. You can keep smoking those twit-teachings, but you can't take wierwille out of those teachings!! You can leave the cult, but if you continue smoking those "rightly-divided" teachings.......you can't take wierwille out of the brand.
I don't give a f---. I'm free of that mind control and enjoy the ability to think and ponder over what I hear.
Twinky, not only do I" think, and ponder over what I hear," but I also can disagree with others. Back in Way World, VPW's opinions were the only ones that were important. Nowadays, I can come to the GSC, and politely disagree with others. Here at the GSC, people are allowed to air their opinions. Sometimes people like my opinions, and sometimes they don't, but I am allowed to voice what is important to ME! And others are allowed the same privilege. Wow, years ago, if people disagreed with VPW, all Hell broke loose.
Twinky, not only do I" think, and ponder over what I hear," but I also can disagree with others. Back in Way World, VPW's opinions were the only ones that were important. Nowadays, I can come to the GSC, and politely disagree with others. Here at the GSC, people are allowed to air their opinions. Sometimes people like my opinions, and sometimes they don't, but I am allowed to voice what is important to ME! And others are allowed the same privilege. Wow, years ago, if people disagreed with VPW, all Hell broke loose.
maybe, these guys truly believe that wierwille had it going on........right doctrine, right practice, right on before God Almighty. Could it be that these guys are SO INDOCTRINATED and INSTITUTIONALIZED that they've lost all grasp of critical thinking?
5 hours ago, skyrider said:
All in all, I think it's about.....
Saving Face
Being Unrepentant
Establishing a lane to run in during retirement
Desiring to be the lead dog
I'm inclined to think it's a combination of these two lines of thought. Not within a particular individual, but among the individuals, some one way and some the other. But it's difficult to determine who goes which way.
Either way, to blindly vomit out what VP vomited doesn't do good for others, or themselves. They have been continuing to hold VP on a pedestal, declaring how they loved this teaching, or that teaching, or how they miss hearing such and such. I feel fortunate that I wasn't exposed to him.
I'm inclined to think it's a combination of these two lines of thought. Not within a particular individual, but among the individuals, some one way and some the other. But it's difficult to determine who goes which way.
Either way, to blindly vomit out what VP vomited doesn't do good for others, or themselves. They have been continuing to hold VP on a pedestal, declaring how they loved this teaching, or that teaching, or how they miss hearing such and such. I feel fortunate that I wasn't exposed to him.
Taxi, great post!! I think that many people " hold VPW on a pedestal," because they have been taught to think that. To believe otherwise, might make them question themselves, and their moral values. I know when I started questioning what I was being taught in TWI, I realized that a lot of the teachings were garbage, and I realized I was wasting my time, and money on malarkey. After much painful soul searching, I realized I had to leave, and I did. Some people don't want to search their hearts, and minds, because of what they might find. For them, it is much easier, and perhaps safer, not to do so. If they did, they might realize that VPW was a POS, and they have wasted decades of their lives believing his lies.
I'm inclined to think it's a combination of these two lines of thought. Not within a particular individual, but among the individuals, some one way and some the other. But it's difficult to determine who goes which way.
Either way, to blindly vomit out what VP vomited doesn't do good for others, or themselves. They have been continuing to hold VP on a pedestal, declaring how they loved this teaching, or that teaching, or how they miss hearing such and such. I feel fortunate that I wasn't exposed to him.
Ah, but you were... unless you never took a class offered by TWI.
Rocky, a very good question. If I had to answer, I would say no.
10 hours ago, skyrider said:
Could it be that these guys are SO INDOCTRINATED and INSTITUTIONALIZED that they've lost all grasp of critical thinking?
At this point, it pretty much goes without saying, yes, they HAVE lost all grasp thereof... as WE did when we fell under the influence of Wierwille, a master manipulator.
However, it also has occurred to me that "critical thinking" is the antithesis of the Wierwille Mystique. Skyrider, perhaps you could weigh in on that idea.
Very brief and cursory research on the subject brought my attention to the following excerpts from a few people who have written on the subject of critical thinking:
Determine the importance and relevance of arguments and ideas.
