Sorry, Naten, even just his pic is more than enough!
We could all have learned far more by watching The Passion, than sitting any number of times through PFAL ... not that the film had been made then.
And most churches sweep it ... behind the stone, as it were ... telling the fact of the crucifixion in some sanitized form without thinking about what was actually entailed. It would be very difficult for most people in Western society today to form a full understanding of everything that had been involved. Perhaps that's why many don't value the sacrifice at all.
Jesus was crucified on a tree according to biblical records. Crucifiction on an existing tree is a quick way to set up a crucifiction because a large tree already has roots for stability. Otherwise to set up a crucifiction you have to wait at least a day for the base of the crucifiction to harden. Sort of like concrete hardening today at a construction site. When you walk around a tree you could be walking in a circle. You could examine one person for death and then have the option of examining the person to the right or to the left next. Jesus could still be in the midst in this scanario regardless of whether he was examined second or third. Therefore 2 others likely died with Jesus. The good thing is God raised Jesus from the dead to sit at God's right hand and bring us closer to God, the Father.
My above shortened post is based on an article I read by a knowledgeable full time bible teacher. Points to consider on whether Jesus was crucified on a literal tree or on wood that was cemented into the ground? Did they have time to do the work of cementation from Jesus' trial to his execution? If they did not there would have to have been something prebuilt for Jesus to be crucified on. If there wasn't they would need the time to build and let the ground foundation set upon which Jesus and the others were crucified on. I read that for fast crucifixtions they used a literal large tree to nail wood on and on this wood they would nail the person they wanted to crucify. Then they could do their dirty deed real fast. And a large tree could hold a few people. So the next question is was it a literal tree that Jesus was crucified on? Three bible verses in Acts say that Jesus was crucified on a tree. Or instead of a literal tree was it pieces of wood? But again the wood would have to be attached to a foundation of some kind.
Mark, Not too difficult to imagine that there were a number of crosses (of standard design) or stakes (no cross-bar) for the punishment of offenders, and a specific place where the offenders were punished with pre-built holes in the ground that could be chocked to keep the crosses/stakes themselves more or less upright.
Kinda like, gas chambers, a trapdoor in the floor where hanging was carried out, a special gurney where lethal injection is carried out. The necessary "tools" are to hand, not fresh made.
That is possible Twinky. Maybe that is true. But then maybe they did need to use an actual tree as a foundation. We would need to check actual history records to see if they had a place as you have described. That might mean a lot of killing to designate a place solely for that purpose. Or perhaps they just built some cross structures and then tore them down when they were done.
The information that I posted here I got from reading a chapter or two out of Ernest L. Martin's book Secrets of Golgotha. Ernest L. Martin was an author, historian and biblical theologist. Like E.W. Bullinger and another person that I don't remember the name of that Victor Wierwille learned about the holy spirit from. Ernest Martin, was one of the people I think that Wierwilled got his good biblical information from. Of course, he would always hint that he came up with the biblical information himself. I think the good biblical information that he had he got from other sources, one of those being Ernest L. Martin. The wrong teachings he may have thought up himself.
Just information to consider. It is good to know the original source of biblical information that we have been taught so that we can evaluate it from the source.
The only thing insignificant and a distraction was your last post Cman.
The good thing about my posts here is that they are short, to the point and don't take long to read and understand. People who don't appreciate that must have a lot of free time. Which is the opposite of my busy schedule. People should be appreciative of others contributions here regardless of whether they agree or disagree. Otherwise you are simply going to have less people posting here.
...Kit is pointing out the silliness of all these doctrines.
Thanks cman. That's really close to what I was aiming for => Our Lord gave His life and bore the sins of the whole world, including mine.
What is so precious to me of biblical research is that it brings me into the deepness of the scriptures where I can see more of the face of the Lord and feel His breath, that pneuma, that ruach of the cool of the day where God meets us and shows us He loves us beyond what we could know without His help.
We require the Holy Spirit to understand what the Bible is saying, and biblical research should bring us into greater life with Him.
All the details of the crucifixion (or any other subject matter of the Bible) should all fit together. Because each of us knows in part our works should help each other understand more and more of the Lord's presence in our lives. That's the goal, in my opinion.
Recommended Posts
Rejoice
looking at any picture of that fraud makes me nauseous, let alone hearing his voice after all these years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
Sorry, Naten, even just his pic is more than enough!
We could all have learned far more by watching The Passion, than sitting any number of times through PFAL ... not that the film had been made then.
