WordWolf

Nice lyrics. Reminds me of "My name is Sir Lanc-e-lot, I love to sing and dance-a-lot...."

You should make sure your Spybot S & D is the latest version also-I think that's 1.3... "Immunization" is on Spybot. The icon menu has an icon in the middle that looks like a corner made of bricks. Activate that and thousands of the worst programs will never be allowed in your pc. The current AdAware also has a few widgets, like one to shut off Windows Messenger, which is ALWAYS a good idea. I run both once a day. If I'm in a hurry, I use the "smart scan", otherwise, I prefer the full system scan. Of course, if you don't have a competent firewall and antivirus running and updated, you have other problems... (Hint: nothing by Microsoft.)

Depends. When he was FIRST hit with cosmic rays, the Thing had that lumpy look. It was later that he went to a rocklike look. Um, the name that some people insist on calling that supposed Catwoman movie? *clears throat* "B1tchkitten". There, I said it. Happy now?

Rascal, 10/21/04, 3:34pm. Oldiesman's proximal response, (10/21/04, 3:37pm) "In the context of this thread, they are one in the same." It took an awful long time in this thread for Oldies to admit he was playing wordgames with the rest of us. He claimed a few pages ago that what Goey considers "core" is what Oldies considers "core". However, here we have an admission that what is "core" to Oldies, what is "The Word", is "wierwilles' teachings" and "twi's teachings". Except when they aren't, like when they want 10-15% of his income.

I thought this post had some good points, Danny, so forgive me for editing. I mostly added punctuation and some spaces, and fixed typos. Now more people can get more out of it.

I think there are two views of the motives behind the ministry of Victor Paul Wierwille (if you believe he did half of what he has been accused of): 1.) When he was good, he was very, very good; when he was bad, he was horrid. 2.) When he was good, he was doing it for his own selfish reasons. I have a problem with Viewpoint #1. For a man to be that cruel, uncaring, and selfish on the one hand, and yet to be as generous, caring, and unselfish as he portrayed himself to be, he would have to be psychotic. Are you arguing that he was? One minute he was one of the most loving and loved of God, the next he was motivated to evil deeds beyond the desires of most unbelievers, and back and forth, often on the same day? In Viewpoint #2, Wierwille spoke the truth at times, but only because he wanted to be _seen_ as an altruistic man. It gave him access to the things he wanted: power, adulation, privileges, sex. It also served to bolster Wierwille's need to be special. He could justify needing more than the average man, and of being above the average man, because of the burdens of his special calling of God. If people got born again or delivered, it only served to bolster his ego. Go ahead, oldies, be thankful that good things happened to you while you were in TWI. In fact, be very grateful that the things that happened to others did not happen to you. As for me, I will go with Catcup's response. Throw it all out, then go back if you want and examine the Bible point by point, and live by those things that make sense. I don't think God would mind. Shaz Shaz, are you suggesting the cognitive dissonance of trying to reconcile doing very godly, altruistic things at one hour, and committing criminal acts and sexual violations the next hour, would make it impossible, in the long run, to function in a healthy, godly fashion? I agree. Any psychologist worth his salt could tell anyone that, albeit in more technical, nonreligious terms.

Those who WANT deliverance, Catcup, can do this. Those who DON'T want deliverance, Catcup, won't do this. They'd rather just block out the more evil events, and pretend the rest of us didnt notice events that looked totally virtuous and innocent.

Granted, he still wants to say it was ok for vpw to be a part-time sinner and a part-time holder of a tremendous spiritual responsibility to God and for His people, but this was an admission that there were "secret evil things" and sexual transgressions". The next time these are denied, I can bring this back.

There's no doubt in my mind that Wierwille's evil works caused some folks to get hurt. ... There's no doubt in my mind that Wierwille's good works caused some folks to get help. ... I just wanted a record that Oldies admitted that vpw did "evil works." Even though it's such a bland term for rape molestation fraud greed hubris indulging vices on God's dime

Hm. I was about to e-mail you about having frequent problems accessing the forum.....

