Of course there is folklore in the Bible. Does that, in itself, detract from its value? I think you have to consider the intrinsic purpose and value of folklore. Folklore exists because people want to preserve information that they feel is important. I wouldn't be too surprised to find that parts of Proverbs or Jesus' parables were derived, at least in part, from "folklore". Why should that disqualify or devalue the messages they contain?
pretty broad generalization there, wouldn't you say?
Is it? If we take the human heart to mean the seat of human intent, thought and interaction. . . . what is comparable? Nothing. . . . not a thing except God. Above all else. . . .what else is there? Pretty limited IMO.
I think that means it is so bad. . . . it is unexplainable. :)
Just think of what we are capable of in terms of deceit. . . .
Is it? If we take the human heart to mean the seat of human intent, thought and interaction. . . . what is comparable? Nothing. . . . not a thing except God. Above all else. . . .what else is there? Pretty limited IMO.
I think that means it is so bad. . . . it is unexplainable. :)
Just think of what we are capable of in terms of deceit. . . .
perhaps. then there are those of us.. who would rather go live in a tent in the woods somewhere.. than start a fanatical hitlerian cult of sorts..
In a general sense.. I would acknowledge that it is POSSIBLE for the mind to be that deceitful. History answers that question..
perhaps. then there are those of us.. who would rather go live in a tent in the woods somewhere.. than start a fanatical hitlerian cult of sorts..
In a general sense.. I would acknowledge that it is POSSIBLE for the mind to be that deceitful. History answers that question..
Not to put too fine a point on it. . . .but, as former fanatical Wierwilian cult members. . . . we got tricked. . . our hearts lead us down the ugly path. Hey, some people won't even admit to that.
It isn't about degrees of deceitfulness. . . .VP vs Hitler . . . the human heart is deceitful. Easily caught up in lies. . . my opinion anyway. It doesn't mean we are not capable of great good though. . ..
the only thing I will say.. I wanted to sell old pfal junk on ebay.. but the said person circumvented.. "don't let a TREASURE to fall into the wrong hands.."
and a previous comment..
"They (the offshoot) needs somebody like you.."
no kidding..
no thanks. If it came down to that, or having to live in the woods somewhere (I did that once )
I'd live in the woods..
I'm still trying to find out what family here, that I belong to..
well.. I'm patient. Let me know now, or the next lifetime..
be warned.. *part* of me.. will remember some of this the next time around..
You know, this whole discussion makes me think about the controversy that erupts, from time to time, regarding the works of William Shakespeare. (Stick with me; there is a parallel.)
For the past 200 years or so, people have debated whether one man was capable of being the author of the many works we attribute to The Bard. Are they the works of one man or a conglomeration of the works of many? That's the essence of the ongoing debate, complete with references, citations and irrefutable proof from both camps.
Does any of that matter when Puck frolics about the stage, in Midsummer Night's Dream, practicing his trickery and mischief? Does any of that matter when, in The Tragedy of Hamlet, the observer is faced with real life questions about insanity, incest and corruption?
One man wrote it all or a hundred men put their pens to paper. No matter. "The play's the thing."
Does any of that matter when Puck frolics about the stage, in Midsummer Night's Dream, practicing his trickery and mischief? Does any of that matter when, in The Tragedy of Hamlet, the observer is faced with real life questions about insanity, incest and corruption?
One man wrote it all or a hundred men put their pens to paper. No matter. "The play's the thing."
I thought you were talking about THIS kind of "dope".
"Thou art a base, proud, shallow, beggarly, three-suited, hundred-pound, filthy worsted-stocking knave; a lily-liver’d, action-taking, whoreson, glass-gazing, superserviceable, finical rogue; one-trunk-inheriting slave; one that wouldst be a bawd in way of good service, and art nothing but the composition of a knave, beggar, coward, pandar, and the son and heir of a mungril bitch."
Kent, King Lear (2.2.15-23)
edit: That's Shakespeare's version of "--------and the horse you rode in on."
(Not you, Ham, just a generic portrayal of a "dope"."
For the record here, I DO believe in an Intelligent Designer/ID (I call God for want of a better word) however it is not worthy of my worship (especially not the alleged trinitarian story book one)
The biblical text itself or any other alleged Holy Book ' are nothing more than a story book of fantasy fabricated by mortal men.
There is NO legitimate evidence to conclude it is the Words of a God given to man.
Everyone is welcome here, Composer, so long as they follow the basic rules. You know, stuff like "no name calling", "no personal attacks", etc. We have people here with a wide variety of spiritual convictions, including those with none.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
40
13
14
17
Popular Days
Apr 2
28
Apr 10
20
Apr 1
16
Apr 15
15
Top Posters In This Topic
year2027 40 posts
Ham 13 posts
geisha779 14 posts
Composer 17 posts
Popular Days
Apr 2 2010
28 posts
Apr 10 2010
20 posts
Apr 1 2010
16 posts
Apr 15 2010
15 posts
Popular Posts
Gen-2
You don't believe in My God, so your points are moot. You believe in another god and when you see these things happening, you blame the God you don't believe in. A rather silly exercise. Thank You f
Composer
Sadly the story book paints a dismal picture of this alleged story book hypocrite and monster of a trinitarian god. (Even more monstrous than that of the Intelligent designer that has inflicted pestil
Sunesis
Composer, how long were you in TWI for?
waysider
Of course there is folklore in the Bible. Does that, in itself, detract from its value? I think you have to consider the intrinsic purpose and value of folklore. Folklore exists because people want to preserve information that they feel is important. I wouldn't be too surprised to find that parts of Proverbs or Jesus' parables were derived, at least in part, from "folklore". Why should that disqualify or devalue the messages they contain?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
geisha779
Is it? If we take the human heart to mean the seat of human intent, thought and interaction. . . . what is comparable? Nothing. . . . not a thing except God. Above all else. . . .what else is there? Pretty limited IMO.
