I think this thread has jumped the shark…if this goes on much longer Roy Scheider said “ I think you’re gonna need a bigger thread.”
The opening post says 99% of the woes are due to us not getting it right. Your sharky remark is a reminder that all these waves has many of us PFAL nay-sayers foaming. Thus, caste your inter-net on the right side, and you will indeed need a bigger thread. (John 21:6)
The opening post says 99% of the woes are due to us not getting it right. Your sharkyremark is a reminder that all these waves has many of us PFAL nay-sayers foaming. Thus, caste your inter-net on the right side, and you will indeed need a bigger thread. (John 21:6)
A line from Sharky’s Machine may work here...
Sharky: You know Frisco, when we used to flush the toilet upstairs, we always wondered where it came to...
Therefore, the answer to life is not 42 but 153 (John 21:10).
John 21: 10 & 11: 10 Jesus said to them, “Bring some of the fish you have just caught.” 11 So Simon Peter climbed back into the boat and dragged the net ashore. It was full of large fish, 153, but even with so many the net was not torn.
...many, many years later...
You know times have changed when a celebrity just doing a simple “backshot” with champagne breaks the net.
I went to see Sharky's Machine a few times in a theater when I was serving a wow year in OH. Loved that movie.
I liked him on Gunsmoke, Sharky’s , Best Little whore house and of course Deliverance.
speaking of movies when we were WOWs
I was WOW in DC 1975-76...going to the movies was a real treat ! I still remember the ones our WOW family went to see...I'll list them according to what I liked - #1 being the best ( "be best" ) - - or I mean in order of what I liked the most:
1. All the President's Men
2. THX-1138 (an older movie playing at some nostalgic theater)
Sometimes when I came across a math problem that was unclear to me, I would look at it in light of similar math problems that were clear to me.
Hmmm sometimes when I come across math problems that are unclear to me they look remarkably similar to other math problems which are also unclear to me.
Does this mean I have recovered from the keys to the maths interpretation?
yeah but not just any number - it's the product of 6 and 7
now - does anyone have a problem with that? well, to be honest - I do...because it's a mathematical problem !
On 2/13/2022 at 8:08 PM, Bolshevik said:
Sometimes when I came across a math problem that was unclear to me, I would look at it in light of similar math problems that were clear to me.
On 2/13/2022 at 8:24 PM, waysider said:
42 is the number of times you can get away with saying "Lo Shanta Lo Maka See Tay Beep Beep Boop" before someone realizes you're really just babbling.
On 2/14/2022 at 6:02 PM, Twinky said:
Therefore, the answer to life is not 42 but 153 (John 21:10).
On 2/14/2022 at 6:29 PM, Bolshevik said:
This is just the tip of the iceberg . . . Twinky is declared the winner. Cause math.
14 hours ago, chockfull said:
Hmmm sometimes when I come across math problems that are unclear to me they look remarkably similar to other math problems which are also unclear to me.
Does this mean I have recovered from the keys to the maths interpretation?
In addition to other negatives of the class, I thought I heard the “Teacher” say he had a non-denominational group but I think it was a Faustian slip – he was talking about the lowest common denominator – i.e. his signature intuition which simplifies adding, subtracting, and comparingfractions of different belief systems like fundamentalism, spiritualism, and Gnosticism.
The Green Book asked the question “Why Division?” – duh - that’s easy – the “Teacher” always preferred to divide and conquer – by repetitive subtraction he broke up families, friends, and subordinates…that’s how cult-leaders maintain control over their subordinates - by encouraging dissent between them, thereby preventing them from uniting in opposite numbers to him.
Eventually I realized what the phrase “numbers racket” meant. It was the constant drone of a loud and confusing noise the “Teacher” made shouting “send more money.” A numbers racket is an illegal use of plagiarized material where players buy chances to win the more abundant life. PFAL is one of the longest running schemes that has redefined value mathematics as the result of an incalculable risk to “bet the farm” on the numero uno cult-leader who lived on a farm in Ohio….and for that we were constantly berated…there must be fifty ways to crucify your followers.
Now we see HOW VPWs Word fits with a mathematical exactness and scientific precision.
and a shoehorn and ethics insurance
Yes
... it fits like his hand in your pocket (eeeeewww double-creepy) …he wanted our undivided attention for his “rightly-divided” message – that believing equals receiving when it comes to the formula for deceiving – it was the exponential growth of his coffer at the square root of a diseased tree – a number which produces an unspecified quantity when error is multiplied by itself. As they say in the gaming industry – it’s not a zero-sum game cuz it’s one person's loss in a transaction is another person's gain…somehow it all adds up – he was a shyster extraordinaire!
Thanks - I like how you tipped the scales back to the other off-topic…that’s always a plus
On 5/6/2021 at 12:04 PM, Mike said:
. . .
From 2002-2008 I was an advocate here that we return to PFAL to see how much we missed the first time(s), and to see how much we forgot or drifted from. I am convinced that 99% of all the woes reported here are due to us all NOT GETTING IT RIGHT the first times.
. .