Recognize, build and appraise arguments.
Identify inconsistencies and errors in reasoning.
Approach problems in a consistent and systematic way.
Reflect on the justification of their own assumptions, beliefs and values.
In essence, critical thinking requires you to use your ability to reason. It is about being an active learner rather than a passive recipient of information.
Critical thinkers rigorously question ideas and assumptions rather than accepting them at face value. They will always seek to determine whether the ideas, arguments and findings represent the entire picture and are open to finding that they do not.
Critical thinking is a skill that allows you to make logical and informed decisions to the best of your ability. For example, a child who has not yet developed such skills might believe the Tooth Fairy left money under their pillow based on stories their parents told them. A critical thinker, however, can quickly conclude that the existence of such a thing is probably unlikely—even if there are a few bucks under their pillow.
The habits ofmindthat characterize a person strongly disposed toward critical thinking include a desire to follow reason and evidence wherever they may lead, a systematic approach to problem solving,inquisitiveness, even-handedness, and confidence inreasoning.
Critical thinking can be seen as having two components: 1) a set of information and belief generating and processing skills, and 2) the habit, based on intellectual commitment, of using those skills to guide behavior. It is thus to be contrasted with: 1) the mere acquisition and retention of information alone, because it involves a particular way in which information is sought and treated; 2) the mere possession of a set of skills, because it involves the continual use of them; and 3) the mere use of those skills ("as an exercise") without acceptance of their results.
Critical thinking varies according to the motivation underlying it. When grounded in selfish motives, it is often manifested in the skillful manipulation of ideas in service of one’s own, or one's groups’, vested interest. As such it is typically intellectually flawed, however pragmatically successful it might be. When grounded in fairmindedness and intellectual integrity, it is typically of a higher order intellectually, though subject to the charge of "idealism" by those habituated to its selfish use.
Critical thinking of any kind is never universal in any individual; everyone is subject to episodes of undisciplined or irrational thought. Its quality is therefore typically a matter of degree and dependent on, among other things, the quality and depth of experience in a given domain of thinking or with respect to a particular class of questions. No one is a critical thinker through-and-through, but only to such-and-such a degree, with such-and-such insights and blind spots, subject to such-and-such tendencies towards self-delusion. For this reason, the development of critical thinking skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor.
In essence, critical thinking requires you to use your ability to reason. It is about being an active learner rather than a passive recipient of information.
That defines my experience with The Way. I started out as an active learner, what people used to call a "seeker". It didn't take long, though, before Way protocol turned me into a passive recipient.Some people are perfectly content to be passive recipients. I only know I wasn't one of them.
4 hours ago, Rocky said:
Critical thinking of any kind is never universal in any individual; everyone is subject to episodes of undisciplined or irrational thought. Its quality is therefore typically a matter of degree and dependent on, among other things, the quality and depth of experience in a given domain of thinking or with respect to a particular class of questions. No one is a critical thinker through-and-through, but only to such-and-such a degree, with such-and-such insights and blind spots, subject to such-and-such tendencies towards self-delusion. For this reason, the development of critical thinking skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor
At this point, it pretty much goes without saying, yes, they HAVE lost all grasp thereof... as WE did when we fell under the influence of Wierwille, a master manipulator.
However, it also has occurred to me that "critical thinking" is the antithesis of the Wierwille Mystique. Skyrider, perhaps you could weigh in on that idea.
Very brief and cursory research on the subject brought my attention to the following excerpts from a few people who have written on the subject of critical thinking:
Determine the importance and relevance of arguments and ideas.
Recognize, build and appraise arguments.
Identify inconsistencies and errors in reasoning.
Approach problems in a consistent and systematic way.
Reflect on the justification of their own assumptions, beliefs and values.
In essence, critical thinking requires you to use your ability to reason. It is about being an active learner rather than a passive recipient of information.
Critical thinkers rigorously question ideas and assumptions rather than accepting them at face value. They will always seek to determine whether the ideas, arguments and findings represent the entire picture and are open to finding that they do not.
