something many Christians trust in because of accounts like Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego and the fiery furnace, David and Goliath, and Daniel in the lion’s den. There are also scriptures like:
2 Thessalonians 3:3 - But the Lord is faithful. He will establish you and guard you against the evil one
All of Psalm 91 – I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust…He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler…There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling. (Verses 2,4,10)
Trusting in these verses, however, does not prevent bad things from happening.
Once this happens, continuing to have faith in them is not thinking logically or critically. Instead, having faith becomes playing a game of chance at the least or being completely deluded at the worst. Are there other conclusions to consider?
This post relates to my previous one about God's protection. I'm calling this one "easier said than done."
I’ve been thinking about the next time I take the 5-hour drive to visit my son and his family, this time without the comforting thought of having God’s protection while driving on very busy highways most of the way. I’m trying to think rationally to get over the nervousness, but it continues to persist.
This morning I happened to listen to the YouTube video called “Belief and the Brain: a Psychiatrist and a Neuroscientist on Evolution and Religion.” Seth Andrews had two guests on his podcast:
- Dr. Andy Thomson, a psychiatrist and author of "Why We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith," and
- Dr. John Wathey, a computational biologist, neuroscientist, and author of "The Illusion of God's Presence: The Biological Origins of Spiritual Longing."
They discussed, among many other things, why the concept of God being a heavenly father can become such a compelling desire and need for bible-believing people. It concerns the neural circuitry which evolved to “program the infant brain to expect the presence of a loving being who responds to the child's needs.” That innate feeling is triggered again in adulthood through religion because of the Father-son relationship that is fundamental to biblical teachings. The strength of these adult feelings is quite similar to the strength one had as an infant. IOW, there’s not just a psychological reason for a believer connecting with an all-loving and ever-present Father but a strong biological one as well.
This explains why Christians are so unwilling to let go of this concept, and why it can also be difficult for one who has deconverted to let go in certain scenarios even though they know it's just wishful thinking. Replacing illogical thinking with rational thinking requires some concentrated work to be done.
Replacing illogical thinking with rational thinking requires some concentrated work to be done.
It (changing one's thinking or values or understanding of spiritual matters) requires time and patience. It doesn't (and can't) happen overnight.
On 5/29/2024 at 9:49 AM, Charity said:
what should someone do when a biblical concept they have put their faith in proves to be untrue?
What should one do when they lose trust and become disillusioned? 1) realize they aren't proving anything either wrong or right. Rather, they are coming to grips with reality. 2) realize the narrative on which they have built their "relationship with God" is all about stories. The stories, it appears, are not holding true under the challenges of contemporary life.
It (changing one's thinking or values or understanding of spiritual matters) requires time and patience. It doesn't (and can't) happen overnight.
What should one do when they lose trust and become disillusioned? 1) realize they aren't proving anything either wrong or right. Rather, they are coming to grips with reality. 2) realize the narrative on which they have built their "relationship with God" is all about stories. The stories, it appears, are not holding true under the challenges of contemporary life.
Thanks Rocky. Your post falls in line with another thought I've been having - have I been too judgmental and/or opinionated with my posts. Each of our realities about God and the bible is uniquely personal although we might connect with the thoughts and feelings of others. I've reviewed what the Socratic Dialog Method is and how it's used which has been helpful.
The trip I mentioned earlier will not happen for at least two more months so there's time to think on the reality of living life without relying on a non-existent god for his protection.
I've ordered the two books I referred to in my previous post and am now reading the available sample of "The Illusion of God's Presence" on Amazon. The author begins by giving a few interesting anecdotes to explain where he's going with the contents of his book, and so far I find it pretty relatable. I've posted it below if you or anyone else is curious about this topic.
