Danny, I'd love to see a picture of what you'd like to find in your cross. :)
I've always "resonated" with the Tibetan mantra for "ohm" and have been looking for two years for a piece of jewelry that's just the "ohm" and not the whole mantra "Ohm mani padme hum". TWO YEARS! I was beginning to think I was crazy for thinking I could get it, but I wanted to find it and I wanted it to be serendipitously, not because I sought it out on the internet.
I couldn't wait and did end up going to ebay and getting it, but I am still keeping my eye out for that serendipitous piece to add to my collection. Especially now that I know it really is out there. :P I hope you find yours!
I bought this little beauty, too. Just to give you an idea of what the ohm looks like.
...yet we are always stuck with some sense of faith
we need a map of our experience with reality
and so our faith is what we expect to happen
how we explain what happened
how we engage with what is happening
"here be dragons"
is what it often says at the edges of our faith
though we often mistake our map for reality
when the map is best served in addition to reality
the illusions become useful again once seen as the truths that they are...
Is that from you? If so - surely thou wast knighted with some kind of poetically endowed sword by the hand of Muse – LOL - but seriously - that's pretty kool!
Danny, I'd love to see a picture of what you'd like to find in your cross. :)
Hi Belle,
I'm leaning along these lines:
One offered by Alaska Jewelry has an interesting, rough texture.
While the one offered by African Gold has a certain, striking elegance to it.
I think I may go with the second one.
Greetings TempleLady: I hadn't considered a wooden anchor cross. But it would be a fantastic idea for building a large one to hang on a wall (perhaps in my refurbished garage-studio-Fortress-of-Solitude), especially with the addition of some brass or gold plating to cover the surface.
Bramble :
The pre Nazi swastika was a positive image, but now the symbolism is so clouded. I have a necklace called a Lauburu, which is like a solar cross but more rounded on the end with a celtic knot look. I have quite few necklaces with symbols that mean something to me but don't freak out the public. I find they help me keep something I want to think about in mind...images work well for me.
BTW, the swastika is still in common use today in Buddhist and Hindu temples.
There is a clockwise and counter-clockwise design and - though what the meaning is seems to vary greatly depending on who you ask - it's generally said to be a symbol of longevity, abundance, and good fortune.
Personally I find "faith" to be simply an excuse to believe in something that you have no proof for whatever, but, as a great sage once said, "Whatever blows your skirt up"...
quote'BTW, the swastika is still in common use today in Buddhist and Hindu temples.
There is a clockwise and counter-clockwise design and - though what the meaning is seems to vary greatly depending on who you ask - it's generally said to be a symbol of longevity, abundance, and good fortune.
Personally I find "faith" to be simply an excuse to believe in something that you have no proof for whatever, but, as a great sage once said, "Whatever blows your skirt up"...'
I read somewhere that the name swastika isn't German but Indo European(I think?).
I don't think there's anything wrong in not believing, or someone not having decided what they believe or if they even do. I would be the last to dictate to anyone what they have to do in such matters. I'd rather people just be honest. And tolerant, I appreciate tolerance.
And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.
Apparently one can have faith before being 'converted'.
converted-
1994 epistrepho { ep-ee-stref’-o}
from 1909 and 4762; TDNT - 7:722,1093; v
AV - turn 16, be converted 6, return 6, turn about 4, turn again 3, misc 4; 39
I'm not being tolerant or intolerant, just stateing what George believes.
And he can stay that way if he wants.
But I said there is substance,and George says it's an excuse.
Then uses the idiotic phrase of the skirt thing.
I can tolerate the phrase but it's not the truth in any sense of the phrase.
"Not the truth in any sense of the phrase" according to YOUR FAITH.
George is entitled to have faith or not in anything he wants and who are any of us to say that he's wrong? Your faith is something you have come to believe in after many years of experiences, studies, observations, etc. George has come to different conclusions based on his. Neither one of you is right MY FAITH is the right one!!