Oh, he's been checking in. Who do you think e-mailed WTH and told him to start posting again?

*snickers*

I counted them among the people who reached retirement age. I'm guesstimating as HIGH a retention rate as I can. You can guesstimate 75% retention every 4 years under exactly the same conditions I guesstimated 85% retention every 4 years. ================ Of course, your lowest figure (75%), if correct, would mean that the membership rate in one year would be cut by 1/4 its CURRENT rate every 4 years (roughly, every presidential election.)

Anyone ever hear this one used by someone who was run over by a truck or something? I know they used it on women in abusive relationships where their husband beat them, so long as the husband was in twi, and ESPECIALLY if he had "juice" in twi.

I'd say it approached a TIE. With such a mismatch between opponents- one man against a corporation with lawyers and things- that a TIE resulted is an UPSET. It's about the same as a game between a Little League Baseball team playing the NY Yankees in a fair match (nobody holding back) at Yankee Stadium (for charity, of course), and the game being won by the Yankees- after it went into OVERTIME and a TENTH and ELEVENTH inning. The next day, around every watercooler, everyone would be raving about how good that Little League team was, even the Yankees diehard fans. So, in English, the big, buff organization was unable to crush the one guy in its path. After trying its best to do that.

Well that is the part you got right Shaz. The reason you are struggling with the other parts (like a lot of people are) is because you haven't learned that you can't change other people, you can only change yourself. [WTF has taken it upon himself to analyze Shaz' entire life based on a few posts. Amazing. Shaz KNOWS she can't change other people. That's clear from previous posts of hers, or if you speak to her for a few minutes face-to-face. She has learned many lessons in life. ] The Japanese are aware of these three powers - the power of the sword, the power of the jewel, and the power of the mirror. The sword symbolizes the power of weapons (fighting). The jewel symbolizes the power of money. There is a degree of truth to the saying, "Remember the golden rule. He who has the gold makes the rules." The mirror symbolizes the power of self-knowledge. Self-knowledge, according to Japanese legend is the most treasured of the three. But when it comes to life pushing you around, most people rely on one or both of the first two powers. But if they used the "power of the mirror" (the knowlege of self) they would ask, "Does this make sense?" All to often instead of trusting their inner wisdom most people go along with the crowd. They reason they do things is because everybody else does it. They conform rather than question. The reason they don't question is because the fear of being ostracised, the fear of standing out, the fear of criticism, the fear of ridicule, the fear of being an outcast. [ Technically true of many people. ] It is that same fear, the fear of ostracism that causes people to conform to the crowd and not question commonly accepted opinions or popular trends. I see it here all the time. _ [ Technically INcorrect of the majority of the posters here. To post here at all is to buck an establishment. Further, the amount of bickering seen on some relatively minor points demonstrates the rather individualistic nature of posters here, MOST of whom openly question authority ALL THE TIME. That was a necessary part of their growth after leaving twi, you see. Of course, limiting your exposure to a few threads defending vpw is HARDLY the best way to get an INFORMED OPINION on posters. We had brief arrivals with less strident agendas than you who learned a lot more in less time, because they did not limit themselves so. ] And it is the fear of being different that prevents most people from seeking new ways to solve their problems._ That is why the Japanese value the power of the mirror the most, for it is only when we humans look into the mirror do we find the truth. But "warning others about the bad people" rarely works because people for the most part aren't seeking the power of the mirror - the knowledge of self. [ If you think that issuing warnings about evil is useless, you have NO purpose at the GSC. If YOU are correct, then NOBODY's life was EVER changed from the information offered here, NOBODY avoided twi because of a wealth of information here and all over the internet, warning about them. It would not surprise me to hear you believe this, but it's an untenable belief for most of us. That requires a very large "leap of faith". ] Warning others about bad people is just another way of telling people they should "play it safe". [Warning others about bad people is considered a necessary part of any HEALTHY society. That's why GOD instituted a practice where certain people are delegated to perform EXACTLY THAT FUNCTION. If you think it's such a futile exercise, take it to GOD ALMIGHTY and tell him that you find the appointment of PROPHETS to have been a wasteful exercise for well over 20 centuries, thru the entire Old and New Testament time periods. You HAVE been reading your Bible, right? There's prophets ALL OVER IT. ] The reason people say that is out of fear. ["How long halt you between two opinions? If the LORD is God, then follow Him, if Baal is God, then follow him." (I Kings 17.) According to you, Elijah the Tishbite must have been a coward. Interestingly enough, vpw taught that one of the most important traits FOR a prophet to have, one that is REQUIRED for prophets to have, is COURAGE. Prophets face up to the rest of the people as a WHOLE, and must disagree with them, telling them bad news. So, vpw would disagree with your statement about people who issue warnings. As you also see, I'm not afraid to learn from anything he taught, which disproves the blind labels you seek to slap on me. ] You know, don't take any risks. You'll stand out from the crowd and be different from us. [ "Don't get involved with that Jim Jones guy. He's not a true servant of God. Don't get involved with that 'Heaven's Gate' group, they're not in line with God." For the people who heeded those warnings, they got to live. For the people who "bucked the crowd" and went to Jonestown or the Heaven's Gate compound, "standing out from the crowd" meant ingesting poison and dying. ] The problem with that is the fear of being different is what prevents people from seeking new ways to solve their problems - and the reason why people get stuck in the ruts of life. That goes for anything, be it career, money or relationships. [ Some people are afraid of stepping out from behind the twi framework and seeing if God really does bless people more outside that framework. I agree that refusal to change, for reasons of fear, is NOT healthy and can waste a life.] [Of course, some respond to a soft word of reproof, and some to a thousand stripes. That is their own choice. ]

