I myself would be happy to talk to Ms. Ash directly, if that helps. or I'll email information to you or her.
No problem with that here. I think her "challenge" is a great opportunity, to get an article back, whether its from me or a group effort, that is a few or many people wanting to be part of the solution. Talking to someone, like Ms. Ash is a potential. As long as she is approached with respect due her as a professional and the subject matter relevant to her, positive, well, in my experience, good things can happen. Good luck in talking with her, the article is part of her work, not her career, so the more calls she gets, no doubt she could get bogged down, but I say go for it, don't worry, be happy....and again, I would like to submit an article for her approval, so if and when you get some time, do let me know what three or four points "rebutt" what Mr. Martin asserts via the article....
Edited: I will endeavor to be in chat tonight, say 7 to 8ish CST and see what people think, I think there is a room option...I would like to get some ideas from those who have read the article, in order help me, narrow down the subject matter, if you feel you can help, please drop by...michael
You might see if Raf would be interested in writing - or perhaps ghost writing - an article as he is a nationally well respected journalist
No problem with that here. I think her "challenge" is a great opportunity, to get an article back, whether its from me or a group effort, that is a few or many people wanting to be part of the solution. Talking to someone, like Ms. Ash is a potential. As long as she is approached with respect due her as a professional and the subject matter relevant to her, positive, well, in my experience, good things can happen.
You might see if Raf would be interested in writing - or perhaps ghost writing - an article as he is a nationally well respected journalist
I wrote a short thank you note to Ms. Ash, thanking her for the opportunity to be considered for publication. I would like to write the article with help from others, including Raf, if he is interested. Raf is cetainly free to contact Ms. Ash. The article, if published is not about me. Currently, I write for a animal shelter, in their newsletter. I see the article as being simple, to the point, positive, and flowing with the goals of the article Ms. Ash wrote. I do disagree about the context of the facts presented there. My qualifications include legal analysis writing, a B.A. and a year of post graduate work in Paralegal studies... The challenge to me, is flowing with, or supplementing, rebutting, the emphasis of that section of the article that deals with Mr. and Mrs. Martin... I do hope you have some time this evenning for some chat. thanks....
As long as it didn't open any avenues for accusations against GSers or especially Paw et al of slander.....I for one want to stay out of this one from now on.
I have always told the truth on this website, but I sure as God made little green apples don't want anyone who wronged me to know who I am from my posts. There's no profit in that, especially since they were so sure of their own righteousness.
As an aspiring journalist, I'd be thrilled to help you write this article, mchud11. PM me and let me know if there's any way I can help.
chat, 7pm CST, be there or be a square, er be square...thanks, I appreciate your interest, expression is marvelous, isn't it..
As long as it didn't open any avenues for accusations against GSers or especially Paw et al of slander.....I for one want to stay out of this one from now on.
I have always told the truth on this website, but I sure as God made little green apples don't want anyone who wronged me to know who I am from my posts. There's no profit in that, especially since they were so sure of their own righteousness.
I think a can of worms has just been opened.
WG
absolutely...GSC is separate and distinct, I do not plan on mentioning GSC at all..at all...I have my head on with what slander is, libel, defamation..thanks, I am hearing reservation and nothing unhealthy about that...thanks for responding to the post Watered Garden..
oh, you...waysider, really, I am worthy of your trust. Writing has boundaries, I have no expectations and no agenda...TWI, to me, said this, and did something else.. In writing, the goal is to reach people, an audience, and in my experience to reach people the necessary condition is relevance, things others can relate to, and out of the gutter so to speak...plain speaking goes a long way with folks..michael
Most of this article is pretty much harmless and not subject to rebuttal. This writer, if I'm viewing this correctly, is concerned with finances, not faith.
The only difficulty is certain things are stated as fact that should be marked off as the opinions of her subjects:
The thirtysomething couple, who live in an apartment, are ministers of The Way International, an Ohio-based worldwide nondenominational ministry that focuses on knowing the Bible inside out and living its messages.
That's clearly going on the say so of the interview subjects. I doubt highly there was independent research to verify that this group is "worldwide" by any stretch.