This is exactly what Bramble is talking about in her first post, dancing. People trying to prove that another person's faith/religions/belief is wrong because it's not what that person believes.
Right now we have thread where one poster is trying to prove that another posters faith/religion is wrong.
There is no concrete evidence that any religion or doctrine is THE ONE. There is only belief and faith.
Now you're doing the same thing on this thread....trying to prove that another poster's faith/religion is wrong. We're all entitled to think and believe what we choose. It's not up to us to judge each other, especially since we "see through a glass darkly". That's my opinion anyway. *shrug* And it's highly possible to learn from others when we don't judge them for what they think, but rather try to see why they think the way they do, accept and appreciate their unique contributions to this world.
p.s. Bible scriptures are useless when trying to prove something to someone who doesn't believe the Bible is anything more than a collection of stories.
To date I've been accused of telling people what to believe, when I've been presenting evidence for anyone to take or leave. That's been almost 3 years now.
Been accused of being a Mystic, a pagan, a poet , a speaker of flowery language and more.
Been accused of telling people what to believe-yeah.
And I get people dictating to me what to say and believe.
Kind of funny in a way.
I do hope this thread continues with the many beliefs here without insults.
I have insulted no one. If one takes offence at what I say then who's fault is it?
I have a deep respect for everyone here including George.
If I say what I believe, does that mean I'm trying to convince someone else to believe like me?
Whether anyone was telling anyone else what to believe on this htread I don't know--things written can read different ways...
I think it is kind of funny how people are always trying to fit you in somewhere, dancing. I suspect you are 'unfittable.'
In TWI it was a non thought--of COURSE everyone in the entire world should believe down to EVERY TINY DETAIL what I believe. It seems like many ex ways can leave Way doctrine, find a new doctrine,and still think this way--of COURSE every one should believe the trinity like I do--or whatever.
I just think it is not possible to dictate what any other person should or even can believe in the depths of their own heart and mind. You can try, using fear and manipulation tactics, along with a few sugar cubes, like TWI did...but deep inside, that can't be controled by another.
I was just reading this in a review of "The God Delusion" at Skepdic.com (Robert Todd Carroll) and thought it appropriate to insert here:
"There is nothing magisterial about irrational faith. Truth is truth. There is not a truth for reason and a truth for faith. To consider the musings of theologians about the Trinity as protected from rational analysis because it is a matter of faith is to abandon reason and admit that irrationality is as good as rationality as a basis for belief. That position can't even be argued for because it requires rationality to argue. Believing on faith is not something to be proud of; it is something a human being should be ashamed of. If we value truth, we must value reason. Faith is not the road to truth but the road to anything goes because we say so. To allow someone off the hook from having to defend his beliefs because he throws up the shield of faith is not only to grant him the right to be irrational, it is also to grant that his irrationality is on an equal footing with your rationality. We shouldn't allow that. We should make it clear that we think a human being should be embarrassed to think it a good thing to believe something on faith. And we should not confuse faith with trust or probability."
(this is copyright material, but the site allows for "fair-use excerpting" - I assume that's what this is?)
I've read your post about a half a dozen times and I can't for the life of me figure out what you're trying to say. Am I being dense or are you being obtuse?
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
8
9
11
26
Popular Days
Nov 28
13
Oct 26
12
Oct 28
12
Oct 29
12
Top Posters In This Topic
sirguessalot 8 posts
Bramble 9 posts
T-Bone 11 posts
dancing 26 posts
Popular Days
Nov 28 2006
13 posts
Oct 26 2006
12 posts
Oct 28 2006
12 posts
Oct 29 2006
12 posts
Belle
Danny, I'd love to see a picture of what you'd like to find in your cross. :)
I've always "resonated" with the Tibetan mantra for "ohm" and have been looking for two years for a piece of jewelry that's just the "ohm" and not the whole mantra "Ohm mani padme hum". TWO YEARS! I was beginning to think I was crazy for thinking I could get it, but I wanted to find it and I wanted it to be serendipitously, not because I sought it out on the internet.
