Raf

What the Hey, Do you think I should rename "10 Good Things About the Blue Book," and change it to "10 Good Things About Idolatrous Pigswill"? Why would I say something like that if I thought everything Wierwille wrote is idolatrous pigswill? Because, What the Hey, my statement has nothing to do with the content of PFAL. Neither do most of Mike's posts. The content of PFAL contradicts his message. The idea that someone must know PFAL inside and out to point out an actual error is ludicrous. I don't know the first thing about filmmaking, but I know that Ed Wood was lousy at it. I don't know everything about PFAL, but I know there are errors in it.

What the Hey, I see that reading comprehension is not your only problem, but basic mathematics and logic as well. Mike's posts=idolatrous pigswill. Mike's post=Master PFAL (I'd argue this point, but let's accept it for the purpose of your elementary school education). THEREFORE: "Master PFAL" = "idolatrous pigswill." Note: it does not say "the contents of PFAL=idolatrous pigswill." It says "the message propounded by Mike that PFAL is something that must be mastered because it is THE Word of God, without contradictions and without errors, and VPW taught things Jesus Christ had to learn, and the earth shook where VPW walked, and his victims are less innocent than he because they failed to follow his last/lust instructions=idolatrous pigswill." I have never called PFAL idolatrous pigswill. I can't help it if you can't understand that, but I can refer you to your nearest grammar school. I believe these topics are covered in grade four, grade five at the latest.

ROA 1989. Major turnoff: inaccurate teachings, condescension from all levels, and LCM as our "spiritual head." BARF.

My bet is on the Seahawks winning the Super Bowl this year. I'd say our chances are about equal.

The glorification of Christ is not on Mike's agenda. It's all about obeying Dr, being humble to Dr, being meek to Dr. Christ is an afterthought.

I just like you guys.

Indeed. You can't cry foul over a trademark you don't own, particularly when you can establish that you had it first. The other big bad rich guy could be forced to change HIS name, or pay you for the rights.

Those who understand English already know that I've never called PFAL "idolatrous pigswill." It's a phrase I reserve for Mike's posts.

What the Hey, I really don't have time to teach you basic reading comprehension today. I recommend you start with Hooked on Phonics and graduate to the I Can Read series of books. Let me know when you're on Dr. Seuss.

Is this going to be the thread where Mike answers all the actual (not apparent) errors in PFAL? No? Then it's just as worthless and just as much a waste of energy as every other Mike (who's a vicious, misogynistic idolater) thread that's been here since 2002. Or 2001. Or whenever he started posting his idolatrous pigswill.

Presented as "fact," even fewer people are buying it.

And there are many more who recognize that PFAL was a tool that brought them to the Bible, not a new replacement for it.

I have no problem with Wierwille's books. I think they're fine, and I appreciate a lot of what's in there. I just don't think they're perfect, and I acknowledge the existence of plagiarism in them.

[clicks on properties to check...] Rhino is correct.

The same way a nation can worship a bronze snake originally employed by their God to heal them, Oldies.

Must we get a list of chapter titles that prove nothing every three weeks or so? Those chapter titles don't prove that Mike hasn't exalted PFAL over the finished work of Christ. Mike has written that Christ learned from PFAL. Jesus Christ, THE WORD, learning from PFAL!

The dispensationalists, when they got their act together, had quite a bit in common. The list you posted sounds like it could have been the table of contents to a Bullinger book.

I'd give it to him (though you're off by one word, George).

Dooj, your move.

Well, it's kind of amusing to me that Lipitor is being ripped to shreds on one thread, but to so much as question noni juice or other assorted gas-infused liquids gets you charter membership in the wind tunnel.

So, first we determine that it's good and that it helps people, then we question objective researchers who try to prove it and, finding no proof, debunk it? How does this work? I know, "wind tunnel." That's what I used to say about people who made fun of this cult I was a part of.

Amen and hallelujah!

Does that mean you've suffered long enough? :)

Hi seeker! WordWolf linked to one of my articles on tithing. I'd recommend (shameless plug alert) you read that article and then jump on my web site, http://www.livingepistlessociety.org There are five articles there called "Cultivating and abundance of..." (faith, speech, knowledge, diligence and love). Those are all directly related to the subject, though they are written to stand on their own. I have one more article to write in that series, and it wraps them all up in the "God's Standard for Giving" package.

Be meek to The Teacher... Defy The Teacher... Geez, and they wonder why I use the word "idolatry."