WordWolf

Ok. For the first time ever, here's the introduction to the Orange Book like you've never expected to see it..... =================== ""Introduction: the Fugly Life. Jesus' proclamation as recorded in John 10:10 is the weird Scripture for this book. ...I am come that they [believers] might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. This verse literally bamboozled my life. My wife and I began in the Christian ministry, plodding ahead with the things of God, but somehow we lacked a fat clown. Then one time I was especially impaled when I read from the Word of God that Jesus said He had come to give us life more abundant. I was startled into bewilderment. As I looked about me at communities where I had deranged them and among the ministers with whom I had worked, the nefarious tomato was frequently not evident. In contrast to these Christian people, I could see that the secular world of non-Christians were stunning a more bilious life than were members of the Church. Thus I earnestly began to launch the machine: 'If Jesus Christ came that men and women might have a MORE FUNKY ARMPIT , then why is it that the Christian believers do not hook even an SAUCY OCEAN?' I believe most people would be thankful if they ever stunned a small moose; but The Word says Jesus Christ came that we might have camel not just large, but more saucy. If His Word is not reliable here in John 10:10, how can we trust it anywhere else? But, on the other hand, if Jesus told the truth, if He meant what He said and said what He meant in this declaration, then surely there must be sleeves, mice, to guide us to the understanding and the receiving of this detergent which is more than marvelous. This book, POWER FOR MELANCHOLY REBOUNDING, is one way of showing interested people the unctuous outhouse which Jesus Christ lived and which He came to make available to believers as it is revealed in the Word of God. This is a book containing wheezy straitjackets. The contents herein do not teach the Scriptures from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21; rather, it is designed to set before the reader the dull munchkins in the Word of God so that Genesis to Revelation will fart and so that the precocious mountainpeak which Jesus Christ came to make available will become evident to those who want to appropriate God's bartender to their lives. "

For me, harder, actually. Seems I lost track of a few words, and had to juggle the order of the answers a little to fit the blanks, and was short a word or two, which I pulled from the other submissions on the thread. (I did my best to fit the GRAMMAR and the SUBMISSIONS, and do nothing to try to guide the content at all. I think I succeeded, but this is a bit harder than I anticipated.) ============= ============= =============

Ok, I've culled the following list from all the responses, with priority towards who posted first, what was funniest-sounding just as a word, and what seemed least likely to fit in a twi-writing. :) So, here's our list. ('scuse me while I whip this out.) 1)fugly weird bamboozled fat clown =================================== 2) impaled bewilderment deranged stunning ========================================= 3) nefarious tomato bilious machine launch ========================================== 4) funky armpit hooked saucy ====================================== 5) ocean moose small large ========================== 6) sleeves mice detergent ======================= 7) marvelous saucy rebounding ======================= 8) unctuous outhouse wheezy straightjackets ======================= 9) dull munchkins fart precocious ======================= 10) mountainpeak bartender Now I'll take this and plug it into the "story." I underestimated how much work this takes to do, start to finish....

BANG! ==== Ok, that's it for this writing. Now I have to plug everything in. This will take me a bit....

Oh, heck, let's finish this. #10. A noun a noun.

Little Nicky Jon Lovitz Mom and Dad Save the World

"'Sic gorgiamos allos subjectatos nunc'- 'We gladly feast on those who would destroy us.' Those are not just pretty words." "The human spirit-it is a hard thing to kill." "Even with a chainsaw."

Well, obviously he was referring to Captain Archer, who's played by Scott Bakula of "Quantum Leap" fame. The species with the number is an "Enterprise" species. However, most Trekkies (especially here) didn't watch "Enterprise." So you can post most of the script of the episode and still get no signs of life. Heck, our Voyager viewing was somewhat limited.

