OldSkool
-
Posts
6,307 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
75
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by OldSkool
-
Signs Someone Is Trolling It can sometimes become difficult to tell the difference between a troll and someone who just genuinely wants to argue about a topic. However, here are a few tell-tale signs that someone is actively trolling. Off-topic remarks: Completely going off-topic from the subject at hand. This is done to annoy and disrupt other posters. Refusal to acknowledge evidence: Even when presented with hard, cold facts, they ignore this and pretend like they never saw it. Dismissive, condescending tone: An early indicator of a troll was that they would ask an angry responder, “Why you mad, bro?” This is a method done to provoke someone even more, as a way of dismissing their argument altogether. Use of unrelated images or memes: They reply to others with memes, images, and gifs. This is especially true if done in response to a very long text post. Seeming obliviousness: They seem oblivious that most people are in disagreement with them. Also, trolls rarely get mad or provoked. The list above is by no means definitive. There are a lot of other ways to identify that someone is trolling. Generally, if someone seems disingenuous, uninterested in a real discussion, and provocative on purpose, they’re likely an internet troll.
-
Right...I keep forgetting it's my fault you can't clearly communicate and contracict yourself in the same set of paragraphs and then roll through with a dump truck load of bullshonta to rationalize it all way.
-
Ya, ok Mr. Wizard. You just showed everyone that you know jack-freaking-diddly about the neuroscience crowd you falsely claim to represent. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/humans-have-more-than-5-senses/
-
Do you even realize that you contradict yourself in the same post?
-
Really, you gonna pat yourself on the back for one of the few times you actually answer a set of questions and not avoid or bury the questions? I also apologized for not noticing that you did answer. I agree though, I should be encouraging good behavor when it happens. Good job!
-
Troll-shonta malakas many satay
-
Signs Someone Is Trolling It can sometimes become difficult to tell the difference between a troll and someone who just genuinely wants to argue about a topic. However, here are a few tell-tale signs that someone is actively trolling. Off-topic remarks: Completely going off-topic from the subject at hand. This is done to annoy and disrupt other posters. Refusal to acknowledge evidence: Even when presented with hard, cold facts, they ignore this and pretend like they never saw it. Dismissive, condescending tone: An early indicator of a troll was that they would ask an angry responder, “Why you mad, bro?” This is a method done to provoke someone even more, as a way of dismissing their argument altogether. Use of unrelated images or memes: They reply to others with memes, images, and gifs. This is especially true if done in response to a very long text post. Seeming obliviousness: They seem oblivious that most people are in disagreement with them. Also, trolls rarely get mad or provoked. The list above is by no means definitive. There are a lot of other ways to identify that someone is trolling. Generally, if someone seems disingenuous, uninterested in a real discussion, and provocative on purpose, they’re likely an internet troll.
-
TrollShonta malakasetay
-
Interesting that splitting and narcissism go hand in hand many times. She just finished her first fnc and appearently is ready for the motor coach the way Shonta-juice moved in on her after she split.
-
Gotta watch that Shonta-juice, he's tricky! The guy on the right is looking at the class coordinator like...this supposed to happen? Class coordinator responds...hold your questions in abeyance until after the class!
-
Good Lord, don't say that j name three times....and the quote counts as the first... That shonta would look similar...
-
Thanks!
-
Oh...oh...wait .... wait... God raised up victor paul wierwille specifically for the holy spirit field....yeah...patent bullshonta. I had that line regarding vpw and the hs field pounded into my cranium while in-residence. My corps coordinator said it like a mantra. Great point sir!
-
Whenever is clever is cool with me. Im game anytime. I think your perspective matches what I am after and just never really said it that way. Thanks!
-
I welcome this thread. Here's my postulate....Jesus Christ was/is a man and after the ascension was promoted to second in command and is unlike anything we can realte to; whereas Joseph and Pharoah is an allegory of that relationship. That's an oversimplified statement on purpose so I welcome this new thread when we are all rested from the constant onslaught of bullshonta. Im interested in hearing what your guy's studies have determined. Laters!
-
You do know that people have more than 5 senses. A neuroscientist such as yourself should know that.
-
Yes you did. My apologies, I stand corrected. Thanks.
-
I suppose God putting his plan of redemption in the stars....you know where God's plan of redemtion concerning Jesus Christ is plastered across all space and time to be read and understood by alll...is that "some small point" --- even your idol wierwille stated that just as much word is written in the stars. No spirit needed. God communicated with the entire world the same if you are natural man or a spirit filled Christian or a devil worshipping pagan. That's not the only example, but likely the most compreshensice and awesome example ever. God only being able to communicate with spirit is complete bull-shonta. But go ahead and continue to show everyone how much of an epic fail way international theology REALLY is.
-
You hit the nail on the head 100% ! What Im gatherhering from Mike is he is mostly the way I used to be, or maybe any of us who had adopted wierwille/way international theology to one degree or another. It's obvious from reading mike's posts he is desperately trying to make wierwille fit with science/neuroscience, etc. So he will bend reality to make it fit. Redefine words, subtly change positions, song and dance us to death, obfuscate, use passive/agressive methodology, disparage those who disagree - probably thinks were all posessed and hate-filled, on down the line. Wierwillian theology allows no dissent, it cannot be bargained with, its all or nothing, adversarial, divisive, and at the end of the day all reality must be bent to match the lies. Heres a prime example. He has to take 1 Corinthians 12:3 Therefore I make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus accursed, and no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit. 1 Corinthians 12:3 doesn't say no man can REALLY say Jesus is Lord - that garbage is from PLAF. But check out his explanation of bull-shonta to make it fit. Even scripture must be bent to accept what wierwille say. Wierwille is his idol.
-
Mike proved my point 100% trollingly correct. You gonna answer these questions mike or continue to try and baffle us with bull-shonta? Here - I will post them, they are questions from So_crates and I want them easily seen so I am repeating them out of the quote feature. Your tome brings about a few interesting question: If the determinism of the universe stated man did not receive spirit (at least for a time) what changed that allowed Jesus Christ to get spirit? If Jesus Christ was a natural man, and as you've stated previously, Natural man is like a beast, the how did he get the free will to do what he had to do to get spirit? If Christ got spirit through water baptism, why don't we? If God can only communicate with what he is, spirit, how did He impregnate Mary? Angels communicated with Joseph telling him not to worry about Mary, does this mean angels are more powerful than God, as they didn't need the spirit-spirit connection?
-
I was probably one of the first to read his post after he worked on it most of the day yesterday. I say that cause he posted nothing else and then came through with the Britinaca BullShonta Edition. I read his post, understood it just fine, and gotta say it was like reading an instructional set to assemble a dishrack.
-
Uh oh T-Bone...Mike's challenging you to a book report...watch out
-
That would pure awesomeness!
-
I'm on it!!!!!
-
My apologies, my intent was lost in cyberspace. You questions are awesome, not obvious. I was referring to myself stating the painfully obvious that mike would never shoot a straight answer...he will most likely try and bury them in bullshonta.
