OldSkool

I just let my toddler imitate me while I am doing calculus...he'll need it when hes mature enough...

bloviate wouldve been more appropriate...

Wierwille taught that the devil indicated a direct interaction, such as the devil tempting Jesus, where as satan was an indirect attack using the kingdoms of the world. Personally, I feel that such a disctinction is trivial at best and the various names simply emphasize attributes of the one named. Lucifer, devil, satan all have shades of meaning in scripture that are descriptive of lucifers nature.

Correct. He not only taught that the Church epistles were written specifically to those in the grace administration, which they werent, he also taught that the book of Revelation was a closed book and was written to the sixth administration. Revelation 10:7 leaves a gigantic problem to that theory. Personally, I was hoping you guys had some insight in Revelation 10:7, Im still searching a lot of that sort of stuff out. Let me say that I no longer believe that Revelation is a closed book that was written to another administration. At this point, and it may change, I feel scripture follows two simple concepts: Old covenant that was eventually supersceded by the New Covenant that Christ ratified in his own blood. The new covenant is built on the Old Covenant so its not a replacement, the new covenant uses the Old Covenant as a foundation of sorts.

I feel this is correct. They have my current address because I recently ordered from the bookstore, and I was surprised they filled the order...I mean it took a month to process and said "On Hold" in the order status so Im thinking my order triggered director approval to fulfill. But no postcard...never not at all. My only contact with TWI since 2008 has been on GSC. I know the directors know who I am, I mean its kinda obvious. And I am absolutely sure that they have known since 2009 when I first started posting here. I used to work for Lind3r (wayGB) and he would print off new posts on GSC so rosalie could read them because she hated computers as we all know. So...yah...I wouldnt expect an invite any time soon..

Mike - this is yet another logic fallacy called argumentum ad populum. Your saying your argument has legitimacy because a majority say or think so.

Man you will say anything to give wierwille legitimacy ... He wasn't Christlike and trying to give his abusive cult legitimacy by saying Jesus was a cult is shameful.

It's your reality.

Yeah...he meant well

Dude... YOu involve yourself with various discussions and come up with the craziest ideas and when we disagree you act like you've been attacked...trollshonta malakas laseetay.

Correct. I've noticed the same. Mike thinks it's ok that wierwille was a plagiarist drunk etc...because he slapped some classes and books together then that makes it ok.

No...it's just that Jesus wasn't a cult leader in the sense that wierwille was...which as soon as anyone agrees it gives u a link to wierwille and Christ. Remedial. Jesus was certainly accused of being what we would call a cult leader in modern day times. But your giving support to the Pharisees accusation which is telling.

Just like white magic uses the same techniques as black magic but with benevolent intent.

Remember that Mike still fellowships with the apostles.

Just like ur embarrassed with your position on hologram Jesus on the absent Christ thread.

Now u read wierwilles sins into Jesus and the Apostles...gnosticism at its finest.

Exactly. Same as a good cult vs bad cult

Oh...you mean like white magic.

Absentloutely dead on the money!!

Makes me wonder if he had a mail in absent spiritual doctorate as well?

Spiritual non-curriculim kingdom. Gotta be careful with those jot and tittles in mikeology.

You can imagine whatever you like.