Critical thinking is a skill that allows you to make logical and informed decisions to the best of your ability. For example, a child who has not yet developed such skills might believe the Tooth Fairy left money under their pillow based on stories their parents told them. A critical thinker, however, can quickly conclude that the existence of such a thing is probably unlikely—even if there are a few bucks under their pillow.
The habits ofmindthat characterize a person strongly disposed toward critical thinking include a desire to follow reason and evidence wherever they may lead, a systematic approach to problem solving,inquisitiveness, even-handedness, and confidence inreasoning.
Critical thinking can be seen as having two components: 1) a set of information and belief generating and processing skills, and 2) the habit, based on intellectual commitment, of using those skills to guide behavior. It is thus to be contrasted with: 1) the mere acquisition and retention of information alone, because it involves a particular way in which information is sought and treated; 2) the mere possession of a set of skills, because it involves the continual use of them; and 3) the mere use of those skills ("as an exercise") without acceptance of their results.
Critical thinking varies according to the motivation underlying it. When grounded in selfish motives, it is often manifested in the skillful manipulation of ideas in service of one’s own, or one's groups’, vested interest. As such it is typically intellectually flawed, however pragmatically successful it might be. When grounded in fairmindedness and intellectual integrity, it is typically of a higher order intellectually, though subject to the charge of "idealism" by those habituated to its selfish use.
Critical thinking of any kind is never universal in any individual; everyone is subject to episodes of undisciplined or irrational thought. Its quality is therefore typically a matter of degree and dependent on, among other things, the quality and depth of experience in a given domain of thinking or with respect to a particular class of questions. No one is a critical thinker through-and-through, but only to such-and-such a degree, with such-and-such insights and blind spots, subject to such-and-such tendencies towards self-delusion. For this reason, the development of critical thinking skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor.
Great post Rocky !!!!
thanks for the info / links - I never get tired of stuff on critical thinking
Given that critical thinking is the antithesis of the Wierwille mystique, it should surprise no one, especially here at GSC, that the R&R RR is stuck in neutral.
Anyone who tries to duplicate -- albeit refine and distill the organizational model back to how it was in the good old days of TWI -- has ZERO chance to establish a thriving fellowship centered on godliness. At it's core, the model of bombarding "students" with hours and hours of bible teachings, in which they ONLY are given information and expected to absorb it, can do very little critical thinking.
To build churches, fellowships, and a way corpse that would actually be better described without the letter "e" in the title, would have to honor the students with the dignity of allowing them to think... critically. The approach is called, Socratic. The student is actively engaged and CHALLENGES the teacher. But if the teacher cannot cope with that kind of student, you get cults instead.
At this point, it pretty much goes without saying, yes, they HAVE lost all grasp thereof... as WE did when we fell under the influence of Wierwille, a master manipulator.
However, it also has occurred to me that "critical thinking" is the antithesis of the Wierwille Mystique. Skyrider, perhaps you could weigh in on that idea.
Very brief and cursory research on the subject brought my attention to the following excerpts from a few people who have written on the subject of critical thinking:
To build churches, fellowships, and a way corpse that would actually be better described without the letter "e" in the title, would have to honor the students with the dignity of allowing them to think... critically. The approach is called, Socratic. The student is actively engaged and CHALLENGES the teacher. But if the teacher cannot cope with that kind of student, you get cults instead.
Given that critical thinking is the antithesis of the Wierwille mystique, it should surprise no one, especially here at GSC, that the R&R RR is stuck in neutral.
Anyone who tries to duplicate -- albeit refine and distill the organizational model back to how it was in the good old days of TWI -- has ZERO chance to establish a thriving fellowship centered on godliness. At it's core, the model of bombarding "students" with hours and hours of bible teachings, in which they ONLY are given information and expected to absorb it, can do very little critical thinking.
To build churches, fellowships, and a way corpse that would actually be better described without the letter "e" in the title, would have to honor the students with the dignity of allowing them to think... critically. The approach is called, Socratic. The student is actively engaged and CHALLENGES the teacher. But if the teacher cannot cope with that kind of student, you get cults instead.
