You get more civil treatment because although your position is opposite you don’t engage in all the other nonsense deflecting questions personally attacking and asking if someone is God.
I like to think it's because I chilled the F out, but ok.
Please drop it. This is not off topic, but it's so ancillary to the topic as to be irrelevant. I do not see that he questioned a single fact: Merely raised the possibility, which is a fair thing to do for someone who concedes to having all the facts second or third hand (which, I should add, includes the overwhelming majority of people who have posted on this site.
I see no reason to disbelieve anything in the opening post, nor do I see any reason to disallow the possibility that the AI aggregation (assuming there even WAS one) got a fact wrong. It might have. It might not. Obla Di Obla Dah.
I like to think it's because I chilled the F out, but ok.
Please drop it. This is not off topic, but it's so ancillary to the topic as to be irrelevant. I do not see that he questioned a single fact: Merely raised the possibility, which is a fair thing to do for someone who concedes to having all the facts second or third hand (which, I should add, includes the overwhelming majority of people who have posted on this site.
I see no reason to disbelieve anything in the opening post, nor do I see any reason to disallow the possibility that the AI aggregation (assuming there even WAS one) got a fact wrong. It might have. It might not. Obla Di Obla Dah.
Hmmm. The topic is “Cult Facts”. The question is “which cult facts exactly do you claim are inaccurate?”
Sorry seem pretty direct on topic to me.
Raising a question and then starting a game of dance dance revolution refusing to answer a follow up question, however, does seem pretty off topic.
When you think about it, T.I.P. is a bit like AI. I mean, unless you put some "yea, verily", and "thus saith the Lord" into the data base to start with, it's not gonna just randomly generate itself.
I don't know if that's off topic or just some silly stuff bouncing around in my head.
When you think about it, T.I.P. is a bit like AI. I mean, unless you put some "yea, verily", and "thus saith the Lord" into the data base to start with, it's not gonna just randomly generate itself.
I don't know if that's off topic or just some silly stuff bouncing around in my head.
Yeah the similarities are that LLM is trained on huge amounts of data that could almost simulate human experience. Then it generates the next most logical thing from that training.
If you think about it the TWI follower listens to very specific ways they run the prayer and TIP in meetings for quite a while watching others do it. Then they take a class and get “trained” in TIP. There is a definite case for saying they are also generating a response constructed from previous experiences, and believing because a few phrases are extemporaneously spoken that indicates that it is God giving the words.
We have all seen and experienced some major f ups in meetings when people “get it wrong”. They are corrected and over time they produce a uniform output.
Yeah the similarities are that LLM is trained on huge amounts of data that could almost simulate human experience. Then it generates the next most logical thing from that training.
If you think about it the TWI follower listens to very specific ways they run the prayer and TIP in meetings for quite a while watching others do it. Then they take a class and get “trained” in TIP. There is a definite case for saying they are also generating a response constructed from previous experiences, and believing because a few phrases are extemporaneously spoken that indicates that it is God giving the words.
We have all seen and experienced some major f ups in meetings when people “get it wrong”. They are corrected and over time they produce a uniform output.
FFS... when YOU blame YOUR words/actions on what (anyone other than yourself) someone else says or does or doesn't say or doesn't do...
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
4
23
30
5
Popular Days
Jan 5
20
Jan 3
10
Dec 31
7
Jan 4
6
Top Posters In This Topic
Raf 4 posts
Rocky 23 posts
chockfull 30 posts
Nathan_Jr 5 posts
Popular Days
Jan 5 2024
20 posts
Jan 3 2024
10 posts
Dec 31 2023
7 posts
Jan 4 2024
6 posts
Popular Posts
chockfull
That is quite a website. It looks like a similar layout for a number of different cults. I have no idea who put it up. It looks like it was done with a bot or LLM tool. For every claim they st
oldiesman
This one was easy for me: "The Way reportedly teaches that members will suffer harm or death if they go into debt" Here's one from me: "The Way reportedly teaches that members will
chockfull
I can see the court interaction now. “That site is inaccurate and slanderous”. Judge: “Every statement on the website has a footnoted source. Which is more than you can say for your
Posted Images
chockfull
Ok this is semi interesting.
AI produces generated output from petabytes of trained data.
One could argue that a TWI intermediate class student is doing the same thing with messages purported to be interpretation of tongues and prophecy.
One could argue that the mind of the manifester is like AI.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Well I’m God. It’s been twice established on this thread.
And I approve.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Have some self respect. You are Mr. God.
That’s accuracy and precision as it hasn’t been known since…
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
I like to think it's because I chilled the F out, but ok.
Please drop it. This is not off topic, but it's so ancillary to the topic as to be irrelevant. I do not see that he questioned a single fact: Merely raised the possibility, which is a fair thing to do for someone who concedes to having all the facts second or third hand (which, I should add, includes the overwhelming majority of people who have posted on this site.
I see no reason to disbelieve anything in the opening post, nor do I see any reason to disallow the possibility that the AI aggregation (assuming there even WAS one) got a fact wrong. It might have. It might not. Obla Di Obla Dah.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Hmmm. The topic is “Cult Facts”. The question is “which cult facts exactly do you claim are inaccurate?”
Sorry seem pretty direct on topic to me.
Raising a question and then starting a game of dance dance revolution refusing to answer a follow up question, however, does seem pretty off topic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Rodney Dangerfield in Caddyshack?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
When you think about it, T.I.P. is a bit like AI. I mean, unless you put some "yea, verily", and "thus saith the Lord" into the data base to start with, it's not gonna just randomly generate itself.
I don't know if that's off topic or just some silly stuff bouncing around in my head.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Where did he claim a fact was inaccurate?
Any fact?
Where did he say there were actual inaccuracies?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
I’m not delving through all those responses to find out where the DDR game started.
He basically was stating as fact AI was involved, then indicated that made it unreliable.
I asked for a specific example. Then the attacks started.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Yeah the similarities are that LLM is trained on huge amounts of data that could almost simulate human experience. Then it generates the next most logical thing from that training.
If you think about it the TWI follower listens to very specific ways they run the prayer and TIP in meetings for quite a while watching others do it. Then they take a class and get “trained” in TIP. There is a definite case for saying they are also generating a response constructed from previous experiences, and believing because a few phrases are extemporaneously spoken that indicates that it is God giving the words.
We have all seen and experienced some major f ups in meetings when people “get it wrong”. They are corrected and over time they produce a uniform output.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
FFS... when YOU blame YOUR words/actions on what (anyone other than yourself) someone else says or does or doesn't say or doesn't do...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
Raf/Modcat said (to chockfull)...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
??
Sorry what does this comment have to do with the post you quoted about LLM ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
He also said it to you ….
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.