I think that means it is so bad. . . . it is unexplainable. :)
Just think of what we are capable of in terms of deceit. . . .
Edited by geisha779Link to comment
Share on other sites
year2027
God first
thanks modbaker
thanks old friend
I glad have peaceful board
thanks all that you do
with love and a holy kiss Roy
thanks cman and Ham and waysider and geisha779
cman yes my friend
Ham and waysider it does not add or take away from things they teach us
folklore is all around us we used it to teach a negative and other used to teach positive
yes it is limited geisha
with love and a holy kiss Roy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
perhaps. then there are those of us.. who would rather go live in a tent in the woods somewhere.. than start a fanatical hitlerian cult of sorts..
In a general sense.. I would acknowledge that it is POSSIBLE for the mind to be that deceitful. History answers that question..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
Just think of what we are capable of in terms of truth.
I think if you turn the bible upside down or at least a little sideways,
you can get a better view.
Looking at anything from one side is deceiving, and only part.
Nice point on folklore waysider.
Much truth in there.
Perhaps the heart can be more truthful then anything else too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
geisha779
Not to put too fine a point on it. . . .but, as former fanatical Wierwilian cult members. . . . we got tricked. . . our hearts lead us down the ugly path. Hey, some people won't even admit to that.
It isn't about degrees of deceitfulness. . . .VP vs Hitler . . . the human heart is deceitful. Easily caught up in lies. . . my opinion anyway. It doesn't mean we are not capable of great good though. . ..
Edited by geisha779Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
i knew you knew that....:)
just thought it was a good place to say it....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
maybe I should rephrase that..
having witnessed or fallen victim to that kind of deceitfulness.. I would not practice the same.. even to who might be described as my worst enemy..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
some just ran off and started offshoots..
somebody said to me.. I won't say who. :)
the only thing I will say.. I wanted to sell old pfal junk on ebay.. but the said person circumvented.. "don't let a TREASURE to fall into the wrong hands.."
and a previous comment..
"They (the offshoot) needs somebody like you.."
no kidding..
no thanks. If it came down to that, or having to live in the woods somewhere (I did that once )
I'd live in the woods..
I'm still trying to find out what family here, that I belong to..
well.. I'm patient. Let me know now, or the next lifetime..
be warned.. *part* of me.. will remember some of this the next time around..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
I dunno.. if anybody thinks this is "over".. I think you are mistaken..
parts of yourself are going to challenge you, one time after another..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
family?
what is the 1 (that means One) thing that everybody shares?
i agree
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
so what do we do now..
what I would prefer..
maybe I shouldn't say..
we sit around the campfire, and smoke something mildly hallucinogenic..
sowy.. sometimes I'm "gone"..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
You know, this whole discussion makes me think about the controversy that erupts, from time to time, regarding the works of William Shakespeare. (Stick with me; there is a parallel.)
For the past 200 years or so, people have debated whether one man was capable of being the author of the many works we attribute to The Bard. Are they the works of one man or a conglomeration of the works of many? That's the essence of the ongoing debate, complete with references, citations and irrefutable proof from both camps.
Does any of that matter when Puck frolics about the stage, in Midsummer Night's Dream, practicing his trickery and mischief? Does any of that matter when, in The Tragedy of Hamlet, the observer is faced with real life questions about insanity, incest and corruption?
One man wrote it all or a hundred men put their pens to paper. No matter. "The play's the thing."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
heh..
as long as they have good dope, who cares..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Perzactly my point!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
dope is not the answer
a play is close
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
OOPS!
I thought you were talking about THIS kind of "dope".
"Thou art a base, proud, shallow, beggarly, three-suited, hundred-pound, filthy worsted-stocking knave; a lily-liver’d, action-taking, whoreson, glass-gazing, superserviceable, finical rogue; one-trunk-inheriting slave; one that wouldst be a bawd in way of good service, and art nothing but the composition of a knave, beggar, coward, pandar, and the son and heir of a mungril bitch."
Kent, King Lear (2.2.15-23)
edit: That's Shakespeare's version of "--------and the horse you rode in on."
(Not you, Ham, just a generic portrayal of a "dope"."
Edited by waysiderLink to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
thanks friend. Yes, it was generic..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
geisha779
:) History also bears this out. . . . that we are capable of extraordinary acts of goodness and great self-sacrifice.
I give a big Amen to that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
Air
yeah too easy, huh
folklore....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
year2027
God first
thanks Ham and cman and geisha779 and waysider
where that mock know as Todd
because he sings the folklore
with love and a holy kiss Roy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
year2027
God first
thanks Ham and cman and geisha779 and waysider
How about DMiller to sing into some type peace
when words do not say the blessing you feel from a tread
it time add music
with love and a holy kiss Roy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Composer
For the record here, I DO believe in an Intelligent Designer/ID (I call God for want of a better word) however it is not worthy of my worship (especially not the alleged trinitarian story book one)
The biblical text itself or any other alleged Holy Book ' are nothing more than a story book of fantasy fabricated by mortal men.
There is NO legitimate evidence to conclude it is the Words of a God given to man.
Cheers!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Everyone is welcome here, Composer, so long as they follow the basic rules. You know, stuff like "no name calling", "no personal attacks", etc. We have people here with a wide variety of spiritual convictions, including those with none.
Cheers back at you
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.