One of the photos in the news article shows a group of the priest's supporters outside the courthouse. I'm really hoping that is just a mistaken caption, that the people in the photo aren't really supporting what the priest did to that boy.
Unfortunately, all too often the "church" or whatever body or association the predator is affiliated with, supports the perpetrator not the victim. Thus the organization is served, but Christ is not.
If that was my son or grandson the perpetrator would be singing soprano. If he was singing at all.
A well-known Catholic priest who hosts a weekly religious television show said in an interview this week that child sex abusers are often seduced by teenage boys and should not go to jail on a first offense. But the comments were removed by the website that published them and replaced by an apology from the priest and the site's editors.
The Rev. Benedict Groeschel, 79, who hosts a weekly show on the Catholic television network EWTN, originally made the comments in an interview with the National Catholic Register. He also referred to convicted pedophile Jerry Sandusky as a "poor guy."
"People have this picture in their minds of a person planning to -- a psychopath. But that's not the case. Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster -- 14, 16, 18 -- is the seducer," Groeschel was quoted as saying in the interview, which is no longer available on the paper's website.
The interview has now been replaced by a statement from Fr. Benedict:
"I apologize for my comments," it said. "I did not intend to blame the victim. A priest (or anyone else) who abuses a minor is always wrong and is always responsible. My mind and my way of expressing myself are not as clear as they used to be. I have spent my life trying to help others the best that I could. I deeply regret any harm I have caused to anyone."
Jeanette R. De Melo, the site's editor in chief, included her own apology for posting the interview.
"Child sexual abuse is never excusable," she wrote. "The editors of the National Catholic Register apologize for publishing without clarification or challenge Father Benedict Groeschel's comments that seem to suggest that the child is somehow responsible for abuse. Nothing could be further from the truth."
The interview, billed as a reflection on the 25 years since Groeschel founded the Franciscan Friars of the Renewal order, covered many topics, but Groeschel's comments on child sexual abuse brought it national attention.
"Well, it's not so hard to see. A kid looking for a father and didn't have his own -- and they won't be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping, but not having intercourse or anything like that. I's an understandable thing, and you know where you find it, among other clergy or important people; you look at teachers, attorneys, judges, social workers," Groeschel was quoted as saying.
Quotes from the interview remained posted on websites including the National Catholic Reporter, the Huffington Post, and the Catholic blog Renew America, all of which criticized Groeschel for the remarks.
Tom Roberts of the National Catholic Reporter called the comments "particularly disturbing" because of Groeschel's background in psychology. He received a Ph.D. in psychology from Columbia University.
"(The comments) cannot stand unchallenged," Roberts wrote.
Groeschel could not be reached for comment. Representatives for the National Catholic Register and EWTN did not immediately return calls for comment.
Groeschel had also commented on recently-convicted pedophile Jerry Sandusky, the former Penn State coach convicted of abusing 10 boys over a 15-year period.
"Here's this poor guy -- Sandusky -- it went on for years. Interesting: Why didn't anyone say anything? Apparently, a number of kids knew about it and didn't break the ice. Well, you know, until recent years, people did not register in their minds that it was a crime. It was a moral failure, scandalous; but they didn't think of it in terms of legal things," Groeschel said.
He also said that he did not think priests or lay people should go to jail based on a first offense of sexual behavior with young children.
"At this point, (when) any priest, any clergyman, any social worker, any teacher, any responsible person in society would become involved in a single sexual act -- not necessarily intercourse -- they're done. And I'm inclined to think, on their first offense, they should not go to jail because their intention was not committing a crime."
"Well, it's not so hard to see. A kid looking for a father and didn't have his own -- and they won't be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping, but not having intercourse or anything like that. I's an understandable thing, and you know where you find it, among other clergy or important people; you look at teachers, attorneys, judges, social workers," Groeschel was quoted as saying.
oh thank you so much for that. my little brothers' lives were ruined at about age 10 and 11 (altar boys) because they did not have a good father. but "father" butler found them after having been tossed from one diocese to another
i hope this guy and butler burn in hell and oh too many others to mention (top dog -- i forget his fkuning title -- and lay people) from the diocese....
ps. i absolutely do not look for these articles, but if i did, it would probably (at least i HOPE) make you sick with how many of them are out there
Recommended Posts
waysider
It makes me both sad and angry at the same time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OperaBuff
One of the photos in the news article shows a group of the priest's supporters outside the courthouse. I'm really hoping that is just a mistaken caption, that the people in the photo aren't really supporting what the priest did to that boy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
I´m fairly confident it means that-somehow-they think he didn´t do it.
Me, I think US law is too lax on this sort of thing, and jail or prison is too good for them.