Just wanted to weigh in, so as not to bait and switch the topic at hand in a glove . . . do not ADD to Da Verd.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
35
61
34
37
Popular Days
May 10
27
May 7
25
Feb 18
16
Feb 16
14
Top Posters In This Topic
Mike 35 posts
T-Bone 61 posts
Twinky 34 posts
Bolshevik 37 posts
Popular Days
May 10 2021
27 posts
May 7 2021
25 posts
Feb 18 2022
16 posts
Feb 16 2022
14 posts
Popular Posts
Twinky
Hello Mike. I've kinda missed you round here. Could always rely on you to make a point that would stir up Cafe denizens. Was wondering what had happened to you. You went away to study PFAL more de
Raf
Am I the only one who thinks Bullinger's Figures of Speech sound a WHOLE LOT like Harry Potter spells? Condescensio! Hypocatastasis! Asyndeton! Polysyndeton! Expecto-Runaroundem!
cman
So the idea is that if specific things come together than things happen. And these things that contribute to the outcome, and the outcome itself, are, or can be known. Some kind of scientific or philo
Posted Images
waysider
42 is the number of times you can get away with saying "Lo Shanta Lo Maka See Tay Beep Beep Boop" before someone realizes you're really just babbling.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
I suspect The Babble Fish would have eliminated the entire Intermediate Class.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
Sorry you had to wait this long for the interpretation of puns:
”and know my children, you should go fishing in the babbling brook in this day and time and hour…that is all…Holy Spirit out”
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
We're just trying to remove the scales from folks' eyes. These matters can get quite slippery. (Acts 9:18)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
Alright so I’m gill-ty of failing to tackle that verse.
hmmmm seems like I should get extra points for the double entendre post super bowl
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
As pointed out in the DTA class, it's a spiritual competition. The only thing that matters in life is winning.
I will "spot" you an upvote.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
Thanks I'll pay you back in full soon - right now all I have is a fin
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
This is getting reely silly.
Trying to cod us all like that! This is not the plaice for it! But I suppose someone will be carping on soon about spiritu-reel competition.
Edited by TwinkyDo I need one?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
I think this thread has jumped the shark…if this goes on much longer Roy Scheider said “ I think you’re gonna need a bigger thread.”
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
The opening post says 99% of the woes are due to us not getting it right. Your sharky remark is a reminder that all these waves has many of us PFAL nay-sayers foaming. Thus, caste your inter-net on the right side, and you will indeed need a bigger thread. (John 21:6)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
Therefore, the answer to life is not 42 but 153 (John 21:10).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
A line from Sharky’s Machine may work here...
Sharky: You know Frisco, when we used to flush the toilet upstairs, we always wondered where it came to...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
John 21: 10 & 11:
10 Jesus said to them, “Bring some of the fish you have just caught.” 11 So Simon Peter climbed back into the boat and dragged the net ashore. It was full of large fish, 153, but even with so many the net was not torn.
...many, many years later...
You know times have changed when a celebrity just doing a simple “backshot” with champagne breaks the net.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
This is just the tip of the iceberg . . . Twinky is declared the winner. Cause math.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
I went to see Sharky's Machine a few times in a theater when I was serving a wow year in OH. Loved that movie.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
I liked him on Gunsmoke, Sharky’s , Best Little whore house and of course Deliverance.
speaking of movies when we were WOWs
I was WOW in DC 1975-76...going to the movies was a real treat ! I still remember the ones our WOW family went to see...I'll list them according to what I liked - #1 being the best ( "be best"
) - - or I mean in order of what I liked the most:
1. All the President's Men
2. THX-1138 (an older movie playing at some nostalgic theater)
3. The Pink Panther Strikes Again
4. Mother, Jugs & Speed
Edited by T-BoneT-Bone editor strikes again
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Yes I do believe Twinky has the right angle
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Hmmm sometimes when I come across math problems that are unclear to me they look remarkably similar to other math problems which are also unclear to me.
Does this mean I have recovered from the keys to the maths interpretation?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
In addition to other negatives of the class, I thought I heard the “Teacher” say he had a non-denominational group but I think it was a Faustian slip – he was talking about the lowest common denominator – i.e. his signature intuition which simplifies adding, subtracting, and comparing fractions of different belief systems like fundamentalism, spiritualism, and Gnosticism.
The Green Book asked the question “Why Division?” – duh - that’s easy – the “Teacher” always preferred to divide and conquer – by repetitive subtraction he broke up families, friends, and subordinates…that’s how cult-leaders maintain control over their subordinates - by encouraging dissent between them, thereby preventing them from uniting in opposite numbers to him.
Eventually I realized what the phrase “numbers racket” meant. It was the constant drone of a loud and confusing noise the “Teacher” made shouting “send more money.” A numbers racket is an illegal use of plagiarized material where players buy chances to win the more abundant life. PFAL is one of the longest running schemes that has redefined value mathematics as the result of an incalculable risk to “bet the farm” on the numero uno cult-leader who lived on a farm in Ohio….and for that we were constantly berated…there must be fifty ways to crucify your followers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Now we see HOW VPWs Word fits with a mathematical exactness and scientific precision.
and a shoehorn and ethics insurance
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
Yes
... it fits like his hand in your pocket (eeeeewww double-creepy) …he wanted our undivided attention for his “rightly-divided” message – that believing equals receiving when it comes to the formula for deceiving – it was the exponential growth of his coffer at the square root of a diseased tree – a number which produces an unspecified quantity when error is multiplied by itself. As they say in the gaming industry – it’s not a zero-sum game cuz it’s one person's loss in a transaction is another person's gain…somehow it all adds up – he was a shyster extraordinaire!
Edited by T-Bone2+ 2 = 4 editors
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
Thanks - I like how you tipped the scales back to the other off-topic…that’s always a plus
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
Just wanted to weigh in, so as not to bait and switch the topic at hand in a glove . . . do not ADD to Da Verd.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.