OMG....Thanks Socks....that was pure torture!!!! I can't believe that I actually listened to the whole thing!! I couldn't watch it...But I heard the whole drawn out, thing....aaaarrrrrggggg...I think I'm gonna need resurrecting soon....is somebody here in fellowship?
...I have recently taken the Way International's new foundational class entitled, "The way of abundance and power". If it were available our father in the word, Dr Victor Paul Wierwille would have turned over in his grave...
...They cut the time from the 68 class of 36 hours down to 24 hours using scripture of course for the change, the good old brevity of time reason, lol. And the reason or as I put it "the excuse to slap God and his son Jesus Christ in the face", is that they have "new research"!!!! You tell me, what is wrong with Dr. Wierwilles class of 1967-68? Yup you tell me, not just whine about how Dr. got his information...
...Continue to read the book. Continue to read the book. Continue to read the book. Continue to read the book...
Welcome to GSC, Preacher! Your post certainly does your name justice. I don't want to spoil your initial experience with GSC – but since you come on so strong I would like to give you some honest feedback.
I no longer consider VPW my father in the Word – personally I don't think you can get farther from the Word than the screwy theology he twisted out of it…In my opinion, more than any doctrinal error - what really must break God's heart is anytime Vicious Predatory Wolves attack what the Father and Son hold near and dear - molesting His daughters! "…Something must be wrong with our scale of values…"
I'm not one to whine over how VPW got his information. The fact that he was a bold-faced plagiarist is a whole other subject! The way he pieced together his eclectic theology should be a prime concern to any serious Bible student. His clumsy misuse of Scripture interpretation principles should have been a tip off – not only showing all this stuff didn't originate with him – but more importantly that he did not "master" them. Although he did "make it his own" by claiming God taught him the Word like it hadn't been known for centuries.
Case in point: In PFAL, before VPW teaches the keys to the Word's interpretation, he sets the stage by referring to
II Peter 1:20, 21 KJV
20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
VPW said verse 20 means no one is allowed to privately interpret the Bible and from that reasons there is no interpretation or the Bible must interpret itself – hence the need for the keys to the Word's interpretation. Even if the reader would miss a little preposition like the "of" in the verse "of any private interpretation" [which indicates origin or source] it becomes obvious if you follow the line of thought in verse 21 – where it describes the origin of Scripture two other ways – not coming by the will of man, holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. So even before "the teacher" begins to show students the keys to the Word's interpretation – he himself ignores the information 1. in the verse and 2. in the context.
May I suggest you lay aside TWI-mindset for a few months – and just read the Bible. Perhaps one without TWI notes, maybe even try a few other versions besides KJV.
Ooooops - I didn't mention that THIS STUFF should only be viewed in a Fully Paid environment of Prevailing Instructors and Grads who can assist you in fully enjoying it.
Sorry. I need to contribute something worthwhile here.
The 24 hours down from 36 - that's a good thing. 36 hours is too long.
4 Crucified - interesting discussion point in PFAL, but today I'd say a minor doctrinal concern. Illustrating the accuracy of the Word, it's marginal as it's not fully provable. Really, it's not. Take my word for it, I read it on GS. Okay, seriously, it was included to illustrate a research principle being taught in the class, it wasn't a point of doctrine, like say speaking in tongues or sonship rights. One free ride on THIS STUFF
to anyone who remembers what point it was illustrating. (no cheating, only watch THIS STUFF if you know! )
What oldiesman said - ?
What's taught/not taught now? Is the devil still a lesbian? I heard there was stuf about outer space, methane or ozone or ice crystals or something. Are they still in it?
Is it better than Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth"? Will it scare me?
TWI has always had cliches, overused ( and mostly meaningless) sayings and terms , usually stuff that VPW or some other "great leader" said that was mimicked or parroted by thier psycophants. I still get a slight urge to smack someone if they say "Bless You". In any case, the overuse of the word "tremendous" is just an example of the progression of the "Wayspeak" that began in the 60's.
