Raf

Re-he-he-he-he-heally?

Yes, I apologize both to you and to Steve for misunderstanding the point you were making.

Ok, it took me a few readings to understand both what Steve is saying and what the author he cited is saying. No one is saying that the bones of nephilim were found either recently or in antiquity. Mayor posits that the ancients found fossilized bones and interpreted them incorrectly, assuming because of some superficial similarity to human bones that these were the bones of giants. Look carefully at what Steve says: Emphases mine. I dispute the word choice Steve's next comment: It was not "common knowledge." It was widespread myth, based on the misinterpretations of the excavated bones.

Uhh, YEAH that's an unwarranted assumption!

Umm. What giant bones?

Soylent Green Mile

Sounds like TIP, the Movie.

"You wanna see something really scary?"

Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Nice!

I actually agree with the statement that you can't go beyond what you're taught, but the belief comes with a very liberal understanding of the word "taught." If you are not taught (either by a person or by the necessity of circumstance/experience) to ask questions, question assumptions, and look at a bigger picture, then you're going to be stuck. The notion that you can't go beyond what you're taught carries within it the means to do exactly that. I would revise the statement to say the following: Unless you learn how to do it, you can't go beyond what others teach you. Science goes beyond what scientists have been taught all the time, because scientists have been taught HOW to do it.

So lusting after another man's wife may not meet the threshold of coveting, in other words. Yeah, that would work. Cain building a city makes no sense on any level, unless we're going to severely dilute the definition of city. Just seems odd to build something that implies a growing society when the number of people on earth is, at most, in the double digits -- and none of the other people want anything to do with you. But okay.

Ah, yes. That seemed to be a perfectly valid explanation. But I had failed to consider that coveting your neighbor's wife is itself a sin (the only sin in the Ten Commandments 1.0 that didn't actually involve DOING anything, just wanting. Thous shalt not WANNA). So Jesus' statement on adultery, by itself, may have made more sense as an example of hyperbole, but you have to ignore an actual (non-obscure, right there in the Big 10) commandment to posit that Jesus was employing a figure of speech here. If you can break one of the 10 Commandments without sinning, it's not much of a commandment, is it? And they all have a LOT of people (and by a lot, I'm being relative... A Lot, as opposed to, say, three. Or one growing family). I guess extrapolating is okay, but the point needs to be made: you do realize that nothing in the Bible even hints at such a motive?

The Patriot *** "Couldn't keep quiet, could we? Just had to invite him to stay, didn't we? 'Serve him tea. Sit in the master's chair. Pet the pooch!'" "I was trying to be hospitable."

Some of you may recall that my son, Leo, was diagnosed with autism in 2012. He's doing well. Looking for your help with a fundraiser to benefit autism research, treatment and education, particularly in my neck of the woods (South Florida). Click here to help. And thanks!

Ursula Andress Clash of the Titans Lawrence Olivier

Desperately Seeking Susan Madonna A League of Their Own

Yes! And I'm sending you a doctor's bill for the emergency room visit from the wounds I suffered biting my tongue. That flipping hurts, man. No, Pharaoh does not rape Moses' wife. He marries the woman Moses loves. So Moses goes off and loves another woman, the blond-haired, blue-eyed desert dweller Zipporah (spelled differently, but whatever).

"What have you found?" "The answer to my prayers!" "You prayed for a basket?" "No. I prayed for a son."

Lawrence of Arabia Alec Guiness Star Wars Feel free to use any of the original trilogy as a jumping off point.

In Genesis 36:31 we read: "These were the kings who reigned in Edom before any Israelite king reigned." Pay close attention to those last five words. Do they not presume that this is being written at a time AFTER there were kings in Israel? How could Moses have written that? Moses died centuries before Israel had a king. Why would he write "before any Israelite king reigned" when no Israelite king reigned until he was long dead?

Jesus was tempted in all points like as we. We are tempted to commit illicit sex, including adultery (in a man's case, sex with a married woman). Jesus must have been tempted to commit adultery. But Jesus said looking on a woman lustfully in one's heart (which is to say, being tempted to commit adultery) IS adultery. So ... Jesus committed adultery (in his heart)? Or he wasn't tempted with adultery (which invalidates the premise that he was tempted IN ALL POINTS like as we)?

These are just questions/thoughts that don't necessarily lend themselves to threads of their own. Please feel free to chime in. Why don't we know the name of Noah's wife? She's got as much claim to being the mother of all living as Eve. In Genesis 4:17, Cain gets to work building a city. Umm. A CITY. Umm. WHY?!?!?! Why does a family of three need a city? Noah was 600 years old when the Flood came. How old were his sons? His daughters-in-law had to be young enough to still bear children, right? So... were these... really, really, really, REALLY old men knocking boots with teenagers and chicks in their 20s and 30s? Because ewww. Add your own.

Too lazy to read three measly pages of posts... Did anyone see Cloverfield? Thoughts? Did anyone see Pacific Rim? Thoughts? And Godzilla's coming back!

Conan is incorrect.