Raf

"You're doing well. Your brother would have shot himself by now." *** "The lady and I were trying to dance." "You were trying. She was succeeding." *** "I would have killed him." "No, not today. He is trained to kill. You seem trained to drink. Oh, yes, my friend, you would have fought very bravely, and died very quickly..." "I've never lost a fight." "Except to a crippled old man just now."

come out and play-ay-ay-ay-ay.... You're up.

Nope. On the right track, though. Not necessarily the Crusades. In fact, the first pic could work all by itself, but I liked the ears pic and wanted to use it again. :)

THIS THREAD IS FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE FINISHED READING HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS. If you haven't read it and don't want the plot ruined, don't keep reading!!! Ok, my first question has to do with WordWolf's disappointment that things he was expecting were left out. Like... what? I LOVED the explanation of Snape's murder of Dumbledore. It all makes perfect sense to me. And I love that Sirius was really dead and Dumbledore was really dead. I agree with WordWolf that the body count seemed to be racked up for no real narrative reason. Don't tell me Lupin's dead and Tonks s dead: tell me how and why! Can we start putting pieces together, though? I really do enjoy that.

Extensive exposition is when you stop the action to explain things you need to know for the action that follows it to make sense. I'm creating a spoiler thread so those who've read this already can discuss the plot more openly. It will be called "Don't Read This Unless..."

Tango and Cash Sylvester Stallone Rocky

I was mostly impressed, and I did find the ending satisfying. As a storyteller, I was a bit troubled by two extensive expositions coming right at the climax, but really, I can't think of a better place to have put them.

Nothing will every top GarthP's pic of Gollum holding a PFAL book.

"You're doing well. Your brother would have shot himself by now." *** "You were trying. She was succeeding."

Kentucky Fried Chicken is not my home. And it's not good for me. and the day you come in there to tell me where I should eat while I'm trying to snack on a finger-lickin'-good original recipe basket is the day I tell you to take a bath and no, I do not have spare change.

That avatar is AWESOME!

Oh, shoot, I'll never get the name of this one, but it might be "The Defector." There's a Romulan on the Enterprise D (Next Gen) and he's trying to tip the crew off to some menacing Romulan plot. Problem is the Romulans already fingered him as a traitor and were feeding him false information, so the information he provided had no real value to the Federation.

"You're doing well. Your brother would have shot himself by now."

Really, this could only be one movie, right? Especially after you said "recent." I thought maybe Mystery Men, but that's not recent. My Super Ex-Girlfriend

I will not be on line, but I will be watching out for the UPS truck!

I don't know if she will eventually become a GSer. She sees it as my thing, but maybe... Anyway, trying to come up with a puzzle...

You may be right about Bellatrix's line, WW, but I have to wonder: JKR has had her thumbprint on these movies, and if she wanted to overrule the line and the visible result, she should have done so. If she allowed that scene and you're wrong, she wanted everyone to know she intended no ambiguity. If she allowed that scene and you're right, it proves she's fallible (horrors!). If she did not allow that line and you're right, producers will have a bit of a time trying to undo the mistake. But we'll know tomorrow, won't we? :)

I thought an ascot was a sweater.

Definitely have a thoguht, but can't figure the third picture into it. Tie? Cravat? U-sket? My guess is The Three Musketeers Death + Ream = The Three M something Ears

Good movie. I understood that some things had to be cut back, but I do wish we'd gotten to spend more time with the actual Order of the Phoenix. Mad Eye Moody, Professor Lupin and Tonks were all severely shortchanged. Another few minutes with each of them would have done some good. Also, the fight at the end of the film seemd a bit rushed and confusing (as I'm sure real fights are). Looking forward to getting my copy of book 7 on Saturday. :)

I've used the Dahmer analogy to make that point that you only need to do evil to a few people for it to taint your legacy. Wierwille met and helped and counseled many people without using them to satisfy his lust for sex and money and power. Dahmer met many people without eating them. Ah, but Wierwille did use people to satisfay is lust for money sex and power, judt like Dahmer did eat people. Not everyone he met. Probably not even a majority. But how many people do you have to eat before you're remembered as a psycopathic cannibal? And how many people do you need to abuse to satisfy your lust for money sex and power before you're recognized as a false minister?

You'll find a wide variety of answers to that question here, Doreen. Welcome to the GSCafe. Me, I still believe those three things.

We truly had a wonderful time. We got back from Puerto Rico yesterday, and are settling into our new home (unpacking gifts - thank you DB and CB) and preparing for the return of my two stepdaughters (the last time I will use that term), who spent this weekend with their father and his family up in Fort Pierce. Puerto Rico was awesome. We fed iguanas, swam in the best beach on earth (near Luquillo), traipsed through the rain forest (El Yunque) and toured the great old forts of El Morro and San Cristobal. We didn't make it to Vieques (next time) or to the cockfighting arena at Isla Verde (next time). But we had just a wonderful, wonderful time. Our first night there, we took a walk on the beach (at night, the stars were phenomenal) and as we made our way back into the hotel, a pianist in the lobby was playing "All I Ask Of You," which was our first dance at the wedding reception. Good sign? :) Thank you, everyone, for your kind wishes.

The pics are at http://www.firstclasssounds.com Click on "view recent events" then under "Christine and Rafael" July 6, 2007