No, and I won't. Good luck to the campaign though. The husband of a good friend of mine died from ALS and I hope they find a cure. I don't donate to that or Jerry Lewis' MDA thing either because I figure they have enough "high power" givers nationwide. There's a lot of small time charities here in town that don't get the recognition like the "big time" causes do, and they need money and funds too. I do my best to shop local, and donate local.
I did it over the weekend (as usual, I put my own twist on it: I auctioned off the opportunity for someone else to pour the bucket over my head. Ended up raising $450 that way).
Great idea! I'm surprised you only got $450 (with all your enemies, and all...). ;)
Ice bucket challenge seems to have been picked up in the UK by the Macmillan Society (cancer research and support charity). The Motor Neurone Society isn't best pleased.
Too bad. No charity is entitled to freewill donations. If you want to give to the Timbuktu Poison Ivy Conservation Society, that's your right and your business.
Taken Friday, August 29 in St. Joe, Arkansas. The Senior Class of St. Joe high school douses the faculty as meeting the ALS challenge during a rainstorm.
That doesn't look a comfortable place to be (shiver!)
Actually I saw a letter today in my local paper - presumably sent to many newspapers, local and national - from an Animal Aid charity explaining that this challenge isn't a good idea from the animal welfare point of view. The funds raised go to research into Motor Neurone Disease (aka ALS in the USA) - and that research takes place on animals. According to this letter, only one animal experiment out of many has shown some (dubious) positive results.
Here is the text of the letter:
Animal Aid is urging the public not to take part in the ALS ice bucket challenge, as the Motor Neurone Disease Association – the main beneficiary of the craze in the UK – funds experiments on animals.
Such tests include those using genetically modified mice bred to suffer severe motor impairment and muscle weakness.
Quite apart from the appalling suffering it inflicts on animals, such research has repeatedly failed to produce effective treatments for humans.
Over the past ten years, around 12 experimental treatments that showed promise in animal 'models' of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (a type of motor neurone disease) have been given to humans in clinical trials.
All except one treatment failed, and that only has marginal benefits in terms of patient survival.
For genuine progress to be made in treating this devastating condition, charities like the Motor Neurone Disease Association must focus their resources entirely on humane and effective non-animal research.
For a free pocket guide to charities that do and don't fund vivisection, please contact Animal Aid by phoning 01732 364 546 ext. 233 or emailing Isobel@animalaid.co.uk
Generally speaking, if research using animals didn't yield results, we'd stop.
I respect anyone who chooses not to give on the basis that animals are used in testing.
Same goes for embryonic stem cells.
I respect anyone who chooses not to give for ANY reason, so long as that reason is true (for example, "I won't give to ALS because I don't care" counts as a valid reason, and I respect that).
The only thing I don't respect (and no one here has even come close) is deciding not to give for invalid reasons (aka, LIES). I've seen some real slander directed at the ALS Association, and I'm appalled by it.
But no sense giving those lies anymore undeserved publicity.
Recommended Posts
dmiller
No, and I won't. Good luck to the campaign though. The husband of a good friend of mine died from ALS and I hope they find a cure. I don't donate to that or Jerry Lewis' MDA thing either because I figure they have enough "high power" givers nationwide. There's a lot of small time charities here in town that don't get the recognition like the "big time" causes do, and they need money and funds too. I do my best to shop local, and donate local.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Very cool.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Great idea! I'm surprised you only got $450 (with all your enemies, and all...). ;)
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
I have a good idea for a follow-up next year. I'll let you know if it's accepted by the ALS Association.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
As a youngster on a weekend camp-out, I once took the "warm pan of water" challenge. The results were somewhat less than charitable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
Ice bucket challenge seems to have been picked up in the UK by the Macmillan Society (cancer research and support charity). The Motor Neurone Society isn't best pleased.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Too bad. No charity is entitled to freewill donations. If you want to give to the Timbuktu Poison Ivy Conservation Society, that's your right and your business.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ron G.
Taken Friday, August 29 in St. Joe, Arkansas. The Senior Class of St. Joe high school douses the faculty as meeting the ALS challenge during a rainstorm.
<IMG SRC="http://photos.capturearkansas.com/photos/Fk5Z8VCeUp1CCHOf_aPDrw/display.jpg"></IMG>
Edited by Ron G.Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
That doesn't look a comfortable place to be (shiver!)
Actually I saw a letter today in my local paper - presumably sent to many newspapers, local and national - from an Animal Aid charity explaining that this challenge isn't a good idea from the animal welfare point of view. The funds raised go to research into Motor Neurone Disease (aka ALS in the USA) - and that research takes place on animals. According to this letter, only one animal experiment out of many has shown some (dubious) positive results.
Here is the text of the letter:
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Generally speaking, if research using animals didn't yield results, we'd stop.
I respect anyone who chooses not to give on the basis that animals are used in testing.
Same goes for embryonic stem cells.
I respect anyone who chooses not to give for ANY reason, so long as that reason is true (for example, "I won't give to ALS because I don't care" counts as a valid reason, and I respect that).
The only thing I don't respect (and no one here has even come close) is deciding not to give for invalid reasons (aka, LIES). I've seen some real slander directed at the ALS Association, and I'm appalled by it.
But no sense giving those lies anymore undeserved publicity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GrouchoMarxJr
This is the cause I believe in...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.