Just to remind people, this thread is about Charlene's book. Â
It is not about snowstorms, snakes in gardens, lesbian sex, or even, really, about VPW himself. It's about her take on his teaching. Her book. Which, doubtless, Mike and other derailers have not read. Â
Just to remind people, this thread is about Charlene's book. Â
It is not about snowstorms, snakes in gardens, lesbian sex, or even, really, about VPW himself. It's about her take on his teaching. Her book. Which, doubtless, Mike and other derailers have not read. Â
An interview was posted by the writer of the book that sparks questions.
Not every empath is codependent, but every empath in a relationship with a narc unwittingly becomes codependent.
Whats a better word than victim?
Technically, the NPD is victim #1, that's how they are made. They're compensating for the permanent damage. Projecting victim mentality outward through the cult strengthens the shared fantasy.
What does it look like when someone rejects the opportunity to escape?
By "escape" do you mean turn one's back the relationships formed in The Way International? Relationships held in place by the authority of government entities?
Technically, the NPD is victim #1, that's how they are made. They're compensating for the permanent damage. Projecting victim mentality outward through the cult strengthens the shared fantasy.
Maybe target is a more accurate word than victim for those abused by a narcissist?
By "escape" do you mean turn one's back the relationships formed in The Way International? Relationships held in place by the authority of government entities?
If being in a cult is anything like being in a relationship with a narcissist, one may feel trapped, imprisoned. So, escape makes sense. There are synonyms for escape. It's a word choice.
If being in a cult is anything like being in a relationship with a narcissist, one may feel trapped, imprisoned. So, escape makes sense. There are synonyms for escape. It's a word choice.
I would argue there's usually a form of leverage involved. Enforced by legal authorities.
The interview focused on feelings, and mental tricks. Â
The interview focused on feelings, and mental tricks. Â
I would say that in my case, at least, this would most closely describe my involvement.
There were no legal complications for me, though I can certainly recognize this wasn't the case for everyone, especially for people who had child custody issues to be resolved.
Â
edit: Escape can be a rather broad term. For me, it was not a case of being physically restrained.
I would argue there's usually a form of leverage involved. Enforced by legal authorities.
The interview focused on feelings, and mental tricks. Â
Legal authorities are the only ones with leverage? After the cult or narcissist has led one to abandon all friends and family and education and career, where will one go? Where is one’s support? Leverage.
Mental tricks are designed to distort reality. The prison feels real, even if it’s a state of mind. Â
Legal authorities are the only ones with leverage? After the cult or narcissist has led one to abandon all friends and family and education and career, where will one go? Where is one’s support? Leverage.
Mental tricks are designed to distort reality. The prison feels real, even if it’s a state of mind. Â
"Legal authorities are the only ones with leverage" I didn't suggest this. I said they enforce the law.
Your example says folks are really good at burning bridges getting into a cult, but somehow forget that technique getting out. I don't think that is true. You got canceled by a group you want to leave, the horror.
Â
I was saying there is likely property or children or a secret being kept, as leverage.
I would say that in my case, at least, this would most closely describe my involvement.
There were no legal complications for me, though I can certainly recognize this wasn't the case for everyone, especially for people who had child custody issues to be resolved.
Â
edit: Escape can be a rather broad term. For me, it was not a case of being physically restrained.
The P in PFAL stands for power. The person least invested holds the power.
Your example says folks are really good at burning bridges getting into a cult, but somehow forget that technique getting out. I don't think that is true. You got canceled by a group you want to leave, the horror.
Â
I don't think the effectual burning of bridges in this context is a consciously, deliberately developed skill. It happens incrementally, subtly, over time, and it's never obvious to the bridge burner they are good at burning bridges until they are all burnt. It's not a learned technique then forgotten.
It's crazy. It is not logical. I expected to get cancelled by the narc. That was neither the problem nor the horror.
To your clarified point about legal enforcement of leverage, yes, that is part of the equation. It can prolong the toxic relationship. Even when the target leaves, willfully, happily, the contact with the narc must continue because of a child.
The child is then weaponized by the narc against her target, punishment for seeing the truth, punishment for cutting off the supply, a final strike to destroy the target once and for all before anyone else finds out the truth.
I don't think the effectual burning of bridges in this context is a consciously, deliberately developed skill. It happens incrementally, subtly, over time, and it's never obvious to the bridge burner they are good at burning bridges until they are all burnt. It's not a learned technique then forgotten.
