-
Posts
17,096 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
174
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Raf
-
If I'm not mistaken, Prince is now a Jehovah's Witness.
-
LG isn't saying that you or anyone here is intentionally lying. He's saying that whoever originated that information was intentionally lying.
-
The Pope was given his last rites this afternoon (American time). CNN
-
Agreed. Still a pizza All of those automatically disqualify an oven-baked, flat, usually circular bread covered with tomato sauce and cheese from qualifying any longer as a pizza. Marginal. One foot in the pizza door, one foot out. Look, aside from anchovies, make up your damn mind. If you want fish, order shrimp. You want fish? Order fish. But stop polluting pizza with this carp! ALL MEATS ARE DONE IN ETHNIC STYLES. These people are making my case for me! Although I think there is legal precedent for a kebab exception. Okay, that's not a pizza either. That's a hot open sandwich. Dude, cool, but not a pizza. Duh!
-
I was hoping to get a nurse to play her. Alas, neither happened. "I was the next man."
-
Dude, I don't care if you call it filet mignon: it's not filet mignon, and it's not a pizza, solely by virtue of it having a pineapple on it. If you try to present me with contradictory information on this, I will have no choice but to DODGE. Dodge, distract, evade, avoid, anything but falsely admit the pizza is a pizza. THERE! ARE! FOUR! LIGHTS!!!! I WILL NOT CAPITULATE!!
-
Hey Roomie! Guys, I'm afraid I will not be able to attend. I'm bummed, but just can't do it. I will try to make it to Chicago sometime in the next couple of months, though, just for kicks.
-
and it usually involves an unimaginably hot looking Rebecca DeMornay. Sighhhhhhh. Okay, I'm better now. Risky Business New quote: "I was the next man."
-
Danny Glover Lethal Weapon 3 Rene Russo
-
Oh, you were defending pineapples? My bad. I thought you were defending crap. :)--> I will kiss a lady even after she's had pineapple on bread, mozzarella cheese and tomato sauce. No problem. She just hasn't eaten a pizza, that's all. She's eaten something. She may have enjoyed it, and that's all well and good. But it wasn't a pizza.
-
Thomas, you poor, sad man... I don't care HOW many people think crap on pizza is acceptable. The moment you put crap on a pizza, it is no longer a pizza. Look, if you enjoy it, that's your prerogative. Just don't kiss anyone after lunch.
-
R2 is not a problem: who understands anything he says anyway? Having Anakin be 3P0's "father" was too silly for words. A nine year old programs a droid fluent in thousands(?) or languages? Hell OOOO! But I'm okay with Chewie showing up. After all, Ben Kenobi did seem to go straight to him at Mos Eisley in Ep 4.
-
Some things seem rather inconsistent between the first trilogy and the current one. Will Amidala survive? Don't know. She should, according to the snippet Steve! is quoting. But there are other things that don't make sense either. Kenobi told Luke that his father was already quite a pilot when they met. I doubt the lucky fluke at the end of Phantom Menace makes a 10-year-old slave who's never flown anything before "quite a pilot." "Your father's lightsabre. He wanted you to have it when you were old enough." Will that quote pan out? I doubt it, myself. Ah, who knows. I'm still trying to figure out how hiding Luke on Tatooine with the same surname is an effective way of keeping Vader from finding him. :)-->
-
Can we agree on certain ground rules, here? If I put hydrochloric acid on a pizza, is it still a pizza? If I put crap on a pizza, is it still a pizza? If I put sausage on a pizza, is it still a pizza? If I put pepperoni on a pizza, is it still a pizza? Okay, no on the first two, yes on the second two, right? Okay, so there IS a line. Can't deny it; you've already admitted it. Now we must determine what goes on what side of the line. Mushrooms? That goes on the sausage and pepperoni side of the line. Shoe leather? That goes on the acid and crap side. Pineapple? Definitely on the shoe leather/acid/crap side of the line. That's all I'm saying. But I am saying it.
-
Yessir. Did I do that one already?
-
"Nuuuuuuude women. Nuuuuuuuude women. Cloooooowns welcome. Cloooooooowns welcome. Nuuuuuude women. Clooooooowns welcome."
-
Amazon Women on the Moon! I was trying for an echo effect, but there's nothing I can do there. :)-->
-
Welcome, Clearwater...
-
No more cheating! It's cheating! Ghostbusters?
-
The moment you put glue on it, it's not a pizza.
-
Twister Carey Elwes (sp?) The Princess Bride
-
Well then.. Lord of the rings: The Two Towers Brad Dourif One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
-
What the Hay, You've completely missed my point, on a number of levels. First, you've justified an interpretation of the verse using linguistic acrobatics instead of a plain reading of the texts. If you want to convince yourself that your right cheek is of a different kind than your left cheek, be my guest: I've nothing to say about that. Frankly, I have no time whatsoever to discuss it. But even if allos means "another of a different kind" in that case, it's not the presence of a confirming case that establishes Wierwille was right about the definition: it's the presence of contradicting cases that proves he was wrong. There are plenty of cases where allos is clearly "another of the same kind," not "another of a different kind" as Wierwille said and originally wrote. That means he was wrong. I have no problem with him being wrong about this. It is one of the farthest things from a big deal that I could imagine. Even Mike wouldn't care about Wierwille being wrong about this! That's how irrelevant it is. But more importantly, you addressed a point I was not making, in any way, shape or form. Wierwille said and wrote that "allos" is "another when more than two are involved." There are multiple Biblical references to show that he was flat out wrong in that definition. Remember that Wierwille's argument on these definitions is that their sharp mathematical accuracy and scientific precision help prove what he was saying about the four crucified. But any argument on the four crucified that relies on Wierwille's definitions of heteros and allos is utterly discredited.
-
Field of Dreams? Shoeless Joe never did finish paying for the Black Sox scandal...