And most churches sweep it ... behind the stone, as it were ... telling the fact of the crucifixion in some sanitized form without thinking about what was actually entailed. It would be very difficult for most people in Western society today to form a full understanding of everything that had been involved. Perhaps that's why many don't value the sacrifice at all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
Or of anyone for that matter, Jesus drew attention to a transformation,
the first of it's kind.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Sanguinetti
Jesus was crucified on a tree according to biblical records. Crucifiction on an existing tree is a quick way to set up a crucifiction because a large tree already has roots for stability. Otherwise to set up a crucifiction you have to wait at least a day for the base of the crucifiction to harden. Sort of like concrete hardening today at a construction site. When you walk around a tree you could be walking in a circle. You could examine one person for death and then have the option of examining the person to the right or to the left next. Jesus could still be in the midst in this scanario regardless of whether he was examined second or third. Therefore 2 others likely died with Jesus. The good thing is God raised Jesus from the dead to sit at God's right hand and bring us closer to God, the Father.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Sanguinetti
My above shortened post is based on an article I read by a knowledgeable full time bible teacher. Points to consider on whether Jesus was crucified on a literal tree or on wood that was cemented into the ground? Did they have time to do the work of cementation from Jesus' trial to his execution? If they did not there would have to have been something prebuilt for Jesus to be crucified on. If there wasn't they would need the time to build and let the ground foundation set upon which Jesus and the others were crucified on. I read that for fast crucifixtions they used a literal large tree to nail wood on and on this wood they would nail the person they wanted to crucify. Then they could do their dirty deed real fast. And a large tree could hold a few people. So the next question is was it a literal tree that Jesus was crucified on? Three bible verses in Acts say that Jesus was crucified on a tree. Or instead of a literal tree was it pieces of wood? But again the wood would have to be attached to a foundation of some kind.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
Mark, Not too difficult to imagine that there were a number of crosses (of standard design) or stakes (no cross-bar) for the punishment of offenders, and a specific place where the offenders were punished with pre-built holes in the ground that could be chocked to keep the crosses/stakes themselves more or less upright.
Kinda like, gas chambers, a trapdoor in the floor where hanging was carried out, a special gurney where lethal injection is carried out. The necessary "tools" are to hand, not fresh made.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Sanguinetti
That is possible Twinky. Maybe that is true. But then maybe they did need to use an actual tree as a foundation. We would need to check actual history records to see if they had a place as you have described. That might mean a lot of killing to designate a place solely for that purpose. Or perhaps they just built some cross structures and then tore them down when they were done.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Sanguinetti
The information that I posted here I got from reading a chapter or two out of Ernest L. Martin's book Secrets of Golgotha. Ernest L. Martin was an author, historian and biblical theologist. Like E.W. Bullinger and another person that I don't remember the name of that Victor Wierwille learned about the holy spirit from. Ernest Martin, was one of the people I think that Wierwilled got his good biblical information from. Of course, he would always hint that he came up with the biblical information himself. I think the good biblical information that he had he got from other sources, one of those being Ernest L. Martin. The wrong teachings he may have thought up himself.
Just information to consider. It is good to know the original source of biblical information that we have been taught so that we can evaluate it from the source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_L._Martin
Edited by Mark SanguinettiLink to comment
Share on other sites
cman
Maybe where and why the place and the type of execution would be significant to some.
But it's a distraction from what happens, and this thread, imo.
Or not, since Kit is pointing out the silliness of all these doctrines.
If we are to look at the things we can't see.
We must be able too.
Anyway these sources are just background info to me.
Edited by cmanLink to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Sanguinetti
The only thing insignificant and a distraction was your last post Cman.
The good thing about my posts here is that they are short, to the point and don't take long to read and understand. People who don't appreciate that must have a lot of free time. Which is the opposite of my busy schedule. People should be appreciative of others contributions here regardless of whether they agree or disagree. Otherwise you are simply going to have less people posting here.
Edited by Mark SanguinettiLink to comment
Share on other sites
cman
Ok, I'll float a question then.
Why does it say-Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree-from-
Galatians 3:13
Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
If you agree or disagree with the way I communicate, isn't this at least part of the real question of the tree?
And if one is made in the image of God, is cursed by the law, that God came up with, isn't God cursed as well?
Pardon me, just thinking about the logic of oneness with God.
And that comes with disagreements as well.
Edited by cmanLink to comment
Share on other sites
Kit Sober
Thanks cman. That's really close to what I was aiming for => Our Lord gave His life and bore the sins of the whole world, including mine.
What is so precious to me of biblical research is that it brings me into the deepness of the scriptures where I can see more of the face of the Lord and feel His breath, that pneuma, that ruach of the cool of the day where God meets us and shows us He loves us beyond what we could know without His help.
We require the Holy Spirit to understand what the Bible is saying, and biblical research should bring us into greater life with Him.
All the details of the crucifixion (or any other subject matter of the Bible) should all fit together. Because each of us knows in part our works should help each other understand more and more of the Lord's presence in our lives. That's the goal, in my opinion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
sometimes..
the best one can do is to deflect this kind of nonsense.
Yes, one has the ability to absorb this kind of energy,..
but one does not have to..
it's not for my benefit, if I do, or not..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
not so sure about deflecting such attacks
if i hear things directed at me or even in general,
that is meant to to get a reaction from me
somehow i still have to process it and file it
usually in the burn barrel,
or you might even say the lake of fire in my head
and possibly engage the matter at another time,
if warranted...i can wait to respond when ready
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.