To build churches, fellowships, and a way corpse that would actually be better described without the letter "e" in the title, would have to honor the students with the dignity of allowing them to think... critically. The approach is called, Socratic. The student is actively engaged and CHALLENGES the teacher. But if the teacher cannot cope with that kind of student, you get cults instead.
Does that make sense?
Yes it makes sense.
You can even trace the RnR railroad by their attempts to get there. First like everyone else they reject the totalitarian rule of the Way leadership. Over the course of many years they plan an exit. They try to complain via letter and direct conversation, but they get shut down completely. So they escalate. Letter to the Way Corpse trying to drum up support. Lofty ideas about how true ministries are run by democracies. This lasts until they appear on that YouTube video that started a thread here. Then they were "marked and avoided" by JY de Loser. Now that group that went through extra suffering feels extra entitled. So they are the new leadership in the cult they split off.
IMO the dictor was a master at sleight-of-hand techniques with scriptures to get people to suspend critical thinking, all while convincing them he was building critical thinking. Thus you have all these islands of misfit toys basing their lives off of the "critical thinking skills" built in PLAF. People can't get out of that mindset. They can't read commentaries for added insight, they can't hold differing opinions about Christology and discuss them over a good meal, they can't even walk in a modern church without getting twitches.
I mean Way-brained theological logic almost has the same ignorant smell and taste that the Westboro Baptist church does. Hate everyone who isn't like you. Excommunicate them. Persecute them. That is the fruit. Combined with a huge ego convinced they understand scriptures like nobody else born on the planet.
The Socratic method has an underlying assumption of two equals carrying on a conversation. In the Way there were seldom conversations between two equals. It was always a condescending discussion.
The reference of Socrates in this thread has quite an ironic note to it:
"he death sentence ofSocrateswas the legal consequence of asking politico-philosophic questions of his students, from which resulted the two accusations of moral corruption and of impiety."
-wikipedia
Those two charges basically stemmed from "not respecting the current gods of Athens" and "introducing new gods".
The reference of Socrates in this thread has quite an ironic note to it:
"he death sentence ofSocrateswas the legal consequence of asking politico-philosophic questions of his students, from which resulted the two accusations of moral corruption and of impiety."
-wikipedia
Those two charges basically stemmed from "not respecting the current gods of Athens" and "introducing new gods".
A sub-topic in the linked wikipedia page on Socrates references the Socratic method.
Perhaps his most important contribution toWesternthought is hisdialecticmethod of inquiry, known as the Socratic method or method of "elenchus", which he largely applied to the examination of key moral concepts such as the Good andJustice. It was first described by Plato in theSocratic Dialogues. To solve a problem, it would be broken down into a series of questions, the answers to which gradually distill the answer a person would seek. The development and practice of this method is one of Socrates's most enduring contributions, and is a key factor in earning his mantle as the father ofpolitical philosophy,ethicsor moral philosophy, and as a figurehead of all the central themes inWestern philosophy. TheSocratic methodhas often been considered as a defining element of American legal education.
French philosopherPierre Hadotsuggests that the dialogues are a type of spiritual exercise. Hadot writes that "in Plato's view, every dialectical exercise, precisely because it is an exercise of pure thought, subject to the demands of theLogos, turns the soul away from the sensible world, and allows it to convert itself towards the Good."
Recommended Posts
waysider
And there you have it.
"Oh, but (insert splinter name) is right on."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
I don't give a f---. I'm free of that mind control and enjoy the ability to think and ponder over what I hear.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Twinky, not only do I" think, and ponder over what I hear," but I also can disagree with others. Back in Way World, VPW's opinions were the only ones that were important. Nowadays, I can come to the GSC, and politely disagree with others. Here at the GSC, people are allowed to air their opinions. Sometimes people like my opinions, and sometimes they don't, but I am allowed to voice what is important to ME! And others are allowed the same privilege. Wow, years ago, if people disagreed with VPW, all Hell broke loose.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
Bingo , Grace !!!!
thought your post deserved it
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Taxidev
I'm inclined to think it's a combination of these two lines of thought. Not within a particular individual, but among the individuals, some one way and some the other. But it's difficult to determine who goes which way.
