-
Posts
16,962 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
168
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Raf
-
Click here to give your advice to a first time dad.
-
Ok, what you know so far, say out loud. You may stumble your way onto the second pic.
-
:) It's a boy. I'll shout the name out on Thursday, assuming all goes well.
-
Oh, I never actually answered it, did I? Della Jen Dove Del Owen Rainn Cher: The Legend of the Lone Ranger And in another time and place, i could have you executed for not knowing who the last picture is!
-
And since it would take a monumental coincidence for me to be wrong... This is an eensy bit of a stretch. Not much, but not an exact phonetic match either. Sounds like...
-
I think I got the first and fourth. Not too sure on either. FIRST Jennifer Aniston (nice eyes) Dove (The?) FOURTH Owen Wilson Rainn Riann? Wilson Cher (nice elbows). So what movie ends with ... Oh! Hall of Fame Pictionary again. Damn, you are good. The first picture is Della Reese. The second is Jennifer Aniston. The third is a dove The fourth is Del Shannon The fifth is Owen Wilson The sixth is Rainn Wilson And the last is Cher And the answer is, of course, The William Tell Overture.
-
IIRC, you have to turn to Order My Steps in Thy Word for at least part of the answer.
-
Sorry haven't kept up with the countdown... But yes, the purpose of the thread has been correctly guessed.
-
Kingdom of God vs. Kingdom of Heaven
Raf replied to What The Hey's topic in Doctrinal: Exploring the Bible
The difference between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Heaven can be summed up in one word. Nothing. -
my memory's fading, but I know you guys exist. At least one went WOW that year: Mike D****y. Please tell me you are leading healthy, happy lives...
-
goop gay superhero babe ape ugly naked guy.
-
When Peter saw the household of Cornelius speak in tongues, it was all the proof he needed that they were born again. From that, Wierwille inferred that speaking in tongues is incontravertible proof (and by extension, that it couldn't be counterfeited, because if it could, it wouldn't prove anything). Agree or disagree, but from a layman's perspective, I consider that a Biblical basis for the statement.
-
Sincerity. Integrity. Scholarship. Godliness. All of the above.
-
Even I have to stick up for VPW on this one. When VPW said it cannot be counterfeited, I'm pretty sure he meant spiritually. It's not that man couldn't pretend to be speaking in tongues, it's that Satan couldn't slip in and provide the utterance. If you're genuinely speaking in tongues and not faking it, then it's of God, not of the devil. If you're faking it, you're faking it. I do see a distinction there. Take a look at the much discussed question 8 in the RTHST book, the question he ripped off wholesale from Stiles. You know, the one with the "faith blasters"? See? Didn't say man can't fake it. Said Satan can't counterfeit it. Big difference. To me, anyway.
-
Now and then I write an article or a blog entry and I want to share it with you guys, so I put up a shameless plug in the shout box. But then I thought, maybe it would be cool (if Paw and co. don't mind), if we created a spot here where I (and anyone else) could post links to articles, posts and projects they wrote or in which they appear. Have at it? The pit bull or the baby: one of them has got to go.
-
Ease enough to find out who owns the site. Revealing the name would be anti-GS policy, so I won't go there. But it's out of California, for what that's worth. Don't recognize the name.
-
Oops. I can count. Yes, a three word title. But I was right about the last two pics being one word, right?
-
Violates net etiquette! Wow! If you held VPW as accountable to the church as you hold Mark to net etiquette, these conversations wouldn't be taking place! :lol: :lol:
-
I didn't ask you. :)