-
Posts
22,879 -
Joined
-
Days Won
261
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by WordWolf
-
Publically Critiquing Someone's Life and Choices Upon Death
WordWolf replied to skyrider's topic in About The Way
I think it's embarrassing that you're making your case with links that point out the risks of vaccination are minimal compared to risks of refusing vaccination. Courtesy of your own link: On the risks of side-effects to Moderna- "It added: 'The risk of being affected is very small.' "'These are typically mild cases and individuals tend to recover within a short time following standard treatment and rest,' they wrote. " " Heart inflammation is also a symptom of many viral infections like COVID-19, though, and the likelihood of developing the inflammation after infection is much higher than it is after vaccination. " So, the experts didn't say to leave kids unvaccinated. They said "they will be offered the Pfizer-BioNTech immunization instead. " "Norway, another Nordic country, has not taken as drastic action as its neighbors, with health officials urging people under 30 to opt for the Pfizer vaccine instead. " So, the risk is small, and the solution was to give kids a different vaccine. Thank you for posting another article showing that people are a lot safer taking the vaccines than skipping the vaccines. -
Publically Critiquing Someone's Life and Choices Upon Death
WordWolf replied to skyrider's topic in About The Way
Courtesy of your very own link: "Fewer than one in a million doses have led to deaths in Australia. Meanwhile, at the time of publication on 2 September, 1012 people had died from COVID in Australia from 56,212 confirmed cases (1.8 per 100)." In plain English, there's always a tiny risk of doing ANYTHING- including staying at home and 'doing nothing.' A SENSIBLE person plays the odds and minimizes risks SENSIBLY. Let's see, get COVID and risk of death is 1.8% in Australia right now. Get the vaccine and the risk of death is BELOW 0.00001% in Australia. Seriously, any look at the odds would tell you to get the vaccine- including your own link! -
BTW, Biblically, the idea that it's not "alive" or "a baby" until 9 months in, when he takes his first breath, is off by at least 3 months. https://www.greasespotcafe.com/ipb/topic/24071-when-is-it-a-person-when-is-it-alive/ "When is it a person? When is it alive?" In the New Testament, vpw hung his "explanation" on a single, mistranslated verse, where Jesus Christ, before his birth, was supposedly called a "holy THING." An honest look shows that this word "thing" was only translated "thing" in that spot, and was a person everywhere else - a "holy one." It's obvious if you check the Greek. It's obvious if you check all the other usages of the same word with a Concordance. It's obvious if you check ALL THE OTHER ENGLISH VERSIONS. Even the NEW KJV doesn't use the word "thing" there. As for what we DO know, in Luke 1, we have a 3rd trimester ( 6 months in development) "BABY" (check the Greek, it's clearly "baby"-but usually "infant" or "young child" in other usages) who has EMOTIONS and responses. It's incredibly rare to see people trying to push this "first breath" doctrine of vpw, and, as we all know, it was remarkably self-serving. To vpw, children were an inconvenience on many levels. First, believers with kids weren't free to move if he told them to move, because they had a responsibility. Second, kids cost money, and vpw wanted all that money to come to him (indirectly to him via twi, from which he could raid the slush fund if it couldn't be untraceable cash in his hand- which it often WAS!) So, just like in his own life where he passed off raising children AND dogs for others to do the work, vpw didn't want twi'ers to have kids, especially if they weren't good little robots.
-
When is it a Person, when is it Alive.