Either way, to blindly vomit out what VP vomited doesn't do good for others, or themselves. They have been continuing to hold VP on a pedestal, declaring how they loved this teaching, or that teaching, or how they miss hearing such and such. I feel fortunate that I wasn't exposed to him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Taxi, great post!! I think that many people " hold VPW on a pedestal," because they have been taught to think that. To believe otherwise, might make them question themselves, and their moral values. I know when I started questioning what I was being taught in TWI, I realized that a lot of the teachings were garbage, and I realized I was wasting my time, and money on malarkey. After much painful soul searching, I realized I had to leave, and I did. Some people don't want to search their hearts, and minds, because of what they might find. For them, it is much easier, and perhaps safer, not to do so. If they did, they might realize that VPW was a POS, and they have wasted decades of their lives believing his lies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
Ah, but you were... unless you never took a class offered by TWI.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
Some of them lost any remnant of critical thinking they might have had... going on 50 years ago now.
Do you think they could even define critical thinking if their lives depended on it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Rocky, a very good question. If I had to answer, I would say no.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
At this point, it pretty much goes without saying, yes, they HAVE lost all grasp thereof... as WE did when we fell under the influence of Wierwille, a master manipulator.
However, it also has occurred to me that "critical thinking" is the antithesis of the Wierwille Mystique. Skyrider, perhaps you could weigh in on that idea.
Very brief and cursory research on the subject brought my attention to the following excerpts from a few people who have written on the subject of critical thinking:
Someone with critical thinking skills can:
In essence, critical thinking requires you to use your ability to reason. It is about being an active learner rather than a passive recipient of information.
Critical thinkers rigorously question ideas and assumptions rather than accepting them at face value. They will always seek to determine whether the ideas, arguments and findings represent the entire picture and are open to finding that they do not.
6 Crucial critical thinking skills (and how you can improve them)
Critical thinking is a skill that allows you to make logical and informed decisions to the best of your ability. For example, a child who has not yet developed such skills might believe the Tooth Fairy left money under their pillow based on stories their parents told them. A critical thinker, however, can quickly conclude that the existence of such a thing is probably unlikely—even if there are a few bucks under their pillow.
Critical thinking is the objective analysis of facts to form a judgment.[1] The subject is complex, and several different definitions exist, which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis, or evaluation of factual evidence.
The habits of mind that characterize a person strongly disposed toward critical thinking include a desire to follow reason and evidence wherever they may lead, a systematic approach to problem solving, inquisitiveness, even-handedness, and confidence in reasoning.
Critical thinking...the awakening of the intellect to the study of itself.
Critical thinking can be seen as having two components: 1) a set of information and belief generating and processing skills, and 2) the habit, based on intellectual commitment, of using those skills to guide behavior. It is thus to be contrasted with: 1) the mere acquisition and retention of information alone, because it involves a particular way in which information is sought and treated; 2) the mere possession of a set of skills, because it involves the continual use of them; and 3) the mere use of those skills ("as an exercise") without acceptance of their results.
Critical thinking varies according to the motivation underlying it. When grounded in selfish motives, it is often manifested in the skillful manipulation of ideas in service of one’s own, or one's groups’, vested interest. As such it is typically intellectually flawed, however pragmatically successful it might be. When grounded in fairmindedness and intellectual integrity, it is typically of a higher order intellectually, though subject to the charge of "idealism" by those habituated to its selfish use.
Critical thinking of any kind is never universal in any individual; everyone is subject to episodes of undisciplined or irrational thought. Its quality is therefore typically a matter of degree and dependent on, among other things, the quality and depth of experience in a given domain of thinking or with respect to a particular class of questions. No one is a critical thinker through-and-through, but only to such-and-such a degree, with such-and-such insights and blind spots, subject to such-and-such tendencies towards self-delusion. For this reason, the development of critical thinking skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
That defines my experience with The Way. I started out as an active learner, what people used to call a "seeker". It didn't take long, though, before Way protocol turned me into a passive recipient.Some people are perfectly content to be passive recipients. I only know I wasn't one of them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
Great post Rocky !!!!
thanks for the info / links - I never get tired of stuff on critical thinking
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
Thank you Waysider. Thank you T-Bone.
