Raf

Once Upon a Time Bandits

The Exorcist. And for good measure Annie

I concur and am willing to call it a draw if you are.

Forrest Gump

Cool. I was trying to pick an easy one, and I Dreamed a Dream is about as recognizable a song as that movie had.

I'm not sure it has happened regularly, but it has happened since. Example, the characters of Ally McBeal (Fox) showed up on The Practice (ABC) and vice versa. And Det. Munch has been on Homicide, Law n Order, The Wire, The X-Files and The Simpsons, I think. But in terms of two regular supporting characters, no, I'm not sure it has happened since.

This ABC series was a spinoff of another ABC series, but ABC decided not to renew it for its third season. NBC picked it up for a third season, however. The parent series continued to air on ABC, the spinoff aired on NBC. It was the first time in TV history that supporting actors in one series on one network played the same characters at the same time in another series on a different network. Again, I'm looking for the spinoff series.

I Dreamed a Dream Master of the House On My Own Bring Him Home

I know this. it's... it's... it's making me crazy... WordWolf, you wanna take it or what?

Hooray?

One more thing, as regards the Cambrian explosion and the challenge it poses to evolution by natural selection: It doesn't. The Cambrian explosion is a popular tool of creationists to cast doubt on the fact of evolution, but it does nothing to cast doubt on natural selection as the mechanism that best explains how evolution has taken place. I refer you to the National Center for Science Education (the same outfit whose article you cited to inadvertently establish that the Biblical flood was indeed an actual error, as I have repeatedly demonstrated). http://ncse.com/blog/2013/10/darwin-s-dilemma-was-cambrian-explosion-too-fast-evolution-0015109 Abstract for source article for the NCSE article: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(13)00916-0 Actual source article: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(13)00916-0.pdf

T-Bone, I personally believe your first paragraph reflects the majority of our experiences, mine included. I believe you can still be a decent, doctrinal consistent Christian while subscribing to your second paragraph, but of course, my opinion on such a thing is no longer worth terribly much. ;)

Billy Bob Thornton Armageddon Ben Affleck

I definitely have the right show in mind, but I don't suppose "that show with the guy with the hair who taught viewers how to paint" is sufficient

I Dreamed a Dream

Yes. They first appeared in Clerks. Dogma was supposed the be the follow-up, but instead, Kevin Smith made Mallrats, which bombed. Then came Chasing Amy, which is a pretty damn good movie. Finally, Dogma was made and released. This was followed by Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (the only movie in which they are the main characters) and Clerks II. Jay and Silent Bob had a cameo in Scream 3 (Jay mistakes Courtney Cox's character for Connie Chung).

Yes

Trading Places ?

Sorry. Here we go: "This is pitiful. A thousand people freezing their butts off waiting to worship a rat. What a hype."

This 1999 movie was intended to be a sequel to the writer-director's first (surprise) hit movie, which came out five years earlier. For various reasons, the director decided to write and direct two other movies first. The first of these two movies bombed. The second was a critical and commercial success. The movies all have two supporting characters in common and are set in the same universe. Sort of. Other actors play multiple roles in different movies in the series, but these two supporting actors always play the same two characters. After the 1999 movie came out, two more movies were made featuring these two characters (who also had a cameo, in character, in a movie from a COMPLETELY unrelated film franchise).

Of course. Any minute now.

I can see it. But I don't know what the show was called and can't remember the main dude's name.

Welcome to the forum, Longhunter. I took a look at that twitter account, and I don't believe for a second that any of it was written by LCM. Not his style at all. The person who wrote it has serious syntax/communication issues that LCM simply did not have. By the way, please check the dates on the threads you decide to post on. Before your update, the last post to this thread was seven years ago! Not that it's a problem, but it is probably something you want to know.

Now, instead of using this space to debate evolution (which is not abiogenesis and does not claim to be), let's stick with the topic of whether there are errors in Genesis. If you would like to discuss evolution in further detail, please start another thread. I raised the issue of the order of development of life on earth to show that Genesis conflicted with scientific consensus, which it absolutely does.