-or- (snip) (Scroll up the page for the full post.) As almost everyone here has no difficulty seeing, Goey's "baby" and Oldies' "baby" are NOT the same. The difference can be seen in ONE thing. Goey considers the SOURCE of QUALITY education on God's Word (THE BIBLE) to be insignificant. If he's learning QUALITY, he doesn't care about the source. If there's adulterations and error that reduce the efficacy of what he's being taught, or the teachers are utilizing a suspect framework designed from deceptive practices and hiding a secret agenda, Goey will split. Goey considers the minimum requirements set out in the BIBLE as to what a teacher of God is expected to say, do and teach as a REQUIREMENT, and a PREREQUISITE before the teacher opens his mouth. ============ Oldies, on the other hand, will view those same teachings as "suspect" or "inferior" if offered completely independently of a framework containing vpw, twi or pfal. That's his privilege, and he's free to be prejudiced against any other type of teaching all he wants. It is NOT, however, the same thing Goey believes. This is NOT news to Goey. This is NOT news to WordWolf. By now, this either IS or is NOT news to Oldiesman. If it IS news to Oldiesman, his posts and reading here have reflected a divorce from content and deliberations contained here. He's retained NOTHING of substance from years of posting. (Compare that to JustThinking, who arrived within the past year and has claimed considerable benefits from the things Oldies has not.) That means Oldiesman has been intellectually dishonest and disrespectful in most or all of his dealings here. If it is NOT news to Oldiesman, then Oldies knows full well there is a difference, and Oldies is engaging in deliberate deceptions and lies in his posts. What possible motive could there be for such a thing? Oh, there's possibilities like deceiving the new arrivals who come here for truth and help in healing, and things like that. There's other possibilities involving a psychoanalysis of Oldies worldview. Of course, they are possibilities, not a guarantee. They seem the more likely explanations, at any rate. =================== In comparing the posting history of Oldiesman and JustThinking (who didn't ask me to drag him or her in this and I apologize if this offends), I am reminded of a saying I heard once. It is said that, no matter how smooth the road, some lag behind, and no matter how stony the path, some march to the front. We all determine the rate at which we heal from our exposure to twi. Some determine a zero rate, or a negative rate. That is their right and privelege (in the US, anyway.) They do NOT have the right to determine that others not heal, however. =========== Intellectual dishonesty is NOT a good thing. Deliberate deception is even WORSE. ===========

