Raf

Rick Moranis... Barney Rubble.

Ripley's Believe it Or Not.

Dancing with the Stars and Stripes Forever ?

And you think correctly.

Based on a movie now considered a comedy classic, this late 70s TV series was... not. It lasted 13 forgettable episodes. The movie it was based on earned one of its actors, Donald Sutherland, a $75,000 paycheck. Had he opted instead to take a cut of the film's earnings, he would have earned between $3 and $4 million. But he didn't think the movie would be a hit. Sutherland did not return for the TV series. His role was taken over by an actor named Peter Kastner. Never heard of him? Most haven't. Oh, the movie had one name, but the TV show had another. Both names referred to the same thing: The movie's name was informal, and the TV show's was formal.

Ok, fine. American Dad

Tee hee. That would make it "Canadian Uncle"

Characters.

Yes

South Florida totally deserves it

I didn't post an answer only because I didn't have a follow up. So I'm jumping in: "I have a headache." "It might be a tumor." "It's not a tumor!"

Another lost post, although I did not post the answer. I would have gotten this just from the first line (thanks to the pause). Quick Change

Yes, I posted "Scott Pilgrim v. All his Girlfriend's Ex-Boyfriends," which I think is what WW said the movie was titled in Peronistaville. "Scottie, help me! I'm gonna die!" Stars include Judd Nelson and Ice-T (as a cop without an Italian-sounding name).

Robin Weathers John Bender Alec Newbary

Correct

You had to make Ray "Raymond," didn't you? Dan Aykroyd

I thought he tried to kill Barry as a child, and the mother died instead because older Barry intervened. But he was there to kill little Barry. That will be why Barry can't save his mom, even if he wants to. Saving his mom would result in his own death. Then again, it's a comic book show and I'm enjoying it.

But why try to kill Barry as a child?

What, the bees episode? Brandon Routh is like a sleeping pill to me. What's your theory?

WordWolf, let us know when you're caught up with the "Who Is Harrison Wells" episode.

I think it belongs here for now. Jim was one of the pioneers of using the Internet to stand up to The Way. Gonna miss that rascal.

It is.

Giveaway: I said a hip hop, Hippie to the hippie, The hip, hip a hop, and you don't stop, a rock it To the bang bang boogie, say, up jump the boogie, To the rhythm of the boogie, the beat.

"That you, sugar bumps?... Who the hell are you?" "It's me, Sugar bumps." "Jack? Oh, oh, thank God you're alive! I heard you'd been..." "Fried? Is that what you heard? You set me up over a woman. A woman! You must be insane."

I don't mind discussing different beliefs as long as everyone agrees that's what we're doing. And sometimes that discussion can be quite challenging (and emotional). The key is, you have to want to participate in such a discussion. Otherwise, it's just arguing and it benefits no one. It doesn't bother me that anyone believes in the Trinity. It doesn't bother me that anyone believes in God. I hope it doesn't bother anyone that I believe in neither. However, your reasons for believing, and my reasons for not believing, are (in and of themselves) interesting topics of conversation for some people. I'm game to discuss them with anyone, in the proper setting (which, in the context of this site, is in doctrinal, which I subdivided even further so that anyone not desiring to discuss doubts can avoid such conversations easily). I look at it this way: you can enjoy drinking alcohol without advocating drunkenness. A sip of wine at home? Cool. Hanging out at a bar with friends? Cool. Going to that same bar at 1:30 a.m.? Look, you're going to encounter drunkenness there. If you want to avoid it, don't go there. It's the same with difficult and challenging conversations. If you want to avoid them, don't go where they're taking place. It's not hard.