No. This was a working actor not known for her beauty but she was known for being an actress who could play a variety of very strong and complex roles. She's a screen legend. She was the first actress to receive 10 Academy Award nominations. Let's not shoot fish in a barrel.
I don't see anyone scoring a number one hit song singing about YOUR eyes, Human.
Bette Davis.
Who was not the first actor to be so honored, but was the first actress.
Even though this was in yesteryear Hollywood, the gender case use today of actress is not preferred, that is why I used the noun, actor. Even so, it doesn't matter. Nit-picking. Yes. Betty Davis
i understand. but there were two actors before her
No one had any doubts about it being a woman. I even said that "it was a woman" in the first post so we could erase any doubts about the answer being a man. Yes, there were others before, maybe I shouldn't have tried to be so objective.
On 1/19/2023 at 12:44 AM, Human without the bean said:
I love presidential trivia. William H Taft. President Warren G Harding nominated him.
Okay I got one.
Who was the first actor to receive a Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Film Institute? It was a woman.
Here's Raf's point. As this reads, it says that the first actor to receive the award was a woman. That isn't the case. James Cagney and Orson Welles both won it before Davis. (As did two directors.)
That isn't the case. James Cagney and Orson Welles both won it before Davis. (As did two directors.)
11 hours ago, GeorgeStGeorge said:
Here's Raf's point. As this reads, it says that the first actor to receive the award was a woman. That isn't the case. James Cagney and Orson Welles both won it before Davis. (As did two directors.)
George
Yeah I get it, yeah, I get it. Thanks for speaking for Raf. It don't matter anyway. Yeah, this is a fact, but it shouldn't matter anyway, even though I used the term "actor" by choice, because I tried clearing up that confusion when I posted
On 1/18/2023 at 10:44 PM, Human without the bean said:
It was a woman.
and I was just trying to refrain from referring and using the term "actresses" because they're also actors. I get it. Can we stop kicking a dead horse now? Come on guys, pull up your big boy pants and move on. Or not. Which ever. I don't care. I mean I don't care to hear it anymore (now who will it be to re-post again something in response to my latest post) about this in this particular case. Please stop it.
What is wrong with you?
Here's how you handle that: "Oh, I see. Sorry about that. Thanks for clearing it up."
And then "Please stop it"? You should have followed that advice first instead of acting like it's on the rest of us. It's on you. You said something incorrect. You were corrected. You doubled down. You were corrected again. THAT'S ON YOU, not us. And if you have a problem with continuing the discussion, ending the discussion is on you too.
We're not children. Stop treating us like we are.
...
Whatever, Next.
...
A funny thing happened to the copyright on this series of movies.
Someone accidentally left the copyright notice off the original. At the time, that put the movie in the public domain and cost the producers $millions.
A handful of movies are considered official sequels, with the same director and writer.
There are other movies that serve as sequels, the first of which was written by a co-writer of the original. The two writers amicably agreed to distinguish their sequels from each other by the inclusion or omission of a single word in the title of each.
A handful of current TV series owe their existence to the original (and the failure to copyright it).
What is wrong with you?
Here's how you handle that: "Oh, I see. Sorry about that. Thanks for clearing it up."
And then "Please stop it"? You should have followed that advice first instead of acting like it's on the rest of us. It's on you. You said something incorrect. You were corrected. You doubled down. You were corrected again. THAT'S ON YOU, not us. And if you have a problem with continuing the discussion, ending the discussion is on you too.
We're not children. Stop treating us like we are.
...
Whatever, Next.
...
A funny thing happened to the copyright on this series of movies.
Someone accidentally left the copyright notice off the original. At the time, that put the movie in the public domain and cost the producers $millions.
A handful of movies are considered official sequels, with the same director and writer.
There are other movies that serve as sequels, the first of which was written by a co-writer of the original. The two writers amicably agreed to distinguish their sequels from each other by the inclusion or omission of a single word in the title of each.
A handful of current TV series owe their existence to the original (and the failure to copyright it).
On 1/24/2023 at 6:16 PM, Human without the bean said:
Come on guys, pull up your big boy pants and move on.
I guess you didn't want to pull up your big pants.