I couldn't wait and did end up going to ebay and getting it, but I am still keeping my eye out for that serendipitous piece to add to my collection. Especially now that I know it really is out there. :P I hope you find yours!
I bought this little beauty, too. Just to give you an idea of what the ohm looks like.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sirguessalot
im sure most everyone has heard me say this before
but i think it bears repeating
a few things i find faith in...
is how faith most naturally unfolds in a spectrum of ways
and as such, is quite measurable, mappable, malleable
and develops in waves and textures
along lines and types
within each of us
and...neither wanting to notice it as such
nor lacking the words or civil environment to describe it
will make reality go away
reality
it seems
has a loving habit of just sitting there in the clear silent dark and doing its thing
yet we are always stuck with some sense of faith
we need a map of our experience with reality
and so our faith is what we expect to happen
how we explain what happened
how we engage with what is happening
"here be dragons"
is what it often says at the edges of our faith
though we often mistake our map for reality
when the map is best served in addition to reality
the illusions become useful again once seen as the truths that they are
and as the most infamous scriptures seems to illustrate
trusting the nature of mystery is the only way through such wilderness
letting the inner darkness lead the edge of our attention
and what was shadow becomes the clear light
which radically changes the view
and humiliates us again
and any practice that deepens self awareness
is still really only deepening more of our map
exposing our naked interiors to our self
but it is a very very important sliver of the big story
and something no one can do for another
though we can go anywhere together
its like taking lamps into darkened caves
investigating the contours and cracks
discovering the paintings on the walls
expanding interior experiences
of our existing maps of reality
the substance of this vessel which holds our worldviews
is deeply textured and layered
and there are a lot of surprising twists in the plot on this journey of expanding reidentification
tho the notion that there are things like
arts and sciences and games and sports
of mapping and charting the truths and languages of inner worlds...
...is likely a tad too many leaps at once for some
there should be no shame in that
tho there likely is
we are often so deeply unable to trust this kind of faith
we often react as if we've been asked to eat a live snake, or something
yet, scripturally, we are instructed not only make leaps of faith
but to prepare for making more such leaps
from faith to faith
most likely forever
fully alone...fully together
like monkeys swinging through a forest of branches
each leap invites a certain cognitive risk
remapping our faith is an earth-shattering move
after the major crack in the vessel finally gives
often sending shockwaves throughout even our physical body
and yet, that we are each such a field of vast interior castles of faith
a vast field of faiths in each other
like many streams in a single ocean
natural fools
born looking for water
in the invisible truth
so anyway...these 3 words have been like a compass for me
and have faithfully helped me remember my way through things
...curiousity
...precision
...kindness
Edited by sirguessalotLink to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
I like that - thanks, Sirguessalot !
Is that from you? If so - surely thou wast knighted with some kind of poetically endowed sword by the hand of Muse – LOL - but seriously - that's pretty kool!
Edited by T-BoneLink to comment
Share on other sites
sirguessalot
yeah, just me
a riff, of sorts
thanks, too
:B)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheInvisibleDan
Hi Belle,
I'm leaning along these lines:
One offered by Alaska Jewelry has an interesting, rough texture.
While the one offered by African Gold has a certain, striking elegance to it.
I think I may go with the second one.
Greetings TempleLady: I hadn't considered a wooden anchor cross. But it would be a fantastic idea for building a large one to hang on a wall (perhaps in my refurbished garage-studio-Fortress-of-Solitude), especially with the addition of some brass or gold plating to cover the surface.
Bramble :
This appears quite true. While reviewing a Christian Symbols site, I came across a link to this article
Sir Guess, Curiosity, Precision, and Kindness are very good guides.