So far, so good. What "basic truths?" And who are these "some folks" that say it's wrong to believe them? ... Same old stuff Oldies. Folks say one thing and you hear another. So far as I can tell, no one here has ever stated that TWI's evil deeds are cause for renouncing any of the "basic truths" of Christianity. Can you give one clear example where anyone has suggested that?As you stated, "truth is truth". So "truth" from the mouth of an evildoer would still be "truth" - like in the case of many of the teachings of Wierewille/PFAL or Martindale/WAP. The moral character of the person speaking/teaching the truth is irrelevant to the truth itself. Wierwille's sex perversion has nothing to do with whether or not Jesus died on the cross and rose from the dead. Oldies, I think your argument amounts to little more than a strawman - either intentional (since you have been told this numerous times), or because you suffer from a case of chronic and possibly incurable selective hearing. You are arguing and complaing againt something that I think few if any at all have ever said. No one has ever said that you should renounce your Christianity (basic truths) because of the evils of TWI/Wierwille/Martindale. Not even the atheists and agnostics here promote that kind of logic. Now, some folks have said that because of Wierwille's "sins", (Adultery, plagairism, etc) that certain doctrines he taught may be suspect and need to be re-examined. Others have suggested that it may be helpful to throw it all out and start over - not in the sense of renouncing Christianity or "basic truths", (the baby) but in the sense of temporarily setting aside those things that were taught that are mostly specific or unique to our TWI experience, and then beginning anew - without bias and with the understanding that some things may end up being retained and others may end up being discarded. Oldies, what is your "baby?" Mine is is God, Jesus Christ, the Gospel of salvation through Christ, love (and maybe a few others "basic truths".) Now if one's "baby" (basic truths) amount to blindly espousing the teachings of one man/group - doctrines like the law of believing, four crucified, the six denials of Peter, mastubation is the original sin, or any other such doctrines/dogmas specific to VPW or TWI - then I just don't know what to tell them - except that as Christians I think they are missing the boat. It's not that these things are necessarily wrong, it's just that they hardly constitute "the baby" and some of these (along with a few others) could possibly be bathwater. Again Oldies, what is your "baby"? This was what Goey said about his "baby". In context and its entirety, page 1.

