The title of the movie is only half the title of the source material. The makers of the movie didn't want actresses auditioning for a biopic, especially considering none of the leading roles are women [not to mention it's a work of fiction. Not science fiction. Not horror. Just dramatic fiction].
One of the characters is known by a nickname because he is Irish. In the movie, he's played by a Black man. The explanation for the nickname was not changed, but was played for laughs.
I am going to play the "come on guys, this is not that difficult" card.
The author of the original story is known for an entirely different genre of story. But fear not! This showed you can't keep him trapped in just one kind of story.
The costar was the narrator.
The costar was THE narrator.
Good God, if that wasn't enough of a clue by itself.
I am going to play the "come on guys, this is not that difficult" card.
The author of the original story is known for an entirely different genre of story. But fear not! This showed you can't keep him trapped in just one kind of story.
The costar was the narrator.
The costar was THE narrator.
Good God, if that wasn't enough of a clue by itself.
Ok, I think I've got it this time.
My subconscious finally spoke up (or woke up.)
The source book was "THE BODY."
The author is that guy up in Bangor who writes about monsters.
No. That's a horror movie. Stephen King is known for horror.
This movie has, best of my memory, no supernatural elements
That eliminates NEARLY all of his movies that I remember. It doesn't eliminate "Misery"- but your other clues do.
On 6/24/2023 at 10:21 AM, modcat5 said:
I am going to play the "come on guys, this is not that difficult" card.
The author of the original story is known for an entirely different genre of story. But fear not! This showed you can't keep him trapped in just one kind of story.
The costar was the narrator.
The costar was THE narrator.
Good God, if that wasn't enough of a clue by itself.
If the costar who is THE narrator is also the Black guy, that shortens the possible list. James Earl Jones is possible- but AFAIK, he never played God. That was MORGAN FREEMAN. What movie of Stephen King's trapped Morgan Freeman? I think that only leaves "THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION."
When this movie came out, it was long-awaited, and some fans had high expectations for it. A few might have complained that the plot for the movie seemed a bit familiar and resembled at least 1 episode with lots of changes and a much, much bigger budget. In fact, with this movie unable to achieve blockbuster status despite the timing and the budget, it would have killed the franchise if someone didn't promise he could bring in the NEXT movie for a LOT less. Not only did he succeed, that movie was popular and became a hit, saving the franchise.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
958
519
988
262
Popular Days
Oct 12
17
May 25
15
May 12
14
May 8
12
Top Posters In This Topic
GeorgeStGeorge 958 posts
Raf 519 posts
WordWolf 988 posts
Human without the bean 262 posts
Popular Days
Oct 12 2018
17 posts
May 25 2021
15 posts
May 12 2014
14 posts
May 8 2014
12 posts
Popular Posts
Human without the bean
Why didn't you say that 2 days ago Mr. Wolf? Your right Rottie, They are pretty good. Makes it tough on me to get my 2 cents in.
Human without the bean
I was way off going with "The Terminal", except that it didn't have any articles of clothing in the title. I assume WordWolf is correct, but I'm not familiar with it. But that's not unusual.
GeorgeStGeorge
Stallone. Also well-known for reprising his Rocky role. I can't see him in Eddie Murphy's role in BHC, though... George
Posted Images
GeorgeStGeorge
This may be too long ago for your second clue to be true, but
Citizen Kane?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Nope.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
I'd guess "Blade Runner", but Phillip K. Dick passed away decades ago.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Wrong author.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
The title of the movie is only half the title of the source material. The makers of the movie didn't want actresses auditioning for a biopic, especially considering none of the leading roles are women [not to mention it's a work of fiction. Not science fiction. Not horror. Just dramatic fiction].
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
One of the characters is known by a nickname because he is Irish. In the movie, he's played by a Black man. The explanation for the nickname was not changed, but was played for laughs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
I am going to play the "come on guys, this is not that difficult" card.
The author of the original story is known for an entirely different genre of story. But fear not! This showed you can't keep him trapped in just one kind of story.
The costar was the narrator.
The costar was THE narrator.
Good God, if that wasn't enough of a clue by itself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
There may be some
s in our future, but I'm not getting it.
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
I'm thinking that the co-star was Will Ferrell, in that movie where someone's writing a book and he's the protagonist. "Stranger Than Fiction."
And if that's not it, I can try again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
It is not Stranger than Fiction. I don't even know who wrote that.
I guarantee you know who wrote this. I mean, he's practically royalty.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
Ok, I think I've got it this time.
My subconscious finally spoke up (or woke up.)
The source book was "THE BODY."
The author is that guy up in Bangor who writes about monsters.
The movie is "STAND BY ME."
The writer is- Richard Bachman!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
A well-known writer who's practically royalty. That must mean something....Earl or Duke or something.... Oh- STEPHEN KING!
(Possibly released under his pseudonym, "Richard Bachman", possibly not.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
Right author, wrong movie.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Children of the Corn?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
No. That's a horror movie. Stephen King is known for horror.
This movie has, best of my memory, no supernatural elements
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
That eliminates NEARLY all of his movies that I remember. It doesn't eliminate "Misery"- but your other clues do.
If the costar who is THE narrator is also the Black guy, that shortens the possible list. James Earl Jones is possible- but AFAIK, he never played God. That was MORGAN FREEMAN. What movie of Stephen King's trapped Morgan Freeman? I think that only leaves "THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION."
Or I could be completely off again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
Based on the novella "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption," which was neither a true story nor one that featured Rita Hayworth as a character.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
When this movie came out, it was long-awaited, and some fans had high expectations for it. A few might have complained that the plot for the movie seemed a bit familiar and resembled at least 1 episode with lots of changes and a much, much bigger budget. In fact, with this movie unable to achieve blockbuster status despite the timing and the budget, it would have killed the franchise if someone didn't promise he could bring in the NEXT movie for a LOT less. Not only did he succeed, that movie was popular and became a hit, saving the franchise.
Name both movies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Star Trek 5 and 6?
Star Trek 5 was an awful lot like the worst ST episode ever, The Way to Eden*. Star Trek 6 wasn't the best, but it was a very good movie.
George
*If you say the worst episode was "Spock's Brain," I couldn't argue with you. It was horrible, too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
Think earlier...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
OK. Star Trek 1 and 2.
ST 1 was a lot like "The Changeling."
ST 2 really did well.
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
That would have been my guess
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
In general, the even-numbered movies were better than the odd-numbered ones.
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
modcat5
Until X
Nemesis was worse than III, by far.
But II, IV and VI were the best of the original cast. III was the best of the odd numbered entries, including the next gen cast.
Nemesis [X] was better than I and V, but not as good as III
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.