Those old Wierwillian gangster-isms were really tremendous.
Recommended Posts
Eyesopen
OMG....Thanks Socks....that was pure torture!!!! I can't believe that I actually listened to the whole thing!! I couldn't watch it...But I heard the whole drawn out, thing....aaaarrrrrggggg...I think I'm gonna need resurrecting soon....is somebody here in fellowship?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
Welcome to GSC, Preacher! Your post certainly does your name justice. I don't want to spoil your initial experience with GSC – but since you come on so strong I would like to give you some honest feedback.
I no longer consider VPW my father in the Word – personally I don't think you can get farther from the Word than the screwy theology he twisted out of it…In my opinion, more than any doctrinal error - what really must break God's heart is anytime Vicious Predatory Wolves attack what the Father and Son hold near and dear - molesting His daughters! "…Something must be wrong with our scale of values…"
I'm not one to whine over how VPW got his information. The fact that he was a bold-faced plagiarist is a whole other subject! The way he pieced together his eclectic theology should be a prime concern to any serious Bible student. His clumsy misuse of Scripture interpretation principles should have been a tip off – not only showing all this stuff didn't originate with him – but more importantly that he did not "master" them. Although he did "make it his own" by claiming God taught him the Word like it hadn't been known for centuries.
Case in point: In PFAL, before VPW teaches the keys to the Word's interpretation, he sets the stage by referring to
II Peter 1:20, 21 KJV
20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
VPW said verse 20 means no one is allowed to privately interpret the Bible and from that reasons there is no interpretation or the Bible must interpret itself – hence the need for the keys to the Word's interpretation. Even if the reader would miss a little preposition like the "of" in the verse "of any private interpretation" [which indicates origin or source] it becomes obvious if you follow the line of thought in verse 21 – where it describes the origin of Scripture two other ways – not coming by the will of man, holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. So even before "the teacher" begins to show students the keys to the Word's interpretation – he himself ignores the information 1. in the verse and 2. in the context.
May I suggest you lay aside TWI-mindset for a few months – and just read the Bible. Perhaps one without TWI notes, maybe even try a few other versions besides KJV.
Edited by T-BoneLink to comment
Share on other sites
socks
Ooooops - I didn't mention that THIS STUFF should only be viewed in a Fully Paid environment of Prevailing Instructors and Grads who can assist you in fully enjoying it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
socks
Sorry. I need to contribute something worthwhile here.
The 24 hours down from 36 - that's a good thing. 36 hours is too long.
4 Crucified - interesting discussion point in PFAL, but today I'd say a minor doctrinal concern. Illustrating the accuracy of the Word, it's marginal as it's not fully provable. Really, it's not. Take my word for it, I read it on GS. Okay, seriously, it was included to illustrate a research principle being taught in the class, it wasn't a point of doctrine, like say speaking in tongues or sonship rights. One free ride on THIS STUFF
to anyone who remembers what point it was illustrating. (no cheating, only watch THIS STUFF if you know! )
What oldiesman said - ?
What's taught/not taught now? Is the devil still a lesbian? I heard there was stuf about outer space, methane or ozone or ice crystals or something. Are they still in it?
Is it better than Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth"? Will it scare me?
Edited by socksLink to comment
Share on other sites
dmiller
Hey Socks -- With ALL due respect ---- I'D RATHER LISTEN TO THIS STUFF INSTEAD.
I think the second tune (entitled I Know You're Married, But I Love You Still),
might be a more appropriate one to be sung from the stage I saw mentioned in your clip.
;)
Edited by dmillerLink to comment
Share on other sites
TheInvisibleDan
Goey wrote:
Those old Wierwillian gangster-isms were really tremendous.
(see?)
Dat's riiight....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Belle
:eusa_clap:
Goey, it's so good to "read" you! :)
You said everything I was thinking of posting while reading this thread. Excellent, and better than I could have put it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.