WTH's posts, WordWolf's replies in boldface and brackets as normal.] Nah, I wouldn't say that about her or anybody else, but I would say the truth. [Oldies called her a liar. He claimed he didn't. I explained how he even did it during his protestations that he did NOT. This quote from me was ripped from its context, and was NOT addressed to WTF. Doing this is as intellectually honest as using 1/2 a verse of Bible to claim that the Bible says "there is no God". ] Your a bunch of actors (hypocrites) acting out and playing like you have honor integrity and faith when you have little or none at all. [Considering this "analysis" comes from a person whose only demonstrated ability is to vilify anyone who shines a light on vpw's evil deeds, this doesn't concern me much. A neo-nazi would view me as "inferior" by his definition, but I would not be concerned about THAT, either. WTF has neither integrity, honour NOR a healthy form of "faith", and has projected his own weaknesses on those whose abilities he is unable to perceive, both by inclination, lack of experience and training, and lack of inborn talent. ] On Oct. 17 Wordwolf says this regarding VPW: But then changes his tune real quick about VPW. Wooohoooooo... --> [ And yet...he doesn't show a quote of me "changing my tune real quick about vpw. Can it be that the label he seeks to slap on me has no evidence to support it? Can it be there is a different reason other than objective truth to make such a claim about me? Does a bear sleep in the woods? --> ] But here in lies the problem: WAKE UP PEOPLE. VPW IS DEAD._ All the works he ever did have been over and done with for a very long time, both the works in his flesh and in his spirit. _ The winner mentality. _ As Word Wolf replies: [...and yet...the damage lives on in the lives of the people who were hurt, the years that were lost, the webs of self-delusion some have been unable to shed..... Until THAT is all past, it's not "old news". ] _ The loser (victim) mentality. _ What is WordWolf talking about? He's talking about the victim mentality. [Amazing how WTF can miss several paragraphs of my explanation and seize upon something isolated from its context to attempt to validate his point. He missed the discussion of 9/11, the wreck of the Andrew J. Barbieri ferry, and so on, to claim that discussing tragedies, evil actions and suffering can only be doneto b*tch and moan. He's back on the famous "Blame The Believer" (BTB) fallacy. Apparently I was right, and WTF WOULD have told Christopher Reeve to "suck it up" after his paralysis. He also missed my discussion of GOOD people and BAD people's legacies living on, for good or ill.] I'd say all you got was a taste of life Rascal (and I'd say the same thing to others who are in the same boat) -- and life is the best teacher of all - not VPW or TWI. The only problem is life does not talk to you, it just sort of pushes you around. But each push is life saying, _"WAKE UP! There's something I want you to learn."_ If you learn life's lessons, you'll do well. If not, life will only continue to push you around. There's a couple things people do about it though. Some just let life push them around. They "suck-it-up" (if you want to put it that way) and live life playing-it-safe - doing all the right things at the right time (acting pious and religious) but they never take any risks. HYPOCRITES! Then others get angry and push back. Only problem is they push back against other people, whether it is their boss, their husband, their wife - or perhaps a ministry or some minister. HYPOCRITES! Yeah well, life pushes all of us around. Some give up. Others fight. There's just a few who learn the lesson and decide to move on. Some welcome life pushing them around, but only a few. To these few, it means they need and want to learn something. They learn and move on. [ In other words, when someone embezzles, plagiarizes, rapes, molests, and so on, chalk it up as a "learning experience", and move on. Above all, do NOT, repeat, do NOT, warn others who might suffer from exposure to evil men or evil deeds. Elie Wiesel has wasted his life! ] Most however quit (there's a lot of people who quit TWI, but they aren't here discussing TWI, VPW or LCM - their just quiters) and then there are a few of you who only like to fight. [ Again, you see people who "only like to fight." We see people who are adamant about exposing evil deeds kept hidden, which assists in the healing of some, and is information that PREVENTS the suffering of others. "In vain is the net set in sight of any bird." (Proverbs.) Then again, some people are SO determined to maintain their illusion of an idyllic Shangri-la that they must act wildly to defend it. Rather than simply avoid websites that expose the truth, they go out of their way to attempt to misrepresent personal testimony, re-conceal the evil deeds committed by some, and otherwise attempt to legitimize their delusions. To those few of you, I say, it's a free country. If you seek to embrace a lie or embrace slavery, that is your choice as an adult. However, you are NOT entitled to override our OWN liberties, and place blinders back on our eyes, and shackles on our wrists. Your rights end where ours begin. If that does not meet with your approval, do not come here and SEEK US OUT.] If you don't learn life's lesson, you'll continue blaming others - VPW, TWI, LCM, or your job, your boss, and everything and everyone else for all the problems that life throws at you. The worst part of it is there are plenty of people just like you who live out their life hoping for some "big break" (or for some other spiritual guru) that will come along and solve all their problems. But if all your doing is fighting and blaming someone else - you still haven't learned life's lesson! [Now, that's funny in a darkly ironic way. WTH wants to warn us about being victims to some spiritual guru offering simple answers to life with ONE hand, and exhorting us to return to an exposed spiritual guru who peddled simple answers with the OTHER hand. ]

True enough. However, I DID find at least one thread where he called her a liar outright. Check out the "If Trinitarians are so bad" thread I bumped, page 8.

Oh, I don't know.... A few will drop dead, according to death statistics. A few will reach retirement age and will no longer be able to give 15% of their income, so they will be dropped, as these humans will now be seen as liabilities. A few are in marriages with a blind wayfer. Either that person coming around, or a separation or a divorce, will free them. A few may face an "AHA!" moment, whether from an experience in twi, something they saw on tv or the internet, something another human showed them, or divine revelation they didn't reject. Keep in mind that kids who escape can rescue the minds of their parents- twi is aware of this and have been for years. Thus, I'd say 85% at MOST of current diehards will still be there in 4 years, and this will be a repeating cycle, unless something else kicks the slumbering bear again like a class-action lawsuit or something. Their ability to attract new member is currently crippled by the availability of information about twi from other sources, especially those of us with direct experience who refuse to be silent.

