[i noticed some time back that vpw's summary led to
"DO AS YOU FOOL WELL PLEASE."
That was vpw's standard. That was vpw's goal.
That was what vpw said in conclusion, too.
He claimed that the LAW had been boiled down to two rules,
then discarded both.
He said it was all subsumed in "Love God, and love your neighbor as yourself."
He then said that "if you love God, and love your neighbor as yourself,
then you can do as you fool well please."
Wierwille was a cherry-picker.....
He picked a scripture here and there......but no substance on the two great commandments on love. Figures. Wierwille would side-step this and look for the lazy way out.
If there was such a thing as cherry-drambuie.....wierwille could be in line.
Do whatever you want, as long as your intentions are good. Where have I heard that before..
Well, actually, he never said your intentions had to be "good". He only said they ought to lead to whatever it was that would please you. -----Screw the other guy, as long as I get whatever I want.
"Do what you like, as long as you like what you do"----VP Wierwille
I ask the animals that I consume for sustenance, for forgiveness..
:)
Don't think that's weird at all. Last fall when I was picking tomatoes off the vine, I was thanking the plant for being kind enough to produce food for me.
I'm not wiccan, or an enviormentalist. It just felt like the thing to do.
If he really thought this concept was new to the philosophical community, he was quite deluded.
Personally, I think he was quite aware this "new insight" was really revamped paraphrasing of other sources.
(That's a polite way of saying he ripped it off.)
I don't think he was deluded and I don't think he thought his insights were new. I think he just sold them that way to attract followers.
Kind of like they're not used cars anymore, they're pre-owned vehicles. He could say the same thing about the so-called light he brought to this generation: pre-owned by a little old lady that took it to church on Sundays.
Nothing at all. For me it was a matter of integrety. Then people get an image in their head of what I am, I act contrary to it (in this case wiccan) and people think I'm being a hypocrite.
As long as I can do my "Lo Shanta"s, who gives a crap about anybody else? I'm going to Heaven and all Hell can't stop me. V.P. said so and he wouldn't lie----would he? :unsure:
Way, please correct me if I am wrong. Â Wasn't it you who said that " all men are liars, and that's the truth."
Well, I'm a man, so I'm probably not the best person to ask.
Way, pardon me!! Â I know I read it on an old thread; I thought you had said it. If you didn't say it, I can't remember who said it, but I thought it was it was a great quote.
He picked a scripture here and there......but no substance on the two great commandments on love. Figures. Wierwille would side-step this and look for the lazy way out.
If there was such a thing as cherry-drambuie.....wierwille could be in line.
Sky, he would probably be the first in line, and everyone else could forget about it. Â
Well, actually, he never said your intentions had to be "good". He only said they ought to lead to whatever it was that would please you. -----Screw the other guy, as long as I get whatever I want.
"Do what you like, as long as you like what you do"----VP Wierwille
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
61
148
118
61
Popular Days
Feb 20
32
Feb 23
32
Feb 2
31
Feb 27
29
Top Posters In This Topic
johniam 61 posts
Ham 148 posts
waysider 118 posts
So_crates 61 posts
Popular Days
Feb 20 2011
32 posts
Feb 23 2011
32 posts
Feb 2 2011
31 posts
Feb 27 2011
29 posts
Popular Posts
Broken Arrow
I
WordWolf
Have I mentioned lately that I'm actually getting quite a bit out of this thread? I don't just mean in a sense of psychology/sociology/criminology, but in a sense of Christian learning. The whole p
T-Bone
morals are man-made? Really?!?! please provide some documentation to back up that philosophical assertion. personally i lean toward the christian idea [that does have a biblical basis] that man is m
skyrider
Wierwille was a cherry-picker.....
He picked a scripture here and there......but no substance on the two great commandments on love. Figures. Wierwille would side-step this and look for the lazy way out.
If there was such a thing as cherry-drambuie.....wierwille could be in line.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
then, he was by his own words, a fool.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Do whatever you want, as long as your intentions are good. Where have I heard that before..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Well, actually, he never said your intentions had to be "good". He only said they ought to lead to whatever it was that would please you. -----Screw the other guy, as long as I get whatever I want.
"Do what you like, as long as you like what you do"----VP Wierwille
Edited by waysiderLink to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Crowley was less harmful..
at least he considered the consequences..
not that it did much good. But he considered..
vs.. "I have the righteousness of Christ, of Gawd Almighty. I can merely do as *I* will..
we're all the same, eh?
why not for one honest moment.. act like it..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
I dunno. ascribing to "we* does not exactly kill you..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
So_crates
Crowley, didn't he say, Do as thou will, but do no harm?
Which, of course, brings up another subject. Crowley was into sexual magick. You think Saint Vic was pulling water from the same well?
SoCrates
Edited by So_cratesLink to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
yes. But in practical terms, no harm never really happened..
it's really impossible..
so what is the choice.. do the least harm one can do.
In a sense, we are all "screwed"..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
The Book of the Law (1904)
Also known as Liber AL vel Legis
* Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
o I:40 This famous statement derives from several historic precedents, including that of François Rabelais in describing the rule of his Abbey of Thélème in Gargantua and Pantagruel: Fait ce que vouldras (Do what thou wilt), which was later used by the Hellfire Club established by Sir Francis Dashwood. It is also similar to the pagan proverb: An ye harm none, do what thou wilt; but the oldest known statement of a similar idea is by St. Augustine of Hippo: Love, and do what thou wilt.
Source
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
"St" vic was more than into sexual "majik"..
really weird. take it as you will..
I ask the animals that I consume for sustenance, for forgiveness..
:)
really weird. take it as you will..
I ask the animals that I consume for sustenance, for forgiveness..
:)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
If he really thought this concept was new to the philosophical community, he was quite deluded.
Personally, I think he was quite aware this "new insight" was really revamped paraphrasing of other sources.
(That's a polite way of saying he ripped it off.)
Edited by waysiderLink to comment
Share on other sites
So_crates
Don't think that's weird at all. Last fall when I was picking tomatoes off the vine, I was thanking the plant for being kind enough to produce food for me.
I'm not wiccan, or an enviormentalist. It just felt like the thing to do.
SoCrates
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
:)
If I might add..
what fundamentally is wrong with wiccan?
I'm too small to judge..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
So_crates
I don't think he was deluded and I don't think he thought his insights were new. I think he just sold them that way to attract followers.
Kind of like they're not used cars anymore, they're pre-owned vehicles. He could say the same thing about the so-called light he brought to this generation: pre-owned by a little old lady that took it to church on Sundays.
SoCrates
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
This is not weird.
For some Native American peoples, this is standard operating procedure. (Forgiveness and gratitude)
Edited by waysiderLink to comment
Share on other sites
So_crates
Nothing at all. For me it was a matter of integrety. Then people get an image in their head of what I am, I act contrary to it (in this case wiccan) and people think I'm being a hypocrite.
SoCrates
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
I really don't know what I am..
too many labels.
what am I..
maybe it depends on something bigger than feeble *me*..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
So I'm still waiting here.. HOW was vic's "ministry" a safe harbor, or a safe haven?
How was his "organization" even a *ministry*?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Way, please correct me if I am wrong. Â Wasn't it you who said that " all men are liars, and that's the truth."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Well, I'm a man, so I'm probably not the best person to ask.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Way, pardon me!! Â I know I read it on an old thread; I thought you had said it. If you didn't say it, I can't remember who said it, but I thought it was it was a great quote.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Sky, he would probably be the first in line, and everyone else could forget about it. Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
Ham, what a clever post!! Â
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grace Valerie Claire
If other people get hurt, too bad for them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.