I would caution very much against allowing your faith to be undermined by whatever challenges your children or grandchildren are facing. My journey from faith coincided with the autism diagnosis of my son and the illness and death of my sister from ALS. To this day I struggle to explain to people that the coincidence of timing was just that, a coincidence. They think I'm angry at God for allowing my son to have autism or my sister to die. The truth is my rejection of faith had a lot more to do with the paucity of evidence for the claims of and about the first century church.
(Bold font is my doing)
I still wonder about this statement when I think about why many people become Christians especially when they are going through a rough time and facing challenges. Here are a couple examples of this:
They hear/read about God’s unconditional love from the bible and/or attend a worship service where the songs are almost always very emotional about God’s love and our love for him (IOW - a loving relationship) and/or they become part of a loving church community.
They hear stories or testimonies from people about God healing all kinds of mental, emotional and physical ailments and/or read verses about healing in the bible.
If these are acceptable reasons for becoming a Christian, why are Christians critical of those like me who let go of Christianity when facing challenges because I no longer accept/believe that God is all present, all loving and one who heals? Isn't that applying a double standard?
why are Christians critical of those like me who let go of Christianity when facing challenges because I no longer accept/believe that God is all present, all loving and one who heals?
I certainly don't speak for anyone who criticizes anyone like you. But I do suspect the culprit may be human nature which finds ways and reasons to justify criticizing anyone with whom they disagree.
I'd recommend, to the extent possible, you just let go of your irritation (or whatever you experience) when recognizing such criticism of you and your path.
We ALL get criticized. Sometimes justly, other times not.
They hear/read about God’s unconditional love from the bible
I’m not convinced the Bible describes an unconditionally loving deity.
Certainly, poor little victor and his simp, Loy, didn’t “teach” this kind of deity
On 7/13/2024 at 1:29 PM, Charity said:
If these are acceptable reasons for becoming a Christian, why are Christians critical of those like me who let go of Christianity when facing challenges because I no longer accept/believe that God is all present, all loving and one who heals? Isn't that applying a double standard?
Yeah, well, see? Here’s a condition: beleeve like me, think like me, get indoctrinated like me, or I’ll shun you.
Just pick up a newspaper or open Twitter or watch your favorite talking heads on TV, you’ll see BELEEEF-based division everywhere. The guy who shot the former President yesterday in a display of sad wickedness was motivated in part by BELEEF, just as both his target and his target’s political opponent foment division and destruction by BELEEF.
I maintain the source of all division is indoctrinated beleef. I don’t see division as a state of nature, rather, it is the fruit of conditioning.
Pay attention to the little children. Do they criticize? Now, who is the more “spiritually mature”?
Those who criticize my lack of belief in BELEEF are not my friends. And I lose no sleep. I have lifelong friends who are Protestant, Catholic, Jew, Buddhist, pagan, atheist… None of them try to proselytize me. Though we occasionally discuss esoteric cosmic mysteries, we never debate or argue or criticize. Ever. We find common ground. They love me, and I them, unconditionally.
Hmmmm. I had a professor in Real Analysis.. he went over about 20 boards of work, trying to prove some theorem..
after watching him traverse forwards and backwards, upside down and right side up.. I would often wonder, what is it that we were exactly trying to prove to begin with..
I certainly don't speak for anyone who criticizes anyone like you. But I do suspect the culprit may be human nature which finds ways and reasons to justify criticizing anyone with whom they disagree.
I'd recommend, to the extent possible, you just let go of your irritation (or whatever you experience) when recognizing such criticism of you and your path.
We ALL get criticized. Sometimes justly, other times not.
Thanks Rocky. I no longer care if Christians disapprove of my reasons for letting go of Christianity.My post was in reply to Raf's suggestion that I use caution against allowing my faith to be undermined by whatever challenges my children or grandchildren were going through and how people falsely connected his rejection of God to the personal challenges he was facing at the time.
I've always wondered about this and now suggest there is a double standard applied by believers where personal reasons for accepting Christianity is lauded yet those same reasons are criticized when they play a part in letting go of it.
