The TWI Verbal Tradition (TVT) got way out of hand on LOTS of things: grace/license, guidelines/law, discipline, tough love, etc., just like all other churches
Verbal communication is what drove the ministry. Why even have teachings at twig meetings if all that was needed was to read the written materials?
I asked in my native English, then I interpreted that into each of my unknown tongues - I have three.
Don’t know if you learned how (H-O-W) to do that kind of reverse interpretation in “excellor” sessions, but it’s available if you can believe big enough for it.
Right! The great line of demarcation that moves constantly to support mikes position...wherever that position is today...the great divide between the physical realm and the spiritual realm...lmao...pure fantasy. There is no divide...where all these different rules apply.
Right! The great line of demarcation that moves constantly to support mikes position...wherever that position is today...the great divide between the physical realm and the spiritual realm...lmao...pure fantasy. There is no divide...where all these different rules apply.
That's why you had to wait for STS/SNS each week before forming an opinion on current events . . . Needed to know what was "spiritually going on" from the MOGFART. It's a Great Principle (GP).
Well, that settles it. It must be true because there was a tape.
The truth of the tape is not the point. The point was that VPW was playing a tape that goes against your theology here.
The real VPW wanted us to know that Jesus was very real and very present when we get hip to him spiritually. Your anti-idol theology is plain wrong because it says he wanted us to look away from Jesus. I just showed you 10 times he emphasized looking toward Jesus.
The truth of the tape is not the point. The point was that VPW was playing a tape that goes against your theology here.
The real VPW wanted us to know that Jesus was very real and very present when we get hip to him spiritually. Your anti-idol theology is plain wrong because it says he wanted us to look away from Jesus. I just showed you 10 times he emphasized looking toward Jesus.
You told us-
"Ten times I count the phrase see Jesus in these two pages.
Couple this with the introductory paragraph I gave you from p.207, and it's progressing to SEE JESUS that he’s urging with us OLGs to do. It’s for other grads too."
===============
Basic pfal- and basic Bullinger- get "to whom" correct.
ONCE, vpw mentioned "see Jesus" for us, and nine times he mentioned it for Zaccheus. If he told us ONCE, he's not "urging" us to do it.Once it was for us to "see more and more of God's Word."
====================
On page 207 he writes:
As we pass through life, we must climb ever higher and higher in our hearts and minds with the greatness of God’s Word. We must always keep progressing to see more and more of God’s Word and His promises manifested in our daily lives.
Then on pages 212-213 we see:
All I know is that the Word of God says Zacchaeus was a publican and he was rich. We learn one other thing about Zacchaeus in this account and that is that he was motivated by a wonderful desire: He wanted to see Jesus.
Luke 19:3
And he sought to see Jesus who he was; and could not for the press, because he was little of stature.
Zacchaeus wanted to see Jesus - who he was. Perhaps it was simple curiosity prompting him. The text doesn't say. But whatever the reason, at least he wanted to see Jesus. I wish that today, across our nation, there were more people who wanted to see Jesus. When people ask to see Jesus today, we've got to show him. When they want to see Jesus, who he is, we can show them God's Word and the greatness of Jesus Christ's position in the Word.
Zacchaeus wanted to see Jesus, but he couldn't. The reason he couldn't see him or get to him was for "the press." That doesn't mean the news media, such as newspaper, radio, or television reporters. "Press" means "numbers of people." There were so many people surrounding Jesus that Zacchaeus couldn't get a glimpse of him.
Verse 3:
. . . because he was little of stature.
Zacchaeus was short. The biggest thing about him was his desire to see Jesus.
Verse 4:
And he [Zacchaeus] ran before [ahead of where Jesus was walking], and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see him: for he [Jesus] was to pass that way.
Zacchaeus climbed up into a sycamore tree in order to get a view of this noted person, Jesus, whom people were talking about. Zacchaeus took the necessary action to fulfill his desire. That's very important. If you want to see Jesus Christ through God's Word, you need to move, take action. Zacchaeus took the initiative and climbed up into that sycamore tree.