(Criminals of this type.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
Of course, he didn't do it. Only money can buy that kind of freedom.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
The RC church has given this priest a loan to hire a top-flight lawyer.
I wonder if the RC church will make a grant to the boy/his parents for counseling for the boy?
Everyone's entitled to a defence. But how about the priest gets honest? Honest to God first, then to everyone else?
Wonder how many parishes this priest has been shunted around, to cover up previous allegations?
Maybe appropriate justice would be to allow the boy to launch a mighty kick at the priest in his "privates."
Edited by TwinkyLink to comment
Share on other sites
Watered Garden
Unfortunately, all too often the "church" or whatever body or association the predator is affiliated with, supports the perpetrator not the victim. Thus the organization is served, but Christ is not.
If that was my son or grandson the perpetrator would be singing soprano. If he was singing at all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
excathedra
http://gma.yahoo.com/catholic-tv-star-rev-benedict-groeschel-defends-child-145215741--abc-news-topstories.html
A well-known Catholic priest who hosts a weekly religious television show said in an interview this week that child sex abusers are often seduced by teenage boys and should not go to jail on a first offense. But the comments were removed by the website that published them and replaced by an apology from the priest and the site's editors.
The Rev. Benedict Groeschel, 79, who hosts a weekly show on the Catholic television network EWTN, originally made the comments in an interview with the National Catholic Register. He also referred to convicted pedophile Jerry Sandusky as a "poor guy."
"People have this picture in their minds of a person planning to -- a psychopath. But that's not the case. Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster -- 14, 16, 18 -- is the seducer," Groeschel was quoted as saying in the interview, which is no longer available on the paper's website.
The interview has now been replaced by a statement from Fr. Benedict:
"I apologize for my comments," it said. "I did not intend to blame the victim. A priest (or anyone else) who abuses a minor is always wrong and is always responsible. My mind and my way of expressing myself are not as clear as they used to be. I have spent my life trying to help others the best that I could. I deeply regret any harm I have caused to anyone."
Jeanette R. De Melo, the site's editor in chief, included her own apology for posting the interview.
"Child sexual abuse is never excusable," she wrote. "The editors of the National Catholic Register apologize for publishing without clarification or challenge Father Benedict Groeschel's comments that seem to suggest that the child is somehow responsible for abuse. Nothing could be further from the truth."
The interview, billed as a reflection on the 25 years since Groeschel founded the Franciscan Friars of the Renewal order, covered many topics, but Groeschel's comments on child sexual abuse brought it national attention.
"Well, it's not so hard to see. A kid looking for a father and didn't have his own -- and they won't be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping, but not having intercourse or anything like that. I's an understandable thing, and you know where you find it, among other clergy or important people; you look at teachers, attorneys, judges, social workers," Groeschel was quoted as saying.
Quotes from the interview remained posted on websites including the National Catholic Reporter, the Huffington Post, and the Catholic blog Renew America, all of which criticized Groeschel for the remarks.
Tom Roberts of the National Catholic Reporter called the comments "particularly disturbing" because of Groeschel's background in psychology. He received a Ph.D. in psychology from Columbia University.
"(The comments) cannot stand unchallenged," Roberts wrote.
Groeschel could not be reached for comment. Representatives for the National Catholic Register and EWTN did not immediately return calls for comment.
Groeschel had also commented on recently-convicted pedophile Jerry Sandusky, the former Penn State coach convicted of abusing 10 boys over a 15-year period.
"Here's this poor guy -- Sandusky -- it went on for years. Interesting: Why didn't anyone say anything? Apparently, a number of kids knew about it and didn't break the ice. Well, you know, until recent years, people did not register in their minds that it was a crime. It was a moral failure, scandalous; but they didn't think of it in terms of legal things," Groeschel said.
He also said that he did not think priests or lay people should go to jail based on a first offense of sexual behavior with young children.
"At this point, (when) any priest, any clergyman, any social worker, any teacher, any responsible person in society would become involved in a single sexual act -- not necessarily intercourse -- they're done. And I'm inclined to think, on their first offense, they should not go to jail because their intention was not committing a crime."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Sick!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
excathedra
aside from EVERYTHING this psycho said.....
oh thank you so much for that. my little brothers' lives were ruined at about age 10 and 11 (altar boys) because they did not have a good father. but "father" butler found them after having been tossed from one diocese to another
i hope this guy and butler burn in hell and oh too many others to mention (top dog -- i forget his fkuning title -- and lay people) from the diocese....
ps. i absolutely do not look for these articles, but if i did, it would probably (at least i HOPE) make you sick with how many of them are out there
Edited by excathedraLink to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.