Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Atheists vs. Agnostics


Recommended Posts

I contend modern Western atheists have been so colored by a culture immersed in Christianity they do not know what they believe or disbelieve.

I have heard that morals and ethics have evolved, but by whose standards? Are the jihadists a step backward or forward? Was Stalin on the right track? Or Christ?

Is freedoom an inherent value or is it learned?

What about murder, stealing, adultery or envy?

How can one say these are wrong or should one even say it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I contend modern Western atheists have been so colored by a culture immersed in Christianity they do not know what they believe or disbelieve.

I have heard that morals and ethics have evolved, but by whose standards? Are the jihadists a step backward or forward? Was Stalin on the right track? Or Christ?

Is freedoom an inherent value or is it learned?

What about murder, stealing, adultery or envy?

How can one say these are wrong or should one even say it?

If someone doesn't say it's wrong what would prevent me from murdering you? I don't think you'll like that very much, would ya?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone doesn't say it's wrong what would prevent me from murdering you? I don't think you'll like that very much, would ya?

Ah yes, but what is the bigger point? Where did these values come from? Did they come from some evolution of mankind? Did they come from some athiest or agnostic philosopher? Did they come from religion?

I think that is the point Def is making (Good to see you again, Def how are ya???)

I would tend to think they come from the latter. However, I by no means take that to imply athiests or agnositcs are categorically immoral any more than I would assume religions people are categorically moral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, I by no means take that to imply athiests or agnositcs are categorically immoral any more than I would assume religions people are categorically moral.

I certainly hope that no one has made the mistaken notion that I believe atheists or agnostics are immoral because they happen to be atheists and/or agnostics. That notion is down-right silly.

Gandi, made one of the most profoundest statements I've ever heard: "I might be persuaded to become a Christian if it wasn't for the way Christians behave."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly hope that no one has made the mistaken notion that I believe atheists or agnostics are immoral because they happen to be atheists and/or agnostics. That notion is down-right silly.

Gandi, made one of the most profoundest statements I've ever heard: "I might be persuaded to become a Christian if it wasn't for the way Christians behave."

No, I didn't think you had implied that, but I've seen that issue come up in similar threads so I wanted to make my POV clear on that score, lest someone accuse me of implying that. :biglaugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I contend modern Western atheists have been so colored by a culture immersed in Christianity they do not know what they believe or disbelieve.

I have heard that morals and ethics have evolved, but by whose standards? Are the jihadists a step backward or forward? Was Stalin on the right track? Or Christ?

Is freedoom an inherent value or is it learned?

What about murder, stealing, adultery or envy?

How can one say these are wrong or should one even say it?

I talked about this on TWI's Sedative to the Conscience thread and on Shifra's Agape or Arrogance thread – how there seems to be a common sense of decency and morality in people of any time and culture – we see that laws are usually made to protect life, promote honesty, protect ownership, etc. It appears to me that there is something inherent in people – that transcends culture and belief systems that enables folks to discern right from wrong. And perhaps it takes a deliberate act of the will or rigid conditioning to dull this function....of course, that's just my opinion.

Edited by T-Bone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gandi, made one of the most profoundest statements I've ever heard: "I might be persuaded to become a Christian if it wasn't for the way Christians behave."

Someone else said (I wish I knew who), "Christianity is the greatest religion no one's ever practiced". :biglaugh:

I consider myself an agnostic (surprise, surprise). I really wish I could believe there is an all knowing, all powerful being even mildly interested in my well being. However, given all the things happening in the world, I find it difficult to swallow.

Some say you can't know. Maybe. I don't know if one CAN know. Maybe.

(How's that for fence sitting? :biglaugh:)

Edited by Sushi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great thread, Oak! I enjoy learning about stuff like this. Unless I make a conscious effort to analyze a particular TWI viewpoint…a lot of their old BS just sits there in my head…great article, Larry – thanks for posting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked about this on TWI's Sedative to the Conscience thread and on Shifra's Agape or Arrogance thread – how there seems to be a common sense of decency and morality in people of any time and culture – we see that laws are usually made to protect life, promote honesty, protect ownership, etc. It appears to me that there is something inherent in people – that transcends culture and belief systems that enables folks to discern right from wrong. And perhaps it takes a deliberate act of the will or rigid conditioning to dull this function....of course, that's just my opinion.