*/*/*/*
Ten times I count the phrase see Jesus in these two pages.
Couple this with the introductory paragraph I gave you from p.207, and it's progressing to SEE JESUS that he’s urging with us OLGs to do. It’s for other grads too.
================================
This is one reason people don't trust your doctrine- you continually make ELEMENTARY MISTAKES. That's why everything's behind a curtain- to try to minimize the sunlight on the BASIC ERRORS.
One of those "ten times" the phrase "see Jesus" wasn't said at all.
ONE of those "ten times" the phrase "see Jesus" referred to us.
The remaining EIGHT times were all in reference to ZACCHEUS, who wanted to see Jesus.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
427
271
423
257
Popular Days
Feb 14
142
Oct 13
105
Jan 18
101
Oct 8
88
Top Posters In This Topic
Mike 427 posts
T-Bone 271 posts
OldSkool 423 posts
Nathan_Jr 257 posts
Popular Days
Feb 14 2023
142 posts
Oct 13 2022
105 posts
Jan 18 2023
101 posts
Oct 8 2022
88 posts
Popular Posts
OldSkool
First off, Biblically speaking, Christ has never been absent...that doctrine does not come close to occuring anywhere in the Bible. Yet the way international teaches the word of God takes the place of
Bolshevik
Mike's apparent anger toward Christ and emphasis on obedience . . . that's Wayworld . . . that's the annihilation of the individual
waysider
Soooo...He used ONE verse from the Amplified Bible, HALF a chapter from the New English Bible and required PFAL '77 students to get some version from the 1800's that has a name so unremarkable you can
Posted Images
Nathan_Jr
Where is the focus? Just follow the attention. It was misplaced from the beginning.
This is fundamental to the abject spiritual bankruptcy that is TWI and victor paul wierwille.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
Except PHYSICALLY at Starbucks.
Right now God thinks the best way is for Christ to be IN YOU (spiritually) as you walk through the door into Starbucks.
And it's not like they cannot do it. They just don't want to reduce down to that measly level, when the better spiritual level is available.
Now every once in a while, like with Stephen, or John, or Paul he seems to make a pre-Return appearance of sorts.
Did you see my post on the AC tape VPW played for us about the girl who got healed by Jesus from a horribly deformed spine?
Maybe Jesus' priority list could include a Starbucks date? Ask God.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
I think the Fog Years were from roughly from 1985 to '90.
But the name "Fog Years" was invented well after the fact, after 1990?
The transition period I was talking about a few posts above was a little earlier: 1981-85
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Verbal communication is what drove the ministry. Why even have teachings at twig meetings if all that was needed was to read the written materials?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
I asked in my native English, then I interpreted that into each of my unknown tongues - I have three.
Don’t know if you learned how (H-O-W) to do that kind of reverse interpretation in “excellor” sessions, but it’s available if you can believe big enough for it.
I am patiently awaiting an answer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldSkool
You have no idea whatsoever what Jesus Christ is doing or where he is or who he chooses to appear to.
What you have that you cherish so dearly are lies from a fake minister that you refuse to see past.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
Yes
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Well, that settles it. It must be true because there was a tape.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
Okay . . . this "spiritual" understanding . . . fantasy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldSkool
Right! The great line of demarcation that moves constantly to support mikes position...wherever that position is today...the great divide between the physical realm and the spiritual realm...lmao...pure fantasy. There is no divide...where all these different rules apply.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Except for adultery. Clearly there's a difference there. /s
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
I hear you. But when those verbal communications drift from the Word, things go wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
That's why you had to wait for STS/SNS each week before forming an opinion on current events . . . Needed to know what was "spiritually going on" from the MOGFART. It's a Great Principle (GP).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
And the "Word" is what exactly? Please use your verbal skills.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
The truth of the tape is not the point. The point was that VPW was playing a tape that goes against your theology here.