And thank you Skyrider for starting this thread.
Given that critical thinking is the antithesis of the Wierwille mystique, it should surprise no one, especially here at GSC, that the R&R RR is stuck in neutral.
Anyone who tries to duplicate -- albeit refine and distill the organizational model back to how it was in the good old days of TWI -- has ZERO chance to establish a thriving fellowship centered on godliness. At it's core, the model of bombarding "students" with hours and hours of bible teachings, in which they ONLY are given information and expected to absorb it, can do very little critical thinking.
To build churches, fellowships, and a way corpse that would actually be better described without the letter "e" in the title, would have to honor the students with the dignity of allowing them to think... critically. The approach is called, Socratic. The student is actively engaged and CHALLENGES the teacher. But if the teacher cannot cope with that kind of student, you get cults instead.
Does that make sense?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
skyrider
Thousands of cult followers AND "ex-cultists" STILL smoking...........
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DontWorryBeHappy
Total sense Rocky!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
skyrider
Ditto. Great post, Rocky...........thanks.
Will respond later........
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Taxidev
Perfect.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Rocky, it makes perfect sense!! Excellent post!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Yes it makes sense.
You can even trace the RnR railroad by their attempts to get there. First like everyone else they reject the totalitarian rule of the Way leadership. Over the course of many years they plan an exit. They try to complain via letter and direct conversation, but they get shut down completely. So they escalate. Letter to the Way Corpse trying to drum up support. Lofty ideas about how true ministries are run by democracies. This lasts until they appear on that YouTube video that started a thread here. Then they were "marked and avoided" by JY de Loser. Now that group that went through extra suffering feels extra entitled. So they are the new leadership in the cult they split off.
IMO the dictor was a master at sleight-of-hand techniques with scriptures to get people to suspend critical thinking, all while convincing them he was building critical thinking. Thus you have all these islands of misfit toys basing their lives off of the "critical thinking skills" built in PLAF. People can't get out of that mindset. They can't read commentaries for added insight, they can't hold differing opinions about Christology and discuss them over a good meal, they can't even walk in a modern church without getting twitches.
I mean Way-brained theological logic almost has the same ignorant smell and taste that the Westboro Baptist church does. Hate everyone who isn't like you. Excommunicate them. Persecute them. That is the fruit. Combined with a huge ego convinced they understand scriptures like nobody else born on the planet.
The Socratic method has an underlying assumption of two equals carrying on a conversation. In the Way there were seldom conversations between two equals. It was always a condescending discussion.
Edited by chockfullLink to comment
Share on other sites
Taxidev
More like a condescending preaching.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
skyrider
Same goes for the condescending pfal class......
Duly Noted: Wierwille was The Teacher. We were his students......and it would ALWAYS stay that way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
The reference of Socrates in this thread has quite an ironic note to it:
"he death sentence of Socrates was the legal consequence of asking politico-philosophic questions of his students, from which resulted the two accusations of moral corruption and of impiety."
-wikipedia
Those two charges basically stemmed from "not respecting the current gods of Athens" and "introducing new gods".
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Sky, bingo! But, even students grow-up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
A sub-topic in the linked wikipedia page on Socrates references the Socratic method.
Perhaps his most important contribution to Western thought is his dialectic method of inquiry, known as the Socratic method or method of "elenchus", which he largely applied to the examination of key moral concepts such as the Good and Justice. It was first described by Plato in the Socratic Dialogues. To solve a problem, it would be broken down into a series of questions, the answers to which gradually distill the answer a person would seek. The development and practice of this method is one of Socrates's most enduring contributions, and is a key factor in earning his mantle as the father of political philosophy, ethics or moral philosophy, and as a figurehead of all the central themes in Western philosophy. The Socratic method has often been considered as a defining element of American legal education.
French philosopher Pierre Hadot suggests that the dialogues are a type of spiritual exercise. Hadot writes that "in Plato's view, every dialectical exercise, precisely because it is an exercise of pure thought, subject to the demands of the Logos, turns the soul away from the sensible world, and allows it to convert itself towards the Good."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.