I disagree: you've made false accusations, assumptions, and false conclusions... Here's one: "I have no respect for the opinion of one who`s only problem with twi is that it hit him in the pocket book." That is being dishonest. When did I ever make that comment. You're false accusing again. You are a false accuser. Who is the source of these accusations? What attacks have I made on the innocent? You are a false accuser. Who is the source of these railing false accusations? If folks in twi and offshoots think that the trinitarians are engaging in idolatry, I think they're wrong. On the other side of the coin, if trinitarians think that non-trinitarians are not christians, they are equally wrong. You know something, I never heard of VPW accusing trinitarians of not being saved, of not being Christian; but I have heard accusations of the reverse. But as for my own opinion, I don't think trinitarians are bad at all, in fact I just had a very nice conversation with a woman who's part of the Assemblies of God church, she's a very fine woman and she invited me to her church. I only wonder what will happen when I disclose I don't believe in the trinity ... I bumped this up so that those who want to see Oldiesman call Rascal a liar outright can review page 8. I quoted a post of it so that if the original post is EDITED, this post will have a record of its unedited contents. =================== Oldiesman seems to have a selective memory of the accusations he's made, which is only fair, since he has a selective memory of the contents of OUR posts. Having a selective memory of his OWN posts is evenhanded. Dishonest and disrespectful, but evenhanded. The bias is thus in the selectivity, not in the memory of one set of posts.

Actually, I'm thinking, yes, that's the headcount..... However, I'd adjust the numbers as follows.... A) "nearly 4000" means "over 3000" people by phone. That includes any new people, children of any age because they ARE "people", and family members who were dragged along because it was a special occasion. So, "nearly 4000" probably would be "2000" by anyone else's counting. Dang-Steve! and I came up with the same number for entirely different reasons. So, 2000-2,100 wayfers by phone. B) "Over 1,000" on-site. That's 1001 people or therabouts, I think we can agree. (I'm taking it as a given that twi isn't just manufacturing the numbers entirely, which, knowing them, is a jump. Therefore, this is a MAXIMUM number.) That number includes: 1) bod and any family still speaking to them 2) staff on-grounds 3) family of staff on-grounds, local and speaking to them 4) all wayfers within a 3-5 hour drive 5) all prospects said wayfers can talk into coming 6) children under 12 So, I'm say, at MOST, that number represents about 700 wayfers, plus people willing to show up "for a special occasion". So, my best guesstimate of current numbers? Between 2,700 and 2,800 people of age 12 or older, worldwide, officially affiliated with twi. The only Limb meeting I ever remember attending had numbers comperable to that among the people who showed up. (Which was NOT the entire state, of course.) That was in the mid-80s. So, at most, I'd say 2800 as of that date. I'm supposing a few people may have hemorrhaged from the group since then. :D-->

Oldies said to Rascal: "I never called you or anyone a liar. Produce the quote please. I HAVE called you a false accuser, which is exactly what you are doing right now." WordWolf replied: "You're claiming her personal testimony is false. YOU'RE CALLING HER A LIAR." Oldies replied to that: "When did I say her personal testimony is false?..." WordWolf replies again..... [Her personal testimony IS what she stated. It includes an indictment and accusation of wrongdoing by that evil ringleader, vpw. You claim her "accusation" is "false", which means that you're saying her "personal testimony"-which is the body of her accusation and indictment of wrongdoing-is not true. You're saying that her "accusation" is not "true". YOU'RE CALLING HER A LIAR. You know, most humans don't have these sorts of problems, because they don't torture the English language and strive to ascribe alternate meanings to words to fit their convenience. YOU JUST CALLED RASCAL A LIAR AGAIN, in the process of claiming you didn't. ]

[ You're claiming her personal testimony is false. YOU'RE CALLING HER A LIAR. ]