I'm not aiming this at anyone in particular. I'm just fed up with the number of people claiming "special" knowledge that they want to sell to you.
Which is such a contrast between (if you are Christian) what Jesus taught.
But "everyone hath a psalm" and they want you to pay them to sing it to you. Instead of doing it for the joy of doing it. What's with all this ego that makes that person's knowledge so very special? It's not passion to share a better way that motivates them. It's passion for money. Passion for accolades. Passion for - themselves.
Well for every scam, there's a scamee! I mean someone has to buy the Hat, the T-shirt, the Bumper Sticker, the Movie, yadda, yadda, yadda....
And as long as people are willing to pay, someone will be there to take their money. Someone with a fried brain (that just knows thay he/she can't be wrong) will bury the slurpee straw deep into your brain and suck vigorously.
I don't know that they all start out as scams, Gen-2. Some might genuinely start out well-meaning. And then careful and appropriate guidance becomes more and more control of people's lives, with the "big stick" of not being pleasing to God. (Is there a "latent bully" in all of us?)
And these books of "special knowledge" or "secrets of life" become a way of extending the bullying, the control. Especially where sold from some private location (our church/HQ/private publishing company).
Don't get me wrong, I'm not against book authors, people who genuinely do have some knowledge, writing about their understanding. Nor am I against them selling their books. But who or what is the focus? How exclusive is the target market? Who ends up getting empowered - the reader, who learns how to live better/gains more understanding of the topic? Or the author, who gains/cements an element of control? And who gets the money? And what becomes of it?
I'm thinking of people like Yancey, Swindoll - even Johnson & VanVonderen, who wrote The Subtle Power of Spiritual Abuse, that has been so helpful to people here at the Cafe. These people - especially the last-named pair - seem the antithesis of cult leaders.
The instruction in 1 Timothy 3 (about selection of church overseers) springs to mind.
:4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
:5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
How do the wannabe's kids present?
>Are they quiet, because cowed into submission?
>Or are they quiet, because they are polite and respectfully brought up?
>Are the wannabe's kids able to express an opinion?
>Or are they required to be seen and not heard?
>Are the kids treated as individuals, with their own personalities?
>Or are they treated like clones, one-size-fits-all?
>Are the kids' abilities acknowledged and encouraged?
>Or are they forced to give up things they enjoy and do things they dislike?
...Cos that's how the wannabe leader will treat his following. That's how his "special knowledge" really plays out.
Recommended Posts
bulwinkl
But twinky thats sounds anti-capitalist!!!!!!!
Edited by bulwinklLink to comment
Share on other sites
year2027
God first
thanks Twinky
yes Simon wanted to get money but it never tells us if he got the money or not
did Peter changed his mind or did Simon get the money
that why we do not call him a troll or any name
we pray that receives knowledge from God to changed his thinking
or knowledge from man to changed his thinking
with love and a holy kiss Roy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
I'm not aiming this at anyone in particular. I'm just fed up with the number of people claiming "special" knowledge that they want to sell to you.
Which is such a contrast between (if you are Christian) what Jesus taught.
But "everyone hath a psalm" and they want you to pay them to sing it to you. Instead of doing it for the joy of doing it. What's with all this ego that makes that person's knowledge so very special? It's not passion to share a better way that motivates them. It's passion for money. Passion for accolades. Passion for - themselves.
Let's write a book.
Chronicles of Grease Spot Cafe, maybe?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
year2027
God first
thanks Twinky
i love you Twinky my friend
with love and a holy kiss Roy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
Nice thread, Twinky.
Too many people seem to start out with good intentions the same way Roy / year2027 does, but then go immediately astray.
Roy says "God first". Then usually some kind message that he loves us.
Most of the opportunists say "God first. Pay me second".
For me, I'll stick with Roy's interpretation
Link to comment
Share on other sites
year2027
God first
thanks chockfull
with love and a holy kiss Roy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gen-2
Well for every scam, there's a scamee! I mean someone has to buy the Hat, the T-shirt, the Bumper Sticker, the Movie, yadda, yadda, yadda....
And as long as people are willing to pay, someone will be there to take their money. Someone with a fried brain (that just knows thay he/she can't be wrong) will bury the slurpee straw deep into your brain and suck vigorously.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
I don't know that they all start out as scams, Gen-2. Some might genuinely start out well-meaning. And then careful and appropriate guidance becomes more and more control of people's lives, with the "big stick" of not being pleasing to God. (Is there a "latent bully" in all of us?)
And these books of "special knowledge" or "secrets of life" become a way of extending the bullying, the control. Especially where sold from some private location (our church/HQ/private publishing company).
Don't get me wrong, I'm not against book authors, people who genuinely do have some knowledge, writing about their understanding. Nor am I against them selling their books. But who or what is the focus? How exclusive is the target market? Who ends up getting empowered - the reader, who learns how to live better/gains more understanding of the topic? Or the author, who gains/cements an element of control? And who gets the money? And what becomes of it?
I'm thinking of people like Yancey, Swindoll - even Johnson & VanVonderen, who wrote The Subtle Power of Spiritual Abuse, that has been so helpful to people here at the Cafe. These people - especially the last-named pair - seem the antithesis of cult leaders.
The instruction in 1 Timothy 3 (about selection of church overseers) springs to mind.
:4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
:5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
How do the wannabe's kids present?
>Are they quiet, because cowed into submission?
>Or are they quiet, because they are polite and respectfully brought up?
>Are the wannabe's kids able to express an opinion?
>Or are they required to be seen and not heard?
>Are the kids treated as individuals, with their own personalities?
>Or are they treated like clones, one-size-fits-all?
>Are the kids' abilities acknowledged and encouraged?
>Or are they forced to give up things they enjoy and do things they dislike?
...Cos that's how the wannabe leader will treat his following. That's how his "special knowledge" really plays out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.