There seems to be more though than just human nature being involved in their need to criticize anyone who does the latter. I think it’s the belief that since God can do no wrong, it is always wrong of the person if they leave the faith.
I wonder though how many would keep their faith if God had never promised eternal life in the bible.Would they continue to believe and worship God if their child was killed in an earthquake knowing there was no hope of ever seeing their child again?This doctrine of being reunited with loved ones in a perfect afterlife is reason enough for justifying (whitewashing) the fact that God allowed the tragedy to happen in the first place.
I've started reading "The Illusion of God's Presence" by John C. Wathey which gets into the "biological origins of spiritual longing." It's very interesting.
Hmmmm. I had a professor in Real Analysis.. he went over about 20 boards of work, trying to prove some theorem..
after watching him traverse forwards and backwards, upside down and right side up.. I would often wonder, what is it that we were exactly trying to prove to begin with..
I know so little about physics but I know it explains a lot about the world we live in. When it comes to the bible though, the mental gymnastics one goes through to prove God is all good is painful to watch.
I've always wondered about this and now suggest there is a double standard applied by believers where personal reasons for accepting Christianity is lauded yet those same reasons are criticized when they play a part in letting go of it.
There seems to be more though[t] than just human nature being involved in their need to criticize anyone who does the latter. I think it’s the belief that since God can do no wrong, it is always wrong of the person if they leave the faith.
Even IF it's "belief that since God can do no wrong, it is always wrong of the person if they leave the faith..." that's just how a person's very human rationalization for their criticism is simply a manifestation of the human tendency to criticize something they disagree with.
Pay attention to the little children. Do they criticize? Now, who is the more “spiritually mature”?
It’s a noteworthy point – when young children see something that is different from what they know or something they simply don’t understand, they often show their wonderment or confusion on their faces and then will ask questions – the most favourite one for parents is “why.” You got to love them for it.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
77
47
92
215
Popular Days
May 18
36
May 13
28
May 16
24
Nov 13
24
Top Posters In This Topic
Raf 77 posts
Rocky 47 posts
Nathan_Jr 92 posts
Charity 215 posts
Popular Days
May 18 2024
36 posts
May 13 2024
28 posts
May 16 2024
24 posts
Nov 13 2024
24 posts
Popular Posts
waysider
Yeah, see. That kinda leaves us between a rock and a hard place. We were either following the teachings of a man with devil spirits or he was wrong about what he taught. That means he could have been
Raf
I consider myself humanist as well. Since there is no hierarchy in humanism, no one really gets to define it. This website gathers various definitions that permit us to ascertain some kind of co
Nathan_Jr
I don't know if they accept the science or not, but I suspect it doesn't matter to them either way because of the new earth. If anything, I could see them pointing to climate change as evidence of the
Posted Images
Charity
You are not alone in believing the accounts of what was said to have happened in 1917. There are many travel agencies that book pilgrimages to Fatima. The info below is from the 206 Tours' website.
Did You Know These Interesting Facts About Fatima?
https://www.206tours.com/cms/blog/fatima-facts-where-to-go-what-to-see/
My question is if there has ever been a miraculous event like this one that could not be explained in some other way by experts in different fields such as those cited in the Miracle of the Sun website? The weeping statues were disproved, and the shroud of Turin was proven not to be the authentic burial shroud of Jesus.
Is it even possible for supernatural beings to prove themselves in the natural realm of science, physics, etc.?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
If the experiences are being exclusively labeled as miracles (either inside or outside of twi), do you mean they are, are not, or possibly can be actual miracles? I'm not sure of the point you are making by your last sentence.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
No. I mean that unexplained, unexplainable phenomena that we considered miracles and thought was exclusive to twi (the "household") takes place whether the person is a believer or not.
It's thought of and described in secular circles as synchronicity.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/503350.The_Tao_of_Psychology
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
Here's another thing that we, in TWI, thought was US as individuals tapping into the power of a specific God.