WordWolf replied to WordWolf's topic in Doctrinal: Exploring the Bible
Someone brought up this subject... -
Publically Critiquing Someone's Life and Choices Upon Death
WordWolf replied to skyrider's topic in About The Way
It doesn't even show an understanding of what the things are for- which is MAKING OTHER PEOPLE SAFE. -
Publically Critiquing Someone's Life and Choices Upon Death
WordWolf replied to skyrider's topic in About The Way
Then that's two of you. The original purpose is still being discussed, and there's more being compared and contrasted at the same time. Threads take on a life of their own, and that's hardly news. -
Publically Critiquing Someone's Life and Choices Upon Death
WordWolf replied to skyrider's topic in About The Way
Few of us are so thick that we can't see that these were unacceptable and mean-spirited, and unhealthy. -
Publically Critiquing Someone's Life and Choices Upon Death
WordWolf replied to skyrider's topic in About The Way
Did one of my posts get eaten yesterday? What twi did was to have people who were lock-step with them until one day they disagreed- then twi immediately went in to hatchet jobs, slandering their reputations, screaming about them, and trying to ruin their lives while ostracizing them. If twi was to be believed, those people were model twi'ers until the day they left- when they suddenly became villains of the deepest dye who must be avoided at all costs. (That's more or less what the other post said.) -
Publically Critiquing Someone's Life and Choices Upon Death
WordWolf replied to skyrider's topic in About The Way
Your original post- and the thread- was posted/begin right now SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE of one person. Please don't pretend it was an amazing coincidence. We've been discussing the difference between what twi did and what we consider appropriate for the entire length of the thread. It's not "all about" JAL any more than it's "all about" twi's former practices of the hatchet job at the microphone. -
Publically Critiquing Someone's Life and Choices Upon Death
WordWolf replied to skyrider's topic in About The Way
Ah, but a DIFFERENT thread is a memorial. I was going to leave that thread completely alone. I had no PERSONAL dealings with JAL, and thus no memories to share. I also wasn't going to make a new thread JUST to call out dangerous teachings. However, since this one was started, I consider it fair game. :) It's one thing to go out of your way to do a character-assassination on someone. Somebody leaves twi, and immediately the spin doctors grab the microphone and begin a smear campaign with vague connections to reality. The person was a model Christian up until the moment before they left twi, NOW they're scum! It's another to point out that someone-who made himself a PUBLIC FIGURE and worked hard to do so- has disseminated dangerous misinformation to the public. For this post, Í'm going to skip the dangerous "Momentus" push he did where people were hurt, and the dangerous "personal prophecy" movement that ruined lives and wrecked marriages. I'm JUST going to go by the video that was linked, and what he said about the global pandemic, during its height. Only going by this one video.... A) He said masks are useless against COVID. That's false. That was known `100 years ago with the "Spanish Flu" and it's true now as well. He said all the authorities speaking up were wrong and that if you listened to the "right sources", you'd know that. No mention of WHO those right sources were, can't fact-check if he's correct, of course. At that level, he's floating a rumor. B) He said COVID was no worse than a flu. Outside the US, this isn't a political thing in many countries- it's acknowledged this is a worldwide killer. Again, no sources for his outrageous claim. C) Claim the CDC said many of the cases (he said "MOST") of the cases were due to comorbidities, so that meant that COVID wasn't to blame there. That shows an ignorance of basic epidemiology. With an "opportunistic infection", something occupies and wears down the immune system, and something else- which normally wouldn't be dangerous- gets in and does a lot of harm or kills someone. So, if there was no COVID, the "co-morbidity" would not have been a significant issue. So, his own words there, for those with a layman's grasp of medicine, show he doesn't understand what he's passing along. He may believe it, but that doesn't make it true, and it doesn't make it harmless. D) He said it's worse to wear the masks than to risk catching COVID. E) He said the isolation protocols have been keeping people from attending church. He hasn't gotten around that much. Virtual church-going got REALLY popular during 2020. F) He said "most" vaccines- with COVID the context- are "HARMFUL", No medical authority has embraced this, and they keep refuting this. All the medical experts rushed out to get vaccinated as soon as was possible. In fact, many people who got on the media and claimed there may have been problems with the vaccines were all quick to get vaccinated. Again, no source, just another rumor he floated. G) He said the US death rate for COVID was 0.0 something death rate. He said he doesn't "worry about it at all", and repeated that the masks were useless, and tells nurses not to bother with them. He mentioned "the true science" with no mention of where one can look it up. So, hidden (OCCULTED) knowledge where he refuses to cite his sources. All of that, if followed, runs between "highly-suspect" (hidden sources) and potentially fatal (skipping the vaccines.) In a lot of the world, this isn't about politics, it's about PUBLIC HEALTH and bipartisan support for measures were common. In countries where this was a political football, the body counts for COVID shot up (like Brazil.) Comedian Gabriel Iglesias is in poor health. He's morbidly obese, has diabetes, and other health problems. He caught the Delta variant of COVID, and took 1 day of bed-rest. He was fine afterwards- because he got BOTH vaccination doses. If one follows JAL's counsel on COVID, one runs the risk of getting the disease, and possibly dying, or possibly passing it along to other family members and friends. Places where vaccination has been up are often maintaining social distancing and mask-wearing, and otherwise are returning to normal- as much as one can while doing both. The places where the highest rates of people getting COVID and dying of COVID correlate directly to places where people remain unvaccinnated. That's a problem for 3rd world countries that can't get vaccines, and that's a problem in the US in counties where people say their personal freedoms are being infringed upon. I agree with what Arnold Schwarzenegger said on this. Your personal freedoms have responsibilities. JAL had the courage of his convictions, and practiced what he preached- which, apparently, led directly to his death. At least he was CONSISTENT. If this post ends up getting chopped up by staff, I'm sorry. I tried to stick to the medical facts and as clear of politics as I could manage. -
That's it. Eric Clapton and BB King were members of the "Louisiana Gator Boys" band at the battle of the bands at the end. John Popper of "Blues Traveler" sounded like he was playing himself, and wanted Elwood to hear his band. The "Blues" in "Blues Traveler" came from an imitation of the Blues Brothers that John Popper and his brother did once. (The "Traveler" part came from "Gozer the Traveler" in the first "Ghostbusters" movie, aka "Gozer the Gozerian." )
-
Paul Shaffer Dan Ackroyd John Goodman John Popper Eric Clapton BB King
-
Ok, taking a swing here.... "CHARMED." I used to watch it on SyFy when it was a new show. The original show is in syndication here on SyFy. I'm thinking the new show is being handled by the same network as the original was when it was a new show- which would make the new "Charmed" a SyFy show.