Well said, Tbone, but I don't know that it is inherent. If it were, why would we need the laws?

It would take a while to type it all out but I think that it seems logical enough to me that through the evolution of our species eventually rules were needed and an enforcement of those rules were needed in order to protect and further the clan/pack/group. Humans needed eachother to survive the animals, the weather, and other humans. Trial and error would show that protecting life, promoting honesty, and protecting ownership would be ways to further life within and of the clan/tribe/pack itself.

It seems to me that religion and gods served two purposes from the start: to explain the unknown and to enforce the rules. That combination in a vacuum might be ok, but in a dynamic world where more and more people interact with eachother and learning explodes exponetially, a group that strictly adheres to that combination becomes a violent one.

When considering the idea of a species with an evolving intellect it would be hard to say which came first the rules or the gods, perhaps they came about at the same time. I don't know.

I also consider myself as an atheistic agnostic. Somewhat of an evolution of my own. I am, of course, willing to change that position, god willing. :biglaugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you're saying, Lindyhopper – I was actually trying to address Def59's questions by observation of generalities. And I think they're some really tough questions at that! Maybe our species' moral capacity is a combination of inherent and learned qualities…like other functions of the brain. It has the capacity for abstract thought and language – but where someone is born and raised determines concepts they'll grasp and their native tongue….My theistic viewpoint believes the moral capacity of man is there by design. But thinking about it from a non-theistic viewpoint – it could be something that evolved – sort of like our immune system. Man's tendency to protect aspects of life driven by self-preservation….I'm not saying how the moral capacity got there – I'm just saying it looks to me like it's always been there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last few posts got me thinking on Hammurabi's code and such. After a quick google ( d*mn it's so great not to have to go to the library but just type in hammurabi instead), i found a interesting article comparing Hammurabi code, Mosaic Law, and Justinian Law.

See

http://www.hyperhistory.net/apwh/essays/co...bijustinlaw.htm

The similarities are striking even though they are centuries apart. An interesting exercise would be comparing Eastern Law (as in Chinese) with these to see any similarities and or differences. Thereby setting aside most contamination.

Your assignment Mr.Phelps if you so choose is to compare these. Of course if any of you are captured during this assignment I will disavow any knowledge of you.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

atheist = I believe there is no god or gods.

agnostic = I don't know whether or not there's a god or gods.

theist = I believe there is a god or gods.

Jew = I believe there is a specific God who played a direct role in our history.

Christian = I believe in the Jewish God, but I believe he's done more than Jewish people think.

Muslim = I believe in the Jewish God, but I believe Christians and Jews have misrepresented Him.

Unification Church = I believe in the Jewish, Christian and Muslim God, and he owns the Washington Times.

Jehovah's Witness = I believe in the Christian and Jewish God, and He's no fun.

The Way = I believe in the Christian God, and He doesn't mind if you sleep around as long as you nitpick over the placement of commas.

Post Way = I believe in the Christian God, but He's a little taller and smarter than I gave Him credit for.

Other Post Way = Can I go back to agnostic?

Agnostic? I think some have gone back to atheist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:offtopic:

I’m glad Grease Spot is not a Christian website! It dawned on me one day that GSC is one of the ways for a recovering TWIt-for-brains like me to get back into enjoying the real world. As life goes on – I’m thinking more and more it’s unhealthy to keep my belief system in a vacuum. More than doctrinally, I think Grease Spot has had a HUGE impact on my worldview.

Some things that continue to have a curious effect are ideas that occurred to me during Garth’s thread Talk about something that turns PFAL on its head. I realized how narrow minded my understanding of the Bible and Science is. And there’s more to it than that – I’m still sorting it out – will get back to ya later with more details :biglaugh: …There’s a lot of food for thought on this thread. Back in my TWI daze it was very comfortable to live in a make-believe world where I had “all the answers.” It was also stifling, boring – and especially frustrating when my mental map of life had nothing to do with reality…I don’t know why I’m posting this stuff – not sure if I qualify to contribute on this thread…As life goes on – I’m finding out there’s more I don’t know…

Great folks here at Grease Spot! Thanks a million for the perspective you all bring here! And I do apologize for the times I’ve been disrespectful on threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...