I have a feeling that this crowd (myself included) spends a lot less time with books than we do with movies, TV, or the radio, but I'll give it a shot:
Herman Melville
You didn't mention needing a title. I'm thinking Moby Dick, of course, but maybe Billy Budd.
I have a feeling that this crowd (myself included) spends a lot less time with books than we do with movies, TV, or the radio, but I'll give it a shot:
Herman Melville
You didn't mention needing a title. I'm thinking Moby Dick, of course, but maybe Billy Budd.
hint: It's non fiction. Not Hemingway, not Melville.
You know him, though
The subject matter does give some good clues.
From the same book, a description of an itinerant preacher of the author's day, a Mr. Whitefield. This quote is a gem.
He had a loud and clear voice, and articulated his words and sentences so perfectly, that he might be heard and understood at a great distance, especially as his auditories, however numerous, observ'd the most exact silence. He preach'd one evening from the top of the Court-house steps, which are in the middle of Market-street, and on the west side of Second-street, which crosses it at right angles.
Both streets were fill'd with his hearers to a considerable distance. Being among the hindmost in Market-street, I had the curiosity to learn how far he could be heard, by retiring backwards down the street towards the river; and I found his voice distinct till I came near Front-street, when some noise in that street obscur'd it. Imagining then a semi-circle, of which my distance should be the radius, and that it were fill'd with auditors, to each of whom I allow'd two square feet, I computed that he might well be heard by more than thirty thousand. This reconcil'd me to the newspaper accounts of his having preach'd to twenty-five thousand people in the fields, and to the antient histories of generals haranguing whole armies, of which I had sometimes doubted.
By hearing him often, I came to distinguish easily between sermons newly compos'd, and those which he had often preach'd in the course of his travels. His delivery of the latter was so improv'd by frequent repetitions that every accent, every emphasis, every modulation of voice, was so perfectly well turn'd and well plac'd, that, without being interested in the subject, one could not help being pleas'd with the discourse; a pleasure of much the same kind with that receiv'd from an excellent piece of musick. This is an advantage itinerant preachers have over those who are stationary, as the latter can not well improve their delivery of a sermon by so many rehearsals.
the author happened to be the youngest son of the youngest son for five generations, not that he was known for this; interesting, though
I was thinking Melville too when I saw George's response so I googled it. I recently read this book or one on the same subject and was especially interested in the Whitfield quote. Here's another quote by the same author on his church-going or lack thereof which I thought was especially interesting. (Dan, hope it's okay to chime in here since I disqualified myself by googling it.)
Tho' I seldom attended any public worship, I had still an opinion of its propriety, and of its utility when rightly conducted, and I regularly paid my annual subscription for the support of the only Presbyterian minister or meeting we had in Philadelphia. He us'd to visit me sometimes as a friend, and admonish me to attend his administrations, and I was now and then prevail'd on to do so, once for five Sundays successively. Had he been in my opinion a good preacher, perhaps I might have continued, notwithstanding the occasion I had for the Sunday's leisure in my course of study; but his discourses were chiefly either polemic arguments, or explications of the peculiar doctrines of our sect, and were all to me very dry, uninteresting, and unedifying, since not a single moral principle was inculcated or enforc'd, their aim seeming to be rather to make us Presbyterians than good citizens.
Great book! Thanks for playing and being such good sports.... Wrds... I'm surprised you didn't get it! Nice "chime in" --- that was another fascinating glimpse into this guy's thinking, one I had also marked in my copy.
I pass to George St. George.
It can be any book, fiction or nonfiction. Could be interesting, since it's not necessarily that a person remembers a particular quote, but can figure out sometimes from the content who might have written it.
"All Gaul is divided into three parts, in one of which dwell the Belgians, in another the Aquitani, and in the third those whose language is of the Celts, who are called Gauls by us."
Admittedly, my Latin is a little rusty. I do a lot more with Greek these days.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
101
94
86
59
Popular Days
Apr 9
14
Jul 29
14
Apr 6
13
Apr 8
12
Top Posters In This Topic
GeorgeStGeorge 101 posts
bfh 94 posts
wrdsandwrks 86 posts
anotherDan 59 posts
Popular Days
Apr 9 2008
14 posts
Jul 29 2017
14 posts
Apr 6 2008
13 posts
Apr 8 2008
12 posts
Popular Posts
Grace Valerie Claire
OK, I'll jump in. What are the best books ever written, other than the Bible? My favorite book for example is An American Tragedy.
GeorgeStGeorge
No, that was actually "Treasure Island," by Robert Louis Stephenson. If you'd like to try, feel free to give a quote from a book, so we can guess the author. I've gotta tell you, though, the pla
WordWolf
Stephen King, The Dark Tower, Volume 1, "The Gunslinger." (For the record, I didn't even find that thing when I moved.)
