Raf

I've never seen Lost, so the first pic stumped me. So I was thinking, what movie could it be? Something, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. Hmmm....

Ask us a tough one.

What is your club? And what did he say to assuage anyone's concern about him being a former klansman?

You'd have to go with the second. It's bad form to go right back to the same actor even though they've been in different films together. We'd be here all day linking Jerry Lewis to Dean Martin and back. This came up early in the thread with, I believe, a Back to the Future reference. Generally, it's best to look back a page or two to make sure there are no redundancies. In cases where the thread has been dormant a while, the rule is relaxed. "My rules. I make 'em up." Hook Robin Williams Dead Poets Society

I'll assume you meant Owen Wilson, as Luke was not in Wedding Crashers. So... Zoolander Ben Stiller Meet the Parents

stumped.

Superman III Christopher Reeve Somewhere in Time

Now where have I heard that before? :)

What does "Myth" say about the moon and cheese?

Only Mike would thank someone for a short, conversational post with a long, non-conversational one.

It's brilliant.

Coming soon, a continuation of the Moon is Made of Green Cheese argument...

I think it happens because sometimes a light goes off and people DO change their minds. Johniam is a good example. Didn't believe the adultery business for the longest, but ultimately nudged on that. I call it a mixture of optimism and insanity. :) Optimism, because we really do hope that logic will ultimately sink in. Insanity, because we're trying the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. There is one other element: it's fun. We didn't get to do this in TWI.

It is Hannibal.

and there's always my promotion, which i was certain would not happen, and which I confessed to many would not happen... but I got it anyway...

There's No Such Thing As Pineapple Pizza Oh, all right. Ewe Knighted ... Tea Tree. Which makes the third picture "Nine." Ewe Knighted Nine Tea Tree. United 93 Easy one.

Questioning the aspects of the Holocaust that Oldiesman is questioning is akin to questioning the release of Star Wars in 1977. Question it all you want. Debate it. Discuss it. Consider the evidence to the contrary. Bottom line is that Star Wars was released in 1977. You may argue it was released in 1980, 1983, 1999, 2002 and 2005. And you'd have evidence to back you up. But it's distorted evidence: Star Wars was released in 1977. And Hitler ordered the execution of Jews, killing about six million, many in gas chambers. Is there evidence to the contrary? Sure, as long as you're allowed to selectively choose your evidence and distort it so that it is saying something different. But there was still a Holocaust that specifically targeted Jews for execution, and succeeded at executing about six million, many in gas chambers, and that the mass execution was ordered by Hitler.

The Man Who Would Be Happy If He Just Looked Up

Thanks for clarifying that, and I apologize for my own baseless speculation.

Don't get me started, people. The Myth of the Pineapple Pizza

But the red drapes are critical to understanding what WIERWILLE meant by the law of the believing. You dismiss it because it's inconvenient and it was left out of the book. But it does help establish what Wierwille thought the law of believing included and did not include.

There is probably evidence that the moon is made of cheese, too. Keep an open mind! White cheese is white. The moon is white. Swiss cheese has holes. The moon has craters... The revisionists do not provide evidence: they distort it. If you call that "evidence," I submit you're wasting your time "considering" a position that has no basis in reality.

I say a piano has 88 keys - why you feel the need to play the same note all the time is sometimes baffling. It would be nice to hear a different note from you every once in a while. :)

Groucho, It is wrong of you to opine that Wierwille wore a swastika while committing his reprehensible actions. It's okay, however, to opine what he was thinking when he said we were on the wrong side of WWII.

You can "opine" that's what Wierwille meant, but that requires us to ignore his promotion of The Myth of the Six Million, which has nothing to do with whether we fought on the wrong side of the war because of communism. And another thing: There were only two sides to that war. To say we fought on the wrong side is to say we should have been fighting alongside Hitler instead of against him. We made a deal with the devil with regard to communism and WWII, no doubt. But we were on the right side of that war. For that matter, you could say we fought on the wrong side of WWII because the Italians were big on punctuality, so we were fighting punctuality.