This sort of thing is what happened to me. One day, in FellowLaborers, I found myself all alone in the house for some reason. I happened to look in a full length mirror and, just like that, like a bolt of lightning, a feeling of self-awareness came over me as I found myself asking, "How the hell did I get here?". Now, I don't mean I couldn't remember arriving or the trip there. I mean I suddenly wondered how my life could have evolved so drastically without me noticing. I realized I wasn't the same person I had been before I got involved with The Way. Not just a little different, but like a completely different person. My bridges to return were gone, vanished. It's not a good feeling. I started to silently question everything that was happening. If only I had paid closer attention to what was unfolding, life might have been very different. Would it have been better? Would it have been worse? Who's to say. But, for sure, it would have been much different.
This sort of thing is what happened to me. One day, in FellowLaborers, I found myself all alone in the house for some reason. I happened to look in a full length mirror and, just like that, like a bolt of lightning, a feeling of self-awareness came over me as I found myself asking, "How the hell did I get here?". Now, I don't mean I couldn't remember arriving or the trip there. I mean I suddenly wondered how my life could have evolved so drastically without me noticing. I realized I wasn't the same person I had been before I got involved with The Way. Not just a little different, but like a completely different person. My bridges to return were gone, vanished. It's not a good feeling. I started to silently question everything that was happening. If only I had paid closer attention to what was unfolding, life might have been very different. Would it have better? Would it have been worse? Who's to say. But, for sure, it would have been much different.
That IS a profound realization. My latest reading adventure, Mama's Last Hug, has likewise profound insight related to things GSCers have reflected on, including but not limited to "going farther than one has been led;" and learning by imitation, IOW how did we get there in the first place.
It also highlights what Augustin Fuentes has said in YouTube shorts that rather than "we are what we eat," instead, we are (or become like) WHO WE MEET. (he says this at the 5:05 point in this video)Â
The entire third chapter of Mama's Last Hug discusses empathy and sympathy.
I go back in my mind to reflect on the lack of concern both Wierwille and Martindale consistently (at least in the open) demonstrated toward those outside of the "in group." They, of course, defined the "in group" as the Household." Further defined as those who "took the class and stood with twi."
I have long viewed that position as callous and lacking in the care necessary to properly exercise the Ministry of Reconciliation. See II Cor 5:17-19.Â
Â
Personally, I can almost understand how/why those two (Victor and Loy) wouldn't be able to grasp the ministry of reconciliation because so much has been studied and written about empathy since the end of the personal ministries (inside of twi) of both of them.
Then again, had either or both of them actually been "tapped in" to the love of God, instead of being more concerned about using their personal position (power/authority) to satisfied their own old nature passions, they might have been able to figure it out without Frans de Waal or Dacher Keltner.
The entire third chapter of Mama's Last Hug discusses empathy and sympathy.
I go back in my mind to reflect on the lack of concern both Wierwille and Martindale consistently (at least in the open) demonstrated toward those outside of the "in group." They, of course, defined the "in group" as the Household." Further defined as those who "took the class and stood with twi."
. . .Â
LCM used to argue "everyone NEEDS to believe something" . . . it was a threat . . . coercing a decision
Same with sense of belonging . . . it is used to encourage people to make a decision to emotionally attach to something they probably should not . . . everyone needs to belong . . . you feel it don't you? . . . well you belong here . . . and we will help you feel the feely feels the way other places do not. . . . Now here's some more vocabulary for our little love language for your brain
This sort of thing is what happened to me. One day, in FellowLaborers, I found myself all alone in the house for some reason. I happened to look in a full length mirror and, just like that, like a bolt of lightning, a feeling of self-awareness came over me as I found myself asking, "How the hell did I get here?". Now, I don't mean I couldn't remember arriving or the trip there. I mean I suddenly wondered how my life could have evolved so drastically without me noticing. I realized I wasn't the same person I had been before I got involved with The Way. Not just a little different, but like a completely different person. My bridges to return were gone, vanished. It's not a good feeling. I started to silently question everything that was happening. If only I had paid closer attention to what was unfolding, life might have been very different. Would it have been better? Would it have been worse? Who's to say. But, for sure, it would have been much different.
I've felt that in TWI. I've felt that in another circumstance. Of course with TWI I didn't exactly burn bridges . . . BUT . . . cutting the cord is supposed to be painful.Â
Usually I remember I would freeze up, just stand there. Was late teens/early 20s a lot. Then the group would bring someone like the Limb Leader for a scream fest. Followed by I would go through the motions for awhile longer.