GeorgeStGeorge
I have a feeling that this crowd (myself included) spends a lot less time with books than we do with movies, TV, or the radio, but I'll give it a shot:
Herman Melville
You didn't mention needing a title. I'm thinking Moby Dick, of course, but maybe Billy Budd.
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
I must confess; I googled it.
WOW!!
Perfect choice for this forum.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wrdsandwrks
Where's the next quote?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
doojable
Is that a Hemingway quote? I only remember the story with the Bonito fish....not the title.
*edited to say that on second thought I don't really think it is Hemingway.
Edited by doojableLink to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Until someone says I'm right (or wrong), we wait!
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
anotherDan
nope, but thanks for trying
hint: It's non fiction. Not Hemingway, not Melville.
You know him, though
The subject matter does give some good clues.
From the same book, a description of an itinerant preacher of the author's day, a Mr. Whitefield. This quote is a gem.
the author happened to be the youngest son of the youngest son for five generations, not that he was known for this; interesting, though
Edited by anotherDanLink to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Thoreau?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wrdsandwrks
I was thinking Melville too when I saw George's response so I googled it. I recently read this book or one on the same subject and was especially interested in the Whitfield quote. Here's another quote by the same author on his church-going or lack thereof which I thought was especially interesting. (Dan, hope it's okay to chime in here since I disqualified myself by googling it.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cheranne
Martin Luther King?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
anotherDan
In the spirit of moving on, I'm revealing the author, who is Benjamin Franklin, from his Autobiography.
It can be read online in its entirety HERE.
Great book! Thanks for playing and being such good sports.... Wrds... I'm surprised you didn't get it! Nice "chime in" --- that was another fascinating glimpse into this guy's thinking, one I had also marked in my copy.
I pass to George St. George.
It can be any book, fiction or nonfiction. Could be interesting, since it's not necessarily that a person remembers a particular quote, but can figure out sometimes from the content who might have written it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
"Gallia est omnis divisa in partis tris, quarum unam incolunt Belgae, aliam Aquitani, tertiam qui ipsorum lingua Celtae, nostra Galli appellantur."
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bfh
GSG:
I am ROTFLMAO.
Who knew 3 years of college Latin would come in handy on GSC?
I only took it to fill the language req. and translate Medieval Manuscripts ( I have since given that up).
That would be Julius Caesar - spent a whole semester on those Commentaries.
Now, all I can translate is the first phrase without my Latin/English Dictionary.
"All of Gaul is divided into three parts"
Edited by bfhLink to comment
Share on other sites
anotherDan
Bravo! Is he right GSG? (how cultured!)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Quite correct!
I believe the whole quote is translated
"All Gaul is divided into three parts, in one of which dwell the Belgians, in another the Aquitani, and in the third those whose language is of the Celts, who are called Gauls by us."
Admittedly, my Latin is a little rusty. I do a lot more with Greek these days.
Your turn, bfh!
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bfh
GSG:
I believe you are correct about that translation.
Although it has been close to a decade since I delved into Latin (has it really been that long), so my Latin is very rusty.
BTW, my favorite Latin quote: Nunc est bibendum!
Okay, on to the next quote:
"We took risks, we knew we took them; things have come out
against us, and therefore we have no cause for complaint, but bow to
the will of Providence, determined still to do our best to the last...
Had we lived, I should have had a tale to tell of the hardihood,
endurance, and courage of my companions which would have stirred the
heart of every Englishman. These rough notes and our dead bodies must
tell the tale."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
anotherDan
Is it Edmonton? Not sure of the name.... antarctic explorer?
edit: ah, but he lived!
Edited by anotherDanLink to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
It sounds like it might be describing the ill-fated Franklin Expedition to find The Northwest Passage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bfh
anotherDan is on the right track -
It was written by an Antarctica explorer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Slight diversion
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wrdsandwrks
Is it Shakleton?
Loved the clip: "These books were alive, they spoke to me."!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bfh
Ah, Fahrenheit 451 - Ray Bradbury. Good Book and a pivotal scene.
Kind of looks like my house with all those books...
Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming....
No, it's not Shackleton...but close.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wrdsandwrks
Okay, it's a longshot, but the only other Anarctic Explorer I can think of is Byrd. Byrd?
Probably not...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bfh
I can't think of any other clues I can give...There were four important Antarctic explorers and you have named two of them.
Let's see...the remaining two explorers were competing to see who could reach the South Pole first.
One explorer and his team accomplished the mission in record time, the other and his team perished on the ice (see quote).
Edited to say: Oops, I forgot to say...No, not Byrd.
Edited by bfhLink to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
Robert Peary?
George
P.S. For those who didn't get bfh's Latin phrase: Now we must drink!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.