Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

The Way: Living in Paranoia


sprawled out
 Share

Recommended Posts

Far be it from me to say something pro-way.

BUT I think this looks pretty standard for an organization who has been sued, talked about and criticized.

I dunno, looks like they are dotting their i's and crossing their legal t's

I guess it can come across fearful -- to me it just looks litigious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a good size section on warrantees.

Which basically sounds to me as if there classes and materials dont work then tough for you, they take no responsible if their products suck.

There doesnt seem to be any big fat claims out there anymore like whatever they used to have .....(produces more harmony in the home!)

Ive wondered from time to time if anyone ever took them to task on that or sued them for making false claims.

Maybe, maybe not, but they certainly make a spectacle of what a cover their own foot organization they are.

The Way is not liable for damages resulting from use of their materials?? :blink:

Gees they really believe in it and stand by their stuff dont they?

Edited by mstar1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Far be it from me to say something pro-way.

BUT I think this looks pretty standard for an organization who has been sued, talked about and criticized.

I dunno, looks like they are dotting their i's and crossing their legal t's

I guess it can come across fearful -- to me it just looks litigious.

Amen Dot -- good point.

HOWEVER it seems to me they are covering their @$$e$,

and ((COUGHH!!!)) copyrighting stuff stolen years ago,

from legitimate scholars who loved God enough

to basically *toss this out for free* for those who hungered, and thirsted.

Sure -- it's a new *format* -- yada yada -- but now they *own it*.

They can have it. Won't find me copying and pasting off THAT site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen Dot -- good point.

HOWEVER it seems to me they are covering their @$$e$,

and ((COUGHH!!!)) copyrighting stuff stolen years ago,

from legitimate scholars who loved God enough

to basically *toss this out for free* for those who hungered, and thirsted.

Sure -- it's a new *format* -- yada yada -- but now they *own it*.

They can have it. Won't find me copying and pasting off THAT site.

Excellant point. If twi believes that they have "God's word", why would they treat it as a commodity that they own and have exclusive rights to?

I can see it now...The apostle Paul copyrights the book of Ephesians and makes sure that nobody reproduces it without his permission...charging a hefty price, of course, for anyone who wants to learn about the body of Christ and how it functions...because afterall, he OWNS that information.

Who are they trying to kid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Litigious, yes. It also appears to be longer than most of the content on the site. It is just curious to have so big a disclaimer and so little total content.

(lol) so true. I am hard pressed to imagine anyone surfing past this site acquiring any meaningful impression from such pitifully bland material, presented like dried white toast on a stick.

"We have dried white toast.

It's on a stick.

Write us."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(lol) so true. I am hard pressed to imagine anyone surfing past this site acquiring any meaningful impression from such pitifully bland material, presented like dried white toast on a stick.

"We have dried white toast.

It's on a stick.

Write us."

Actually, they might be able to sell that at the local renaissance festival. Foods on sticks sell fairly well. Steak on a Stake, Pork Chop on a Stake, even (yes, it's true!) Fried Mac & Cheese on a Stake. :)

As long as they have ventured onto the devilish realm of the internet, I'm surprised The Way hasn't thought of having on-line versions of their classes, at least the basic (foundational) ones. Oh, of course, you would have to register, and fees would be involved, but it would relieve them of the onerous task of getting together a mininum number of people to have a class. It might even be more revenue than what they're now getting from ABS.

Of course, this would mean they'd have even less control of "the household" than they do now, but I think they will eventually have to admit most people (especially in this country) won't continue to allow a religious group to have as much micro-managing control of their lives as TWI has. People get tired of being screamed at, brow-beaten, told on the one hand they are "more than conquerors" then treated "less than dirt" on the other.

Frankly, if I were the BOD (and thank God I'm not), I would be looking for ways to re-invent this organization. I would remove the "and fellowship" part of their organizational title and go back to just being all about "Biblical Research and Teaching", as it used to be. Whether their "Biblical Research" has any merit, you be the judge.

I would think having the "and Fellowship" in their title would imply they ran, were in charge of, and (by implication) were responsible for the actions of those who were in charge of running their "fellowships". Hmmmmmm. :wink2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim, that is extremely odd! I remember craiggers teaching that there are devil spirits who answer to "Jesus" and that we were to never, ever, ever say "Jesus" without also saying "Christ". It would get you put on probation quickly for inviting devil spirits into the household!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen Jesus Christ involved in any legal battles, covering his B-Hind with a bunch of words, except for quoting what his Dad said...

What happened to:

"IT IS WRITTEN"?

"FREELY WE HAVE RECEIVED, FREELY GIVE"?

"ALL THOSE THAT HUNGER AND THIRST AFTER RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL BE FILLED"?

All of their statements don't seem to line up with God's Word at all~

Could it be, TWI's TRUE self is showing?!?!?!?!Wolf20-20sheep.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Write us" - posting an email address would open the floodgates from...us :dance::evilshades:

Always thought it was telling that sites like GS pretty much let anyone on to speak their piece, but anytime a conflicting point of view shows up on any Way website, sanctiond or unofficial, it's quickly shut down or restricted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While this may seem a little paranoid, it really is a pretty standard set of statements. I am part of a team that works on my library's terms of use statements and while the wording is different the key elements are the same. These elements are common among most of the use and privacy statements that I've seen on web.

So I can't really falt them here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...