I've felt that in TWI. I've felt that in another circumstance. Of course with TWI I didn't exactly burn bridges . . . BUT . . . cutting the cord is supposed to be painful.Â
Â
Â
Would you say that since you never really cut ties or burn bridges that is why your view and mind seems to be straddling a fence? Â Where half the time you seem like a TWI apologist and the other half critical?
I've reread what Penworks wrote again and again. It sounds completely helpless. Her insides were screaming to act and she refused to give herself authority in the situation. VPW could have been a 6 year old making demands to his mother. (I'm sure the story changes later)
Â
*set hand on flat on desk . . . smashes it repeatedly with a hammer* . . . I had no choice.
I read what you wrote here. Â It sounds completely without empathy. Â It sounds like you refuse to acknowledge the ties that family, friends, marriages, and long time associations produce by nature of those relationships existing.
Sure at any time any of us could have escaped the bondage we endured by refusing at that moment to accept the false authority usurped by tyrants, cutting ties and leaving.
So what?Â
I find your example comparing this to hitting yourself in the hand repeatedly to be very inaccurate as well as triggering and judgmental.  Ties formed by family and choices aren’t easily reversed.  You can’t just wave your hand like they never existed.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
67
62
91
62
Popular Days
Jul 3
73
Jul 5
48
Jul 24
39
Jul 2
23
Top Posters In This Topic
Rocky 67 posts
Bolshevik 62 posts
penworks 91 posts
Nathan_Jr 62 posts
Popular Days
Jul 3 2023
73 posts
Jul 5 2023
48 posts
Jul 24 2023
39 posts
Jul 2 2023
23 posts
Popular Posts
waysider
This sort of thing is what happened to me. One day, in FellowLaborers, I found myself all alone in the house for some reason. I happened to look in a full length mirror and, just like that, like a bol
penworks
Some of you know that in 1987, I escaped the fundamentalism and cult control of The Way International when I drove away from TWI headquarters in New Knoxville, Ohio, and never went back. I don't
penworks
Hi folks. Hope you're having a happy holiday season. I'm checking in just to let those interested know that Undertow is available on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and local bookstores can order it, t
Posted Images
Rocky
SMHÂ
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
Just to remind people, this thread is about Charlene's book. Â
It is not about snowstorms, snakes in gardens, lesbian sex, or even, really, about VPW himself. It's about her take on his teaching. Her book. Which, doubtless, Mike and other derailers have not read. Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
An interview was posted by the writer of the book that sparks questions.
Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
Technically, the NPD is victim #1, that's how they are made. They're compensating for the permanent damage. Projecting victim mentality outward through the cult strengthens the shared fantasy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Questions like:
What does it look like when someone rejects the opportunity to escape?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
By "escape" do you mean turn one's back the relationships formed in The Way International? Relationships held in place by the authority of government entities?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Maybe target is a more accurate word than victim for those abused by a narcissist?
Â
Edited by Nathan_JrLink to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
If being in a cult is anything like being in a relationship with a narcissist, one may feel trapped, imprisoned. So, escape makes sense. There are synonyms for escape. It's a word choice.
Edited by Nathan_JrLink to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
I would argue there's usually a form of leverage involved. Enforced by legal authorities.
The interview focused on feelings, and mental tricks. Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
I would say that in my case, at least, this would most closely describe my involvement.
There were no legal complications for me, though I can certainly recognize this wasn't the case for everyone, especially for people who had child custody issues to be resolved.
Â
edit: Escape can be a rather broad term. For me, it was not a case of being physically restrained.
Edited by waysiderLink to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Legal authorities are the only ones with leverage? After the cult or narcissist has led one to abandon all friends and family and education and career, where will one go? Where is one’s support? Leverage.
Mental tricks are designed to distort reality. The prison feels real, even if it’s a state of mind. Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
And who can forget that old collateral we all loved so dearly, Escape From Your Prisons: A Lesson in Irony.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
"Legal authorities are the only ones with leverage" I didn't suggest this. I said they enforce the law.
Your example says folks are really good at burning bridges getting into a cult, but somehow forget that technique getting out. I don't think that is true. You got canceled by a group you want to leave, the horror.
Â
I was saying there is likely property or children or a secret being kept, as leverage.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
The P in PFAL stands for power. The person least invested holds the power.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
"If you leave now, the adversary will have free reign to harm your family."
Â
(or so we are told, as Advanced Class grads.)