The Way teaches three basic principles from the Bible regarding financial prosperity and debt-free living: Tithe 10 percent of your income, live within your means, and work heartily as unto the Lord.
Agree or disagree, this is CLEARLY the opinion of the subjects. There is plenty of Christian disagreement on tithing and living debt-free.
Though Biblical scholars, they do not restrict their reading to the holy book.
SCHOLARS? Puh-LEASE.
For the most part, I'd advise against giving TWI any publicity by responding to this. At best, this warrants a letter to the editor about calling people Biblical Scholars when their only claim to the title is membership in a discredited cult founded by a plagiarizing predatory preacher.
Most of this article is pretty much harmless and not subject to rebuttal. This writer, if I'm viewing this correctly, is concerned with finances, not faith.
The only difficulty is certain things are stated as fact that should be marked off as the opinions of her subjects:
That's clearly going on the say so of the interview subjects. I doubt highly there was independent research to verify that this group is "worldwide" by any stretch.
Agree or disagree, this is CLEARLY the opinion of the subjects. There is plenty of Christian disagreement on tithing and living debt-free.
SCHOLARS? Puh-LEASE.
For the most part, I'd advise against giving TWI any publicity by responding to this. At best, this warrants a letter to the editor about calling people Biblical Scholars when their only claim to the title is membership in a discredited cult founded by a plagiarizing predatory preacher.
Thanks for responding Raf, if you are around at 7cst, would love to hear your thoughts..and I very much agree, specifically, this is about finances, not faith, absolutely.. and the context, I am hearing you assert about the article..opinion, absolutely (the authors facts are not givens by any stretch of the word, a representation of "biblical research" or even "ministers" all opinion, tithing, opinion. It may be a complete waste of my time and that is not a problem, it is my time to waste.. that is, what I write, they decide not to publish, NP, I have no control over the situation, I mean the point of their publishing anything, whether its me or Joe Doe is self-interest, publicity..
I have completed my Letter To The Editor in response to the article pointed to in Belle's posting. Yes, the result of my letter if posted, may result in individuals currently associated with TWI starting a letter writing campaign. And so what? Quality to me, is more important than quantity, but that is just me.. If there is a response from the Editor to me, that I feel is significant, I may post it here on GSC. GSC has not been mentioned in my letter, implied, referenced, no ones name, handle has been referenced. All my name, my thoughts, my take on the article..
Recommended Posts
potato
I myself would be happy to talk to Ms. Ash directly, if that helps. or I'll email information to you or her.
Edited by potatoLink to comment
Share on other sites
mchud11
No problem with that here. I think her "challenge" is a great opportunity, to get an article back, whether its from me or a group effort, that is a few or many people wanting to be part of the solution. Talking to someone, like Ms. Ash is a potential. As long as she is approached with respect due her as a professional and the subject matter relevant to her, positive, well, in my experience, good things can happen. Good luck in talking with her, the article is part of her work, not her career, so the more calls she gets, no doubt she could get bogged down, but I say go for it, don't worry, be happy....and again, I would like to submit an article for her approval, so if and when you get some time, do let me know what three or four points "rebutt" what Mr. Martin asserts via the article....
Edited: I will endeavor to be in chat tonight, say 7 to 8ish CST and see what people think, I think there is a room option...I would like to get some ideas from those who have read the article, in order help me, narrow down the subject matter, if you feel you can help, please drop by...michael
Edited by mchud11Link to comment
Share on other sites
potato
I pm'd you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RumRunner
You might see if Raf would be interested in writing - or perhaps ghost writing - an article as he is a nationally well respected journalist
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twinky
She might like a link to the Cafe so's she can check some of the stories/info herself.
Especially about the lawsuits - documented on the front page. Very verifiable information.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mchud11
Thanks, in my voice mail, I referred to GSC. In talking with her this afternoon, she is aware of "us" as well. thanks again..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brushstroke
As an aspiring journalist, I'd be thrilled to help you write this article, mchud11. PM me and let me know if there's any way I can help.