-
Out of those, possibly 2 of them are airing here. We also don't have consistency with the US guaranteed. When "Supergirl" started here, it started on "Warner" and joined "Flash" and "Gotham." For that matter, it's possible NONE of the new shows are airing here, and I'm thinking only of the original versions re-airing here now.
-
Got a movie where the other 2 both appeared?
-
Care to post the answer, George?
-
Keep in mind that not a lot of us will have that in the first place. I don't have music of the people I liked back in twi because they made music on tape back then. Few have made CDs and digital formats available. The people most likely to have converted them to digital, i think, tend to be more in the "how dare you suggest vpw wasn't a fantastic human being" camp. They're more likely to have felt the need to have either that or have no music at all, so they would have arranged conversions some time ago. All of that's my thinking, though, so I might be wrong.
-
Paul Schaefer Dan Ackroyd John Goodman
-
That's him. Oliver Putnam is a role he's playing now, in "Only Murders in the Building." His character is one of two who are elderly fans of mystery solving. They're going to try to solve murders. Since they're not up to the rigors of investigation, they're only going to solve murders that happen in their own apartment building. (I SWEAR I'm not making that up.)
-
OK, next round. This was a rather famous TV show. There were also movies and books as well as the show. The main character was very obviously female. It seems traditional, by now, to have a male actor performing the role- as far as I can determine, in every single appearance on TV and in movies, that's been the case. BTW, they originally cast an actress, but she refused to shoot a potentially-dangerous shot involving swimming in water from a REAL flood while they filmed on-location. The actor not only nailed the scene in the first take, he did it so convincingly that the director got tears in his eyes. He built a reputation for filming in one take and doing all his own stunts. All of this predated the TV show, but the same actor went on to play "her" in the show. What was this TV show's name?
-
Johnny Del Bravo Tucker Kerwin Neal Stryker Mitch Harris Sebastian Ballentine Henry Palaver Oliver Putnam Jack Putter David Morgan Ned Perry Neil Sussman Eugene Proctor Leonard Winstone Steward Havens Garrison Cootes Louis "Lou" Cannon Mervin "Merv" Schechter
-
Nothim.
-
It's not part of a turn, but I wanted to say something that's on my mind right now. "Mr Iglesias" was GABRIEL Iglesias' show ( aka "Fluffy") When he was growing up, his mother told him he wasn't "fat", he was "fluffy". There's 3 categories, I THINK the first is "puffy", then there's "fluffy", then there's "D@MM!!!", according to his account. He's done a LOT of stand-up. ("Hey, why are your fans bringing you cake?" "I've mentioned in the shows that I like cake." "You should tell them you like hookers, man!" "Why do I drink diet soda? So I can have regular cake.") So, GI "Fluffy" is the new voice for Speedy Gonzales in the new "Space Jam". Stephen Colbert interviewed him the other month. It came up that GI had caught the Delta variant of Covid. Since he'd had the double vaccination, he was in bed for a day with chills, and he was up and around the next day. He said that he credited that entirely to the 2 shots, since he was in generally poor health to begin with. (He's morbidly obese and apparently has Type 2 Diabetes.) He said he's had HANGOVERS that have treated him worse. BTW, when they tested him out, he did a fantastic job with Speedy Gonzales' voice immediately. When they complimented him on the first attempt being so successful, he replied, "Yes, I've been Mexican a long time." Without reference to anything else, I felt the need to pass that along. Now, let's see, I need to post the next round....
-
Johnny Del Bravo Tucker Kerwin Neal Stryker Mitch Harris Sebastian Ballentine Henry Palaver Oliver Putnam Jack Putter David Morgan Ned Perry Neil Sussman Eugene Proctor
-
It's obviously "Soap." What? No? Um... *reads the other clue* "Dynasty"???