Well what I DON`T like, is she made a comment about some groups dissaproving of the story because they were about witches, that now they would REALLY have something to talk about....seemed to me like kind of an *in your face* christians...:(
It was like she was looking to deliberately offend people.
I am just really dissapointed. I have enthusiastically recomended these books for YEARS ...claimed that there wasn`t anything blatantly evil or threatening to christianity.....A great read, an inspiration to get children hooked on reading...now I feel ...I just don`t know...dirty...betrayed
I don`t know, I thought I was over being a homophobe, but with the reaction that I am having...I am guessing that I have some work to do yet.
My kids were shocked and disgusted as well...I am going to have to figure out why it matters so much.
It can`t be JUST the homosexuality issue, because I have read and enjoyed Ann Macafferty`s Dragon rider series and been able to stomache the gay characters and sexual life styles that are in her stories. Maybe it was because it was right up front from the very beginning. :(
Well what I DON`T like, is she made a comment about some groups dissaproving of the story because they were about witches, that now they would REALLY have something to talk about....seemed to me like kind of an *in your face* christians...:(
That wasn't your imagination-she clearly was thinking that and said as much.
It was like she was looking to deliberately offend people.
But not until after they bought the whole series.
I am just really dissapointed. I have enthusiastically recomended these books for YEARS ...claimed that there wasn`t anything blatantly evil or threatening to christianity.....A great read, an inspiration to get children hooked on reading...now I feel ...I just don`t know...dirty...betrayed
Lots of Christians read and recommended the series, giving her a lot of revenue.
Now that they already spent the money, she's free to offend them.
Mind you, I'd actually be less offended if she'd come out and said this in the actual books.
Doing it NOW strikes me as particularly greasy, underhanded, dishonest.
If she wanted to make a major character gay, this
"oh, he secretly was all through the series, but now that you've all bought it,
now I'm going to announce it" thing strikes me as disrespectful to the readers.
It's like she wanted all the "benefits" of being "open-minded" and "politically-correct",
but without taking the risks of offending "traditional values" readers and affecting the sales negatively.
I find that distinctly lacking courage and CONVICTION.
Oh, and if one's going to say "the signs were all there", an equally-strong argument can be made
for almost anything else that didn't happen in the actual books.
I thought she'd made DD's personal life more like Prospero's in The Tempest,
who said
"My library was dukedom large enough."
I don`t know, I thought I was over being a homophobe, but with the reaction that I am having...I am guessing that I have some work to do yet.
My kids were shocked and disgusted as well...I am going to have to figure out why it matters so much.
It can`t be JUST the homosexuality issue, because I have read and enjoyed Ann Macafferty`s Dragon rider series and been able to stomache the homosexual characters and life style of some of her charaters. Maybe it was because it was right up front from the very beginning. :(
It probably was the way she SNUCK THIS IN after the entire series was OVER.
I've read stories with homosexual characters in them and liked the stories.
Then again, that's hardly the same thing- these were marketed for youths,
and the stories I read, the characters' sex lives (or lack thereof) were all in the stories,
Thanks wolf, I think that you are absolutely right. I think that definately is part of what has offended me. She has been carefully neutral. Her stories have always been good overcoming evil, not a lot of swearing or sex or anything that would be offensive to parents, nothing that hs to be explained to the kiddoes. Just good wholesom fun for the kiddos...
Now, to me the innocence has been destroyed by bringing it into the political social correctness arena.
Recommended Posts
rascal
Well what I DON`T like, is she made a comment about some groups dissaproving of the story because they were about witches, that now they would REALLY have something to talk about....seemed to me like kind of an *in your face* christians...:(
It was like she was looking to deliberately offend people.
I am just really dissapointed. I have enthusiastically recomended these books for YEARS ...claimed that there wasn`t anything blatantly evil or threatening to christianity.....A great read, an inspiration to get children hooked on reading...now I feel ...I just don`t know...dirty...betrayed
I don`t know, I thought I was over being a homophobe, but with the reaction that I am having...I am guessing that I have some work to do yet.
My kids were shocked and disgusted as well...I am going to have to figure out why it matters so much.
It can`t be JUST the homosexuality issue, because I have read and enjoyed Ann Macafferty`s Dragon rider series and been able to stomache the gay characters and sexual life styles that are in her stories. Maybe it was because it was right up front from the very beginning. :(
Edited by rascalLink to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
That wasn't your imagination-she clearly was thinking that and said as much.
But not until after they bought the whole series.Lots of Christians read and recommended the series, giving her a lot of revenue.
Now that they already spent the money, she's free to offend them.
Mind you, I'd actually be less offended if she'd come out and said this in the actual books.
Doing it NOW strikes me as particularly greasy, underhanded, dishonest.
If she wanted to make a major character gay, this
"oh, he secretly was all through the series, but now that you've all bought it,
now I'm going to announce it" thing strikes me as disrespectful to the readers.
It's like she wanted all the "benefits" of being "open-minded" and "politically-correct",
but without taking the risks of offending "traditional values" readers and affecting the sales negatively.
I find that distinctly lacking courage and CONVICTION.
Oh, and if one's going to say "the signs were all there", an equally-strong argument can be made
for almost anything else that didn't happen in the actual books.
I thought she'd made DD's personal life more like Prospero's in The Tempest,
who said
"My library was dukedom large enough."
It probably was the way she SNUCK THIS IN after the entire series was OVER.
I've read stories with homosexual characters in them and liked the stories.
Then again, that's hardly the same thing- these were marketed for youths,
and the stories I read, the characters' sex lives (or lack thereof) were all in the stories,
and not tacked on once the series was over.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rascal
Thanks wolf, I think that you are absolutely right. I think that definately is part of what has offended me. She has been carefully neutral. Her stories have always been good overcoming evil, not a lot of swearing or sex or anything that would be offensive to parents, nothing that hs to be explained to the kiddoes. Just good wholesom fun for the kiddos...
Now, to me the innocence has been destroyed by bringing it into the political social correctness arena.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.