Meditation alone in nature. 42 or 43 years ago, I spent a year as a Wow in Fremont, Ohio. In the Spring of 1982, I started spending some time in a small woods environment along Muskellunge Creek Road, immediately south of State Street. It was my happy place. I felt like I was communing with God.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fremont+ohio+map&atb=v353-1&t=chromentp&iaxm=maps&source=maps
What was really happening is better described as achieving a FLOW state.
The irony, looking back on it, is in that it was and is something that is not at all unique to TWI or any other flavor or sect of Christianity.
It took me a VERY LONNNNNGGG time to recognize and realize this aspect of FLOW. When I did, it was freeing in a very real way. I could accomplish things without reference to anything Wierwille.
As far as a biblical key, I found it in Proverbs 2: 1-5.
It took many long hours (over the course of years) it took me to overcome the chains Victor Wierwille planted in my brain in his PFLAP classes (read ONLY this and not that),
Why? Could it have been because I had been indoctrinated ("trained") to be afraid of world wisdom?
Edited by Rockyadditional thoughts
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
I like the video - I keep saying I want to begin doing laps again and the video is a good incentive.
I can understand someone communing with God while being in the woods. I used to do that myself.
When it comes to Prov 2:1-5 though, I don't see world wisdom here.
1 My son, if thou wilt receive my words, and hide my commandments with thee;
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
Well... proverbs was written by a specific person or people to specific persons or people.
That doesn't mean any OTHER people would be unable to cultivate long term curiosity. I get it. it took me years to get beyond the chains Wierwille installed in my brain.
Think about what scientists, mathematicians, or philosophers having curiosity to figure out things they are interested in. Wierwille and Martindale were adamant that any new insight about ANYTHING was ONLY revelation from God. I (NOW) say that's malarkey.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldiesman
Honestly don't know... but I believe faith is still a requirement to accept it as an actual miracle. Similar is the story of Bernadette Soubirous. I believe the hell she went through trying to prove to everyone what she saw, was eventually confirmed by the spring, the healings that occurred, and later her incorruptible physical body. Even with all that, faith still is a requirement.
Bernadette Soubirous - Wikipedia
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
The link is an Interesting account of her life.
Bernadette Soubirous had a childhood bout of cholera which left her with severe, chronic asthma along with other ailments throughout her life. Eventually she contracted tuberculosis of the lungs and bones, and this long-term illness caused her to die in 1879 at the age of 35.
But here's the thing - according to Wikipedia, the apparition of "the lady" in Bernadette's third vision "told her that she does not promise to make her happy in this world, but in the other." However, the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes was built in honor of the apparitions of "the lady" she saw. It is one of the most-visited Catholic shrines in the world, with around four million tourists coming every year. (Wikipedia: Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes)
And although God did not heal her during her life, she was canonized by the church in 1933.
But because of her religious faith, she will get her rewards in the afterlife – an unprovable concept which requires faith in order to be real in the minds of those living.
Where would religions be without the faith requirement?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
Did you have any strong beliefs about God before you became involved with twi? You went through a lot more than I ever did and you've come through a lot since leaving. Do you think any of it still has some impact on your life?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
I was born into an Italian family in upstate NY. I was baptized into the Catholic Church and attended five years of Catholic (elementary) school. It was, on the whole, a major influence in my childhood. It sowed the seeds of longing for communion with God. IOW, it was instrumental in plowing the fields of my mind to prepare me for Wierwille's cult.
When my children (one of mine and a stepson) were elementary school age, I became very involved in advocacy for public schools, both political and involvement with school district leadership.
That was when I began reading regularly and extensively to satisfy curiosities and answer questions that frequently came up as I faced and endured life's challenges.
Of course my childhood still has impact in and on my life. We each, individually and together, are the sum and substance of our life experience. I'm in my 70th year in this life (I have completed half of my 70th trip around the sun). I've been around the block a time or two. I've face my share of travails.