Edited by waysiderwording
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
I don't think the effectual burning of bridges in this context is a consciously, deliberately developed skill. It happens incrementally, subtly, over time, and it's never obvious to the bridge burner they are good at burning bridges until they are all burnt. It's not a learned technique then forgotten.
It's crazy. It is not logical. I expected to get cancelled by the narc. That was neither the problem nor the horror.
To your clarified point about legal enforcement of leverage, yes, that is part of the equation. It can prolong the toxic relationship. Even when the target leaves, willfully, happily, the contact with the narc must continue because of a child.
The child is then weaponized by the narc against her target, punishment for seeing the truth, punishment for cutting off the supply, a final strike to destroy the target once and for all before anyone else finds out the truth.
Yes, the horror.
Â
Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
This sort of thing is what happened to me. One day, in FellowLaborers, I found myself all alone in the house for some reason. I happened to look in a full length mirror and, just like that, like a bolt of lightning, a feeling of self-awareness came over me as I found myself asking, "How the hell did I get here?". Now, I don't mean I couldn't remember arriving or the trip there. I mean I suddenly wondered how my life could have evolved so drastically without me noticing. I realized I wasn't the same person I had been before I got involved with The Way. Not just a little different, but like a completely different person. My bridges to return were gone, vanished. It's not a good feeling. I started to silently question everything that was happening. If only I had paid closer attention to what was unfolding, life might have been very different. Would it have been better? Would it have been worse? Who's to say. But, for sure, it would have been much different.
Edited by waysidermissed a word/spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
That IS a profound realization. My latest reading adventure, Mama's Last Hug, has likewise profound insight related to things GSCers have reflected on, including but not limited to "going farther than one has been led;" and learning by imitation, IOW how did we get there in the first place.
It also highlights what Augustin Fuentes has said in YouTube shorts that rather than "we are what we eat," instead, we are (or become like) WHO WE MEET. (he says this at the 5:05 point in this video)Â
Â
Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky
The entire third chapter of Mama's Last Hug discusses empathy and sympathy.
I go back in my mind to reflect on the lack of concern both Wierwille and Martindale consistently (at least in the open) demonstrated toward those outside of the "in group." They, of course, defined the "in group" as the Household." Further defined as those who "took the class and stood with twi."
I have long viewed that position as callous and lacking in the care necessary to properly exercise the Ministry of Reconciliation. See II Cor 5:17-19.Â
Â
Personally, I can almost understand how/why those two (Victor and Loy) wouldn't be able to grasp the ministry of reconciliation because so much has been studied and written about empathy since the end of the personal ministries (inside of twi) of both of them.
Then again, had either or both of them actually been "tapped in" to the love of God, instead of being more concerned about using their personal position (power/authority) to satisfied their own old nature passions, they might have been able to figure it out without Frans de Waal or Dacher Keltner.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
Correct. It's also a blatant lie. Authority is handed over to the liar. The name of this website says the liar still holds it.
P, P-FAL
Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
Â
LCM used to argue "everyone NEEDS to believe something" . . . it was a threat . . . coercing a decision
Same with sense of belonging . . . it is used to encourage people to make a decision to emotionally attach to something they probably should not . . . everyone needs to belong . . . you feel it don't you? . . . well you belong here . . . and we will help you feel the feely feels the way other places do not. . . . Now here's some more vocabulary for our little love language for your brain
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bolshevik
I've felt that in TWI. I've felt that in another circumstance. Of course with TWI I didn't exactly burn bridges . . . BUT . . . cutting the cord is supposed to be painful.Â
Usually I remember I would freeze up, just stand there. Was late teens/early 20s a lot. Then the group would bring someone like the Limb Leader for a scream fest. Followed by I would go through the motions for awhile longer.
Â
Edited by Bolshevikexample
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Would you say that since you never really cut ties or burn bridges that is why your view and mind seems to be straddling a fence? Â Where half the time you seem like a TWI apologist and the other half critical?
Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
I read what you wrote here. Â It sounds completely without empathy. Â It sounds like you refuse to acknowledge the ties that family, friends, marriages, and long time associations produce by nature of those relationships existing.
Sure at any time any of us could have escaped the bondage we endured by refusing at that moment to accept the false authority usurped by tyrants, cutting ties and leaving.
So what?Â
I find your example comparing this to hitting yourself in the hand repeatedly to be very inaccurate as well as triggering and judgmental.  Ties formed by family and choices aren’t easily reversed.  You can’t just wave your hand like they never existed.
But that’s you so it’s par for the course.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.