Raf

I apologize for the misunderstanding, Def. Amd allow me to predict my own behavior in saying that this would quickly devolve into a shouting match. Seeing as I'd rather not, and I wouldn't change your mind if I would, I'd rather just read. :)-->

What despicable liars.

Refiner, I don't think you meant anything by it, but we have a standing rule here against using people's real names unless they've already revealed them (I fall into the latter category). It's to protect people's privacy. Raf

I disagree: it's got some genuinely scary moments, but the suspense is poorly sustained. The ending is muddled, and Rob Lowe's voiceovers are generally distracting. I keep watching the end trying to figure out what happened. For the life of me I don't get it.

Bringing this up for Schuks.

Schuks, There's a "Best Way Songs" thread too. FYI

Tom, It really is a twisted communion service.

This is not a fair summary, given that "I disagree completely with Mike" is not one of the options. The option that comes closest to that statement is "I disagree with Mike and think PFAL is utter garbage." I don't know how much more one can disagree with him. And 19 people picked that option. No one is on record completely agreeing with him, which means two things: 1. Mike hasn't voted and 2. EITHER Mike hasn't encouraged enough of his compatriots to come in, sign on and vote OR Mike HAS encouraged his friends to do so and they simply haven't (because that's not how they feel or they don't want to be bothered).

Nooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry: Not looking forward to election coverage. :)-->

True, WordWolf, but I was not aware that anyone other than the Geerites who left by 1989 knew about those books. I stuck with the two that were actually sold in the TWI bookstore. Were the other books sold in the TWI bookstore?

Why? I'm not going to change your mind. You're not going to change mine. You can ask me to look at that site, I can ask you to look at Buzzard's book. Where does it get us? I assume you've looked at the evidence and have drawn a conclusion. Give me a little credit here: I've looked at the evidence too. I draw a different conclusion, and I'm not particularly interested in arguing to point to death with someone who has already made up his mind. I discuss this on a regular basis with folks who've never been exposed to a Biblical Unitarian position. That's different: it's not arguing. It's exchange. Def, you and I would just be arguing. I'd rather not.

Picky picky.

When I was in, it was my understanding that JW publications were dirt cheap (I'm talking cost, not content). But even at these real bargain prices, they were a lot cheaper to produce. The profit margin was astronomical. I forgot where I read that: I THINK it was in the book "Witnesses of Jehovah," which I have long since lost. Oh, and my memory concurs with Refiner's: The money isn't made by selling the products to the public, but selling them to the followers who MAY accept payment for them when they give them to others, but often do not.

That's all right. You'll sound fine so long as the rest of us are drunk.

You're a good sport, Def. We should have a beer sometime. You can try to talk me into the Trinity, and I can try to talk you into karaoke.

Def, this page will sum up the discussion, point for point. :D-->

As for my "vicious tone," I treat you with the respect you have earned. Wanna know something really weird? In recognizing PFAL for what it is, as opposed to worshipping it for what it is not, I honor and respect PFAL more than you ever will.

Here you go. Cream and sugar are on the counter.

And... how would you like your coffee? I have a question, having visited the ex-JW board and seen some of the (yikes!) discussions that go on there: do you still consider yourself Christian? You don't have to answer, but you DO have to try the coffee here. I'll have it for you in a second...

You are the liar here, Mike. But I appreciate your assessment of me. Coming from you, I take it as the highest of compliments. If I've got your Satanic influence worried about the source of any revelation I may receive, then I am surely doing something right.

Years ago. I came to PFAL assuming it all to be true. It was only through careful reading and prayer that I realized that not all of its contents were true. When you came along spouting your idolatrous nonsense, it was as easy to refute as someone walking around talking about the moon being made of green cheese. I think it's clever that you refer to my rejection of your nonsense as idolatry. Telling me that I idolize tradition is plain old ordinary flat out stupid, but coming from you, I'd call it standard. You, on the other hand, idolize the imperfect work of an imperfect man. And you proudly proclaim your unwillingness to consider a contrary point of view. You CLAIM you looked at PFAL honestly, but your words have demonstrated that you have always considered PFAL to be God-breathed. YOU HAVE NEVER HONESTLY CONSIDERED THE POSSIBILITY THAT PFAL IS NOT GOD-BREATHED. I reject your idolatrous swill, Mike.

So you're less likely to consider the merit of our counterarguments to your idolatry because we outnumber you, right?

Mike, You have so established a lack of trustworthiness that your denials prove my conclusions more than any recap or quote of your idolatrous rantings. But thank you for playing. That wasn't the poster's implication. That was your inference. The poster (Def) only cited a statistic. You're the one who injected meaning into it. Take a grammar class, it will help you communicate more effectively.

Dan, you're looking at Def's post from the wrong perspective. Look at my earlier post and you'll see where Def was coming from. Def, my post was aimed at my inference from Mike's post, namely, that he finds comfort in the fact that most of us are rejecting him. The fact that one's views are rejected are not an indicator that they are right.

Did you mean Ref, Raf or Def? Which was it, Tom?