I realize that's vague. But it's the best answer I can give you this evening.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
Faith is a requirement when it comes to believing in God for without it, one would see God and the bible quite differently. But what should someone do when a biblical concept they have put their faith in proves to be untrue?
God’s protection is a good example of this. It is something many Christians trust in because of accounts like Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego and the fiery furnace, David and Goliath, and Daniel in the lion’s den. There are also scriptures like:
2 Thessalonians 3:3 - But the Lord is faithful. He will establish you and guard you against the evil one
All of Psalm 91 – I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust…He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler…There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling. (Verses 2,4,10)
Trusting in these verses, however, does not prevent bad things from happening.
Once this happens, continuing to have faith in them is not thinking logically or critically. Instead, having faith becomes playing a game of chance at the least or being completely deluded at the worst. Are there other conclusions to consider?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
This post relates to my previous one about God's protection. I'm calling this one "easier said than done."
I’ve been thinking about the next time I take the 5-hour drive to visit my son and his family, this time without the comforting thought of having God’s protection while driving on very busy highways most of the way. I’m trying to think rationally to get over the nervousness, but it continues to persist.
This morning I happened to listen to the YouTube video called “Belief and the Brain: a Psychiatrist and a Neuroscientist on Evolution and Religion.” Seth Andrews had two guests on his podcast:
- Dr. Andy Thomson, a psychiatrist and author of "Why We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith," and
- Dr. John Wathey, a computational biologist, neuroscientist, and author of "The Illusion of God's Presence: The Biological Origins of Spiritual Longing."
They discussed, among many other things, why the concept of God being a heavenly father can become such a compelling desire and need for bible-believing people. It concerns the neural circuitry which evolved to “program the infant brain to expect the presence of a loving being who responds to the child's needs.” That innate feeling is triggered again in adulthood through religion because of the Father-son relationship that is fundamental to biblical teachings. The strength of these adult feelings is quite similar to the strength one had as an infant. IOW, there’s not just a psychological reason for a believer connecting with an all-loving and ever-present Father but a strong biological one as well.
This explains why Christians are so unwilling to let go of this concept, and why it can also be difficult for one who has deconverted to let go in certain scenarios even though they know it's just wishful thinking. Replacing illogical thinking with rational thinking requires some concentrated work to be done.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
It (changing one's thinking or values or understanding of spiritual matters) requires time and patience. It doesn't (and can't) happen overnight.
What should one do when they lose trust and become disillusioned? 1) realize they aren't proving anything either wrong or right. Rather, they are coming to grips with reality. 2) realize the narrative on which they have built their "relationship with God" is all about stories. The stories, it appears, are not holding true under the challenges of contemporary life.
Edited by Rockypatience...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
Thanks Rocky. Your post falls in line with another thought I've been having - have I been too judgmental and/or opinionated with my posts. Each of our realities about God and the bible is uniquely personal although we might connect with the thoughts and feelings of others. I've reviewed what the Socratic Dialog Method is and how it's used which has been helpful.
The trip I mentioned earlier will not happen for at least two more months so there's time to think on the reality of living life without relying on a non-existent god for his protection.
I've ordered the two books I referred to in my previous post and am now reading the available sample of "The Illusion of God's Presence" on Amazon. The author begins by giving a few interesting anecdotes to explain where he's going with the contents of his book, and so far I find it pretty relatable. I've posted it below if you or anyone else is curious about this topic.
https://www.amazon.ca/Illusion-Gods-Presence-Biological-Spiritual/dp/1633880745
https://www.amazon.ca/Illusion-Gods-Presence-Biological-Spiritual/dp/1633880745
Hopefully, one of the two above will bring up the site.
Edited by CharityLink to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
I still wonder about this statement when I think about why many people become Christians especially when they are going through a rough time and facing challenges. Here are a couple examples of this:
They hear/read about God’s unconditional love from the bible and/or attend a worship service where the songs are almost always very emotional about God’s love and our love for him (IOW - a loving relationship) and/or they become part of a loving church community.