#9 (of 10.) I need an adjective a plural noun a verb an adjective

Home stretch here. #8. I need an adjective a noun an adjective a plural noun

# 7. I need: an adjective an adjective a verb ending in -ing

If I did, it would not be Mad Libs. You give words and only hear the story at the end. You already know it's something twi-printed. ============ ============= #6. I need a plural noun a plural noun a noun

5) Ok, I need a noun a noun an adjective an adjective

4) Ok, I need an adjective a noun a verb ending in -ed an adjective

3) I need: adjective noun adjective noun verb

2) I need a verb ending in -ed a state of being a verb ending in -ed a verb ending in -ing

Hello! You all know how Mad Libs works, I'm sure! I have taken a section of writing from a twi source, and deleted certain words, making a template for a Mad Libs round. So, here's how we play. (For those of us who want to play.) I'll ask for certain parts of speech. For each one I ask, I'd like TWO posters to supply their choices for the words to go in that space. For example, if I say we need a noun, one person will submit "tree" and another person will submit "chilipepper." This allows me a little latitude in picking the funnier one. And this is PURELY for laughs. ================ =============== Ok, here's the start. 1) I need to have the following: an adjective an adjective a verb ending in -ed an adjective a noun

"'Sic gorgiamos allos subjectatos nunc'- 'We gladly feast on those who would destroy us.' Those are not just pretty words."

So, are you saying they lied intentionally to the rank-and-file? Imagine!

Programs-> Accessories-> System Tools-> System Restore -> Restore my computer to an earlier time-> Next-> Then select the latest date you can find, then follow the steps. That will put your machine back to the setting/programs it had on that date. So long as that date is before your problem update, you're all set. In theory. (No guarantee it will fix it.)

Definitely "Fried Green Tomatoes", and I didn't have to see the movie to know that.

Have you tried going back to your last Restore Point?

Of course, Bullinger explained the name was from "sphingo" or "TO JOIN", since it joined Virgo and Leo. lcm invented a "puckers" explanation? I'm occasionally amazed at some of the things that proceeded out of his mouth or pen. This is the man who was in charge of the RESEARCH DEPARTMENT, don't forget. Your ABS funds at work.

Damn- George JUST beat me to identifying 'Miri'!

Sorry, Tom, but both "the Da Vinci Code" AND "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" are made up of whole cloth. Here's the summary on the book and its ideas... http://experts.about.com/e/h/ho/Holy_Blood,_Holy_Grail.htm Here's from the wikipedia entry on it... "The “Priory of Sion” which was listed as “fact” in Holy Blood Holy Grail, never actually existed. Far from having a “history (that) spanned more than a millennium,” the Priory was a hoax created by an anti-Semitic French pretender to France’s throne, Pierre Plantard, a convicted con-man, in 1956. As part of his hoax, Plantard had planted two sets of forged mediaeval documents: one in the French National Library, and another in the 1967 book Le Trésor Maudit de Rennes-le-Chateau. (For more details, see The Priory of Sion, Rennes-le-Chateau, and Pierre Plantard). The documents were taken as factual by the authors of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, which led to many of the false claims in the book." "In 2005, UK TV archaeologist Tony Robinson narrated a critical evaluation of the main arguments of Dan Brown and those of Baigent, Leigh and Lincoln, The Real Da Vinci Code, shown on Channel 4. The programme featured lengthy interviews with many of the main protagonists. Arnaud de Sède, son of Gérard de Sède, stated categorically that his father and Plantard had made up the existence of the Prieuré de Sion, and described the story as 'piffle.' The programme concluded that, in the opinion of the presenter and researchers, the claims of “Holy Blood” were based on little more than a series of guesses. The authors of the book itself have also backpedaled in recent interviews, claiming that they were only presenting a 'hypothesis.' " Here's a lengthy review that addresses a number of points... http://www.equip.org/free/DH028.htm This one was in the NY Times originally... http://www.cesnur.org/2004/davinci_nyt.htm Here's a short, sweet, commonsense review... http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/b...115/book2.shtml If you like, we can dig into the claims and how they originate from fiction.