Danny
Edited by TheInvisibleDanLink to comment
Share on other sites
templelady
GOld nugget texture unpolished is really beautiful
Alaska Jewelry is a very reputable company
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dancing
faith is seen by works
what works
speaking is work-sort of
'out of his belly shall flow'
flowing don't sound like work
but getting to the point that it can flow can be a task
love is not work either
but getting there can be
and is this faith something that is unchangeable?
well yes and no imo
seeing only a part is not seeing the whole
believing one thing is not an automatic for something else
where does this faith come from
the inner heart
that which is written in the soul
and continues to be written
like waking a sleeping giant
slowly at times and quickened at times
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sirguessalot
a few thoughts, danny
some you may already have thought of
saint brigit's cross has some rich history
and is one of those timeless archetypal symbols
also, as you may know...the tao is thought of as a very profound cross
also, i cant tell whose noticed
but every single piece of my artwork is based on some sort of cross
as homages to notions of divine intersection...or thresholds
in a lot of my work...the cross is often represented as an invisible force that shapes the rest of the piece
but more interesting to me than my work,
is how i would really love to see what kind of original cross people doodle up for themselves
especially because of how symbols can become incredible mandalas for soul work
cuz i think the process of creating our own original symbology for things (especially the cross)
ironically seems to connect us even more to the old old symbols that originally shaped us
its like our art somehow becomes original
again and again
one of my favorites is the hand sigil i sign on my art
always reminds me of my fondess for the number five
Edited by sirguessalotLink to comment
Share on other sites
George Aar
BTW, the swastika is still in common use today in Buddhist and Hindu temples.
There is a clockwise and counter-clockwise design and - though what the meaning is seems to vary greatly depending on who you ask - it's generally said to be a symbol of longevity, abundance, and good fortune.
Personally I find "faith" to be simply an excuse to believe in something that you have no proof for whatever, but, as a great sage once said, "Whatever blows your skirt up"...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sushi
The race may not be to the swift,
or the contest to the strong.
But that's the way to bet.
Damon Runyon
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dancing
Hi George,
I guess you have faith in that statement and could never be shown otherwise.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bramble
quote'BTW, the swastika is still in common use today in Buddhist and Hindu temples.
There is a clockwise and counter-clockwise design and - though what the meaning is seems to vary greatly depending on who you ask - it's generally said to be a symbol of longevity, abundance, and good fortune.
Personally I find "faith" to be simply an excuse to believe in something that you have no proof for whatever, but, as a great sage once said, "Whatever blows your skirt up"...'
I read somewhere that the name swastika isn't German but Indo European(I think?).
I don't think there's anything wrong in not believing, or someone not having decided what they believe or if they even do. I would be the last to dictate to anyone what they have to do in such matters. I'd rather people just be honest. And tolerant, I appreciate tolerance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sushi
Yeah, Bramble, I just can't STAND intolerant people.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dancing
I'm not being tolerant or intolerant, just stateing what George believes.
And he can stay that way if he wants.
But I said there is substance,and George says it's an excuse.
Then uses the idiotic phrase of the skirt thing.
I can tolerate the phrase but it's not the truth in any sense of the phrase.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dancing
Apparently one can have faith before being 'converted'.
converted-
1994 epistrepho { ep-ee-stref’-o}
from 1909 and 4762; TDNT - 7:722,1093; v
AV - turn 16, be converted 6, return 6, turn about 4, turn again 3, misc 4; 39
GK - 2188 { ejpistrevfw }
1) transitively
1a) to turn to
1a1) to the worship of the true God
1b) to cause to return, to bring back
1b1) to the love and obedience of God
1b2) to the love for the children
1b3) to love wisdom and righteousness
2) intransitively
2a) to turn to one’s self
2b) to turn one’s self about, turn back
2c) to return, turn back, come back
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Belle
"Not the truth in any sense of the phrase" according to YOUR FAITH.
George is entitled to have faith or not in anything he wants and who are any of us to say that he's wrong? Your faith is something you have come to believe in after many years of experiences, studies, observations, etc. George has come to different conclusions based on his. Neither one of you is right MY FAITH is the right one!!
This is exactly what Bramble is talking about in her first post, dancing. People trying to prove that another person's faith/religions/belief is wrong because it's not what that person believes.
