JeffSjo Posted September 21, 2009 Share Posted September 21, 2009 JeffSjo...I'm just now reading this. I didn't think you were referring to me with your comment so I wasn't responding to that, at least not defensively. So I apologize to you if I came off that way. In reading your original post I think you were pretty clear. I guess I was just lamenting that I never saw any of the "stuff" while I was in. But it's pretty clear upon re-reading your post that you weren't referring to that. I guess I read that into what you were saying. But I wasn't offended. I apologize for any misunderstanding. Dear Erkjohn, Thank you for saying you were not offended and for whatever it is worth, I did not assume that you were at all. But because of your first response and the reason for some of it seemed like you might have taken my post in a way that I did not intend I felt I should make sure we were straight. In a perfect world I think that we all could just be straight about things if the topics or posts offend somebody. At least that gives the ones with friendly intentions the option of working things out IMO. Plus, I believe communicating on a web-site by text makes it even more difficult to know how something was meant. Simpler if we just decide to ask and work it out. Concerning sociopaths..... I think anyone who has been around one and ended up feeling the complete and udder disdain they carry for relating to people as anything other than a tool to be manipulated would understand that being a sociopath is not an excuse. In my mind a sociopath is is a very, very nasty bird. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.