They hear stories or testimonies from people about God healing all kinds of mental, emotional and physical ailments and/or read verses about healing in the bible.
If these are acceptable reasons for becoming a Christian, why are Christians critical of those like me who let go of Christianity when facing challenges because I no longer accept/believe that God is all present, all loving and one who heals? Isn't that applying a double standard?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
I certainly don't speak for anyone who criticizes anyone like you. But I do suspect the culprit may be human nature which finds ways and reasons to justify criticizing anyone with whom they disagree.
I'd recommend, to the extent possible, you just let go of your irritation (or whatever you experience) when recognizing such criticism of you and your path.
We ALL get criticized. Sometimes justly, other times not.
Edited by RockyLink to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
I’m not convinced the Bible describes an unconditionally loving deity.
Certainly, poor little victor and his simp, Loy, didn’t “teach” this kind of deity
Yeah, well, see? Here’s a condition: beleeve like me, think like me, get indoctrinated like me, or I’ll shun you.
Just pick up a newspaper or open Twitter or watch your favorite talking heads on TV, you’ll see BELEEEF-based division everywhere. The guy who shot the former President yesterday in a display of sad wickedness was motivated in part by BELEEF, just as both his target and his target’s political opponent foment division and destruction by BELEEF.
I maintain the source of all division is indoctrinated beleef. I don’t see division as a state of nature, rather, it is the fruit of conditioning.
Pay attention to the little children. Do they criticize? Now, who is the more “spiritually mature”?
Those who criticize my lack of belief in BELEEF are not my friends. And I lose no sleep. I have lifelong friends who are Protestant, Catholic, Jew, Buddhist, pagan, atheist… None of them try to proselytize me. Though we occasionally discuss esoteric cosmic mysteries, we never debate or argue or criticize. Ever. We find common ground. They love me, and I them, unconditionally.
Edited by Nathan_JrGloves
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Hmmmm. I had a professor in Real Analysis.. he went over about 20 boards of work, trying to prove some theorem..
after watching him traverse forwards and backwards, upside down and right side up.. I would often wonder, what is it that we were exactly trying to prove to begin with..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
We were trying to prove that we knew that we knew that we knew.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
Thanks Rocky. I no longer care if Christians disapprove of my reasons for letting go of Christianity. My post was in reply to Raf's suggestion that I use caution against allowing my faith to be undermined by whatever challenges my children or grandchildren were going through and how people falsely connected his rejection of God to the personal challenges he was facing at the time.
I've always wondered about this and now suggest there is a double standard applied by believers where personal reasons for accepting Christianity is lauded yet those same reasons are criticized when they play a part in letting go of it.
There seems to be more though than just human nature being involved in their need to criticize anyone who does the latter. I think it’s the belief that since God can do no wrong, it is always wrong of the person if they leave the faith.
I wonder though how many would keep their faith if God had never promised eternal life in the bible. Would they continue to believe and worship God if their child was killed in an earthquake knowing there was no hope of ever seeing their child again? This doctrine of being reunited with loved ones in a perfect afterlife is reason enough for justifying (whitewashing) the fact that God allowed the tragedy to happen in the first place.
I've started reading "The Illusion of God's Presence" by John C. Wathey which gets into the "biological origins of spiritual longing." It's very interesting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
I know so little about physics but I know it explains a lot about the world we live in. When it comes to the bible though, the mental gymnastics one goes through to prove God is all good is painful to watch.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
...but he loves you!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
Even IF it's "belief that since God can do no wrong, it is always wrong of the person if they leave the faith..." that's just how a person's very human rationalization for their criticism is simply a manifestation of the human tendency to criticize something they disagree with.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charity
It’s a noteworthy point – when young children see something that is different from what they know or something they simply don’t understand, they often show their wonderment or confusion on their faces and then will ask questions – the most favourite one for parents is “why.” You got to love them for it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.