Oakspear

I'd really like to hear what a "real" person (non-professional reviewer) thinks about it. My girlfriend is the only person that I know who saw it. Sure, the trailer shows the highlights, but there aren't too many dead spots, if any. The pace stays consistant throughout. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

ah...original Yes: Peter Banks, Tony Kaye, Bill Bruford, Jon Anderson, Chris Squire...nice line-up...good sound. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

He very well might have fixed it himself, or maybe it was his daughter the editor, or Walter or somebody with an education :D--> Despite Mike's focussing on the "written record", it was the spoken PFAL, audio, and especially video that made the impression on us. I read the PFAL book cover to cover before ever attending a twig fellowship, but was not impressed; it was dry and somewhat boring. The class itself is what hooked me, and it's what's in that spoken presentation that we remember. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Yeah, we can find plenty of problems in PFAL without resorting to nit-picking In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Zix: I went camping with the branch one night at a lake (Oak Lake, actually :D-->) north of Lincoln. There was a bit of a glow from the nearby city, but stars were clearly visible in the "gap", even if there were only a few, it contradicted the MOG. When I pointed them out, actually showed them the stars where the MOGs said there weren't any, I was met with embarassed silence. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Almost done! This isn't docvic, but his toady, Martindale, although he may have gotten it from Wierwille originally: Martindale explains the Big Bang as the devil making the earth "without form and void". He shows no comprehension of the Big Bang model on any level, but makes pronouncements as if they make sense. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Maybe this one is junk doctrine, not junk science, but I'm on a roll: The whole concept of "the Word in the stars" is flawed in that the key constellations in this theory appear to be the polar constellations. I do not believe that you can see the north polar constellations south of a certain point (the tropics?) just as we in the northern hemisphere cannot see the Southern Cross. When I put this forth at an advanced class I was told that maybe Pangaea was all north of the equator. --> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Speaking of light, Wierwille, when expounding on "the Word in the stars", Wierwille quoted Job 26:7 - He would then state "that's why there are no stars in the north".Huh? --> There are plenty of stars in the north...it made no sense to me. In the mid nineties Martindale tried to explain it. Even though he had been quoting it for years, he admitted that he didn't know what Wierwille meant by that. To explain, he unveiled a blow up of Bullingers map of the constellations and showed how there was a "gap" between Ursa Major and Ursa Minor, which supposedly represented the "gap" of the Mystery. "See" he said, "there are no stars in the north", meaning between the two Ursas. The only problem was that there are stars in the supposed gap. Easy to see on a clear night away from the cities. At best, there were no constellations in that "gap". One of our young men came home from the advanced class one summer talking about "no stars" in the gap. When I corrected him, he went to the Limb Coordinator for an explanation. The official explanation was that modern man knows of more constellations than they did in biblical times due to high powered telescopes. Huh? --> --> Seems that before the growth of cities the people of biblical times would be able to see more stars, not less! Even when I would point out on camping trips the stars in the so-called gap, no one was convinced except my son Thomas. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Steve!: Thanks for bumping the thread for me Zix: I remember that booklet. Wayne Clapp did something similar when Martindale re-did the PFAL Advanced class in 1994, filmed it as a segment of the class. Seems like it was just speculation, since unless the bible spelled it out (unlikely), how could you really know how the devil pulled things off, but it sounded plausible. I was remembering the TWI view of light sources. Wierwille notes in PFAL that light is "spoken into being" before the sun and stars in the Genesis account. He makes some kind of statement indicating that he believes that light exists independent of stellar objects. He doesn't really dwell on it, it's one of what I call his "throw away lines" - he says something that sounds profound and then never addresses it again - except maybe in Mikey's secret messages :D-->. As usual, Martindale takes Wierwille's gibberish and expounds upon it; the WayAP class has a section where Martindale claims that the sun is not a light source, but somehow merely something that reflects or focuses the true source of light. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Yes they did. If I remember correctly, Falcon's bass player went off to play in Foreigner and was replaced by Gene (maybe his last name was Boccio?). Gene was already in TWI at that time and signed up Mike Visaggio, the keyboard player and Billy Milne, the drummer for PFAL. My girlfriend at the time was also in that class, so I got to know Mike and Billy pretty well. When I left NY in 1980 the whole band except Falcone were active in TWI. Falcone and his original band went to the same Catholic church that I did. His guitarist and I were classmates at the associated Catholic grade school.In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

This isn't an error, just a comment. When reading the PFAL book one can see areas where Wierwille's sloppiness was sometimes edited. When did Wierwille ever verbally refer to "Aramaic in Estrangelo script"? He almost always called it "Estrangelo Aramaic", which is why a lot of us thought that it was a dialect of Aramaic, rather than a type of script. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

love Southside Johnny...couple of ex-Ways used to play in his band...Gene somebody on bass, and Wayne something-or-other on guitar In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

from a :D-->fellow Weenie In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Relf and McCarty founded Rennaissance after the Yardbirds broke up. It's all coming back to me now In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Box of Frogs! Yes, I remember now :P--> - for some reason "Flock of Seagulls" kept popping into my head :o--> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

...and reserved a room In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Me too In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

papajohn...I started a thread on this but it slid off the page due to lack of interest :(--> see my remarks there In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Moved up for papajohn I went back and saw it a second time. There are some holes in the plot, and a few inconsistancies in the way the "time travel" is handled, and how the changes take place. Part of this is the difficulty in general in unravelling how time travel might work. AS far as we know it's not possible, and even if it was we wouldn't know how it would affect the real world. Regarding reviews: one local movie reviewer criticized how Evan would return to the present confused at the changes that had taken place due to his visit to the past. The reviewer scoffed that he would return fitting in perfectly with the changed timeline. Actually, science fiction handles this in a variety of ways, but in most cases the person who initiates the change still remembers the "original" timeline, sometimes holding simultaneous memories from both. Since time travel is an impossible, or at least an unknown procedure, a writer can take whatever liberties he or she wants, as long as they are consistant. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear [This message was edited by Oakspear on February 05, 2004 at 13:36.]

Mike, the offer of a Leinenkugel on me still stands, even though I disagree with virtually everything you say. :D--> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Thinking...that's a good thing, right? In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Is Vickles going? Let's add her to the list! In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Yeah, I think that's Satriani In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

Talk away! I envy you having seen the Y-birds! I was a little too young to have seen them live (I was born in '58) but became a fan after learning that Aerosmith's Train Kept A Rollin' was a Yardbirds cover (1975?). When I was a deejay in the late 80's and early 90's I played a lot of Yardbirds on a blues show that I produced called Shades of Blue: I'd play an old blues standard, say "You Need Love" done by Muddy Waters back to back with Zep's "Whole Lotta Love" (same song basically). The Yardbirds provided a lot of fuel for these back-to-back versions. Didn't the surviving non-famous 'birds get together in the 80's under a different name? I have a vague memory of something or other... In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear

I snore Loud In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice...but in practice there is Oakspear