The real VPW wanted us to know that Jesus was very real and very present when we get hip to him spiritually. Your anti-idol theology is plain wrong because it says he wanted us to look away from Jesus. I just showed you 10 times he emphasized looking toward Jesus.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
I gotta go use my window cleaning skills a little bit while the sun is out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
I think I've been clear on this thread already that "The Word" has distorted meaning.
As does spiritual.
We can't just carry on as if people understand each other.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Of course. Windows seem to get dirty whenever the questions get too hard to answer.
Edited by waysiderspelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Except that it really is the point. You have no idea whether or not the claims are verifiable.
You also have no idea what my "theology" is.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
I asked this of him many times. After days, even weeks, of dodging and window washing, he answered.
Mike said:
The Word = YourBelieving+ChristInYou+YourWalk+TheBible
Hope this clears things up.
Edited by Nathan_JrBloody gloves
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
A) They were.
B) It was not. lcm was walking around as if in a fog at the time. Even he called it that by 1989.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
You told us-
"Ten times I count the phrase see Jesus in these two pages.
Couple this with the introductory paragraph I gave you from p.207, and it's progressing to SEE JESUS that he’s urging with us OLGs to do. It’s for other grads too."
===============
Basic pfal- and basic Bullinger- get "to whom" correct.
ONCE, vpw mentioned "see Jesus" for us, and nine times he mentioned it for Zaccheus. If he told us ONCE, he's not "urging" us to do it.Once it was for us to "see more and more of God's Word."
====================
On page 207 he writes:
As we pass through life, we must climb ever higher and higher in our hearts and minds with the greatness of God’s Word. We must always keep progressing to see more and more of God’s Word and His promises manifested in our daily lives.
Then on pages 212-213 we see:
All I know is that the Word of God says Zacchaeus was a publican and he was rich. We learn one other thing about Zacchaeus in this account and that is that he was motivated by a wonderful desire: He wanted to see Jesus.
Luke 19:3
And he sought to see Jesus who he was; and could not for the press, because he was little of stature.
Zacchaeus wanted to see Jesus - who he was. Perhaps it was simple curiosity prompting him. The text doesn't say. But whatever the reason, at least he wanted to see Jesus. I wish that today, across our nation, there were more people who wanted to see Jesus. When people ask to see Jesus today, we've got to show him. When they want to see Jesus, who he is, we can show them God's Word and the greatness of Jesus Christ's position in the Word.
Zacchaeus wanted to see Jesus, but he couldn't. The reason he couldn't see him or get to him was for "the press." That doesn't mean the news media, such as newspaper, radio, or television reporters. "Press" means "numbers of people." There were so many people surrounding Jesus that Zacchaeus couldn't get a glimpse of him.
Verse 3:
. . . because he was little of stature.
Zacchaeus was short. The biggest thing about him was his desire to see Jesus.
Verse 4:
And he [Zacchaeus] ran before [ahead of where Jesus was walking], and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see him: for he [Jesus] was to pass that way.
Zacchaeus climbed up into a sycamore tree in order to get a view of this noted person, Jesus, whom people were talking about. Zacchaeus took the necessary action to fulfill his desire. That's very important. If you want to see Jesus Christ through God's Word, you need to move, take action. Zacchaeus took the initiative and climbed up into that sycamore tree.
*/*/*/*
Ten times I count the phrase see Jesus in these two pages.
Couple this with the introductory paragraph I gave you from p.207, and it's progressing to SEE JESUS that he’s urging with us OLGs to do. It’s for other grads too.
================================
This is one reason people don't trust your doctrine- you continually make ELEMENTARY MISTAKES. That's why everything's behind a curtain- to try to minimize the sunlight on the BASIC ERRORS.
One of those "ten times" the phrase "see Jesus" wasn't said at all.
ONE of those "ten times" the phrase "see Jesus" referred to us.
The remaining EIGHT times were all in reference to ZACCHEUS, who wanted to see Jesus.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
Window washing should shine light on things. In principle (IP)
The Word = Plate Spinning
Got it. Maybe. May have to adjust the equation. Again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
You notice in that equation, it appears Christ's relation to The Word is a function of other people?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.