Edited by BrushstrokeLink to comment
Share on other sites
mchud11
I wrote a short thank you note to Ms. Ash, thanking her for the opportunity to be considered for publication. I would like to write the article with help from others, including Raf, if he is interested. Raf is cetainly free to contact Ms. Ash. The article, if published is not about me. Currently, I write for a animal shelter, in their newsletter. I see the article as being simple, to the point, positive, and flowing with the goals of the article Ms. Ash wrote. I do disagree about the context of the facts presented there. My qualifications include legal analysis writing, a B.A. and a year of post graduate work in Paralegal studies... The challenge to me, is flowing with, or supplementing, rebutting, the emphasis of that section of the article that deals with Mr. and Mrs. Martin... I do hope you have some time this evenning for some chat. thanks....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Watered Garden
As long as it didn't open any avenues for accusations against GSers or especially Paw et al of slander.....I for one want to stay out of this one from now on.
I have always told the truth on this website, but I sure as God made little green apples don't want anyone who wronged me to know who I am from my posts. There's no profit in that, especially since they were so sure of their own righteousness.
I think a can of worms has just been opened.
WG
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mchud11
chat, 7pm CST, be there or be a square, er be square...thanks, I appreciate your interest, expression is marvelous, isn't it..
absolutely...GSC is separate and distinct, I do not plan on mentioning GSC at all..at all...I have my head on with what slander is, libel, defamation..thanks, I am hearing reservation and nothing unhealthy about that...thanks for responding to the post Watered Garden..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mchud11
oh, you...waysider, really, I am worthy of your trust. Writing has boundaries, I have no expectations and no agenda...TWI, to me, said this, and did something else.. In writing, the goal is to reach people, an audience, and in my experience to reach people the necessary condition is relevance, things others can relate to, and out of the gutter so to speak...plain speaking goes a long way with folks..michael
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bowtwi
What article that belle pointed us to are you referring to? And while I'm at it, which Mr. and Mrs. Martin are you referring to?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
This one:
http://www.greasespotcafe.com/ipb/index.php?showtopic=19238
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bowtwi
Thanks, man. If it were a snake it would've bitten me!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
I'll see you in chat. 7 p.m. CST.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Most of this article is pretty much harmless and not subject to rebuttal. This writer, if I'm viewing this correctly, is concerned with finances, not faith.
The only difficulty is certain things are stated as fact that should be marked off as the opinions of her subjects:
That's clearly going on the say so of the interview subjects. I doubt highly there was independent research to verify that this group is "worldwide" by any stretch.
Agree or disagree, this is CLEARLY the opinion of the subjects. There is plenty of Christian disagreement on tithing and living debt-free.
SCHOLARS? Puh-LEASE.
For the most part, I'd advise against giving TWI any publicity by responding to this. At best, this warrants a letter to the editor about calling people Biblical Scholars when their only claim to the title is membership in a discredited cult founded by a plagiarizing predatory preacher.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mchud11
Thanks for responding Raf, if you are around at 7cst, would love to hear your thoughts..and I very much agree, specifically, this is about finances, not faith, absolutely.. and the context, I am hearing you assert about the article..opinion, absolutely (the authors facts are not givens by any stretch of the word, a representation of "biblical research" or even "ministers" all opinion, tithing, opinion. It may be a complete waste of my time and that is not a problem, it is my time to waste.. that is, what I write, they decide not to publish, NP, I have no control over the situation, I mean the point of their publishing anything, whether its me or Joe Doe is self-interest, publicity..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Something's wrong with my computer. I haven't been able to get in.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mchud11
I have completed my Letter To The Editor in response to the article pointed to in Belle's posting. Yes, the result of my letter if posted, may result in individuals currently associated with TWI starting a letter writing campaign. And so what? Quality to me, is more important than quantity, but that is just me.. If there is a response from the Editor to me, that I feel is significant, I may post it here on GSC. GSC has not been mentioned in my letter, implied, referenced, no ones name, handle has been referenced. All my name, my thoughts, my take on the article..
regards...michael
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.