Now you're doing the same thing on this thread....trying to prove that another poster's faith/religion is wrong. We're all entitled to think and believe what we choose. It's not up to us to judge each other, especially since we "see through a glass darkly". That's my opinion anyway. *shrug* And it's highly possible to learn from others when we don't judge them for what they think, but rather try to see why they think the way they do, accept and appreciate their unique contributions to this world.
p.s. Bible scriptures are useless when trying to prove something to someone who doesn't believe the Bible is anything more than a collection of stories.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dancing
I didn't say George was wrong in what he believes Belle.
I just pointed out what he believes.
George is the one trying to insult other beliefs.
I have no intention to change anyone-not my job.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dancing
Let's see here-
To date I've been accused of telling people what to believe, when I've been presenting evidence for anyone to take or leave. That's been almost 3 years now.
Been accused of being a Mystic, a pagan, a poet , a speaker of flowery language and more.
Been accused of telling people what to believe-yeah.
And I get people dictating to me what to say and believe.
Kind of funny in a way.
I do hope this thread continues with the many beliefs here without insults.
I have insulted no one. If one takes offence at what I say then who's fault is it?
I have a deep respect for everyone here including George.
If I say what I believe, does that mean I'm trying to convince someone else to believe like me?
No.
I let the Lord be Lord.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bramble
Whether anyone was telling anyone else what to believe on this htread I don't know--things written can read different ways...
I think it is kind of funny how people are always trying to fit you in somewhere, dancing. I suspect you are 'unfittable.'
In TWI it was a non thought--of COURSE everyone in the entire world should believe down to EVERY TINY DETAIL what I believe. It seems like many ex ways can leave Way doctrine, find a new doctrine,and still think this way--of COURSE every one should believe the trinity like I do--or whatever.
I just think it is not possible to dictate what any other person should or even can believe in the depths of their own heart and mind. You can try, using fear and manipulation tactics, along with a few sugar cubes, like TWI did...but deep inside, that can't be controled by another.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
George Aar
I was just reading this in a review of "The God Delusion" at Skepdic.com (Robert Todd Carroll) and thought it appropriate to insert here:
"There is nothing magisterial about irrational faith. Truth is truth. There is not a truth for reason and a truth for faith. To consider the musings of theologians about the Trinity as protected from rational analysis because it is a matter of faith is to abandon reason and admit that irrationality is as good as rationality as a basis for belief. That position can't even be argued for because it requires rationality to argue. Believing on faith is not something to be proud of; it is something a human being should be ashamed of. If we value truth, we must value reason. Faith is not the road to truth but the road to anything goes because we say so. To allow someone off the hook from having to defend his beliefs because he throws up the shield of faith is not only to grant him the right to be irrational, it is also to grant that his irrationality is on an equal footing with your rationality. We shouldn't allow that. We should make it clear that we think a human being should be embarrassed to think it a good thing to believe something on faith. And we should not confuse faith with trust or probability."
(this is copyright material, but the site allows for "fair-use excerpting" - I assume that's what this is?)
Edited by George AarLink to comment
Share on other sites
sirguessalot
it seems obvious that we each have an interior perspective (like our faith/imagined story of cause)
and an exterior perspective (like truth/reality...which is highly measurable yet ultimately UNmeasureable)
as well as shared interior perspectives (which can also be a shared faith)
and if some would stop confusing the three
than perhaps others would stop being so confused
but we tend to devalue perspectives that are essential to our favorites
Edited by sirguessalotLink to comment
Share on other sites
George Aar
SirG,
I've read your post about a half a dozen times and I can't for the life of me figure out what you're trying to say. Am I being dense or are you being obtuse?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dancing
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sirguessalot
yeah, i hate to say it, but i think you are being pretty dense, geo
which is fine with me
tho...im not sure which post you are refering to
nor do i know what it is you dont understand
can you gimme a word or phrase that makes the least sense?
cuz i dunno
looks like im obviously somehow being dense myself
...hm...density...
Edited by sirguessalotLink to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.