Is this trivia? You're up man. Just so you know Raf, I didn't even read your jumbo mumbo.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
377
198
280
283
Popular Days
Apr 5
17
Jul 11
11
Feb 15
10
Nov 28
10
Top Posters In This Topic
GeorgeStGeorge 377 posts
Raf 198 posts
WordWolf 280 posts
Human without the bean 283 posts
Popular Days
Apr 5 2023
17 posts
Jul 11 2023
11 posts
Feb 15 2024
10 posts
Nov 28 2023
10 posts
Popular Posts
GeorgeStGeorge
No. (Misread it.) George
WordWolf
Raf clears the table! (Been practicing billiards lately?) A) 1605 was the last time- before JP1- that there were 3 different Popes in the same calendar year. It has to coincide with the concl
Human without the bean
Don't forget about me Raf, I'm so petty too. From "Wildflowers" to "The Last DJ".
Posted Images
Human without the bean
Yes. She doesn't seem like an Alicia to me. She's also an atheist with the surname Christian.
Go.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Which US President was also Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (not concurrently, of course)?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
I love presidential trivia. William H Taft. President Warren G Harding nominated him.
Okay I got one.
Who was the first actor to receive a Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Film Institute? It was a woman.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Helen Hayes?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
Good guess, but no.
Edited by Human without the beanLink to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Katherine Hepburn?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
No. She was a rebel.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Vivien Leigh?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
No. She was named second of AFI's 100 Years.....100 Stars behind Katherine Hepburn.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
A rebel? Hedy Lamarr?????
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
Nope. Maybe rebellious would be a better adjective.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Jane Fonda?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
No. This was a working actor not known for her beauty but she was known for being an actress who could play a variety of very strong and complex roles. She's a screen legend. She was the first actress to receive 10 Academy Award nominations. Let's not shoot fish in a barrel.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
Not known for her beauty.
I don't see anyone scoring a number one hit song singing about YOUR eyes, Human.
Bette Davis.
Who was not the first actor to be so honored, but was the first actress.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
Even though this was in yesteryear Hollywood, the gender case use today of actress is not preferred, that is why I used the noun, actor. Even so, it doesn't matter. Nit-picking. Yes. Betty Davis
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
i understand. but there were two actors before her
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
No one had any doubts about it being a woman. I even said that "it was a woman" in the first post so we could erase any doubts about the answer being a man. Yes, there were others before, maybe I shouldn't have tried to be so objective.
You're up
Edited by Human without the beanLink to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Here's Raf's point. As this reads, it says that the first actor to receive the award was a woman. That isn't the case. James Cagney and Orson Welles both won it before Davis. (As did two directors.)
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
Yeah I get it, yeah, I get it. Thanks for speaking for Raf. It don't matter anyway. Yeah, this is a fact, but it shouldn't matter anyway, even though I used the term "actor" by choice, because I tried clearing up that confusion when I posted
and I was just trying to refrain from referring and using the term "actresses" because they're also actors. I get it. Can we stop kicking a dead horse now? Come on guys, pull up your big boy pants and move on. Or not. Which ever. I don't care. I mean I don't care to hear it anymore (now who will it be to re-post again something in response to my latest post) about this in this particular case. Please stop it.
Raf is up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
What is wrong with you?
Here's how you handle that: "Oh, I see. Sorry about that. Thanks for clearing it up."
And then "Please stop it"? You should have followed that advice first instead of acting like it's on the rest of us. It's on you. You said something incorrect. You were corrected. You doubled down. You were corrected again. THAT'S ON YOU, not us. And if you have a problem with continuing the discussion, ending the discussion is on you too.
We're not children. Stop treating us like we are.
...
Whatever, Next.
...
A funny thing happened to the copyright on this series of movies.
Someone accidentally left the copyright notice off the original. At the time, that put the movie in the public domain and cost the producers $millions.
A handful of movies are considered official sequels, with the same director and writer.
There are other movies that serve as sequels, the first of which was written by a co-writer of the original. The two writers amicably agreed to distinguish their sequels from each other by the inclusion or omission of a single word in the title of each.
A handful of current TV series owe their existence to the original (and the failure to copyright it).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
I guess you didn't want to pull up your big pants.
Is this trivia? You're up man. Just so you know Raf, I didn't even read your jumbo mumbo.
Edited by Human without the beanLink to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
This sounds familiar, but I'm having trouble coming up with an answer. It's the "current TV shows" thing that's throwing me worst.
"Blade Runner"?? How about "MAD MAX"????
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
Not Mad Max.
One of the current TV shows recently aired its seties finale. It has spinoffs thatvare still going [and still to come].
Human, you're being a jerk about this and I don't get why.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
I see after sifting through the minisha you did post something.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.